Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:32:16.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Resonance fluorescence from a single quantum dot

from Part II - Manipulation of individual quantum states in quantum dots using optical techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

By
A. N. Vamivakas ,
C. Matthiesen ,
Y. Zhao ,
C.-Y. Lu  and
M. Atatüre
Edited by
Alexander Tartakovskii
A. N. Vamivakas
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
C. Matthiesen
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
Y. Zhao
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
C.-Y. Lu
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
M. Atatüre
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
Alexander Tartakovskii
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Quantum optics provides a complete description of the resonant interaction of light and a material system. The light scattered as a result of this interaction – the resonance fluorescence – provides a means to monitor and affect the material system's dynamics and also allows for the generation of nonclassical states of the electromagnetic field. Initial theoretical studies characterizing resonance fluorescence addressed fundamental questions regarding the necessity of quantizing the electromagnetic field. This is a particularly illustrative period in optical physics where multiple theories existed that might describe resonance fluorescence – semi-classical optical Bloch equations [1, 2] or quantum electrodynamics [4, 3] – and experimental evidence was necessary to identify the appropriate theoretical framework. Indeed, experiments in 1974 and 1977 investigating the resonance fluorescence lineshape [5, 6] and the photon statistics of the scattered light [7] vindicated the full quantum electrodynamical description of light-matter interaction over other models. In the subsequent 30 years, resonance fluorescence has been used as a high-resolution spectroscopic probe of a variety of physical systems, as a means to investigate quantum coherence in atomic gases and, with the current interest in quantum information science (QIS), as a tool for quantum-state preparation, measurement and control in trapped ions [8].

During this same time period, advances in material science have ushered in an era where it is possible to grow and fabricate solid-state devices at length scales commensurate with the quantum confinement of electrons and holes. It is only recently that resonance fluorescence has been observed from the prototypical artificial nanostructure exhibiting three-dimensional quantum confinement – a single semiconductor quantum dot (QD) [9].

Type
Chapter
Information
Quantum Dots
Optics, Electron Transport and Future Applications
 , pp. 86 - 102
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Crisp, M. D. and Jaynes, E. T. 1969. Radiative effects in semiclassical theory. Phys. Rev., 179, 1253–1261.Google Scholar
[2] Stroud, C. R. Jr., and Jaynes, E. T. 1970. Long-term solutions in semiclassical radiation theory. Phys.Rev. A, 1, 106–121.Google Scholar
[3] Mollow, B. R. 1969. Power spectrum of light scattered by two-level systems. Phys. Rev., 188, 1969–1975.Google Scholar
[4] Stroud, C. R. Jr., 1971. Quantum-electrodynamic treatment of spontaneous emission in the presence of an applied field. Phys. Rev. A, 3, 1044–1052.Google Scholar
[5] Schuda, F., Stroud, C. R. Jr., and Hercher, M. 1974. Observation of the resonant Stark effect at optical frequencies. J. Phys. B, 7, L198–L202.Google Scholar
[6] Wu, F. Y., Grove, R. E. and Ezekiel, S. 1975. Investigation of the spectrum of resonance fluorescence induced by a monochromatic field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 1426–1429.Google Scholar
[7] Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M. and Mandel, L. 1977. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 39, 691–695.Google Scholar
[8] Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. and Wineland, D. 2003. Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 281–324.Google Scholar
[9] Gammon, D. and Steele, D. G. 2002. Optical studies of single quantum dots. Physics Today, 36–41.
[10] Muller, A., Flagg, E. B., Bianucci, P. et al. 2007. Resonance fluorescence from a coherently driven semiconductor quantum dot in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 187402:1–4.Google Scholar
[11] Vamivakas, A. N., Zhao, Y., Lu, C.-Y. et al. 2009. Spin-resolved quantum-dot resonance fluorescence. Nat. Phys., 5, 198–201.Google Scholar
[12] Fallahi, P., Yilmaz, S. T. and Imamoğlu, A. 2010. Measurement of a heavy-hole inter-action in InGaAs quantum dots using resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 257402:1–4.Google Scholar
[13] Imamoğlu, A., Awschalom, D. D., Burkard, G. et al. 1999. Quantum information processing using quantum dot spins and cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4204–4207.Google Scholar
[14] Vamivakas, A. N., Lu, C.-Y., Matthiesen, C. et al. 2010. Observation of spin-dependent quantum jumps via quantum dot resonance fluorescence. Nature, 467, 297–300.Google Scholar
[15] Ates, A., Ulrich, S. M., Reitzenstein, S. et al. 2009. Post-selected indistinguishable photons from the resonance fluorescence of a single quantum dot in a microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett, 103, 167402:1–4.Google Scholar
[16] Knill, E. and LaFlamme, R. 2001. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, 409, 46–52.Google Scholar
[17] Loudon, R. 2000. The Quantum Theory of Light. Oxford University Press.
[18] Scully, M. O. and Zubairy, M. S. 1997. Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press.
[19] Tannoudji, C. C., Dupont-Roc, J. and Grynberg, G. 1998. Atom–Photon Interactions. Wiley.
[20] Citron, M. L., Gray, H. R., Gabel, C. W. and Stroud, C. R. 1977. Experimental study of power broadening in a two-level atom. Phys. Rev. A, 16, 1507–1511.Google Scholar
[21] Flagg, E. B., Muller, A., Robertson, J. W. et al. 2009. Resonantly driven coherent oscillations in a solid-state quantum emitter. Nat. Phys., 5, 203–207.Google Scholar
[22] Unpublished data obtained by the authors.
[23] Warburton, R. J., Schein, C., Haft, D. et al. 2000. Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring. Nature 405, 926–929.Google Scholar
[24] Ramsay, A. J., Godden, T. M., Boyle, S. J. et al. 2010. Phonon-induced Rabifrequency Renormalization of optically driven single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 177402:1–4.Google Scholar
[25] Dreiser, J., Atatüre, M., Galland, C. et al. 2008. Optical investigations of quantum dot spin dynamics as a function of external electric and magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B, 77, 075317:1–15.Google Scholar
[26] Lu, C.-Y., Zhao, Y., Vamivakas, A. N. et al. 2010. Direct measurement of spin dynamics in InAs/GaAs quantum dots using time-resolved resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. B, 81, 035332:1–5.Google Scholar
[27] Khaetskii, A. and Nazarov, Y. 2001. Spin-flip transitions between Zeeman sublevels in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B, 64, 125316:1–6.Google Scholar
[28] Yilmaz, S. T., Fallahi, P. and Imamoğlu, A. 2010. Quantum-dot-spin single-photon interface. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 033601:1–4.Google Scholar
[29] Latta, C., Högele, A., Zhao, Y. et al. 2009. Confluence of resonant laser excitation and bidirectional quantum-dot nuclear-spin polarization. Nat. Phys., 9, 5–5.Google Scholar
[30] Xu, X., Wang, Y., Sun, B. et al. 2009. Optically controlled locking of the nuclear field via coherent dark-state spectroscopy. Nature 459, 1105–1109.Google Scholar
[31] Yang, W. and Sham, L. J. 2011. Collective nuclear stabilization by optically excited hole in quantum dot. arXiv:1012.0060v2.
[32] Chekhovich, E. A., Krysa, A. B., Skolnick, M. S. and Tartakovskii, A. I. 2010. Direct measurement of the hole–nuclear spin interaction in single InP/GaInP quantum dots using photoluminescence spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 027402:1–4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×