Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
13 - Clinical data management
from Section 2 - Quality management of the ICU
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide, pp. 103 - 110Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
HIMSS Analytics. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. www.himssanalytics.org/home/index.aspx (accessed 15 May 2014).Google Scholar
Chan, K.S., Fowles, J.B., Weiner, J.P. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures – a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2010; 67(5): 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, M.W., Chen, P.G., Van Busum, K.R., et al. Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and Their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häyrinen, K., Harno, K., Nykänen, P. Use of headings and classifications by physicians in medical narratives of EHRs: an evaluation study in a Finnish hospital. Appl Clin Inform. 2011; 2(2): 143–157.Google Scholar
SNOMED CT: The Global Language of Healthcare. The International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct (accessed 13 November 2014).Google Scholar
Hanson, C.W., Marshall, B.E. Artificial intelligence applications in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(2): 427–435.Google Scholar
Williams, C.N., Bratton, S.L., Hirshberg, E.L. Computerized decision support in adult and pediatric critical care. World J Crit Care Med. 2013; 2(4): 21–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G. Integrated suites vs best of breed–advantage 2013. YouTube, 12 February 2014.Google Scholar
Ford, E.W., Huerta, T.R., Menachemi, N., Thompson, M.A., Yu, F. Health information technology vendor selection strategies and total factor productivity. Health Care Manage Rev. 2013; 38(3): 177–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meystre, S., Shen, S., Hofmann, D., Gundlapalli, A. Can physicians recognize their own patients in de-identified notes? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 205: 778–782.Google Scholar
Maat, B. Optimization of electronic prescribing in pediatric patients. Diss. U Medical Center Utrecht, 2014.Google Scholar
Han, Y.Y. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(6): 1506–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarkar, S., Kak, A.C., Rama, G.M., Metrics for measuring the quality of modularization of large-scale object-oriented software. IEEE T Software Eng. 2008; 34(5): 700–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by