Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
17 - Implementation of evidence-based practice
from Section 2 - Quality management of the ICU
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide, pp. 134 - 141Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Cochrane, AL. Effectiveness and efficiency. In Random Reflections on Health Services. London: Taylor and Francis, 1999.Google Scholar
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 2000; 342(18): 1301–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenfeld, GD, Cooper, C, Carter, G, Thompson, BT, Hudson, LD. Barriers to providing lung-protective ventilation to patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32(6): 1289–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umoh, NJ, Fan, E, Mendez-Tellez, PA, et al. Patient and intensive care unit organizational factors associated with low tidal volume ventilation in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36(5): 1463–1468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinuff, T, Cook, D, Giacomini, M, Heyland, D, Dodek, P. Facilitating clinician adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit: a multicenter, qualitative study. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35(9): 2083–2089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinuff, T, Muscedere, J, Adhikari, NK, et al. Knowledge translation interventions for critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(11): 2627–2640.Google Scholar
D’Andreamatteo, A, Ianni, L, Lega, F, Sargiacomo, M. Lean in healthcare: a comprehensive review. Health Policy. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Koning, H, Verver, JP, van den Heuvel, J, Bisgaard, S, Does, RJ. Lean Six Sigma in healthcare. J Healthc Qual. 2006; 28(2): 4–11.Google Scholar
Nicolay, CR, Purkayastha, S, Greenhalgh, A, et al. Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare. Brit J Surg. 2012; 99(3): 324–335.Google Scholar
Scales, DC, Dainty, K, Hales, B, et al. A multifaceted intervention for quality improvement in a network of intensive care units: a cluster randomized trial. JAMA. 2011; 305(4): 363–372.Google Scholar
Wallis, L. Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice remain high for U.S. nurses: getting past “we’ve always done it this way” is crucial. Am J Nurs. 2012; 112(12): 15.Google Scholar
Grant, HS, Stuhlmacher, A, Bonte-Eley, S. Overcoming barriers to research utilization and evidence-based practice among staff nurses. JNSD. 2012; 28(4): 163–165.Google ScholarPubMed
Dainty, KN, Scales, DC, Sinuff, T, Zwarenstein, M. Competition in collaborative clothing: a qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013; 22(4): 317–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Services VCfH. ICU delirium and Cognitive Impairment Study Group www.icudelirium.org 2013 (accessed 1 March 2015).Google Scholar
Halpern, SD, Becker, D, Curtis, JR, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/American Association of Critical-Care Nurses/American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine policy statement: the Choosing Wisely(R) Top 5 list in Critical Care Medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 190(7): 818–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranieri, VM, Thompson, BT, Barie, PS, et al. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. NEJM. 2012; 366(22): 2055–2064.Google Scholar
Finfer, S, Chittock, DR, Su, SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. NEJM. 2009; 360(13): 1283–1297.Google Scholar
Niven, DJ, Rubenfeld, GD, Kramer, AA, Stelfox, HT. Effect of published scientific evidence on glycemic control in adult intensive care units. JAMA. 2015; 175: 801–809.Google ScholarPubMed