Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:24:52.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Components of working memory deficit in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Steven Matthysse
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Francine M. Benes
Affiliation:
McClean Hospital
Deborah L. Levy
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Jerome Kagan
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter, we focus on the working memory deficit of schizophrenic patients, as assessed by delayed-response tasks. The relevance of delayed-response performance to schizophrenia has already been extensively documented by Goldman-Rakic (1987, 1991; see also Chapter 2, this volume). A typical delayed-response task involves the presentation of a stimulus, followed by a delay period and the subsequent presentation of a small set of alternative choices. Although the delayed-response task is a simple procedure, it involves a variety of cognitive functions. In order to succeed, the target stimulus or, to be more specific, the context-relevant attribute of the stimulus, must be encoded (e.g., spatial location). This information is maintained in working memory during the delay period. Then, a motor command must be successfully executed in order to elicit a response, which may involve voluntary control over the motor system. The delayed-response task is not dependent on recognition memory because at the response stage, there is no external cue in the response environment.

Deficits in delayed-response task performance remain one of the best-documented symptoms of prefrontal damage (e.g., Jacobsen, 1935; Kojima et al., 1982). Lesions in the principal sulcus impair performance on delayed-response tasks in monkeys (e.g., Blum, 1952; Goldman and Rosvold, 1970; Gross and Weiskrantz, 1964). Humans with dorsolateral prefrontal lesions show analogous deficits on tasks that require a delayed response (e.g., Oscar-Berman, 1975; Freedman and Oscar-Berman, 1986; Lewinsohn et al., 1972).

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychopathology
The Evolving Science of Mental Disorder
, pp. 34 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×