Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T17:31:31.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

J. Samuel Barkin
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Realist Constructivism
Rethinking International Relations Theory
, pp. 174 - 189
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3: 319–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.) 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis 1971. Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, trans. Brewster, Ben. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arfi, Badredine 2005. “Resolving the Trust Predicament in IR: A Quantum Game-Theoretic Approach,” Theory and Decision 59: 127–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 1958. The Politics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. Barker, Ernest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism,” International Organization 38: 225–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard and Walker, R. B. J. 1990. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton 1962. “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review 56: 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David 1979. “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies,” World Politics 31: 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David 1989. Paradoxes of Power. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 1998. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium 27: 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2003a. “Realist Constructivism,” International Studies Review 5:3: 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2003b. Social Construction and the Logic of Money: Financial Predominance and International Economic Leadership. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2008. “Qualitative Methods?” In Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa (eds.), Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond 2005. “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59: 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens 1998. “Second Natures: Is the State Identical With Itself?European Journal of International Relations 4: 295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biebricher, Thomas 2005. “Habermas, Foucault, and Nietzsche: A Double Misunderstanding,” Foucault Studies 3: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Ken 1991. “Security and Emancipation,” Review of International Studies 17: 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucoyannis, Deborah 2007. “The International Wanderings of a Liberal Idea, or Why Liberals Can Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Balance of Power,” Perspectives on Politics 5: 703–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven 1980. Biblical Games: A Strategic Analysis of Stories in the Old Testament. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris 1994. “Turtles All the Way Down: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory, and International Relations,” Millennium 23: 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce 1985. “The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model,” American Political Science Review 79: 156–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James, Siverson, Randolph, and Smith, Alastair 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace,” American Political Science Review 93: 791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian, and True, Jacqui 2001. Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burgerman, Susan 2001. Moral Victories: How Activists Provoke Multilateral Action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Waever, Ole, and Wilde, Jaap 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Campbell, David 1998. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. 1964. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Reprinted from the earlier edition. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve 1997. “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise,” Mearshon International Studies Review 41: 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey 2006. “Tracing Causal Mechanisms,” International Studies Review 8: 362–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, Fred 2007. “Critical Realism, Scientific Realism, and Interna­tional Relations Theory,” Millennium 35: 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey 2007. “Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund,” International Studies Quarterly 51: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claude, Inis 1962. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay,” International Security 25: 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Dale 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School,” Review of International Studies 29: 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert 1986. “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” In Keohane, Robert (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces and the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, Bruce 1999. Community Under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Derian, James 1990. “The (S)pace of International Relations: Sim­ulation, Surveillance, and Speed,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessler, David 1989. “What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?International Organization 43: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel 2006. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and Matthew, Richard (eds.) 1999. Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne Lynn 2000. “Desire All the Way Down,” Review of International Studies 26: 137–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueck, Colin 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, Kevin 2006. “Examining Historical Representations,” International Studies Review 8: 370–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, David 2005. “Defending the International Interest.” Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
Ellis, David 2009. “On the Possibility of ‘International Community’,” International Studies Review 11: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49: 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James and Wendt, Alexander 2002. “Rationalism versus Constructivism: A Skeptical View.” In Carlesnaes, Walter, Risse-Kappen, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karen and J, Knud Erikørgensen (eds.) 2001. Constructing Interna­tional Relations: The Next Generation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 1996a. National Interest in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 1996b. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism,” International Organization 50: 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52: 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyberg-Inan, Annette 2004. What Moves Man: The Realist Theory of International Relations and its Judgment of Human Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.) 1995. The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
George, Jim 1989. “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Jim 1994. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Jim and Campbell, David 1990. “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly 34: 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 2002. “Liberalism and its Discontents,” Political Theory 30: 320–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Michael and Garand, James 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches,” PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 741–751.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen (ed.) 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie 2009. “When Right Makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power,” International Security 33: 110–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie and Nexon, Daniel 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 11: 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Patricia and Dunn, Kevin (eds.) 2004. Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald and Shapiro, Ian 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph 1997. “Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics.” In Doyle, Michael and Ikenberry, G. John (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John 1993. The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 1993. “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis,” International Organization 47: 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 147–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 2005. “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium 33: 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Levy, Marc (eds.) 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce 1997. “Moral Authority as a Power Resource,” International Organization 51: 555–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helleiner, Eric 2003. The Making of National Money: Territorial Currencies in Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew 2005. Ozone Depletion and Climate Change: Constructing a Global Response. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert 2009. “Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?International Studies Review 11: 231–252.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi 1985. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security 23: 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Houghton, David Patrick 2007. “Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach,” Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Barry 2000. Continuity and Change in World Politics: Competing Perspectives, 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel 2004. “Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?International Studies Review 6: 337–341.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel 2009. “Paradigmatic Faults in International Relations Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, John Kurt 2003. “Duelling Constructivisms: A Post-mortem on the Ideas Debate in Mainstream IR/IPE,” Review of International Studies 29: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30: 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1994. “Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics,” Social Research 61: 853–876.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1998. “Realism in the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52: 971–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson Bagby, Laurie 1994. “The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles 1998. “Rationality in International Relations,” International Organization 52: 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1957. Perpetual Peace, ed. Beck, Lewis White. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Krasner, Stephen 1998. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52: 645–685.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles 1993. “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities,” International Studies Quarterly 37: 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegley, Charles and Wittkopf, Eugene 2001. World Politics: Trends and Transformations, 8th edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly 32: 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth and Mercer, Jonathan 1996. “Setting Precedents in Anarchy: Military Intervention and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” International Security 20: 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, Grayson 1947. The Study of International Relations in American Colleges and Universities. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie 2006. “Moving Beyond the Agent-Structure Debate,” International Studies Review 8: 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecelia 2006. “Translating Terminologies,” International Studies Review 8: 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecelia 2007. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa (eds.) 2008. Qualitative Methods in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James (eds.) 1969. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics 28: 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and US Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1984. “Errors Have Their Advantages,” International Organization 38: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 2000. “Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics and the Constructivist Challenge,” Millennium 29: 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich and Ruggie, John Gerard 1986. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization 40: 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Ronald and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric,” European Journal of International Relations 13: 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubálková, Vendulka 1998. “The Twenty Years' Catharsis: E. H. Carr and IR.” In Vendulka Kubálková, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul 1998 “Constructing Constructivism.” In Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1991. “The Natural and the Human Sciences.” In Hiley, D., Bohman, J., and Shusterman, R. (eds.), The Interpretative Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja 2007. “Critical Realism and Causal Analysis in International Relations,” Millennium 35: 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Anthony 2002. Agency and Ethics: The Politics of Military Intervention. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef 1989. “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold 1935. World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold and Kaplan, Abraham 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned 2001. “Thucydides the Constructivist,” American Political Science Review 95: 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey 1995. Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey and Moravcsik, Andrew 1999. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24: 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir Illyich 1969 [1917]. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Moscow: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Lieber, Robert 2001. No Common Power: Understanding International Relations. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew 1990. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linklater, Andrew 1992. “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View,” Millennium 21: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linklater, Andrew 1997. “The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations,” Review of International Studies 23: 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linklater, Andrew 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew 2001. “Rationalism.” In Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian, and True, Jacqui, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lobell, Steven, Ripsman, Norrin, and Taliaferro, Jeffrey (eds.) 2009. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mark 1999. State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan's Identity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael 2007. The View from the Ivory Tower: TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in the United States and Canada. Williamsburg, VA: The Program on the Theory and Practice of International Relations.Google Scholar
March, James and Olsen, Johan 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James and Olsen, Johan 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52: 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa and Simmons, Beth 1998. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,” International Organization 52: 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, Natalie, Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott 2007. “The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update,” PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 133–145.Google Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially 2005a. Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially 2005b. “Why Soft Power Isn't So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics,” Millennium 33: 583–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John 1983. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John 1994/1995. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19: 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John 2005. “E. H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On,” International Relations 19: 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan 1995. “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organi­zation 49: 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart 1863. Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourne.Google Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods,” European Journal of International Relations 5: 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald 1994. “Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance,” International Organization 48: 425–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed.) 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans 1967. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig 2001Political Consequences of the New Inequality,” International Studies Quarterly 45: 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Craig 2007. “The Promise of Critical IR, Partially Kept,” Review of International Studies 33: 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Craig and Nelson, Douglas 2001. “International Political Economy: A Tale of Two Hederodoxies,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Alastair 1997. Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Times, New York 2002. “A War With Iraq is Not in America's National Interest,” paid advertisement, September 26.
Nexon, Daniel 2009. “The Balance of Power in the Balance,” World Politics 61: 330–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael 2003. “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform,” International Organization 57: 241–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oborne, Peter 2002. “Who Inspired Thatcher's Most Damaging Remark? Tony Blair's Favourite Guru,” The Spectator, August 24.
Onuf, Nicholas 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas 1998. “Constructivism: A User's Manual.” In Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas and Klink, Frank 1989. “Activity, Authority, Rule,” International Studies Quarterly 33: 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oren, Ido. 2000. “Is Culture Independent of National Security? How America's National Security Concerns Shaped ‘Political Culture’ Research,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 543–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oren, Ido. 2006. “Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self-Disconfirming Analysis,” Polity 38: 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas and Klink, Frank 2009. “The Unrealism of Contemporary Realism: The Tension between Realist Theory and Realists' Practice,” Perspectives on Politics 7: 283–301.Google Scholar
Oren, Ido and Solomon, Ty 2008. “WMD: Words of Mass Destruction,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco.
Owen, John 1994. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security 19: 87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, Oxford University 2002. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki and Wight, Colin 2000. “After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettman, Ralph 2000. Commonsense Constructivism: Or the Making of World Affairs. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Pichler, Hans-Karl 1998. “The Godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau's Theory of Power Politics,” Review of International Studies 24: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark 1997. “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda-Setting in the European Community,” International Organization 51: 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian 1998. “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism,” European Journal of International Relations 4: 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian 2001a. “Constructivism.” In Burchill, Scott, Devetak, Richard, Linklater, Andrew, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian, and True, Jacqui, Theories of International Relations, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian 2001b. “The Strange Death of Liberal International Theory,” European Journal of International Law 12: 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas 2000. “‘Let's Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.) 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rommen, Hans 1944. “Realism and Utopianism in World Affairs,” Review of Politics 6: 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, Jerel 2000. “The Power of Human Cognition in the Study of World Politics,” International Studies Review 2: 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Gideon 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51: 144–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard, 2001. “Has Realism Become Cost-Benefit Analysis? A Review Essay,” International Security 26: 132–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Joel 1991. Righteous Realists: Political Realism, Responsible Power, and American Culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organizations 36: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity,” World Politics 35: 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1993 (ed.). Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1998. “What Makes the World Hand Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization 52: 858–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce and Oneal, John 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William 2007a. “Carl Schmitt and Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond.” In Williams, Michael (ed.), Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William 2007b. “Was Morgenthau a Realist? Revisiting Scientific Man vs. Power Politics,” Constellations 14: 506–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl 1976. The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, William 2001. In Our Own Best Interest: How Defending Human Rights Benefits All Americans. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, Frederick 1933. International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine 2005. “The Graduate Student Experience: ‘Hegemony’ or Balance in Methodological Training?” In Monroe, Kristen Renwick (ed.), Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in,” International Security 19: 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall 2003. “The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism.” In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John 2000. “Rational Choice Theory.” In Browning, Gary, Halcli, Abigail, and Webster, Frank (eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn 2000. “Norms are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47: 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David 1990. Models, Methods, and Progress in World Politics: A Peace Research Odyssey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve 2000. “Wendt's World,” Review of International Studies 26: 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve 2002. “The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline,’” International Studies Review 4: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spegele, Roger 1996. Political Realism in International Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent 2007. “Liberal-Idealism: A Constructivist Critique,” International Studies Review 9: 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2000. “Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2002. “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Recons­tructing, or Rereading,” International Studies Review 4: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2004. “Realist-Constructivism and Morality,” International Studies Review 6: 341–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2006a. “Lamarckian with a Vengeance: Human Nature and American International Relations Theory,” Journal of International Relations and Development 9: 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2006b. “Constructivism.” In Sterling-Folker, (ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer 2009. “Realist Theorizing as Tradition: Forward Is as Forward Does.” In Freyberg-Inan, Annette, James, Patrick, and Harrison, Ewan (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer and Shinko, Rosemary 2005. “Discourses of Power: Traversing the Realist-Postmodern Divide,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33: 637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan 1987. “The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony,” International Organization 41: 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, Richard 2005. “Can There Be a Sociological Concept of Interest?” Theory and Society 34: 359–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use,” International Organization 53: 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John 1983. The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John 1998. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole 1996. “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate.” In Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole 1997. “Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms.” In Neumann, Iver and Waever, Ole (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1987. “Realism, Change, and International Political Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 31: 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth 1959. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth 1967. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics.” In Keohane, Robert (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41: 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46: 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review 88: 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable,” European Journal of International Relations 9: 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Colin 2006. Agents, Structures, and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Colin 2007. “A Manifesto for Scientific Realism in IR: Assuming the Can-Opener Won't Work!Millennium 35: 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin 1946. Power Politics. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wyn Jones, Richard (ed.) 2001. Critical Theory & World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj 2000. The Fragile Absolute – Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For?New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • J. Samuel Barkin, University of Florida
  • Book: Realist Constructivism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750410.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • J. Samuel Barkin, University of Florida
  • Book: Realist Constructivism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750410.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • J. Samuel Barkin, University of Florida
  • Book: Realist Constructivism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750410.011
Available formats
×