Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-6sdl9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-04T05:22:12.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2010

Vernon L. Smith
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rationality in Economics
Constructivist and Ecological Forms
, pp. 329 - 352
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, J. 1975. “The Lobster Fiefs: Economic and Ecological Effects of Territoriality in the Maine Lobster Industry.” Human Ecology 3:183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. 2002. “Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior.” American Economic Review 92:411–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 21:39–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, T., and Hill, P. J.. 1975. “The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West.” Journal of Law and Economics 18:163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrioni, J. 1995. “Cooperation in Public Good Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?American Economic Review 85:891–904.Google Scholar
Angel, R. 2001. “Future Optical and Infrared Telescopes.” Nature Insights 409:427–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Arrow, K. 1987. “Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System.” In Hogarth, R. and Reder, M., eds., Rational Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 201–15.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99(395):116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., and Piankov, N. N.. 2006. “Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness.” Experimental Economics 9:193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augier, M., and March, J.. 2004. Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. 1990. Foreword to Roth, A. and Sotomayer, M.. Two-Sided Matching: A Study of Game Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. ⅸ–ⅺ.Google Scholar
Backerman, S., Denton, M., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. L.. 2001. “Market Power in a Deregulated Electrical Industry.” Journal of Decision Support Systems 30:357–81.Google Scholar
Backerman, S., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. L.. 2000. “Efficiency and Income Shares in High Demand Energy Network: Who Receives the Congestion Rents When a Line Is Constrained?Pacific Economic Review 5:331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J., Ledyard, J., and Porter, D.. 1989. “Allocating Uncertain and Unresponsive Resources: An Experimental Approach.” Rand Journal of Economics 20:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J., Olson, M., Porter, D., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V.. 2003. “Theory, Experiment and the Federal Communications Commission Spectrum Auctions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51:303–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J.. 1992. The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. 1979. “Quasi-Permanence of Price Reductions: A Policy for Prevention of Predatory Pricing.” Yale Law Journal, November:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W., Panzer, J., and Willig, R.. 1982. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure. New York: Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R.. 1997. “Deciding Advantageously before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy.” Science 275(5304):1293–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. (translator). 1989. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and McCabe, K.. 1995. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior 10:122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and McCabe, K.. 2005. “Risk Preference Instability across Institutions: A Dilemma.” Proceedings National Academy of Science 102:4209–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, J., Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., and Rietz, T.. 2000. “Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Market Research.” Iowa Electronic Market, available online at http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/archive/BFNR_2000.pdf.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 1994. Game Theory and the Social Contract, vol. 1: Playing Fair. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K.. 1997. Game Theory and the Social Contract, vol. 2: Just Playing (Economic Learning and Social Evolution). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H. P. 1980. “Attitudes toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63:395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binswanger, H. P.. 1981. “Attitudes toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India.” Economic Journal 91:867–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, T. 1995. Bears Discover Fire and Other Stories. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. 2004. “Can a Dog Learn a Word?Science, June 11, 304:1605–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohnet, I., Frey, B., and Huck, S.. 2001. “More Order with Less Law: On Contract Enforcement, Trust, and Crowding.” American Political Science Review 95:131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G. E. 1991. “A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review 81:1096–136.Google Scholar
Bolton, G., Katok, E., and Zwick, R.. 1998. “Dictator Game Giving: Rules of Fairness Versus Acts of Kindness.” International Journal of Game Theory 27:269–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G., and Ockenfels, A.. 2000. “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition.” American Economic Review 90:166–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borenstein, S., and Bushnell, J.. 1999. “An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California's Electricity Industry.” Journal of Industrial Economics 47:285–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. 1943. Experiment and Theory in Physics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bortoft, H. 1996. The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe's Way of Science. Edinburgh: Floris.Google Scholar
Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., Shen, Y., and Whitelaw, R.. 2007. “Do Asset Markets Reflect Fundamentals? Freshly Squeezed Evidence from the FCOJ Market.” Journal of Financial Economics 83: 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., and Shizgal, P.. 2001. “Functional Imaging of Neural Responses to Expectancy and Experience of Monetary Gains and Losses.” Neuron 30:619–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfman, C., McCabe, K., Porter, D., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. L.. 1996. “An Experimental Examination of the Walrasian Tatonnement Mechanism.” Rand Journal 27:681–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. E. 1991. Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Buchan, J. 2004. Crowded with Genius the Scottish Enlightenment: Edinburgh's Moment of the Mind. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., and Tullock, G.. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, T. 2003. “Engineering Altruism: An Experimental Investigation of Anonymity and Gift Giving.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50(1):133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, T., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 2000. “Friend-or-Foe Intentionality Priming in an Extensive Form Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44:1–17.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. 2003. Hayek's Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camera, G., C. Noussair, and S. Tucker. 2001. “Rate-of-Return Dominance and Efficiency in an Experimental Economy.” Department of Economics, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University.
Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., T-H. Ho, and J. Chong. 2004. “Behavioral Game Theory: Thinking, Learning, and Teaching.” In Huck, S., ed., Advances in Understanding Strategic Behavior. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C., and Hogarth, R. M.. 1999. “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19:7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D.. 2005. “Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 43:9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C., and Thaler, R. H.. 1995. “Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators, and Manners.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2):209–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C., and Weigelt, K.. 1988. “Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation Model.” Econometrica 56(1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, T., and D. Friedman. 1993. “An Empirical Analysis of Price Formation in Double Auction Markets.” In Friedman, and Rust, J., eds., The Double Auction. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Cassady, R. 1967. Auctions and Auctioneering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cesari, M., and Plott, C.. 2003. “Decentralized Management of Common Property Resources: Experiments with a Centuries-Old Institution.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51:217–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles River and Associates, Inc., and Market Design, Inc. 1998a. Report 1A: Auction Design Enhancements for Non-Combinatorial Auctions. Charles River and Associates No. 1351–00.
Charles River and Associates, Inc., and Market Design, Inc.. 1998b. Report 1B: Package Bidding for Spectrum Licenses. Charles River and Associates No. 1351–00.
Charles River and Associates, Inc., and Market Design, Inc.. 1998c. Report 2: Simultaneous Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding. Charles River and Associates No. 1351–00.
Charness, G., and Rabin, M.. 2003. “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117:817–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Frechette, G., and Kagel, J.. 2004. “How Robust Is Gift Exchange?Experimental Economics 7:189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, T., Frykblom, P., and Shogren, J.. 2002. “Hardnose the Dictator.” American Economic Review 92:1218–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, T., Kroll, S., and Shogren, J.. 2005. “The Impact of Endowment Heterogeneity and Origin on Public Good Contributions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57:357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, S. H., and N. Nishimura. 1999. “Revenue Non-Equivalence between the English and the Second Price Auctions: Experimental Evidence.” Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Christie, R., Colgin, F., and Geis, L.. 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Y.-P., and Chu, R.-L.. 1990. “The Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Market-Life Experimental Settings: A Note.” American Economic Review 80:902–11.Google Scholar
Coase, R. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R.. 1974. “The Lighthouse in Economics.” Journal of Law and Economics 17:357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgin, L., and Moser, E.. 2006. “Neuroscience: Rewinding the Memory Record.” Nature 440: 615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, D., and Kagel, J.. 2003. “Lessons Learned: Generalizing Learning across Games.” American Economic Review 93(2):202–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D., and J. Kagel. 2004. “Learning and Transfer in Signaling Games.” Working paper, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
Cooper, D., and Huyck, J. B.. 2003. “Evidence on the Equivalence of the Strategic and Extensive Form Representation of Games.” Journal of Economic Theory 110(2):290–308.Google Scholar
Coppinger, V., Smith, V., and Titus, J.. 1980. “Incentives and Behavior in English, Dutch and Sealed-Bid Auctions.” Economic Inquiry 18(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corelli, K. McCabe, and V. L. Smith. 2000. “Theory-of-Mind Mechanism in Personal Exchange.” Proceedings, 13th Annual Toyota Conference on Affective Minds. In Hatano, G., Okada, N., and Tanabe, H., eds., Affective Minds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, chapter 26.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby. 1992. “Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange.” In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds., The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–228.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J.. 1996. “Are Humans Good Intuitive Statisticians after All? Rethinking Some Conclusions from the Literature on Judgment under Uncertainty.” Cognition 58:1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coursey, D., Isaac, R. M., Luke, M., and Smith, V.. 1984a. “Market Contestability in the Presence of Sunk (Entry) Cost.” Rand Journal of Economics Spring: 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coursey, D., Isaac, R. M., and Smith, V.. 1984b. “Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results.” Journal of Law and Economics April:91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. 2000. “Implications of Game Triads for Observations of Trust and Reciprocity.” Working paper, University of Arizona, Department of Economics.
Cox, J.. 2002. “Trust, Reciprocity and Other-Regarding Preferences: Groups vs. Individuals and Males vs. Females.” In Zwick, R. and Rapoport, A., eds., Advances in Experimental Business Research. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 33–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J.. 2004. “How to Identify Trust and Reciprocity.” Games and Economic Behavior 46:260–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., and Deck, C.. 2005. “On the Nature of Reciprocal Motives.” Economic Inquiry 43:623–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., and Grether, D.. 1996. “The Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Response Mode, Markets and Incentives.” Economic Theory 7:381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., Isaac, R. M., and Smith, V.. 1983. “OCS Leasing and Auctions: Incentives and the Performance of Alternative Bidding Institutions.” Supreme Court Economic Review 2:43–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., B. Roberson, and V. Smith. 1982. “Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions.” In Smith, V., ed., Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 2. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Cox, J., and V. Smith. 1992. “Endogenous Entry and Exit in Common Value Auction.” Mimeograph, Economic Science Laboratory, University of Arizona.
Cox, J., Smith, V., and Walker, J.. 1988. “Theory and Individual Behavior of First Price Auctions.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1:61–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., and Steinberg, R., eds. 2006. Combinatorial Auctions. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crockett, S., V. Smith, and B. Wilson. 2006. “Specialization and Exchange as a Discovery Process.” Working paper, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science. George Mason University. Available online at http://gunston.gmu.edu/bwilson3/papers/CrockettSmithWilson.pdf.
Dalton, G. 1979. “Aboriginal Economies in Stateless Societies.” In Earle, T. and Ericson, J., eds., Exchange Systems in Prehistory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859; 1979. The Origin of Species. Darby: Arden Library.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.. 1872; 1998. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D., and Holt, C.. 1993. Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, D., and Williams, A. W.. 1991. “The Hayek Hypothesis in Experimental Auctions: Institutional Effects and Market Power.” Economic Inquiry 29:261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. 1988. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. New York: Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Deck, C., McCabe, K., and Porter, D.. 2006. “Why Stable Fiat Money Hyperinflates: Evidence from an Experimental Economy.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61:471–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, C., and Wilson, B.. 2004. “Economics at the Pump.” Regulation 1:22–9.Google Scholar
Deck, C., and Wilson, B.. 2006. “Tracking Customer Search to Price Discriminate.” Economic Inquiry 44:280–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, C., and Wilson, B.. 2007. “Experimental Gasoline Markets.” FTC Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 253. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. 1997. The Number Sense. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demmert, H., and Klein, D. B.. 2003. “Experiment on Entrepreneurial Discovery: An Attempt to Demonstrate the Conjecture of Hayek and Kirzner.” Journal of Economics and Behavioral Organization 50(3):295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentin, M., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V. L.. 2001. “Spot Market Mechanism Design and Competitivity Issues in Electric Power.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44:435–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. B. M. 1989. “Food Sharing and Reciprocal Obligations among Chimpanzees.” Journal of Human Evolution 18(5):433–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. B. M.. 1997. “Food-Transfers through Mesh in Brown Capuchins.” Journal of Comparative Psychology 111:370–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waal, F. B. M.. 2005. “How Animals Do Business.” Scientific American, April: 73–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Donahue, G. 2002. “The US Air Transportation System: A Bold Vision for Change.” Paper prepared for the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Airspace Industry, September 19.
Dufwenberg, M., Lindqvist, T., and Moore, E.. 2002. “Bubbles and Experience: An Experiment.” American Economic Review 95:1731–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, Y., McCabe, K., Olson, M., and Rassenti, S.. 2004. “Oligopoly Competition in Fixed Cost Environments.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 22(2):147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, P. K., and Radner, R.. 1999. “Profit Maximization and the Market Selection Hypothesis.” Review of Economic Studies 66:769–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, D., and Kagel, J. H.. 1996. “Bidding in Common Value Auctions: How the Commercial Construction Industry Corrects for the Winners' Curse.” Management Science 42:1463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C., and Grossman, P.. 1996. “Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 16:181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. C., and Wilson, R. K.. 2004. “Is Trust a Risky Decision?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55(4):447–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Science Laboratory Research Group. 1985. “Alternatives to Rate of Return Regulation.” Final Report for the Arizona Corporation Commission, February 15.
Einstein, A. 1905; 1989. “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” In A. Beck, tr., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A.. 1907; 1989. “On the Relativity Principle and the Conclusions Drawn from It.” In A. Beck, tr., The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2, pp. 252–311. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A.. 1934. The World as I See It. New York: Covici, Friede.Google Scholar
El-Gamal, M., and Grether, D.. 1995. “Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral Strategies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:1137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. 1991. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Engelmann, D., and Strobel, M.. 2004. “Inequality Aversion, Efficiency and Maximum Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments.” American Economic Review 94:857–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erev, I., and Roth, A.. 1998. “Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed-Strategy Equilibria.” American Economic Review 88:848–81.Google Scholar
Falk, A., E. Fehr, and U. Fischbacher. 1999. “On the Nature of Fair Behavior.” Working Paper No. 17, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, 1424–0459, University of Zurich.
Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U.. 2002. “Why Social Preferences Matter: The Impact of Nonselfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation, and Incentives.” Economic Journal 112:C1–C33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and S. Gachter. 2000. “Do Incentive Contracts Crowd Out Voluntary Cooperation?” Working paper, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., and Riedl, A.. 1993. “Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(2):437–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Rockenbach, B.. 2002. “Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism.” Nature 422:137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. M.. 1999. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3):817–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. 1991. The Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
P, Fletcher, Happe, F., Frith, U., Baker, S., Dolan, R., Frakowiak, R., and Frith, C.. 1995. “Other Minds in the Brain: A Functional Imaging Study of ‘Theory of Mind’ in Story Comprehension.” Cognition 57:109–28.Google Scholar
Fölsing, A. 1997. Albert Einstein. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., and Sefton, M.. 1994. “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments.” Games and Economic Behavior 6:347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. R., and Wright, J.. 1992. “Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market.” American Economic Review 82:1142–61.Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Rietz, T. A., and Ross, T. W.. 1999. “Wishes, Expectations, and Actions: Price Formation in Election Stock Markets.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39:83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D., and Wilson, M.. 2006. “Reverse Replay of Behavioral Sequences in Hippocampal Place Cells during the Awake State.” Nature, 440:680–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fouraker, L., and Siegel, S.. 1963. Bargaining Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Franciosi, R., Kujal, P., Michelitsch, R., Smith, V. L., and Deng, G.. 1995. “Fairness: Effect on Temporary and Equilibrium Prices in Posted Offer Markets.” Economic Journal 105:938–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Freuchen, P. 1960. Book of the Eskimos. Cleveland: World Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. 1984. “On the Efficiency of Double Auction Markets.” American Economic Review 74:60–72.Google Scholar
Friedman, D.. 1993. “The Double Auction Market Institution: A Survey.” In Friedman, J. and Rust, J., eds., The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence: Proceedings of the Workshop on Double Auction Markets Held June 1991 in Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe: Perseus, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M.. 1960. A Program for Monetary Stability. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., and Savage, L. J.. 1948. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Journal of Political Economy 56:279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuster, J. 1999. Memory in the Cerebral Cortex. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Garvin, S., and Kagel, J.. 1994. “Learning in Common Value Auctions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25:351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. 1998. The Mind's Past. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., and Mangun, G.. 1998. Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gibran, K. 1918; 2002. The Madman. Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar
Gibran, K.. 1928. Jesus the Son of Man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. 1991. “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond Heuristics and Biases.” In Stroebe, W. and Hewstone, M., eds., European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 2. New York: Wiley, pp. 83–115.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G.. 1993. “The Bounded Rationality of Probabilistic Models.” In Manktelow, K. and Over, D., eds., Rationality. London: Routledge, pp. 284–313.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G.. 1996. “On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky.” Psychological Review 103:592–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., and Selten, R., eds. 2002. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and the ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giocoli, N. 2003. “Fixing the Point: The Contribution of Early Game Theory to the Tool-Box of Modern Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gode, D., and Sundar, S.. 1993. “Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality.” Journal of Political Economy, 101:119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gode, D.. 1997. “What Makes Markets Allocationally Efficient?Quarterly Journal of Economics 57: 603–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, V., Grafman, J., Tajik, J., Gana, S., and Danto, D.. 1997. “A Study of the Performance of Patients with Frontal Lobe Lesions in a Financial Planning Task.” Brain 120(10):1805–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeree, J., and Holt, C.. 2001. “Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions.” American Economic Review 91:1402–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, I., Harel, M., and Malach, R.. 2006. “When the Brain Loses Its Self: Prefrontal Inactivation during Sensorimotor Processing.” Neuron 50:329–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberger, A. 1979. “Heritability.” Economica 46(184):327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, R., J. K. Goeree, and C. A. Holt. 2008. “Predatory Pricing: Rare Like a Unicorn?” In Plott, C. A. and Smith, V. L., eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.” American Sociological Review 25:161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T. 1996. Thinking in Pictures. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Grandin, T., and Johnson, C.. 2005. Animals in Translation. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Grether, D., and Plott, C.. 1984. “The Effects of Market Practices in Oligopolistic Markets: The Ethyl Case.” Economic Inquiry 22(4):479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnthorsdottir, A., Houser, D., McCabe, K., and Ameden, H.. 2002a. Disposition, History, and Contributions in a Public Good Experiment. Working Paper, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 2002b. “Using the Machiavellianism Instrument to Predict Trustworthiness in a Bargaining Game. Journal of Economic Psychology 23:49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, W., Huck, S., and Ockenfels, P.. 1996. “Two-Level Ultimatum Bargaining with Incomplete Information: An Experimental Study.” Economic Journal 106(436):593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., and Schwarze, B.. 1982. “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3:367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwartney, J., and Lawson, R.. 2003. “The Concept and Measurement of Economic Freedom.” European Journal of Political Economy 19(3):405–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamowy, H. 2003. “F. A. Hayek and the Common Law.” Cato Journal 23(2):241–64.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. 1988. “Predatory Pricing in a Multiple Market Experiment: A Note.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9:405–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G.. 1989. “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions.” American Economic Review 79(4):749–62.Google Scholar
Harrison, G., Johnson, E., McInnes, M., and Rutström, E.. 2005. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: Comment.” American Economic Review 95(3):897–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G., and List, J.. 2004. “Field Experiments.” Journal of Economic Literature 52: 1005–55.Google Scholar
Harrison, G., and McKee, M.. 1985a. “Experimental Evaluation of the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Law and Economics 28:653–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G., and McKee, M.. 1985b. “Monopoly Behavior, Decentralized Regulation, and Contestable Markets: An Experimental Evaluation.” Rand Journal of Economics 16(1):51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, K. 1990. “Showing Off: Tests of an Hypothesis about Men's Foraging Goals.” Ethnology and Evolutionary Biology 12:29–54.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4:33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1942; 1979. “Scientism and the Study of Society.” Economica 9(35):267–91. Reprinted in The Counter-Revolution of Science, pp. 19–40. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35(4):519–30.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order (Essays). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1952. The Sensory Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1956. “The Dilemma of Specialization.” In White, L., ed., State of the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1967. Studies in Philosophy Politics and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1973. “Law, Legislation, and Liberty.” In Rules and Order, vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1974. “Banquet Speech.” December 10. Available online at http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1974/hayek_speech.html.
Hayek, F. A.. 1976; 1991. “Adam Smith (1723–1790): His Message in Today's Language.” In Bartley, W. and Kresge, S., eds., The Trend of Economic Thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 119–24.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1978; 1984. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In The Essence of Hayek. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, chapter 13.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. 1988. The Fatal Conceit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. 2000. “Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon.” American Economic Review 90(4):973–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J.. 2004. “Cultural Group Selection, Co-Evolutionary Processes and Large-Scale Cooperation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53:3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F., Patton, J., and Tracer, D.. 2005. “‘Economic Man’ in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertwig, R., and Ortmann, A.. 2001. “Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(3):383–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Hertwig, R., and A. Ortmann. 2003. “Economists' and Psychologists' Experimental Practices: How They Differ, Why They Differ, and How They Could Converge.” In Brocas, I. and Carrillo, J. D., eds., The Psychology of Economic Decisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–72.Google Scholar
Hill, E., and D. Sally. 2003. “Dilemmas and Bargains: Autism, Theory of Mind, Cooperation and Fairness.” Working paper, University College, London.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., and Smith, V.. 1994. “Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 7(3):346–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 1995. “Ultimatum and Dictator Games,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9:236–9.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 1996a. “On Expectations and the Monetary Stakes in Ultimatum Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 25(3):289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 1996b. “Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games.” American Economic Review 86(3):653–60.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 1998. “Behavioral Foundations of Reciprocity: Experimental Economics and Evolutionary Psychology.” Economic Inquiry 36(3):335–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 2000. “The Impact of Exchange Context on the Activation of Equity in Ultimatum Games.” Experimental Economics 3(1):5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, and V. Smith.. 2008. “Reciprocity in Ultimatum and Dictator Games.” In Plott, C. A. and Smith, V. L., eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. New York: Elsevier, chapter 4.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., and Spitzer, M. L.. 1985. “Entitlements, Right and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subject's Concepts of Distributive Justice.” Journal of Legal Studies 14(2):259–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S., and Martignon, L.. 2002. “Representation Facilitates Reasoning: What Natural Frequencies Are and What They Are Not.” Cognition 84(3):343–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogarth, R., and Reder, M.. 1987. Rational Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holt, C. 1989. “The Exercise of Market Power in Experiments.” Journal of Law and Economics 32(2):S107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C.. 1995. “Industrial Organization.” In Kagel, J. and Roth, A., eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, chapter 5.Google Scholar
Holt, C., Langan, L., and Villamil, A.. 1986. “Market Power in Oral Double Auction Experiments.” Economic Inquiry 24:107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C., and Laury, S.. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” American Economic Review 92(5):1644–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, D. 1999. “An Empirical Model of Strategic Choice with an Application to Coordination Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 27:86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1967. The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Houser, D. 2003. “Classification of Types of Dynamic Decision Makers.” In Nadel, L., ed., Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, vol. 1. London: Nature Publishing Group, pp. 1020–6.Google Scholar
Houser, D., Bechera, A., Keane, M., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 2005. “Identifying Individual Differences: An Algorithm with Application to Phileas Gage.” Games and Economic Behavior 52:373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, D., Gunnthorsdottir, A., and McCabe, K.. 2006. “Disposition, History and Contributions in a Public Goods Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.Google Scholar
Houser, D., Keane, M., and McCabe, K.. 2004. “Behavior in a Dynamic Decision Problem.” Econometrica 72:781–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, D., and Kurzban, R.. 2002. “Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Good Experiments.” American Economic Review 92:1062–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, D., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. L.. 2004. “Cultural Group Selection, Co-Evolutionary Processes and Large-Scale Cooperation: Discussion.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53(1):85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, D., Xiao, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V.. 2008. “When Punishment Fails: Research on Sanctions, Intentions and Non-Cooperation.” Games and Economic Behavior.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, S., Norman, H., and Oechssler, J.. 2004. “Two Are Few and Four Are Many: Number Effects in Experimental Oligopolies.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53:435–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, A., and A. Bonpland. 1815; 1907. Personal Narrative of Travels to the Equinoctial Regions of the New Continent, during the Years 1799–1804. Ross, T., ed. 3 volumes. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739; 1985. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L. 1960. “Optimality and Informational Efficiency in Resource Allocation Processes.” In Arrow, K., Karlin, S., and Suppes, P., eds., Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L.. 1973The Design of Mechanism for Resource Allocation.” American Economic Review 63(2):1–30.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L., Radner, R., and Reiter, S.. 1975. “A Stochastic Decentralized Resource Allocation Process: Part II.” Econometrica 43(3):363–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussam, R., D. Porter, and V. L. Smith. 2006. “Thar She Blows: Rekindling Bubbles with Inexperienced Subjects.” Working paper, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, George Mason University.
Insul, S. 1915. Central Station Power Systems. Chicago: Privately published.Google Scholar
Isaac, R., and James, D.. 2000a. “Just Who Are You Calling Risk Averse?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20:177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R., and James, D.. 2000b. “Robustness of the Incentive Compatible Combinatorial Auction.” Experimental Economics 3(1):31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R., Salmon, T., and Zillante, A.. 2007. “A Theory of Jump Bidding in Ascending Auctions.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 62(1):144–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R. M., and Smith, V. L.. 1985. “In Search of Predatory Pricing.” Journal of Political Economy 93:320–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikida, T., J. Ledyard, M. Olson, and D. Porter. 2001. “The Design of a Pollution Trading System for Southern California's RECLAIM Emission Trading Program.” In Isaac, R. M., ed., Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. O. 2005. “Non-Existence of Equilibrium in Vickrey, Second-Price, and English Auctions.” Division of Humanities and Social Sciences Working Paper 1241, California Institute of Technology.
Jamal, K., and Sundar, S.. 1991. “Money vs. Gaming: Effects of Salient Monetary Payments in Double Oral Auctions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49(1):151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1871; 1888. The Theory of Political Economy, 3rd edition. London: Macmillan. Available online at http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/YPDBooks/Jevons/jvnPE.html.Google Scholar
Jung, Y., Kagel, J., and Levin, D.. 1994. “On the Existence of Predatory Pricing: An Experimental Study of Reputation and Entry Deterrence in the Chain-Store Game.” Rand Journal of Economics 25:253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachelmeier, S. J., and Shehata, M.. 1992. “Examining Risk Preferences under High Monetary Incentives: Evidence from the People's Republic of China.” American Economic Review 82:1120–41.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. 1994. Galen's Prophecy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., and Lamb, S.. 1987. The Emergence of Morality in Young Children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kagel, J. H., and Levin, D.. 1986. “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions.” American Economic Review 76:894–920.Google Scholar
Kagel, J., and Roth, A.. 1995. Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2002. Nobel Interview. Available online at http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman-interview.html.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R.. 1986. “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market.” American Economic Review 76(4):728–41.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1991. “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics.” In Thaler, R., ed., Quasi Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47:263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1996. “On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions: A Reply to Gigerenzer.” Psychological Review 103:582–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalai, E., and Lehrer, E.. 1993. “Rational Learning Leads to Nash Equilibrium.” Econometrica 61(5):1019–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Call, J., and Fischer, J.. 2004. “Word Learning in a Domestic Dog: Evidence for ‘Fast Mapping.’” Science 304:16832–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H., and Hill, K.. 1985. “Food Sharing among Ache Foragers: Tests of Explanatory Hypotheses.” Current Anthropology 26:223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketcham, J., Smith, V. L., and Williams, A.. 1984. “A Comparison of Posted-Offer and Double-Auction Pricing Institutions.” Review of Economic Studies 51:595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P. 1998. “Auctions with Almost Common Values: The ‘Wallet Game’ and Its Applications.” European Economic Review 42:757–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P., and Meyer, M.. 1989. “Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty.” Econometrica 57:1243–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., and Fehr, E.. 2006. “Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex.” Science 314:829–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowlton, B., Mangels, J., and Squire, L.. 1996. “A Neostriatal Habit Learning System in Humans.” Science 273(5280):1399–1402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koehler, J. J. 1996. “The Base-Rate Fallacy Reconsidered: Descriptive, Normative, and Methodological Challenges.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(1):1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Y., Levy, H., and Rapoport, A.. 1988. “Experimental Tests of the Separation Theorem and the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” American Economic Review 78(3):500–19.Google Scholar
Krueger, J. I., and Funder, D. C.. 2004. “Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: Causes, Consequences, and Cures for the Problem-Seeking Approach to Social Behavior and Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:313–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krutch, J. 1954. The Voice of the Desert. New York: William Sloane Associates.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., and Houser, D.. 2005. “An Experimental Investigation of Cooperative Types in Human Groups: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:1803–7.CrossRef
Kwasnica, A. M., Ledyard, J., Porter, D., and DeMartini, C.. 2003. “A New and Improved Design for Multiobject Iterative Auctions.” Management Science 51(3):419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs, vol. 1, 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzarini, S., G. Miller, and T. Zenger. 2002. “Order with Some Law: Complementarity vs. Substitution of Formal and Informal Arrangements.” Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Trust and Reciprocity in Experimental Economics, October 11–12. Washington University, St. Louis.
Leamer, E. 1978. Specification Searches. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. 1986. “The Scope of the Hypothesis of Bayesian Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory 39:59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J., Olson, M., Porter, D., Swanson, J. A., and Torma, D. P.. 2002. “The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services.” Interfaces 32(5):4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J., Porter, D., and Rangle, A.. 1997. “Experiment Testing Multi Object Allocation Mechanism.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6:639–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, V., Noussair, C., and Plott, C.. 2001. “Nonspeculative Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets: Lack of Common Knowledge of Rationality vs. Actual Irrationality.” Econometrica 69:831–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S., and List, J.. 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us about the Real World?” University of Chicago prepublication paper, June 15. Journal of Economic Perspectives.Google Scholar
Libet, B. 2004. Mind Time. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
List, J. 2004. “Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace,” Econometrica 72(2):615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J., and Cherry, T.. 2002. “Learning to Accept in Ultimatum Games: Evidence from an Experimental Design that Generates Low Offers.” Experimental Economics 3:11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, S. 1992. “Lessons from a Hurricane: It Pays Not to Gouge.” New York Times, September 22, p. C2.Google Scholar
Lopes, L. 1991. “The Rhetoric of Irrationality.” Psychology and Theory 1:65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. 1986. “Adaptive Behavior and Economic Theory.” Journal of Business 56:S401–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., R. M. Miller, C. R. Plott, and R. Porter. 1986. “Product Quality, Consumer Information and ‘Lemons’ in Experimental Markets.” In Ippolito, P. and Scheffman, D., eds., Empirical Approaches to Consumer Protection Economics. Washington: FTC Bureau of Economics, pp. 251–306.Google Scholar
Lyyken, D. T. 1995. The Antisocial Personalities. Hillsdsale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Majumdar, M. K., and Radner, R.. 1991. “Linear Models of Economic Survival under Production Uncertainty.” Economic Theory 1:13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumdar, M. K., and R. Radner. 1992. “Survival under Production Uncertainty.” In Majumdar, M. K., ed., Equilibrium and Dynamics. London: Macmillan, pp. 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandaville, A. 2006. “Look and Learn.” Nature, 441:271–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandeville, B. 1705; 1924; 2005. “The Grumbling Hive: Or, Knaves Turned Honest.” In Kaye, F. B., ed., The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Public Benefits, vol. 1. London: Oxford University Press, Amen House, pp. 17–37. Available online at http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/Set.php?recordID=0014.Google Scholar
Maquet, P. 2001. “The Role of Sleep in Learning and Memory.” Science 294(5544):1048–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, H. 1952. “The Utility of Wealth.” Journal of Political Economy 60:151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzarello, P. 2000. “What Dreams May Come?Nature 408:523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAfee, R. P., and McMillan, J.. 1996. “Analyzing the Airways Auction.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10:159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., J. Henrich, W. Albers, R. Boyd, G. Gigerenzer, A. Ockenfels, P. E. Tetlock, and H. P. Young. 2001a. “Group Report: What Is the Role of Culture in Bounded Rationality?” In Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R., eds., Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 343–59.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., and Trouard, T.. 2001b. “A Functional Imaging Study of Cooperation in Two-Person Reciprocal Exchange.” Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences 98:11832–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. J., and Smith, V. L.. 1989. “Designing ‘Smart’ Computer Assisted Markets.” European Journal of Political Economy 5(2–3):259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. J., and Smith, V. L.. 1990. “Auction Institutional Design: Theory and Behavior of Simultaneous Multiple-Unit Generalizations of the Dutch and English Auctions.” American Economic Review 80(5):1276–83.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. J., and Smith, V. L.. 1991a. “Smart Computer-Assisted Markets.” Science 254:534–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., S. J. Rassenti, and V. L. Smith. 1991b. “Testing Vickrey's and Other Simultaneous Multiple Unit Versions of the English Auction.” In Isaac, R. M., ed., Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 4. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 45–79.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., S. J. Rassenti, and V. L. Smith. 1993. “Designing a Uniform-Price Double Auction: An Experimental Evaluation.” In Friedman, J. and Rust, J., eds., The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence: Proceedings of the Workshop on Double Auction Markets Held June 1991 in Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe: Perseus, pp. 307–32.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. J., and Smith, V. L.. 1996. “Game Theory and Reciprocity in Some Extensive Form Experimental Games.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93:13421–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. J., and Smith, V. L.. 1998. “Reciprocity, Trust and Payoff Privacy in Extensive Form Bargaining.” Games and Economic Behavior 24(1–2):10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., M. Rigdon, and V. L. Smith. 2002. “Cooperation in Single Play, Two-Person Extensive Form Games between Anonymously Matched Players.” In Zwick, R. and Rapoport, A., eds., Experimental Business Research. Boston: Kluwer, chapter 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., and Smith, V. L.. 2003. “Positive Reciprocity and Intentions in Trust Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52(2):267–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., and Smith, V. L.. 2007. “Sustaining Cooperation in Trust Games,” Revised working paper, Economic Journal.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., and Smith, V. L.. 2000. “A Comparison of Naïve and Sophisticated Subject Behavior with Game Theoretic Predictions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97:3777–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, K., and V. L. Smith. 2001. “Goodwill Accounting and the Process of Exchange.” In Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R., eds., Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 319–40.Google Scholar
McCabe, K., Smith, V., and LePore, M.. 2000. “Intentionality Detection and ‘Mindreading’: Why Does Game Form Matter?Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences 97:4404–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mealy, L. 1995. “The Sociobiology of Sociopathy.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18:523–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meardon, S., and Ortmann, A.. 1996. “Self-Command in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments: A Game-Theoretic Re-Interpretation.” Rationality and Society 8:57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J., and Bever, T. G.. 1967. “Cognitive Capacity of Very Young Children.” Science New Series 158 (3797):141–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., and Ritor, I.. 1999. “Emotion-Based Choice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128:1–14.Google Scholar
Metzger, B., and Murphy, R., eds. 1994. The New Oxford Annotated Bible. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. 2000. “Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction.” Journal of Political Economy 108(2):245–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P.. 2004. Putting Auction Theory to Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. R., and Weber, R. J.. 1982. “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica 50:1089–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848; 1900. Principles of Political Economy, vols. 1–2. London: Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. 2002. “Don't Let Your Robots Grow Up to Be Traders.” Working paper, Miller Risk Advisors.
Miller, R., and Plott, C.. 1985. “Product Quality Signaling in Experimental Markets.” Econometrica 53:837–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R., Plott, C., and Smith, V.. 1977. “Intertemporal Competitive Equilibrium: An Empirical Study of Speculation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 91:599–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, L. 2003. “Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25:63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, E. 2006. “Rewinding the Memory Record.” Nature, 440:615–17.Google Scholar
Mullainathan, S., and R. Thaler. 2001. “Behavioral Economics.” In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B., eds., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nash., J. F. 1996. Essays in Game Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., and Nelson, R.. 2002. “On the Nature and Evolution of Human Know-How.” Research Policy 31:719–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, L. 2004. “While You Were Sleeping.” Nature 430 (7003):962–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Netting, R. 1976. “What Alpine Peasants Have in Common: Observations on Communal Tenure in a Swiss Village.” Human Ecology 4:135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, J. 2002. “Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(1):73–96.Google ScholarPubMed
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C.. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrup, F. S. C. 1969. “Einstein's Conception of Science.” In Schilpp, P. A., ed., Albert Einstein Philosopher – Scientist. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, J., and Nadel, L.. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. London: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Olson, M., Rassenti, S., Smith, V., and Rigdon, M.. 2003. “Market Design and Motivated Human Trading Behavior in Electricity Markets.” Institute of Industrial Engineering Transactions 35(9):833–49.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. 2005. “Field Experiments: Some Methodological Caveats.” In Carpenter, J., Harrison, G. W., and List, J. A., eds., Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 10: Field Experiments in Economics. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A., Fitzgerald, J., and Boening, C.. 2000. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Experimental Economics 3(1):81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, A., and Rydval, O.. 2004. “How Financial Incentives and Cognitive Abilities Affect Task Performance in Laboratory Settings: An Illustration.” Economic Letters 85:315–20.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1982. Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E.. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., and Walker, J.. 1994. Rules, Games and Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxoby, R., and Spraggon, J.. 2007. “Mine and Yours: Property Rights in Dictator Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. 1999. The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pillutla, M., Malhotra, D., and Murnighan, J. K.. 2003. “Attributions of Trust and the Calculus of Reciprocity.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39(5):448–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.. 2002. The Blank Slate. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Pirsig, R. M. 1981. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Pitchik, C., and A. Schotter. 1984. “Regulating Markets and Asymmetric Information: An Experimental Study.” Working Paper No. 84–12. C. V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
Plott, C. 1988. “Research on Pricing in a Gas Transportation Network.” Technical Report No. 88–2. Washington: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Economic Policy.
Plott, C.. 2001. “Equilibrium, Equilibration, Information and Multiple Markets: From Basic Science to Institutional Design.” Paper presented to the Nobel Symposium, Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Stockholm, December 4–6.
Plott, C. R., and G. Agha. 1983. “Intertemporal Speculation with a Random Demand in an Experimental Market.” In Tietz, R., ed., Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Plott, C., Sugiyama, A. B., and Elbaz, G.. 1994. “Economies of Scale, Natural Monopoly, and Imperfect Competition in an Experimental Market.” Southern Economic Journal 61(2):261–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C., and Sundar, S.. 1982. “Efficiency of Experimental Security Markets with Insider Information: An Application of Rational-Expectations Models.” Journal of Political Economy 90:663–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C., and Sundar, S.. 1988. “Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Securities Markets.” Econometrica 56:1085–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C., and T. Turocy III. 1996. “Intertemporal Speculation under Uncertain Future Demand.” In Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., and Damme, E., eds., Understanding Strategic Interaction: Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 475–93.Google Scholar
Plott, C., and Uhl, J.. 1981. “Competitive Equilibrium with Middlemen.” Southern Economic Journal 47:1063–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C., and L. Wilde. 1982. “Professional Diagnosis vs. Self-Diagnosis: An Experimental Examination of Some Special Features of Markets with Uncertainty.” In Smith, V. L., ed., Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 2. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 63–112.Google Scholar
Plott, C., and Zeiler, K.. 2005. “The Willingness to Pay/Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations.” American Economic Review 95(3):530–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1913. Foundations of Science. New York: Science Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M.. 1969. Knowing and Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Porter, D. 1999. “The Effect of Bid Withdrawal in a Multi-Object Auction.” Review of Economic Design 4(1):73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D., Rassenti, S., Roopnarine, A., and Smith, V.. 2003. “Combinatorial Auction Design.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(19):11153–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, D., S. Rassenti, V. Smith, A. Winn, and W. Shobe. 2005. “The Design, Testing and Implementation of Virginia's NOx Allowance Auction.” Working Paper, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, George Mason University.
Porter, D., and Smith, V. L.. 1994. “Stock Market Bubbles in the Laboratory.” Applied Mathematical Finance 1:111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, M. 1993. “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics.” American Economics Review 83(5):1281–302.Google Scholar
Radner, R. 1997. “Economic Survival.” In Jacobs, D. P., Kalai, E., and Kamien, M. I., eds., Frontiers of Research in Economic Theory: The Nancy L. Schwartz Memorial Lectures, 1983 –1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radner, R., and Schotter, A.. 1989. “The Sealed-Bid Mechanism: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Economic Theory 48:179–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1997. “Order of Play in Strategically Equivalent Games in Extensive Form.” International Journal of Game Theory 26:113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A., and Sundali, J. A.. 1996. “Ultimatums in Two Persons Bargaining with One-Sided Uncertainty: Offer Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 25(4):475–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rassenti, S. 1981. “O-1 Decision Problems with Multiple Resource Constraints: Algorithms and Applications.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arizona.
Rassenti, S., and Smith, V.. 1986. “Electric Utility Deregulation.” In Pricing Electric Gas and Telecommunication Services. Institute for the Study of Regulation, Proceedings of a Conference, December.Google Scholar
Rassenti, S., Smith, V. L., and Bulfin, R.. 1982. “A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation.” Bell Journal of Economics 13:402–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rassenti, S., V. L. Smith, and B. Wilson. 2002a. “Controlling Market Power and Price Spikes in Electricity Networks: Demand Side Bidding.” Working paper, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, George Mason University.
Rassenti, S., Smith, V. L., and Wilson, B.. 2002b. “Using Experiments to Inform the Privatization/Deregulation Movement in Electricity.” Cato Journal 21:515–44.Google Scholar
Rassenti, S., Smith, V. L., and Wilson, B.. 2003. “Controlling Market Power and Price Spikes in Electricity Networks: Demand-Side Bidding.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(5):2998–3003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rassenti, S., and Wilson, B.. 2004. “How Applicable Is the Dominant Firm Model of Price Leadership?Experimental Economics 7(3):271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiley, D.. 2000. “Auctions on the Internet: What's Being Auctioned, and How?Journal of Industrial Economics 48(3):227–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, S. 1959; 1981. “A Dynamic Process of Exchange.” In Horwich, G. and Quirk, J., eds., Essays in Contemporary Fields of Economics, pp. 3–23. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. Revised from “A Market Adjustment Mechanism.” Institute Paper No. 1, School of Industrial Management, Purdue University, 1959.Google Scholar
Renshaw, E. 1988. “The Crash of October 19 in Retrospect.” Market Chronicle 22:1.Google Scholar
Rigdon, M. 2002. “Efficiency Wages in an Experimental Labor Market.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(20):13348–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzello, S. 1999. The Economics of the Mind. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1979. “What Are the Questions?Journal of Economic Literature 15:1318–39.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. 1981. “Games of Perfect Information, Predatory Pricing, and the Chain Store Paradox.” Journal of Economic Theory 25:92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A., and Sotomayer, M.. 1990. Two-Sided Matching: A Study of Game Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, M. H., Pekec, A., and Harstad, R. M.. 1998. “Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions.” Management Science 44(8):1131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., and Nordhaus, W.. 1985. Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarPubMed
Satterthwaite, M. 1987. “Strategy-Proof Allocation Mechanisms.” In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P., eds., The New Palgrave, vol. 4, pp. 518–20. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, P. M. 2003. “On Perceptions of Fairness: The Role of Valuations, Outside Options, and Information in Ultimatum Bargaining Games.” Experimental Economics 7:49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A. and Sopher, B.. 2006. “Trust and Trustworthiness in Games: An Experimental Study of Intergenerational Advice.” Experimental Economics, 9:123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A., Wiegelt, K., and Wilson, C.. 1994. “A Laboratory Investigation of Multiperson Rationality and Presentation Effects.” Games and Economic Behavior 6:445–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W. 2000. “Multiple Reward Signals in the Brain.” Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 1:199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W.. 2002. “Getting Formal with Dopamine and Reward.” Neuron 36:241–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, T., and J. S. Ang. 1989. “Speculative Bubbles in the Asset Market: An Experimental Study.” Paper presented at the American Finance Association meeting, Atlanta, December.
Scully, G. W. 1988. “The Institutional Framework and Economic Development.” Journal of Political Economy 96(3):652–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, N. 1999. Entwined Lives. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Segrè, E. 1984. From Falling Bodies to Radio Waves. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Selten, R. 1973. “A Simple Model of Imperfect Competition, Where Four Are Few and Six Are Many.” International Journal of Game Theory 2(2):141–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R.. 1975. “Re-Examination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 4(1):25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, Avner. 2005. “The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion.” Available online at http://www.wiwi.uni-bonn.de/shaked/rhetoric/.
Shepard, G. B. 1995. Rejected. Sun Lakes: Thomas Horton and Daughters.Google Scholar
Shubik, M. 1959. Strategy and Market Structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1959. “Theoretical Models of Choice and Strategy Behavior.” Psychometrika 24:303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S.. 1961. “Decision Making and Learning under Varying Conditions of Reinforcement.” Annals of the New York Academy of Science 89(5):766–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S., and Fouraker, L.. 1960. Bargaining and Group Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., and Harnett, D. L.. 1964. “Bargaining Behavior: A Comparison between Mature Industrial Personnel and College Students.” Operations Research March: 334–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69:99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A.. 1956. “A Comparison of Game Theory and Learning Theory.” Psychometrika 3:267–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A.. 1981; 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, S. 2000. “Will the Net Turn Car Dealers into Dinosaurs?Cato Institute Briefing Papers 58.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1759; 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Raaphaet, D. and Mactie, A.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A.. 1776; 1981. An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol 1. Edited by Campbell, R. and Skinner, A.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, H. 2001. Why Religion Matters. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., and Pardo, J.. 2002. “Neuronal Substrates for Choice under Ambiguity, Risk, Gains, and Losses.” Management Science 48:711–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L. 1962. “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 70:111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1967. “Experimental Studies of Discrimination versus Competition in Sealed-Bid Auction Markets.” Journal of Business 70:56–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory.” American Economic Review Proceedings 66:274–9.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1980. “Relevance of Laboratory Experiments to Testing Resource Allocation Theory.” In Kmenta, J. and Ramsey, J. B., eds., Evaluation of Econometric Models. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 345–77.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1982a. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” American Economic Review 72:923–55.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1982b. “Markets as Economizers of Information: Experimental Examination of the ‘Hayek Hypothesis’.” Economic Inquiry 20:165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1986. “Experimental Methods in the Political Economy of Exchange.” Science 234:167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1991. Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1992. “Game Theory and Economics: Beginnings and Early Influences.” In Weintraub, E., ed., Toward a History of Game Theory. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 241–82.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1997. “Experimental Economics: Behavioral Lessons for Microeconomic Theory and Policy.” In Jacobs, D. P., Kalai, E., and Kamien, M. I., eds., Frontiers of Research in Economic Theory: The Nancy L. Schwartz Memorial Lectures, 1983–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–22.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 1998. “The Two Faces of Adam Smith.” Southern Economic Journal 65:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 2000. Bargaining and Market Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 2002. “Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and Reality.” Experimental Economics 5:91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” Les Prix Nobel. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation. Reprinted in American Economic Review 93:465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 2005a. From Starlight to Stockholm, A Memoir. Manuscript in typescript.
Smith, V. L.. 2005b. “Sociality and Self Interest.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:833–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.. 2007. Discovery: Starlight to Stockholm (title tentative). Forthcoming.
Smith, V. L., K. McCabe, and S. Rassenti. 1991. “Lakatos and Experimental Economics.” In Marchi, N. and Blaug, M., eds., Appraising Economic Theories. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L., Suchanek, G., and Williams, A.. 1988. “Bubbles, Crashes and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets.” Econometrica 56:1119–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L. and F. Szidarovszky. 2004. “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Strategic Interactions.” In Augier, M. and March, J., eds., Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L., and Walker, J.. 1993a. “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics.” Economic Inquiry April:245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L, and Walker, J.. 1993b. “Rewards, Experience and Decision Costs in First Price Auctions.” Economic Inquiry April:237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L., and A. Williams. 1982. “An Experimental Comparison of Alternative Rules for Competitive Market Exchange.” In Shubik, M., ed., Auctioning and Bidding. New York: New York University Press, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L., Williams, A., Bratton, K., and Vannoni, M.. 1982. “Competitive Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs. Sealed Bid-Offer Auctions.” American Economic Review 72:58–77.Google Scholar
Smuts, B. 1999. “Multilevel Selection, Cooperation and Altruism: Reflections on Unto Others.” Human Nature 10:156–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobel, J. 2005. “Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity.” Journal of Economic Literature 42:392–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soberg, M. 2005. “The Duhem-Quine Thesis and Experimental Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12:581–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sopher, B., and Gigliotti, G.. 1993. “Intransitive Cycles: Rational Choice or Random Error.” Theory and Decision 35:311–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M. 2002. “Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets.” American Economic Review 92(3):434–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, D. 1993. “Evolution of Smart Players.” Games and Economic Behavior 5:604–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. 1957. “Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated.” Journal of Political Economy 65:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G.. 1967. “Imperfections in the Capital Market.” Journal of Political Economy June: 287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. “Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics.” Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8, 2001. In Frängsmyr, T., ed., The Nobel Prizes 2001. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation. Reprinted in American Economic Review 92(3): 460–501.Google Scholar
Strathern, P. 1996. Wittgenstein. Chicago: Ivan Dee.Google Scholar
Straub, P., and Murnigan, K.. 1995. “An Experimental Investigation of Ultimatum Games: Information, Fairness, Expectations, and Lowest Acceptable Offers.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27:345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundar, S. 2004. “Market as Artifact: Aggregate Efficiency from Zero Intelligence Traders.” In Augier, M. and March, J., eds., Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1969. “Models of Data.” In Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suroweicki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1:39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R., and Ziemba, W. T.. 1988. “Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2(2):161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thut, G., Schultz, W., Roelcke, U., et al. 1997. “Activation of the Human Brain by Monetary Reward.” NeuroReport 8:1225–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, L., and Schultz, W.. 1999. “Relative Reward Preference in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex.” Nature 389:704–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treynor, J. 1987. “Market Efficiency and the Bean Jar Experiment.” Financial Analysts Journal 43:50–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. 2004. “Mutual Benefits at All Levels of Life.” Science 304:964–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, G. 1985. “Adam Smith and the ‘Prisoners’ Dilemma.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100 Supplement:1073–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1983. “Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.” Psychological Bulletin 90(4):293–315.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1987. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” In Hogarth, R. M. and Reder, M. W., eds., Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Umbeck, J. 1977. “The California Gold Rush: A Study of Emerging Property Rights.” Explorations in Economic History 14:197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boening, M., and Wilcox, N.. 1996. “Avoidable Cost: Ride a Double Auction Roller Coaster.” American Economic Review 86(3):461–77.Google Scholar
Vickery, W. 1961. “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” Journal of Finance 16:8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, W.. 1976. “Auction Markets and Optimal Allocation.” In Amihud, Y., ed., Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1991. “Adam Smith.” In Irvin, D., ed., Essays on the Intellectual History of Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 248–61.Google Scholar
Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W.. 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., and Born, J.. 2004. “Sleep Inspires Insight.” Nature 427:352–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, R. A., and Camerer, C. F.. 2006. “Behavioral Experiments in Economics.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9:187–92.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. 1979. “Intertemporal Competitive Equilibrium: On Further Experimental Results.” In Smith, V. L., ed., Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 1. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 225–78.Google Scholar
Williams, A.. 1980. “Computerized Double-Auction Markets: Some Initial Experimental Results.” Journal of Business 53:235–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., and V. L. Smith. 1986. “Simultaneous Trading in Two Competitive Markets.” Manuscript, Indiana University, Department of Economics.
Williams, A., Smith, V. L., Ledyard, J. O., and Gjerstad, S.. 2000. “Concurrent Trading in Two Experimental Markets with Demand Interdependence.” Journal of Economic Theory 16:511–28.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 1977. “Predatory Pricing: A Strategic and Welfare Analysis.” Yale Law Journal December: 284–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. 2005. “Language Games of Reciprocity.” Working Paper, Interdisciplinary Center of Economic Science, George Mason University.
Wilson, R. B. 1987. “On Equilibria of Bid-Ask Markets.” In Feiwel, G., ed., Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. New York: NYU Press, pp. 375–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. B.. 1992. “Strategic Analysis of Auctions.” In Aumann, R. and Hart, S., eds., Handbook of Game Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 227–79.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B.. 1993. “Design of Efficient Trading Procedures.” In Friedman, J. and Rust, J., eds., The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence: Proceedings of the Workshop on Double Auction Markets Held June 1991 in Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe: Perseus, pp. 125–52.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B.. 2002. “Architecture of Power Markets.” Econometrica 70:1299–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1963. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.. 1967. Zettel. Edited by Anscombe, G. and Wright, G.. Translated by G. Anscombe. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Zajac, E. E. 1995. Political Economy of Fairness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zajac, E. E.. 2002. “What Fairness-and-Denial Research Could Have Told the Florida Supreme Court (and Can Tell the Rest of Us).” Independent Review 6(3):377–97.Google Scholar
Zeaman, D. 1949. Response Latency as a Function of the Amount of Reinforcement. Dissertation Thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Vernon L. Smith, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Rationality in Economics
  • Online publication: 18 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754364.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Vernon L. Smith, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Rationality in Economics
  • Online publication: 18 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754364.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Vernon L. Smith, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Rationality in Economics
  • Online publication: 18 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754364.022
Available formats
×