Book contents
- Reading American Indian Law
- Reading American Indian Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Editors and Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Core Concepts
- Part II Voices
- Part III Property
- 9 Sovereignty and Property
- 10 The Legacy of Allotment
- 11 A Common Law for Our Age of Colonialism: The Judicial Divestiture of Indian Tribal Authority over Nonmembers
- 12 In Defense of Property
- Part IV (Mis)Understandings
- Book part
- References
12 - In Defense of Property
from Part III - Property
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2019
Book contents
- Reading American Indian Law
- Reading American Indian Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Editors and Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Core Concepts
- Part II Voices
- Part III Property
- 9 Sovereignty and Property
- 10 The Legacy of Allotment
- 11 A Common Law for Our Age of Colonialism: The Judicial Divestiture of Indian Tribal Authority over Nonmembers
- 12 In Defense of Property
- Part IV (Mis)Understandings
- Book part
- References
Summary
In Defense of Property: begins by cataloging various types of property and the ways in which Indigenous and European conceptions of property differ. It then proceeds to illustrate ways in which those conceptions have been stereotyped, thus leading to mistaken assumptions about the incompatibility of the two approaches. Carpenter, Katyal, and Riley conclude that using the concepts of fiduciary duty and stewardship found in both approaches can supply a foundation for bridging the different conceptions of property.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reading American Indian LawFoundational Principles, pp. 285 - 306Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further Readings
Byrne, Christopher S., Chilkat Indian Tribe v. Johnson and NAGPRA: Have We Finally Recognized Communal Rights in Cultural Objects?, 8 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 109 (1993).Google Scholar
Carpenter, Kristen A., A Property Rights Approach to Sacred Sites Cases: Asserting a Place for Indians as Nonowners, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 1061 (2005).Google Scholar
Dutfield, Graham, TRIPS-Related Aspects of Traditional Knowledge, 33 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 233 (2001).Google Scholar
Guest, Richard A., Intellectual Property Rights and Native American Tribes, 20 Am. Indian L. Rev. 111 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremers, Nancy, Speaking with a Forked Tongue in the Global Debate on Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources: Is US Intellectual Property Law and Policy Really Aimed at Meaningful Protection for Native American Cultures?, 15 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Riley, Angela R., Recovering Collectivity: Group Rights to Intellectual Property in Indigenous Communities, 18 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 175 (2000).Google Scholar
Riley, Angela R., Straight Stealing: Towards an Indigenous System of Cultural Property Protection, 80 Wash. L. Rev. 69 (2005).Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, Of Seeds and Shamans: The Appropriation of the Scientific and Technical Knowledge of Indigenous and Local Communities, 17 Mich. J. Int’l L. 919 (1996).Google Scholar
Trope, Jack & EchoHawk, Walter, The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Background and Legislative History, 24 Ariz. St. L.J. 35 (1992).Google Scholar