Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:57:49.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Joint Arthroplasty

from Section II - Orthopedic Apparatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

By
Tim B. Hunter
Edited by
Tim B. Hunter ,
Mihra S. Taljanovic  and
Jason R. Wild
Tim B. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Mihra S. Taljanovic
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Jason R. Wild
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Radiologic Guide to Orthopedic Devices , pp. 59 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography and Useful Links

AAOS. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: what, why, and how. PDF (2016) available at: www.aaos.org/AAOSNow/2014/Feb/clinical/clinical6/?ssopc=1Google Scholar
Adams, S B, Demetracopoulos, C A, Queen, R M, et al. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(23): 1983–1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adelani, M A, Keeney, J A, Palisch, A, Fowler, S A, Clohisy, J C. Has total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger improved? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(8): 2595–2601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adkinson, J M, Chung, K C. Advances in small joint arthroplasty of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134(6): 1260–1268.Google Scholar
Anthony, P P, Gie, G A, Howie, C R, Ling, R S. Localized endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 971–979.Google Scholar
Ardaugh, B M, Graves, S E, Redberg, R F. The 501(k) ancestry of a metal-on-metal hip implant. N Engl J Med 2013; 363(2): 97–100.Google Scholar
Argenson, J N, Boisgard, S, Paratte, S, et al. Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Tramatol Res 2013; 99(4): 385–390.Google Scholar
Asencio, J G, Leonardi, C, Biron-Andreani, C, Schved, J F. Short-term and mid-term outcome of total ankle replacement in haemophilic patients. Foot Ankle Surg 2014; 20(4): 285–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awan, O, Chen, L, Resnick, C S. Imaging evaluation of complications of hip arthroplasty: review of current concepts and imaging findings. Can Assoc Radiol J 2013; 64(4): 306–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillie, A G, Lewis, P L, Brumby, S A, et al. The Unispacer knee implant: early clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(4): 446–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, J G, Wall, L B, Stern, P J. Long-term results of Swanson silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39(3): 455–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrack, R L. Modularity of prosthetic implants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994; 2: 16–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, J B, Lund, P J. Orthopedic devices. In: Hunter, T B, Bragg, D G, eds. Radiologic Guide to Medical Devices and Foreign Bodies. St Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1994; 348–385.Google Scholar
Berasi, C C, Berend, K R, Adams, J B, Ru, E L, Lombardi, A V. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(2): 528–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berend, K R, Turnbull, N J, Howell, R E, Lombardi, A V The current trends for lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2015; 46(2): 177–184.Google Scholar
Berger, R A, Beckenbaugh, R D, Linscheid, R L. Arthroplasty in the hand and wrist. In: Green, D P, Hotchkins, R N, Pederson, W C. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 4th ed., Vol 1. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1999; 147–191.Google Scholar
Berquist, T H. Imaging Atlas of Orthopedic Appliances and Prostheses. New York, NY: Raven, 1995.Google Scholar
Berth, A, Pap, G. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteorarthritis. J Orthop Tramatol 2013; 14(1): 31–37.Google Scholar
Bestic, J M, Berquist, T H. Current concepts in hip arthroplasty imaging: metal-on-metal prostheses, their complications, and imaging strategies. Semin Roentgenol 2013; 48(2): 178–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bini, S A, Khatod, M, Inacio, M C, Paxton, E W. Same-day versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty poses no increase in complications in 6672 primary procedures. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(4): 694–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boileau, P, Avidor, C, Krishnan, S G, et al. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double- blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11: 351–359.Google Scholar
Boileau, P, Sinnerton, R J, Chuinard, C, Walch, G. Athroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(5): 562–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradberry, S M, Wilkinson, J M, Ferner, R E. Systemic toxicity related to metal hip prostheses. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2014; 52(8): 837–847.Google Scholar
Brady, O H, Masri, B A, Garbuz, D S, Duncan, C P. Use of reconstruction rings for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision hip surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7: 1–7.Google Scholar
Burgess, D L, McGrath, M S, Bonutti, P M, et al. Shoulder resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(5): 1228–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calenoff, L, Stromberg, W B. Silicone rubber arthroplasties of the hand. Radiology 1973; 107: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, J R, Simons, B P. Total wrist arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998; 6: 308–315.Google Scholar
Casadei, R, De Paolis, M, Drago, G, Romagnoli, C, Donati, D. Total elbow arthroplasty for primary and metastatic tumor. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102(4): 459–465.Google Scholar
Catena, F, Doty, J F, Jastifer, J, Coughlin, M J, Stevens, F. Prospective study of hammertoe correction with an intramedullary implant. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35(4): 319–325.Google Scholar
Celli, A, Morrey, B F. Total elbow arthroplasty in patients forty years of age or less. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(6): 1414–1418.Google Scholar
Charnley, J. The classic: the bonding of prostheses to bone by cement. [1964]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(12): 3149–3159.Google Scholar
Charnley, J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. [1970]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 430: 3–11.Google Scholar
Choi, H R, Bedair, H. Mortality following revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study of septic versus aseptic revisions. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(6): 1216–1218.Google Scholar
Coughlin, M J. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement prosthesis. AAOS Instr Course Lect 2002; 51: 135–142.Google Scholar
Covey, D C. Conversion from limb salvage to late amputations: lessons learned from recent battlefields with application to civilian trauma. J Surg Orthop Adv 2015; 24(3): 170–173.Google Scholar
Craik, J D, El Shafie, S A, Singh, V K, Twyman, R S. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014 Nov 11. pii: S0883-5403(14)00827-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.038. [Epub ahead of print.]Google Scholar
Deleu, P A, Devos Bevernage, B, Maldaque, P, Gombault, V, Leemrijse, T. Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35(6): 549–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshmukh, R V, Scott, R D. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001; 392: 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhar, D. Fat embolism syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012; 22(12): 800–802.Google Scholar
Divelbiss, B J, Sollerman, C, Adams, B D. Early results of the Universal total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27: 195–204.Google Scholar
Dula, A N, Virostko, J, Shellock, F G. Assessment of MRI issues at 7 T for 28 implants and other objects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202: 401–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dy, C J, Bozic, K J, Pan, T J, et al. Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66(6): 907–915.Google Scholar
Easley, M E, Vertullo, C J, Urban, W C, Nunley, J A. Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10: 157–167.Google Scholar
Erdil, M, Bilsel, K, Imren, Y, et al. Metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of advanced stage hallux rigidus: outcomes in the short-term. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012; 46(4): 281–285.Google Scholar
Ettinger, S, Stukenborg-Colsman, C, Plaass, C, et al. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis as a limb salvage procedure for complex hindfoot deformities. Arch Orthop Truama Surg 2016; 136(4): 457–462.Google Scholar
Fehring, T K, Rosenberg, A G. Primary total hip arthroplasty: indications and contraindications. In: Callaghan, J J, Rosenberg, A G, Rubash, H E, eds. The Adult Hip. Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 893–898.Google Scholar
Ferlic, D C. Rheumatoid arthritis in the elbow. In: Green, D P, Hotchkins, R N, Pederson, W C. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 4th ed., Vol 2. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1999; 1740–1758.Google Scholar
Freeman, M A, Swanson, S A, Todd, R C. Total replacement of the knee using the Freeman–Swanson knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1973; 94: 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiberg, A A. The Radiology of Orthopedic Implants: An Atlas of Techniques and Assessment. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.Google Scholar
Fritz, J, Lurie, B, Miller, T T, Potter, H G. MR imaging of hip arthroplasty implants. RadioGraphics 2014; 34: 1000–1001.Google Scholar
Galante, J O. Overview of total hip arthroplasty. In: Callaghan, J J, Rosenberg, A G, Rubash, H E, eds. The Adult Hip. Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott- Raven, 1998; 829–837.Google Scholar
Gebhard, J S, Amstutz, H C, Zinar, D M, Dorey, F J. A comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop 1992; 282: 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gililland, J M, Anderson, L A, Erickson, J, Pelt, C E, Peters, C L. Mean 5-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of 30. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 649506.Google Scholar
Gill, L H. Principles of joint arthroplasty applied to the ankle. AAOS Instr Course Lect 2002; 51: 117–128.Google Scholar
Gougoulias, N E, Khanna, A, Maffulli, N. History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty. Br Med Bull 2009; 89: 111–151.Google Scholar
Granberry, W M, Noble, P C, Bishop, J O, Tullos, H S. Use of a hinged silicone prosthesis for replacement arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 1453–1459.Google Scholar
Greisberg, J. The failed first metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 2014; 19(3): 343–348.Google Scholar
Ha, A S, Petscavage, J M, Chew, F S. Radial head arthroplasty: a radiologic outcome study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 1078–1082.Google Scholar
Hak, D J, Mauffrey, C, Seligson, D, Lindeque, B. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2014; 37(12): 825–830.Google Scholar
Han, S C, Chung, Y E, Lee, Y H, et al. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 788–795.Google Scholar
Hillock, R, Howard, S. Historical review. Utility of carbon fiber implants in orthopedic surgery: literature review. JISRF Reconstructive Review 2014; 4(1): 23–32.Google Scholar
Hsu, A R, Haddad, S L. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97(3): 194–200.Google Scholar
Hunt, L P, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Clark, E M, et al. 45-day mortality after 467,779 knee replacements for osteoarthritis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: an observational study. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1429–1436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, T B. Medical devices and foreign bodies: an introduction. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 193–194.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Taljanovic, M. Overview of medical devices. Curr Probl Diag Radiol 2001; 4: 89–139.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Taljanovic, M S. Glossary of medical devices and procedures: abbreviations, acronyms, and definitions. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 195–213.Google Scholar
Inglis, A E, Pellicci, P M. Total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62: 1252–1258.Google Scholar
Insall, J N. Historical development, classification, and characteristics of knee prostheses. In: Insall, J N, ed. Surgery of the Knee. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1993; 677–717.Google Scholar
Insall, J N, Ranawat, C S, Aglietti, P, Shine, J. A comparison of four models of total knee replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 754–765.Google Scholar
Jacobson, J A, Morag, Y. Hip replacement imaging. Medscape (updated October 27, 2015).Google Scholar
Jansen, J, Frokjaer, J, Gerka, O, Ludvigsen, L, Torfing, T. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone cysts in patients with a Scandinavian total ankle replacement: weight-bearing conventional digital radiographs versus weight-bearing mulitplanar reconstructed fluoroscopic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 863–868.Google Scholar
Jazrawi, L M, Kummer, F J, DiCesare, P E. Alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1988; 6: 198–203.Google Scholar
Jebson, P J, Adams, B D. Wrist arthrodesis: review of current techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 953–960.Google Scholar
Ji, J H, Park, S E, Song, I S, et al. Complications of medial unicomparmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2014; 6(4): 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B R. Proximal interphalangeal joint surface replacement arthroplasty. Hand Surg 2001; 6: 1–11.Google Scholar
Kadam, D. Limb salvage surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46(2): 265–274.Google Scholar
Katz, J N. Parachutes and preferences – a trial of knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(17): 1668–1669.Google Scholar
Kim, S H, Wise, B L, Zhang, Y, Szabo, R M. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(24): 2249–2254.Google Scholar
Koff, M F, Shah, P, Potter, H G. Clinical implementation of MRI of joint arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 154–161.Google Scholar
Koh, I J, Cho, W S, Choi, N Y, Kim, T K, Kleos Korea Research Group. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(1): 316–326.Google Scholar
Kramer, W C, Parman, M, Marks, R M. Hammertoe correction with K-wire fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2015; 36(5): 494–502.Google Scholar
Kumar, N, Chandrashekhar, Y, Raj, R, Anand, S. How to interpret postoperative x-rays after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 2014; 6(3): 179–186.Google Scholar
Lazarus, M D, Jensen, K L, Southworth, C, Matsen, F A 3rd. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 1174–1182.Google Scholar
Lee, S M, Seong, S C, Lee, S, Choi, W C, Lee, M C. Outcomes of the different types of total knee arthroplasty with identical femoral geometry. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012; 24(4): 214–220.Google Scholar
Lee, J K, Lee, S, Kim, D, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus–valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21(3): 620–628.Google Scholar
Levy, O, Funk, L, Sforza, G, Copeland, S A. Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86A(3): 512–518.Google Scholar
Li, X, Zhang, Y, Wan, S, et al. A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma. J Bone Oncol 2016; 5(1): 15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddle, A D, Judge, A, Pandit, H, Murray, D W. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1437–1445.Google Scholar
Lin, D J, Wong, T T, Kazam, J K. Shoulder arthroplasty, from indications to complications: what the radiologist needs to know. RadioGraphics 2016; 36: 192–208.Google Scholar
Lindgren, V, Gordon, M, Wretenberg, P, Karrholm, J, Garellick, G. Deep infection after total hip replacement: a method of national incidence surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35(12): 1491–1496.Google Scholar
Little, J B. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux valgus. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2014; 31(2): 281–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunebourg, A, Parratee, S, Gay, A, et al. Lower function, quality of life, and survival rate after total knee arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis than for primary arthritis. Acta Orthopaedica 2014; Oct 28: 1–6.Google Scholar
Manaster, B J. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation. RadioGraphics 1996; 16: 645–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manrique, J, Gomez, M M, Parvizi, J. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2015; 28(2): 119–126.Google Scholar
Marshall, D A, Pykerman, K, Werle, J, et al. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(7): 2217–2230.Google Scholar
McAuley, J P, Engh, G A. Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: when and what? J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(3 Suppl 1): 51–54.Google Scholar
McCalden, R W, Robert, C E, Howard, J L, et al. Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(8 Suppl): 83–86.Google Scholar
Miric, A, Inacio, M C, Kelly, M P, Namba, R S. Can total knee arthroplasty be safely performed among nonagenarians? An evaluation of morbidity and mortality within a total joint replacement registry. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(8): 1635–1638.Google Scholar
Morgan, H, Battista, V, Leopold, S S. Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13(8): 515–524.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists; Part 1, features and radiographic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012a; 199: 559–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists; Part 2, revisions and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012b; 570–580.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in knee replacement: features and imaging assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; Dec; 201(6): W828–842. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11307.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in knee replacement: complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202: W76–W86.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in total ankle replacement for radiologists: features and imaging assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015a; 205: 1038–1047.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in total ankle replacement for radiologists: complication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015b; 205: 1244–1250.Google Scholar
Nair, R. Review article: total wrist arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2014; 22(3): 399–405.Google Scholar
Neer, C S. Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955; 37A: 215–218.Google Scholar
Padgett, DE, Windsor, RE. Understanding implants in knee and hip replacement. Available at: www.hss.edu/conditions_understanding-implants-in-knee-and-hip-replacement.asp (2015).Google Scholar
Pedersen, A B, Mehnert, F, Sorensen, H T, et al. The risk of venous thrombolembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding and death in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a 15-year retrospective cohort study of routine clinical practice. Bone Joint J 2014; 96B(4): 479–485.Google Scholar
Petscavage, J M, Ha, A S, Chew, F S. Current concepts of shoulder arthroplasty for radiologists: part 1 – epidemiology, history, preoperative imaging, and hemiarthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012a; 199: 757–767.Google Scholar
Petscavage, J M, Ha, A S, Chew, F S. Current concepts of shoulder arthroplasty for radiologists: part 2 – anatomic and reverse shoulder replacement and nonprosthetic resurfacing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012b; 199: 768–776.Google Scholar
Petscavage, J M, Ha, A S, Chew, F S. Radiologic review of total elbow, radial head, and capitellar resurfacing arthroplasty.Radiographics 2012c; 32: 129–149.Google Scholar
Pyevich, M T, Saltzman, C L, Callaghan, J J, Alvine, F G. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design – two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1410–1420.Google Scholar
Radnay, C S, Setter, K J, Chambers, L, et al. Total shoulder replacement compared with humeral head replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16(4): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reito, A, Moilanent, T, Puolakka, T, Pajamaki, J, Eskelinen, A. Repeated metal ion measurements in patients with high risk metal-on-metal hip replacement. Int Orthop 2014; 38(7): 1353–1361.Google Scholar
Riff, A J, Sah, A P, Della Valle, C J. Outcomes and complications of unicondylar arthroplasty. Clin Sports Med 2014; 33(1): 149–160.Google Scholar
Roberts, C C, Ekelund, A L, Renfree, K J, Liu, P T, Chew, F S. Radiologic assessment of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. RadioGraphics 2007; 27: 223–235.Google Scholar
Ronconi, P, Martinelli, N, Cancilleri, F, et al. Hemiarthroplasty and distal oblique first metatarsal osteotomy for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32(2): 148–152.Google Scholar
Sabouret, P, Lavoie, F, Cloutier, J M. Total knee replacement with retention of both cruciate ligaments: a 22-year follow-up study. Bone Joint 2013; 95B(7): 917–922.Google Scholar
Saltzman, C L, Alvine, F G. The Agility total ankle replacement. AAOS Instr Course Lect 2002; 51: 129–133.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Sotelo, J. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Open Orthop J 2011; 5: 106–114.Google Scholar
Schairer, W W, Vail, T P, Bozic, K J. What are the rates and causes of hospital readmission after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(1): 181–187.Google Scholar
Scheker, L R, Babb, B A, Killion, P E. Distal ulnar prosthetic replacement. Orthopedic Clin North Am 2001; 32: 1–10.Google Scholar
Schiavone, P A, Cerciello, S, Del Regno, C, Felici, A, Vasso, M. Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2014; 38(2): 313–317.Google Scholar
Schrumpf, M, Maak, T, Hammoud, S, Craig, E V. The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011; 4(4): 191–199.Google Scholar
Seeger, L L, Farooki, S, Yao, L, Kabo, J M, Eckardt, J J. Custom endoprosthesis for limb salvage: historical perspective and imaging evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 1525–1529.Google Scholar
Sevelda, F, Schuh, R, Hofstaetter, J G, et al. Total femur replacement after tumor resection: limb salvage usually achieved but complications and failures are common. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(6): 2079–2087.Google Scholar
Sirveaux, F, Favard, L, Oudet, D, et al. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff: results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 388–395.Google Scholar
Skou, S T, Roos, E M, Laursen, M B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(17): 1597–1606.Google Scholar
Springer, B D, Scott, R D, Sah, A P, Carrington, R. McKeever hemiarthroplasty of the knee in patients less than sixty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(2): 366–371.Google Scholar
Sung, W, Weil, L, Weil, L S Sr. Retrospective comparative study of operative repair of hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Spec 2014; 7(3): 185–192.Google Scholar
Swanson, A B. Silicone rubber implants for replacement of arthritic or destroyed joints in the hand. Surg Clin N Amer 1968; 48: 1113–1127.Google Scholar
Taljanovic, M S, Jones, M D, Hunter, T B, et al. Joint arthroplasties and prostheses. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 1295–1314.Google Scholar
Tiberi, J V 3rd, Hansen, V, El-Abbadi, N, Bedair, H. Increased complication rates after hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(9): 2774–2778.Google Scholar
Titchner, A G, Duncan, N S, Rajan, R A. Outcome following first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement using TOEFIT-PLUS: a mid term alert. Foot Ankle Surg 2015; 21(2): 119–124.Google Scholar
Tsai, I T, Hsu, C J, Chen, Y H, et al. Fat embolism syndrome in long bone fracture – clinical experience in a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2010; 73(8): 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uribe, J W, Botto-van Bemden, A. Partial humeral head resurfacing for osteonecrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18(5): 711–716.Google Scholar
van Harlingen, D, Heesterbeek, P J C, de Vos, M J. High rate of complications and radiographic loosening of biaxial total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(6): 721–726.Google Scholar
Visuri, T, Borq, H, Pulkkinen, P, Paavolainen, P, Pukkala, E. A retrospective comparative study of mortality and causes of death among patients with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses in primary osteoarthritis after a long-term follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-78.Google Scholar
Walch, G, Boileau, P, Noel, E. Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Joint Bone Spine 2010; 77(6): 501–505.Google Scholar
Wang, H, Lou, H, Zhang, H, Jiang, J, Liu, K. Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22(12): 3191–3197.Google Scholar
Weinstein, A M, Rome, B N, Reichmann, W M, et al. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95(5): 385–392.Google Scholar
Weiss, A P, Kamal, R N, Shultz, P. Total wrist arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21(3): 140–148.Google Scholar
Wulker, N, Mittag, F. The treatment of hallux valgus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109(49): 857–868.Google Scholar
Yu, J J, Sheskier, S. Total ankle replacement – evolution of the technology and future applications. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2014; 72(1): 120–128.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×