Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Preface
- Part I Perspectives on the 1927 Solvay conference
- Part II Quantum foundations and the 1927 Solvay conference
- Part III The proceedings of the 1927 Solvay conference
- 13 The intensity of X-ray reflection
- 14 Disagreements between experiment and the electromagnetic theory of radiation
- 15 The new dynamics of quanta
- 16 Quantum mechanics
- 17 Wave mechanics
- 18 General discussion of the new ideas presented
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
16 - Quantum mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Preface
- Part I Perspectives on the 1927 Solvay conference
- Part II Quantum foundations and the 1927 Solvay conference
- Part III The proceedings of the 1927 Solvay conference
- 13 The intensity of X-ray reflection
- 14 Disagreements between experiment and the electromagnetic theory of radiation
- 15 The new dynamics of quanta
- 16 Quantum mechanics
- 17 Wave mechanics
- 18 General discussion of the new ideas presented
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Quantum mechanics is based on the intuition that the essential difference between atomic physics and classical physics is the occurrence of discontinuities (see in particular [1,4,58–63]). Quantum mechanics should thus be considered a direct continuation of the quantum theory founded by Planck, Einstein and Bohr. Bohr in particular stressed repeatedly, already before the birth of quantum mechanics, that the discontinuities must lead to the introduction of new kinematical and mechanical concepts, so that indeed classical mechanics and its corresponding conceptual scheme should be abandoned [1,4]. Quantum mechanics tries to introduce the new concepts through a precise analysis of what is ‘observable in principle’. In fact, this does not mean setting up the principle that a sharp division between ‘observable’ and ‘unobservable’ quantities is possible and necessary. As soon as a conceptual scheme is given, one can infer from the observations to other facts that are actually not observable directly, and the boundary between ‘observable’ and ‘unobservable’ quantities becomes altogether indeterminate. But if the conceptual scheme itself is still unknown, it will be expedient to enquire only about the observations themselves, without drawing conclusions from them, because otherwise wrong concepts and prejudices taken over from before will block the way to recognising the physical relationships [Zusammenhänge].
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum Theory at the CrossroadsReconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, pp. 372 - 405Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009