The crux of the religionist assault on science and anthropology is the assertion that their supernatural and paranormal view of the world and universe based upon a Christian “evidence base” and “positive theistic arguments” provides a superior explanatory framework. In doing so, as noted before, religionists have made their theistic premises a legitimate subject for scientific and anthropological scrutiny in the tradition of systematic skepticism. In this chapter, therefore, I focus on the core premises of this “evidence base” and attempt to find out how well they hold up under such scrutiny and whether or not the religionist claim about the superiority of their supernatural framework, or what the theistic philosopher Plantinga calls an “Augustinian Science,” has any evidentiary justification. The approach is the same one I use when evaluating similar types of evidence in the context of any other anthropological analyses of supernatural and paranormal claims. This entails an examination of historical records, textual analysis in relation to anthropological findings, use of the principles of evolutionary and cognitive psychology, prior probabilities, the presence or absence of disconfirming evidence, and the availability of non-supernatural explanations that accord with the empirical evidence.