Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 85
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2012
Print publication year:
2010
Online ISBN:
9780511750410

Book description

Realism and constructivism, two key contemporary theoretical approaches to the study of international relations, are commonly taught as mutually exclusive ways of understanding the subject. Realist Constructivism explores the common ground between the two, and demonstrates that, rather than being in simple opposition, they have areas of both tension and overlap. There is indeed space to engage in a realist constructivism. But at the same time, there are important distinctions between them, and there remains a need for a constructivism that is not realist, and a realism that is not constructivist. Samuel Barkin argues more broadly for a different way of thinking about theories of international relations, that focuses on the corresponding elements within various approaches rather than on a small set of mutually exclusive paradigms. Realist Constructivism provides an interesting new way for scholars and students to think about international relations theory.

Reviews

‘As the first major work to examine the realist-constructivist nexus in detail, Realist Constructivism is a must-read for IR scholars and students. Barkin’s masterful synthesis of realism and constructivism delineates fresh analytical terrain and offers new insights about international politics. Comprehensive in both vision and scope, Realist Constructivism is a ground-breaking book and a major contribution to international relations theory.’

Jennifer Sterling-Folker - University of Connecticut

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
Adler, Emanuel 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3: 319–363.
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.) 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Althusser, Louis 1971. Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, trans. Brewster, Ben. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Arendt, Hannah 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arfi, Badredine 2005. “Resolving the Trust Predicament in IR: A Quantum Game-Theoretic Approach,” Theory and Decision 59: 127–174.
Aristotle, 1958. The Politics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. Barker, Ernest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ashley, Richard 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism,” International Organization 38: 225–286.
Ashley, Richard and Walker, R. B. J. 1990. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 259–268.
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton 1962. “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review 56: 947–952.
Baldwin, David 1979. “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies,” World Politics 31: 161–194.
Baldwin, David 1989. Paradoxes of Power. New York: Blackwell.
Barkin, J. Samuel 1998. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium 27: 229–252.
Barkin, J. Samuel 2003a. “Realist Constructivism,” International Studies Review 5:3: 325–342.
Barkin, J. Samuel 2003b. Social Construction and the Logic of Money: Financial Predominance and International Economic Leadership. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Barkin, J. Samuel 2008. “Qualitative Methods?” In Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa (eds.), Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 107–130.
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond 2005. “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59: 39–75.
Bartelson, Jens 1998. “Second Natures: Is the State Identical With Itself?European Journal of International Relations 4: 295–326.
Bernstein, Steven 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Biebricher, Thomas 2005. “Habermas, Foucault, and Nietzsche: A Double Misunderstanding,” Foucault Studies 3: 1–26.
Booth, Ken 1991. “Security and Emancipation,” Review of International Studies 17: 313–326.
Boucoyannis, Deborah 2007. “The International Wanderings of a Liberal Idea, or Why Liberals Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Balance of Power,” Perspectives on Politics 5: 703–728.
Bourdieu, Pierre 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brams, Steven 1980. Biblical Games: A Strategic Analysis of Stories in the Old Testament. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, Chris 1994. “Turtles All the Way Down: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory, and International Relations,” Millennium 23: 213–236.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce 1985. “The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model,” American Political Science Review 79: 156–177.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James, Siverson, Randolph, and Smith, Alastair 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace,” American Political Science Review 93: 791–807.
Bull, Hedley 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian, and True, Jacqui 2001. Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burgerman, Susan 2001. Moral Victories: How Activists Provoke Multilateral Action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Buzan, Barry, Waever, Ole, and Wilde, Jaap 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Campbell, David 1998. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, E. H. 1964. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Reprinted from the earlier edition. New York: Harper & Row.
Chan, Steve 1997. “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise,” Mearshon International Studies Review 41: 59–91.
Checkel, Jeffrey 2006. “Tracing Causal Mechanisms,” International Studies Review 8: 362–370.
Chernoff, Fred 2007. “Critical Realism, Scientific Realism, and Interna­tional Relations Theory,” Millennium 35: 399–407.
Chwieroth, Jeffrey 2007. “Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund,” International Studies Quarterly 51: 5–30.
Claude, Inis 1962. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.
Copeland, Dale 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay,” International Security 25: 187–212.
Copeland, Dale 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School,” Review of International Studies 29: 427–441.
Cox, Robert 1986. “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” In Keohane, Robert (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cox, Robert 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces and the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cronin, Bruce 1999. Community Under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dahl, Robert 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Derian, James 1990. “The (S)pace of International Relations: Sim­ulation, Surveillance, and Speed,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 295–310.
Dessler, David 1989. “What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?International Organization 43: 441–473.
Deudney, Daniel 2006. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Deudney, Daniel and Matthew, Richard (eds.) 1999. Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Donnelly, Jack 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn 2000. “Desire All the Way Down,” Review of International Studies 26: 137–139.
Dueck, Colin 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dunn, Kevin 2006. “Examining Historical Representations,” International Studies Review 8: 370–381.
Dunne, Tim 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Ellis, David 2005. “Defending the International Interest.” Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Doctoral Dissertation.
Ellis, David 2009. “On the Possibility of ‘International Community’,” International Studies Review 11: 1–26.
Elster, Jon 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fearon, James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49: 379–414.
Fearon, James and Wendt, Alexander 2002. “Rationalism versus Constructivism: A Skeptical View.” In Carlesnaes, Walter, Risse-Kappen, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.
Fierke, Karen and J, Knud Erikørgensen (eds.) 2001. Constructing Interna­tional Relations: The Next Generation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Finnemore, Martha 1996a. National Interest in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha 1996b. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism,” International Organization 50: 325–347.
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52: 887–917.
Flyvbjerg, Bent 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freyberg-Inan, Annette 2004. What Moves Man: The Realist Theory of International Relations and its Judgment of Human Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.) 1995. The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
George, Jim 1989. “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 269–279.
George, Jim 1994. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. New York: Macmillan.
George, Jim and Campbell, David 1990. “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 269–293.
Geuss, Raymond 2002. “Liberalism and its Discontents,” Political Theory 30: 320–338.
Giles, Michael and Garand, James 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches,” PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 741–751.
Gill, Stephen (ed.) 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, Robert 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goddard, Stacie 2009. “When Right Makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power,” International Security 33: 110–142.
Goddard, Stacie and Nexon, Daniel 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 11: 9–61.
Goff, Patricia and Dunn, Kevin (eds.) 2004. Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Green, Donald and Shapiro, Ian 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Grieco, Joseph 1997. “Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics.” In Doyle, Michael and Ikenberry, G. John (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Gunnell, John 1993. The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Guzzini, Stefano 1993. “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis,” International Organization 47: 443–478.
Guzzini, Stefano 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.
Guzzini, Stefano 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 147–182.
Guzzini, Stefano 2005. “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium 33: 495–522.
Haas, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Levy, Marc (eds.) 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hall, Rodney Bruce 1997. “Moral Authority as a Power Resource,” International Organization 51: 555–589.
Helleiner, Eric 2003. The Making of National Money: Territorial Currencies in Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hoffmann, Matthew 2005. Ozone Depletion and Climate Change: Constructing a Global Response. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Jervis, Robert 2009. “Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?International Studies Review 11: 231–252.
Holsti, Kalevi 1985. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
Hopf, Ted 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security 23: 171–200.
Hopf, Ted 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Houghton, David Patrick 2007. “Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach,” Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 24–45.
Hughes, Barry 2000. Continuity and Change in World Politics: Competing Perspectives, 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel 2004. “Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?International Studies Review 6: 337–341.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel 2009. “Paradigmatic Faults in International Relations Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 53.
Jacobsen, John Kurt 2003. “Duelling Constructivisms: A Post-mortem on the Ideas Debate in Mainstream IR/IPE,” Review of International Studies 29: 39–60.
Jervis, Robert 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jervis, Robert 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30: 167–214.
Jervis, Robert 1994. “Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics,” Social Research 61: 853–876.
Jervis, Robert 1998. “Realism in the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52: 971–991.
Johnson Bagby, Laurie 1994. “The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 131–153.
Kahler, Miles 1998. “Rationality in International Relations,” International Organization 52: 919–941.
Kant, Immanuel 1957. Perpetual Peace, ed. Beck, Lewis White. New York: Macmillan.
Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Krasner, Stephen 1998. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52: 645–685.
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kegley, Charles 1993. “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities,” International Studies Quarterly 37: 131–147.
Kegley, Charles and Wittkopf, Eugene 2001. World Politics: Trends and Transformations, 8th edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.
Keohane, Robert 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly 32: 379–396.
Keohane, Robert 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kier, Elizabeth and Mercer, Jonathan 1996. “Setting Precedents in Anarchy: Military Intervention and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” International Security 20: 77–106.
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kirk, Grayson 1947. The Study of International Relations in American Colleges and Universities. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Klotz, Audie 2006. “Moving Beyond the Agent-Structure Debate,” International Studies Review 8: 355.
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecelia 2006. “Translating Terminologies,” International Studies Review 8: 356–362.
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecelia 2007. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa (eds.) 2008. Qualitative Methods in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James (eds.) 1969. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krasner, Stephen 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics 28: 317–347.
Krasner, Stephen 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and US Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1984. “Errors Have Their Advantages,” International Organization 38: 305–320.
Kratochwil, Friedrich 2000. “Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics and the Constructivist Challenge,” Millennium 29: 73–101.
Kratochwil, Friedrich and Ruggie, John Gerard 1986. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization 40: 753–775.
Krebs, Ronald and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric,” European Journal of International Relations 13: 35–66.
Kubálková, Vendulka 1998. “The Twenty Years' Catharsis: E. H. Carr and IR.” In Vendulka Kubálková, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul 1998 “Constructing Constructivism.” In Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Kuhn, Thomas 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas 1991. “The Natural and the Human Sciences.” In Hiley, D., Bohman, J., and Shusterman, R. (eds.), The Interpretative Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kurki, Milja 2007. “Critical Realism and Causal Analysis in International Relations,” Millennium 35: 361–378.
Lang, Anthony 2002. Agency and Ethics: The Politics of Military Intervention. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lapid, Yosef 1989. “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 235–254.
Lasswell, Harold 1935. World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lasswell, Harold and Kaplan, Abraham 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lebow, Richard Ned 2001. “Thucydides the Constructivist,” American Political Science Review 95: 547–560.
Lebow, Richard Ned 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Legro, Jeffrey 1995. Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Legro, Jeffrey and Moravcsik, Andrew 1999. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24: 5–55.
Lenin, Vladimir Illyich 1969 [1917]. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Moscow: International Publishers.
Lieber, Robert 2001. No Common Power: Understanding International Relations. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Linklater, Andrew 1990. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. London: Macmillan.
Linklater, Andrew 1992. “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View,” Millennium 21: 77–98.
Linklater, Andrew 1997. “The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations,” Review of International Studies 23: 321–338.
Linklater, Andrew 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Linklater, Andrew 2001. “Rationalism.” In Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian, and True, Jacqui, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lobell, Steven, Ripsman, Norrin, and Taliaferro, Jeffrey (eds.) 2009. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, Mark 1999. State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan's Identity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael 2007. The View from the Ivory Tower: TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in the United States and Canada. Williamsburg, VA: The Program on the Theory and Practice of International Relations.
March, James and Olsen, Johan 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
March, James and Olsen, Johan 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52: 943–969.
Martin, Lisa and Simmons, Beth 1998. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,” International Organization 52: 729–757.
Masuoka, Natalie, Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott 2007. “The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update,” PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 133–145.
Mattern, Janice Bially 2005a. Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. London: Routledge.
Mattern, Janice Bially 2005b. “Why Soft Power Isn't So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics,” Millennium 33: 583–612.
Mearsheimer, John 1983. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Mearsheimer, John 1994/1995. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19: 5–49.
Mearsheimer, John 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.
Mearsheimer, John 2005. “E. H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On,” International Relations 19: 139–152.
Mercer, Jonathan 1995. “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organi­zation 49: 229–252.
Mill, John Stuart 1863. Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourne.
Milliken, Jennifer 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods,” European Journal of International Relations 5: 225–254.
Milner, Helen 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, Ronald 1994. “Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance,” International Organization 48: 425–458.
Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed.) 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Morgenthau, Hans 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, Hans 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morgenthau, Hans 1967. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morgenthau, Hans 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Murphy, Craig 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, Craig 2001Political Consequences of the New Inequality,” International Studies Quarterly 45: 347–356.
Murphy, Craig 2007. “The Promise of Critical IR, Partially Kept,” Review of International Studies 33: 117–133.
Murphy, Craig and Nelson, Douglas 2001. “International Political Economy: A Tale of Two Hederodoxies,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3: 393–412.
Murray, Alastair 1997. Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Times, New York 2002. “A War With Iraq is Not in America's National Interest,” paid advertisement, September 26.
Nexon, Daniel 2009. “The Balance of Power in the Balance,” World Politics 61: 330–359.
Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael 2003. “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform,” International Organization 57: 241–276.
Oborne, Peter 2002. “Who Inspired Thatcher's Most Damaging Remark? Tony Blair's Favourite Guru,” The Spectator, August 24.
Onuf, Nicholas 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Onuf, Nicholas 1998. “Constructivism: A User's Manual.” In Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Onuf, Nicholas and Klink, Frank 1989. “Activity, Authority, Rule,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 149–174.
Oren, Ido. 2000. “Is Culture Independent of National Security? How America's National Security Concerns Shaped ‘Political Culture’ Research,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 543–573.
Oren, Ido. 2006. “Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self-Disconfirming Analysis,” Polity 38: 72–100.
Onuf, Nicholas and Klink, Frank 2009. “The Unrealism of Contemporary Realism: The Tension between Realist Theory and Realists' Practice,” Perspectives on Politics 7: 283–301.
Oren, Ido and Solomon, Ty 2008. “WMD: Words of Mass Destruction,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco.
Owen, John 1994. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security 19: 87–125.
Press, Oxford University 2002. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Patomäki, Heikki and Wight, Colin 2000. “After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 213–237.
Pettman, Ralph 2000. Commonsense Constructivism: Or the Making of World Affairs. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Pichler, Hans-Karl 1998. “The Godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau's Theory of Power Politics,” Review of International Studies 24: 185–200.
Pollack, Mark 1997. “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda-Setting in the European Community,” International Organization 51: 99–134.
Posen, Barry 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian 1998. “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism,” European Journal of International Relations 4: 259–294.
Rawls, John 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reus-Smit, Christian 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reus-Smit, Christian 2001a. “Constructivism.” In Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian, and True, Jacqui, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reus-Smit, Christian 2001b. “The Strange Death of Liberal International Theory,” European Journal of International Law 12: 573–594.
Risse, Thomas 2000. “‘Let's Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54: 1–39.
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.) 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rommen, Hans 1944. “Realism and Utopianism in World Affairs,” Review of Politics 6: 193–215.
Rosati, Jerel 2000. “The Power of Human Cognition in the Study of World Politics,” International Studies Review 2: 45–75.
Rose, Gideon 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51: 144–172.
Rosecrance, Richard, 2001. “Has Realism Become Cost-Benefit Analysis? A Review Essay,” International Security 26: 132–154.
Rosenthal, Joel 1991. Righteous Realists: Political Realism, Responsible Power, and American Culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Ruggie, John Gerard 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organizations 36: 379–415.
Ruggie, John Gerard 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity,” World Politics 35: 261–285.
Ruggie, John Gerard 1993 (ed.). Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ruggie, John Gerard 1998. “What Makes the World Hand Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization 52: 858–885.
Russett, Bruce 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Russett, Bruce and Oneal, John 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.
Scheuerman, William 2007a. “Carl Schmitt and Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond.” In Williams, Michael (ed.), Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheuerman, William 2007b. “Was Morgenthau a Realist? Revisiting Scientific Man vs. Power Politics,” Constellations 14: 506–530.
Schmidt, Brian 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Schmitt, Carl 1976. The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Schulz, William 2001. In Our Own Best Interest: How Defending Human Rights Benefits All Americans. Boston: Beacon Press.
Schuman, Frederick 1933. International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine 2005. “The Graduate Student Experience: ‘Hegemony’ or Balance in Methodological Training?” In Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed.), Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schweller, Randall 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in,” International Security 19: 72–107.
Schweller, Randall 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schweller, Randall 2003. “The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism.” In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Scott, John 2000. “Rational Choice Theory.” In Browning, Gary, Halcli, Abigail, and Webster, Frank (eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. London: Sage.
Shannon, Vaughn 2000. “Norms are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 293–316.
Sikkink, Kathryn 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47: 411–441.
Singer, J. David 1990. Models, Methods, and Progress in World Politics: A Peace Research Odyssey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Smith, Steve 2000. “Wendt's World,” Review of International Studies 26: 151–163.
Smith, Steve 2002. “The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline,’” International Studies Review 4: 67–85.
Spegele, Roger 1996. Political Realism in International Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steele, Brent 2007. “Liberal-Idealism: A Constructivist Critique,” International Studies Review 9: 23–52.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2000. “Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 97–119.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2002. “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Recons­tructing, or Rereading,” International Studies Review 4: 73–97.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2004. “Realist-Constructivism and Morality,” International Studies Review 6: 341–343.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2006a. “Lamarckian with a Vengeance: Human Nature and American International Relations Theory,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9: 227–246.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2006b. “Constructivism.” In Sterling-Folker, (ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2009. “Realist Theorizing as Tradition: Forward Is as Forward Does.” In Freyberg-Inan, Annette, James, Patrick, and Harrison, Ewan (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer and Shinko, Rosemary 2005. “Discourses of Power: Traversing the Realist-Postmodern Divide,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33: 637–664.
Strange, Susan 1987. “The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony,” International Organization 41: 551–574.
Swedberg, Richard 2005. “Can There Be a Sociological Concept of Interest?” Theory and Society 34: 359–390.
Tannenwald, Nina 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use,” International Organization 53: 433–468.
Vasquez, John 1983. The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Vasquez, John 1998. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waever, Ole 1996. “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate.” In Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waever, Ole 1997. “Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms.” In Neumann, Iver and Waever, Ole (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?London: Routledge.
Walker, R. B. J. 1987. “Realism, Change, and International Political Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 31: 65–86.
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walt, Stephen 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth 1959. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth 1967. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston: Little, Brown.
Waltz, Kenneth 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Waltz, Kenneth 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics.” In Keohane, Robert (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wendt, Alexander 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41: 335–370.
Wendt, Alexander 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46: 391–425.
Wendt, Alexander 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review 88: 384–396.
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, Alexander 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable,” European Journal of International Relations 9: 491–542.
Wight, Colin 2006. Agents, Structures, and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wight, Colin 2007. “A Manifesto for Scientific Realism in IR: Assuming the Can-Opener Won't Work!Millennium 35: 379–398.
Wight, Martin 1946. Power Politics. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Williams, Michael 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfers, Arnold 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wyn Jones, Richard (ed.) 2001. Critical Theory & World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Zehfuss, Maja 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Žižek, Slavoj 2000. The Fragile Absolute – Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For?New York: Verso.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.