CENSORING THE WEATHER FORECAST

In November 2010 a senior government meteorologist revealed that for much of the previous decade Zimbabwe's weather forecast had been censored on a daily basis by the President's Office. The admission came in response to journalists’ questions about ‘why the meteorological service department (MET) had over the years denied possible droughts’ that were later experienced despite predictions that ‘the country was expecting above average rainfall every year’. Also blaming ‘obsolete weather equipment’ and the loss of experienced personnel for the ‘inaccurate weather forecasting’, Washington Zhakata ‘admitted that there is heavy political interference and censorship of the weather forecasts in Zimbabwe before it is issued out to the public’. ‘This information’, he said, ‘was seen as sensitive’.

What this sensitivity amounts to is the subject of this chapter. A clue can be found in a much earlier news item in the international press, which had reported (amid official denials) that ‘the president's office took control of the forecasting service’ in 2003 ‘after learning that the drought-affected country is facing two more years of low rainfall’. Then a series of droughts had coincided with the first three years of fast-track land reform, deepening economic and political crises, and widening discontent about food shortages.

Although the political consequences of food shortages and rising prices are undoubtedly of great significance in Zimbabwe's recent history, they do not alone adequately explain this long-term commitment to daily interference in the weather forecast.