Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T06:35:16.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Recruiting politicians

Designing competency-based selection for UK parliamentary candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

According to George Bernard Shaw, ‘democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few’ (1903), yet selection and election decisions both play an important part in determining who will ultimately become a politician. Most politicians represent a political party, and successful democratic elections in the UK and a majority of other Western countries depend on the ability of political parties to attract and select the best possible candidates. In fact, recruiting individuals to legislative office is seen as a core function of political systems, with the quality of candidates selected impacting ultimately on the quality of government delivered (Gallagher and Marsh, 1988; Katz, 2001). As gatekeepers to political roles political parties therefore bear an important responsibility to their members, and the public they hope to represent, to identify the best possible candidates through fair and effective selection procedures (Lovenduski, 2005).

Despite clear parallels between political recruitment and employee selection, there has been surprisingly little exploration of how selection research might inform our understanding of how and why certain individuals become politicians (Silvester and Dykes, 2007). Indeed, industrial and organisational (I/O) psychologists have paid remarkably little attention to politics and political work in general (Bar-Tal, 2002; Silvester, 2008). This chapter sets out to redress this situation by exploring how knowledge and practice relevant to employee selection research might be usefully applied to the political context. More specifically, it considers whether such knowledge and practice might be used to improve how political parties select candidates and identify those individuals likely to perform well in government. Beginning with a review of existing research on political recruitment (conducted mostly by political scientists), the chapter considers potential advantages and disadvantages of applying traditional employee selection methods to political recruitment. Finally, two examples of competency-based selection procedures for approving prospective UK parliamentary candidates are described; one with the Conservative Party and one with the Liberal Democrat Party. Although the chapter takes a predominantly UK perspective, focusing on the role of Member of Parliament (MP), similarities with political recruitment and implications for practice in other countries are discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N.Cunningham-Snell, N. 2000 Personnel selectionChmiel, N.Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology: A European Perspective69OxfordBlackwellGoogle Scholar
Arvey, R. D.Faley, R. H. 1988 Fairness in Selecting EmployeesReading, Mass.Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. 2002 The (social) psychological legacy for political psychologyMonroe, K. R.Political Psychology173Mahwah, N.J.Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Caprara, G. V.Zimbardo, P. G. 2004 Personalizing politics: a Congruency Model of political preferenceAmerican Psychologist 59 581CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costantini, E.Craik, K. H. 1980 Personality and politicians: California party leaders, 1960–1976Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgood, J.Vinter, L.Williams, R. 2002 Man Enough for the Job? A Study of Parliamentary CandidatesManchesterEOC Discussion Series, Equal Opportunities CommissionGoogle Scholar
Society, Fawcett 2005 www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/documents/May05electionWomenMPs.pdf
Ferris, G. R.King, T. R. 1991 Politics in human resources decisions: a walk on the dark sideOrganizational Dynamics 20 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, G. R.Treadway, D. C.Kolodinsky, R. W.Hochwarter, W. A.Kacmar, C. J.Douglas, C.Frink, D. D. 2005 Development and validation of the political skill inventoryJournal of Management 31 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, M.Marsh, M. 1988 Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of PoliticsLondonSageGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, F. 1992 Can personality and politics be studied systematically?Political Psychology 13 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, E. C. 1993 Presidential personality and leadership styleEdwards, G. C.Kessel, J. H.Rockman, B. A.Researching the Presidency69University of Pittsburgh PressGoogle Scholar
Hough, L. M.Oswald, F. L. 2000 Personnel selection: looking toward the future – remembering the pastAnnual Review of Psychology 51 631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House of Commons Information Office 2009 www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/m01.pdf
Kamp, A. 2000 Breaking up old marriages: the political process of change and continuity at workTechnology Analysis and Strategic Management 12 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katwala, S.Whitford, B.Ottery, C. 2003
Katz, R. S. 2001 The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracyParty Politics 7 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, J. 2005 Feminizing PoliticsCambridgePolity PressGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, J. 2009
Lovenduski, J.Norris, P. 2003 Westminster women: The politics of presencePolitical Studies 51 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundell, K. 2004 Determinants of candidate selection: The degree of centralization in comparative perspectiveParty Politics 10 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maidment, R.Tappin, M. 1994 American Politics TodayManchester University PressGoogle Scholar
March, J. G.Olsen, J. P. 1999 Institutional perspectives on political institutionsMarch, J. G.The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence52LondonBlackwellGoogle Scholar
Moe, T. M. 1993 Presidents, institutions and leadershipEdwards, G. C.Kessel, J. H.Rockman, B. A.Researching the presidency337University of Pittsburgh PressGoogle Scholar
Morrell, K.Hartley, J. 2006 A model of political leadershipHuman Relations 59 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskowitz, D.Stroh, P. 1996 Expectation-driven assessments of political candidatesPolitical Psychology 17 695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, 1990 Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of LeadershipNew YorkFree PressLondonCollier MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. 2002 Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political ActivismCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. 2004 Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political behaviorCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P.Carty, L. K.Erikson, L.Lovenduski, J.Simms, M. 1990 Party selectorates in Australia, Britain and Canada: Prolegomena for research in the 1990sCommonwealth and Comparative Politics 28 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P.Lovenduski, L. 1993 Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British ParliamentCambridge Universtity PressGoogle Scholar
Norris, P.Lovenduski, L. 2004 Why parties fail to learn: Electoral defeat, selective perception and British party politicsParty Politics 10 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P.Vallance, E.Lovenduski, J. 1992 Do candidates make a difference? Gender, race, ideology and incumbencyParliamentary Affairs 45 496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novicevic, M. M.Harvey, M. G. 2004 The political role of corporate human resource management in strategic global leadership developmentThe Leadership Quarterly 15 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parliament 2009 www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmcode.htm
Parliament 2009 www.parliament.uk/about/how/members/mps.cfm
Phillips, A. 1998 Democracy and representation: or, why should it matter who our representatives are?Phillips, A.Feminism and Politics224Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Pickard, J. 2009 What every MP should knowFinancial Times Weekend Magazine32Google Scholar
Rentoul, J. 2001 Tony Blair: Prime MinisterLondonTime WarnerGoogle Scholar
Riddell, P. 2003 Candidate Selection: The Report of the Commission on Candidate SelectionLondonElectoral Reform SocietyGoogle Scholar
Rubenzer, S. J.Faschingbauer, T. R.Ones, D. S. 2002 Assessments of America’s Chief Executives: insights from biographers and objective personality measuresValenty, L.Feldman, O.Political Leadership for the New Century105LondonPraegerGoogle Scholar
Schippmann, J. S.Ash, R. A.Battista, N.Carr, L.Eyde, L. D.Hesketh, B.Kehoe, J.Pearlman, K.Prien, E. P.Sanchez, J. I. 2000 The practice of competency modellingPersonnel Psychology 53 703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. 1987 The people make the placePersonnel Psychology 40 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, G. B. 1903 Man and SupermanWestmisterArchibald Constable and Co. LtdGoogle Scholar
Shepherd-Robinson, L.Lovenduski, J. 2002 Women and Candidate Selection in British Political PartiesLondonThe Fawcett SocietyGoogle Scholar
Silvester, J. 2008 The good, the bad, and the ugly: politics and politicians at workHodgkinson, G. P.Ford, J. K.International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 23 107ChichesterJohn Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Silvester, J.Dykes, C. 2007 Selecting political candidates: a longitudinal study of assessment centre performance and political success in the 2005 UK General ElectionJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 80 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. 1988 Presidential style: personality, biography and performancePersonality Processes and Individual Differences 55 928Google Scholar
Stokes, W. 2005 Women in Contemporary PoliticsCambridgePolity PressGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1918 Politics as a vocationMorgan, M. L.Classics of Moral and Political Theory1213CambridgeHackett Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×