Aamodt, M. G., Bryan, D. A. & Whitcomb, A. J. (1993). Predicting performance with letters of recommendation. Public Personnel Management, 22(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achilles, P. S. & Achilles, E. M. (1917). Estimates of the military value of certain character qualities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(4), 305–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: an integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2008). Knowledge and cognitive aging. In Fergus, T. A. S. & Craik, I. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, pp. 445–90. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ackerman, P. L. & Rolfhus, E. L. (1999). The locus of adult intelligence: knowledge, abilities, and nonability traits. Psychology and Aging, 14(2), 314–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ackerman, P. L. & Wolman, S. (2007). Determinants and validity of self-estimates of abilities and self-concept measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 57–78.Google ScholarPubMed

Ackerman, S., Clemence, A., Weatherill, R. & Hilsenroth, M. (1999). Use of TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV Cluster B personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 422–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alley, T. R. (1988). Physiognomy and social perception. In Alley, T. R. (ed.), Social and Applied Aspects of Perceiving Faces, pp. 167–86. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Alliger, G. M. & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

All-issa, I. (1972). Stimulus generalization and over-inclusion in normal and schizophrenic subjects. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 182–6.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. & Vernon, P. E. (1933). Studies in Expressive Movement. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allworth, E. & Hesketh, B. (2000). Job requirements biodata as a predictor of performance in customer service roles. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(3), 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: the social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In Runco, M. A. & Alber, R. S. (eds.), Theories of Creativity, pp. 61–91. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–84.Google Scholar

Amelang, M. & Steinmayr, R. (2006). Is there a validity increment for tests of emotional intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria?Intelligence, 34(5), 459–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anastasi, A. (1981). Coaching, test sophistication, and developed abilities. American Psychologist, 36, 1086–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anastasi, A. (1989). Ability testing in the 1980s and beyond: some major trends. Public Personnel and Management Journal, 18, 471–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anastasi, A. & Schaefer, C. (1971). Note on the concepts of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 113–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, L. R. & Fielder, F. E. (1964). The effect of participatory and supervisory leadership on group creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N., Born, M. & Cunningham-Snell, N. (2001). Recruitment and selection: applicant perspectives and outcomes. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinargil, H. K. & Viswesvaran, C. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1. London and New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. & Cunningham-Snell, N. (2000). Personnel selection. In Chmiel, N. (ed.), Introduction to Work and Organisational Psychology, pp. 69–99. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Andriopoulos, C. (2003). Six paradoxes in managing creativity: an embracing act. Long Range Planning, 36(4), 375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P. & Rounds, J. (2008). Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, J. (2005). Work Psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Arthur, W., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L. & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identify theory and the organisation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athey, R. (2004). It's 2008: do you know where your talent is? Deloitte Research Study.

Atkinson, J. W. (ed.) (1958). Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C. & Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: does EI have a dark side?Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 179–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. T. & Hanisch, K. A. (1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: a longitudinal analysis using project TALENT data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full Leadership Development: Building the Vital Forces in Organisations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M. & Jung, D. I. (1999). Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5X). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar

Awoniyi, E. A., Griego, O. V. & Morgan, G. A. (2002). Person-environment fit and transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailin, S. (1988). The something more. In Achieving Extraordinary Ends: An Essay on Creativity, pp. 109–33. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, J.-A., Greatorex, J. & Bell, J. F. (2004). What makes marking reliable? Experiments with UK examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Ball, R. J. (1929). An objective measure of emotional instability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(3), 226–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1999). A social–cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin, L. & John, O. (eds.), Handbook of Personality, 2nd edn, pp. 154–96. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Barber, J. D. (1992). The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Barling, J., Weber, T. & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: a field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 827–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory: Technical Manual. Toronto: Toronto Multihealth Systems.Google Scholar

Baron, R. A. & Byrne, D. (1987). Social Psychology: Understanding Human Interaction, 5th edn. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Barrett, G. V. & Alexander, R. A. (1989). Rejoinder to Austin, Humphreys, and Hulin: critical reanalysis of Barrett, Caldwell, and Alexander. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, G. V. & Depinet, R. L. (1991). A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 46(10), 1012–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big-Five personality dimensions in job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 715–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Antecedents of involuntary turnover due to a reduction in force. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 515–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J. & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, F. (1963). The needs for order and disorder as motives in creative action. In Taylor, C. W. & Barron, F. (eds.), Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development, pp. 139–52. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1969). Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Barron, F. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barthel, E. & Schuler, H. (1989). Nutzenkalkulation eignungsdiagnostischer Verfahren am Beispiel eines biographischen Fragebogens. / Utility calculation of personnel selection methods using the example of a biographical questionnaire. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 33(2), 73–83.Google Scholar

Bartol, K. M. & Martin, D. C. (1986). Women and men in task groups. In Ashmore, R. D. & Boca, F. K. Del (eds.), The Social Psychology of Female–Male Relations, pp. 259–310. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartram, D. & Dale, H. C. (1982). The Eysenck Personality Inventory as a selection test for military pilots. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55(4), 287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1981). From leaderless group discussions to the cross-national assessment of managers. Journal of Management, 7, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 3rd edn. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux, Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organisational and national boundaries?American Psychologist, 52, 130–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (eds.) (1985). Leadership Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.

Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire for Research: Permission Set. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar

Baxter, J. C., Brock, B., Hill, P. C. & Rozelle, R. M. (1981). Letters of recommendation: a question of value. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayne, R. & O'Neill, F. (1988). Handwriting and personality: a test of some expert graphologists' judgments. Guidance and Assessment Review, 4, 1–3.Google Scholar

Becker, G. (1978). The Mad Genius Controversy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Becker, T. E. & Billings, R. S. (1993). Profiles of commitment: an empirical test. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 14, 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, T. E. & Colquitt, A. L. (1992). Potential versus actual faking of a biodata form: an analysis along several dimensions of item type. Personnel Psychology, 45(2), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, N. L., Matthews, T. D., Lassiter, K. S. & Leveret, J. P. (2002). Validity of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a measure of fluid or crystallized intelligence: implications for career assessment. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 113–20.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. J. & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Non-conventional methods in personnel selection. In Herriot, P. (ed.), Assessment and Selection in Organizations, pp. 469–85. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ben-Shakhar, G., Bar-Hillel, M., Bilu, Y., Ben-Abba, E. & Flug, A. (1986). Can graphology predict occupational success? Two empirical studies and some methodological ruminations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 645–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, L. (2004). Creating a talent management system for organisation excellence. In Berger, L. & D. (eds.), The Talent Management Handbook, pp. 3–21. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Berger, L. & Berger, D. (eds.) (2004). The Talent Management Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bergman, M. E., Drasgow, F., Donovan, M. A., Henning, J. B. & Juraska, S. E. (2006). Scoring situational judgment tests: once you get the data, your troubles begin. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(3), 223–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernadin, H. & Russell, J. (1993). Human Resource Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bernardin, J. J. & Cooke, D. K. (1993). Validity of an honesty test in predicting theft among convenience store employees. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1097–1108.Google Scholar

Berry, D. S. (1990). Taking people at face value: evidence for the kernel of truth hypothesis. Social Cognition, 8, 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, D. S. (1991). Accuracy in social perception: contributions of facial and vocal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertua, C., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J. F. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: a UK meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 78, 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J. & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 751–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In McGarty, C. & Haslam, S. (eds.), The Message of Social Psychology, 36–42. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Binet, A. & Henri, V. (1896). La psychologie individuelle. Année Psychologique, 2, 411–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binet, A. & Simon, T. (1905/1973). The Development of Intelligence in Children, trans. Kite, E.. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar

Bliesener, T. (1996). Methodological moderators in validating biographical data in personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, J. (1995a). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Block, J. (1995b). Going beyond the five factors given: rejoinder to Costa and McCrae (1995) and Goldberg and Saucier (1995). Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 226–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, J. (2001). Millennial contrarianism: the five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobko, P., Roth, P. L. & Potosky, D. (1999). Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52, 561–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogels, S. M. (1999). Diagnostic interviewing in mental health care: methods, training and assessment. In Memon, A. & Bull, R. (eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Interviewing. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bogg, T. & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviours: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioural contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bono, J. E. & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554–71.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J. (1998). Genetic and environmental influences on adult intelligence and special mental abilities. Human Biology, 70, 257–79.Google ScholarPubMed

Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R. & Judge, T. A. (2001). Effects of personality on executive career success in the United States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratko, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Saks, Z. (2006). Personality and school performance: incremental validity of self- and peer-ratings over intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. & Schwartz, M. (1998). Semantic factors in verbal retrieval: an effect of complexity. Brain and Language, 63(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bretz, R. D. (1989). College grade point average as a predictor of adult success: a meta-analytic review and some additional evidence. Public Personnel Management, 18(1), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, N. (2004). What cognitive intelligence is and what emotional intelligence is not. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 234–8.Google Scholar

Brody, L. & Mills, C. (2005). Talent search research. High Ability Studies, 16, 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brolyer, C. R., Thorndike, E. L. & Woodyard, E. R. (1927). A second study of mental discipline in high school studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, P. & Arnold, D. (1989). Reid Report Examiners Manual. Chicago, IL: Reid Psychological Systems.Google Scholar

Brosnan, M. (2006). Digit ratio and faculty membership. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 455–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, B. K. & Campion, M. A. (1994). Biodata phenomenology: recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: what are we to measure? In Glover, J. A., Ronning, P. R. & Reynolds, C. R. (eds.), Handbook of Creativity. New York. Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Brtek, M. & Motowildo, S. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 185–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruce, M. M. (1953). Business Judgment Test [Test booklet with manual]. Oxford: Author.Google Scholar

Bruce, M. M. & Learner, D. B. (1958). A supervisory practices test. Personnel Psychology, 11, 207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. & Ferrieux, D. (1991). Une enquête sur le recrutement en France [A study of recruitment in France]. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 9–17.Google Scholar

Buel, W. D. (1965). Biographical data and the identification of creative research personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(5), 318–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

,Bureau of National Affairs (1988). Recruiting and Selection Procedures. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Burns, J. M. (2003). Transformational Leadership. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterworth, B. (1999). The Mathematical Brain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Byrne, J., Smither, S., Reilly, R. & Dominick, G. J. (2007). An examination of the discriminant, convergent, and criterion-related validity of self-ratings on the emotional competence inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cable, D. M. & Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D. T. & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A Primer on Regression Artifacts. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cardall, A. J. (1942). Test of Practical Judgment; for 12th Grade Level and Above. Oxford: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar

Carlson, S. (1985). A double-blind test of astrology. Nature, 318, 419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, K. D., Scullen, S. E., Schmidt, F. L., Rothstein, H. & Erwin, F. (1999). Generalizable biographical data validity can be achieved without multi-organizational development and keying. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 731–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlyle, T. (1907). On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A. & Schell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carretta, T. R. & Ree, M. J. (1996). Factor structure of the Air Force officer qualifying test: analysis and comparison. Military Psychology, 8, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrington, D. H. (1949). Note on the Cardall Practical Judgment Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 33(1), 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. J. & Nash, A. N. (1972). Effectiveness of a forced-choice reference check. Personnel Administration, 35(2), 42–6.Google Scholar

Carson, D. K. & Runco, M. A. (1999). Creative problem solving and problem findings in young adults: interconnections with stress, hassles, and coping abilities. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Catalyst (2002a). Catalyst census makes gains in number of women corporate officers in America's largest 500 companies [Press release, 19 November]. Retrieved 20 February 2003, from www.catalystwomen.org/press_room/factsheets/fact_ women_ceos.htm.

Catalyst (2002b). Fact sheet: women CEOs. Retrieved 6 October 2002, from www. catalystwomen.org/press_room/factsheets/fact_women_ceos.htm.

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A Systematic Theoretical and Factual Study. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1971). The process of creative thought. In Cattell, R. (ed.), Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action, pp. 407–17. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. & Peters, D. (1984). Letters of reference: a naturalistic study of the effects of confidentiality. American Psychologist, 39(1), 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and Individual Differences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Ahmetoglu, G. & Furnham, A. (2008). Little more than personality: trait determinants of test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 258–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Arteche, A. (2008). Intellectual competence and academic performance: preliminary validation of a model. Intelligence, 18(6), 564–73.Google Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Bennett, E. & Furnham, A. (2007). The happy personality: mediational role of trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(8), 1633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2002). Neuroticism and ‘special treatment’ in university examinations. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(8), 807–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2003a). Personality predicts academic performance: evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2003b). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(3), 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2004). A possible model to understand the personality – intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and Intellectual Competence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2006a). Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: a third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2006b). Self-assessed intelligence and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 26, 769–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Harlaar, N. & Plomin, R. (In press). More than just IQ: incremental validity of self-perceived ability in the longitudinal prediction of school performance. Intelligence.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Moutafi, J. & Furnham, A. (2005). The relationship between personality traits, subjectively-assessed and fluid intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1517–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Reichenbacher, L. (2008). Effects of personality and threat of evaluation on divergent and convergent thinking. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 1095–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, D. & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15(3), 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chemers, M. M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: a functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, B. (1988). Growing up Gifted. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar

Clarke, D., Gabriels, T. & Barnes, J. (1996). Astrological signs as determinants of extroversion and emotionality: an empirical study. Journal of Psychology, 130, 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, R. (1973). Patterns of Personality Judgements. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Colarelli, S. M., Hechanova-Alampay, R. & Canali, K. G. (2002). Letters of recommendation: an evolutionary psychological perspective. Human Relations, 55(3), 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F. & Harris, S. G. (2004). Job type and recruiters' inferences of applicant personality drawn from resume biodata: their relationships with hiring recommendations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(4), 363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collaros, P. A. & Anderson, , , L. R. (1969). Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(2, part 1), 159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership in organisational settings. Academy of Management Review, 16, 262–90.Google Scholar

Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Toward a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership. In Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (eds.), Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organisational Effectiveness, pp. 78–97. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic Leadership in Organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. J. & Viswesvaran, C. (2000). The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(2), 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J. & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: a meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 110–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, J., Jako, R. & Goodman, D. (1995). A meta-analysis of inter-rater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 565–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, M. (2004). Personnel Selection. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cooter, R. (1984). The Cultural Meaning of Popular Science: Phrenology and the Organization of Consent in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corr, P. J., Pickering, A. D. & Gray, J. A. (1997). Personality, punishment, and procedural learning: a test of J. A. Gray's anxiety theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 337–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Primary traits of Eysenck's P-E-N system: three- and five-factor solutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 308–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cox, C. M. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. In Terman, L. (ed.), Genetic Studies of Genius, vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, C. & Cooper, C. (1988). High Flyers: An Anatomy of Managerial Success. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Crepieux-Jamin, J. (1909). L'écriture et la caractère. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1960). Essentials of Psychological Testing, 2nd edn. Oxford: Harper.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Five decades of public controversy over psychological testing. American Psychologist, 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Cross, S. E. & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives, pp. 325–39. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Daft, R. L. (1999). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Orlando, FL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, D. R. & Metzger, M. B. (1993). Integrity testing for personnel selection: an unsparing perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, D. R., Metzger, M. B. & Wimbush, J. C. (1994). Integrity testing for personnel selection: a review and research agenda. In Ferris, G. (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 12, pp. 125–60. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, D. R., Wimbush, J. C. & Daily, C. M. (1994). Using the unmatched count technique (UCT) to estimate base rates for sensitive behavior. Personnel Psychology, 47(4), 817–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dany, F. & Torchy, V. (1994). Recruitment and selection in Europe: policies, practices and methods. In Brewster, C. & Hegewisch, A. (eds.), Policy and Practice in European Human Resource Management: The Price Waterhouse Cranfield Survey, pp. 68–85. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Datta, L. E. (1963). Test instructions and identification of creative scientific talent. Psychological Reports, 13, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Datta, L. E. (1964a). A note on the remote associates test, United States culture, and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(3), 184–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Datta, L. E. (1964b). Remote associates test as a predictor of creativity in engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(3), 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davey, D. M. (1989). How to Be a Good Judge of Character: Methods of Assessing Ability and Personality. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Davies, J. D. (1955). Phrenology, Fad and Science: A Nineteenth-Century American Crusade. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dean, G. (1987). Does astrology need to be true? Part 2: The answer is no. Skeptical Inquirer, 11, 257–73.Google Scholar

Dean, G. (1992). The bottom line and effect size. In Beyerstein, B. L. & Beyerstein, D. F. (eds.), The Write Stuff: Evaluations of Graphology, the Study of Handwriting Analysis, pp. 269–341. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Dean, M. A. & Russell, C. J. (2005). An examination of biodata theory-based constructs in a field context. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(2), 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, M. A., Russell, C. J. & Muchinsky, P. M. (1999). Life experiences and performance prediction: toward a theory of biodata. In Ferris, G. (ed.), Research in Personnel / Human Resources, pp. 245–81. Westport, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2001). Human intelligence differences: a recent history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 127–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deary, I. J., Taylor, M. D., Hart, C. L., Wilson, V., Davey Smith, G., Blane, D. & Starr, J. M. (2005). Intergenerational social mobility and mid-life status attainment: influences of childhood intelligence, childhood social factors, and education. Intelligence, 33, 455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., Lemmon, H., Crawford, J. R. & Starr, J. M. (2000). The stability of individual differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: follow-up of the 1932 Scottish mental survey. Intelligence, 28, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bono, E. (1992). Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

DeNeve, K. M. & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R. & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I'm able, and I know I am: longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78(2), 430–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeShon, R. P., Smith, M. R., Chan, D. & Schmitt, N. (1998). Can racial differences in cognitive test performance be reduced by presenting problems in a social context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 438–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devlin, S. E., Abrahams, N. M. & Edwards, J. E. (1992). Empirical keying of biographical data: cross-validity as a function of scaling procedure and sample size. Military Psychology, 4(3), 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, D. H. & Kelly, I. W. (1985). The ‘Barnum effect’ in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 57, 367–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dilchert, S., Ones, D., Davis, R. D. & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dodrill, C. B. (1981). An economical method for the evaluation of general intelligence in adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 668–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodrill, C. B. (1983). Long-term reliability of the Wonderlic Personnel Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 316–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Domino, S. J. (1974). Assessment of cinematographic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 150–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dracup, C. (1997). The reliability of marking on a psychology degree. British Journal of Psychology, 88(4), 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drakeley, R. J., Herriot, P. & Jones, A. (1988). Biographical data, training success and turnover. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(2), 145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Driver, R., Buckley, M. & Frink, D. (1996). Should we write off graphology?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 4, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drory, A. & Gluskinos, U. (1980). Machiavellianism and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duckworth, A. L. (2006). Intelligence is not enough: non-IQ predictors of achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, vol. 67(3-B).Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D. & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duckworth, A. L. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dudek, S. Z. & Hall, W.B. (1991). Personality consistency: eminent architects 25 years later. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E. & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J. & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–44.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. & Engen, M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

,Economist Intelligence Unit (2006). The CEOs Role in Talent Management. London: Economist.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. G. P. & Armitage, P. (1992). An experiment to test the discriminating ability of graphologists. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R. & Hough, L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellingson, J. E., Smith, D. B. & Sackett, P. R. (2001). Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 122–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elliott, R. & Strenta, A. C. (1988). Effects of improving the reliability of the GPA on prediction generally and on comparative predictions for gender and race particularly. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(4), 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) (1988). Legislative history, United States Code Congressional and Administrative News (USCCAN). Paper presented at the 100th Congress, 2nd Session.

England, G. W. (1961). Development and Use of Weighted Application Banks. Dubuque, IO: Brown.Google Scholar

Entwisle, D. R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,European Commission (2001). Employment trends and sectors of growth in the cultural economy. Final report. European Commission, DG Employment and Social Affairs.

Eysenck, H. (1970). The Structure of Human Personality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. (1994). Personality and intelligence: psychometric and experimental approaches. In Sternberg, R. J. & Ruzgis, P. (eds.), Personality and Intelligence, pp. 3–31. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. (1999). Personality and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (ed.), Creativity Research Handbook. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Edits.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W. & Eysenck, H. J. (1980). Mischel and the concept of personality. British Journal of Psychology, 71(2), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. & Furnham, A. (1993). Personality and the Barron-Welsh art scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 837–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. & Gudjonsson, G. (1986). An empirical study of the validity of handwriting analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 263–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, E. W. (1974). Psychoticism and person-orientation as general personality characteristics. BSc thesis, University of Glasgow.

Farsides, T. & Woodfield, R. (2007). Individual and gender differences in ‘good’ and ‘first-class’ undergraduate degree performance. British Journal of Psychology, 98(3), 467–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Faust, Q. C. (1996). Integrity tests: do they have any integrity. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 6, 211–32.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity, pp. 273–96. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. & Barron, F. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenollar, P., Román, S. & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students' academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Fiedler, F. E. (1993). The leadership situation and the black box in contingency theories. In Chemers, M. M. & Ayman, R. (eds.), Leadership Theory and Research, pp. 1–28. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar

Fiedler, F. E. (2002). The curious role of cognitive resources in leadership. In Riggio, R. E., Murphy, S. E. & Pirozzolo, F. J. (eds.), Multiple Intelligences and Leadership, pp. 91–104. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

File, Q. W. & Remmers, H. H. (1946). Studies in supervisory evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30(5), 421–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fine, S. A. & Cronshaw, S. (1994). The role of job analysis in establishing the validity of biodata. In G. Stokes, S, Mumford, M. D. & Owens, W. A. (eds.), Biodata Handbook, pp. 39–64. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Fineman, S. (1977). The achievement motive construct and its measurement: where are we now?British Journal of Psychology, 68, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelstein, J. (1991). The Fashioned Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: the impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flach, F. (1990). Disorders of the pathways involved in the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 158–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleishman, E. A. (1988). Some new frontiers in personnel selection research. Personnel Psychology, 41(4), 679–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, C., Taylor, P. & Glanfield, K. (1996). Acceptance of personality questionnaire feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 44, 118–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frensch, P. A. & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: when is it worse to know better? In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In Strachey, J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 28: Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Group Psychology and Other Works, pp. 65–143. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, H. S., Hall, J. A. & Harris, M. J. (1985). Type A behavior, nonverbal expressive style, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1299–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Funder, D. C., Parke, R. D., Tomlinson-Keasey, C. & Widaman, K. (1993). Studying Lives through Time: Personality and Development (APA Science Volumes). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. (1986). Social skills training with adolescents and young adults. In Hollin, C. R. & Trower, P. (eds.), Handbook of Social Skills Training, pp. 33–57. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (1988). Write and wrong: the validity of graphological analysis. Skeptical Inquirer, 13, 64–9.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (1994a). Personality at Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (1994b). The Barnum effect in medicine. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. (1999). Personality and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 407–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. (2001). All in the Mind: The Essence of Psychology, 2nd edn. London: Whurr.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (2003). The Icarus syndrome: talent management and derailment in the new millennium. In Effron, M., Gandossy, R. & Goldsmith, M. (eds.), Human Resources in the 21st Century, pp. 99–108. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (2004). Personality and organisation: a European perspective on personality assessment in organisations. In Schneider, B. & Smith, D. (eds.), Personality and Organisation, pp. 25–57. Mahwah, NJ: Lea.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (2007). Personality disorders and derailment at work: the paradoxical positive influence of pathology in the workplace. In Langen-Fox, J., Cooper, C. & Klimoski, R. (eds.), Management Challenges and Symptoms of the Dysfunctional Workplace. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(5), 943–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Self-assessed intelligence and confidence for the acquisition of skills. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 6, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Callahan, I. (2003). Does graphology predict personality and intelligence?Individual Difference Research, 1, 78–94.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & McDougall, F. (2002). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. & Gunter, B. (1987). Graphology and personality: another failure to validate graphological analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 433–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. & Vartan, C. (1988). Predicting and accepting personality test feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 735–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagne, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983/2003). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993a). Creative Minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993b). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1995). Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gauquelin, M. (1969). The Scientific Basis for Astrology. New York: Stein & Day.Google Scholar

Gauquelin, M. (1975). Spheres of influence. Psychology Today, 7, 22–7.Google Scholar

Gauquelin, M., Gauquelin, F. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1979). Personality and the position of the planets at birth: an empirical study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gellatly, I. R. (1996). Conscientiousness and task performance: test of cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 474–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Getzels, J. M. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The Validity of Occupational Aptitude Tests. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ghiselli, E. E. (1973). The validity of aptitude test in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 26, 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghiselli, E. E. & Barthol, R. P. (1953). The validity of personality inventories in the selection of employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghiselli, E. E. & Brown, C. W. (1955). Personnel and Industrial Psychology, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Gilliland, S. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gladwell, M. (2002). The talent myth. The New Yorker, 28 July, p. 33.Google Scholar

Glick, P., Gottesman, D. & Jolton, J. (1989). The fault is not in the stars: susceptibility of skeptics and believers in astrology to the Barnum effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 572–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goethals, G. R. (2005). Presidential leadership. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 545–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, L. R. (1972). Parameters of Personality Inventory Construction and Utilization: A Comparison of Prediction Strategies and Tactics (Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, no. 59). Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1986). Some informal explorations and ruminations about graphology. In Nevo, B. (ed.), Handbook of Scientific Aspects of Graphology, pp. 281–93. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of personality traits: vertical and horizontal aspects. In Funder, D. C., Parke, R. D., Tomlinson-Keasey, C. & Widaman, K. (eds.), Studying Lives through Time: Personality and Development (APA Science Volumes), pp. 169–88. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Goncalo, J. A. & Staw, , , B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, N. (1955). The new riddle of induction. In Fact, Fiction and Forecast, pp. 72–83. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gott, K. (1992). Enhancing creativity in older adults. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 40–9.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1986). Societal consequences of the g factor in employment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1988). Reconsidering fairness: a matter of social and ethical priorities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Racially gerrymandering the content of police tests to satisfy the US Justice Department: a case study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 418–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997b). Why g matters: the complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2004). Intelligence: is it the epidemiologists' elusive ‘fundamental cause’ of social class inequalities in health?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 311–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2007). Applying double standards to ‘divisive’ ideas: commentary on Hunt and Carlson (2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 216–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Götz, K. O. & Götz, K. (1979a). Personality characteristics of professional artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Götz, K. O. & Götz, K. (1979b). Personality characteristics of successful artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 919–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1976). Studying creativity by means of word association tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1981). The Mismeasures of Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Graham, J. (1961). Lavater's physiognomy in England. Journal of the History of Ideas, 22, 561–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1982). Précis of The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(3), 469–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1988). The neuropsychological basis of anxiety. In Hersen, M. (ed.), Handbook of Anxiety Disorders, pp. 10–37. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Greasley, P. (2000). Handwriting analysis and personality assessment: the creative use of analogy, symbolism and metaphor. European Psychologist, 5, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1997). Occupational Crime, 2nd edn. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Greenberg, S. H. (1963). Supervisory Judgment Test Manual. Washington, DC: US Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Guastello, S. J. & Rieke, M. L. (1991). A review and critique of honesty test research. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 9, 501–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: a quarter century of progress. In Taylor, I. A. & Getzels, J. W. (eds.), Perspectives in Creativity, pp. 37–59. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the Structure-of-Intellect Model. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 48, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. & Christensen, P. R. (1973). The one-way relation between creative potential and IQ. Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, 247–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guion, R. M. & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunter, B. & Furnham, A. (2001). Assessing Business Potential. London: Whurr.Google Scholar

Haensly, P. A. & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Creativity and intelligence. In Glover, J. A.et al. (eds.), Handbook of Creativity. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, M. M. (1995). Incorporation of astrology-based personality information into long-term self-concept. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 707–18.Google Scholar

Hamilton, M. M. (2001). Who believes in astrology? Effect of favorableness of astrologically derived personality descriptions on acceptance of astrology. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 895–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampson, E., Ellis, C. L. & Tenk, C. M. (2008). On the relation between 2D:4D and sex-dimorphic personality traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, special issue: Biological Research on Sex-Dimorphic Behavior and Sexual Orientation, 37, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hansemark, O. C. (1997). Objective vs. projective measurement of need for achievement and the relation between TAT and CMPS. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12, 280–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansemark, O. C. (2000). Predictive validity of TAT and CMPS on the entrepreneurial activity, ‘start of a new business’: a longitudinal study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15, 634–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harcourt Assessment, I. (2005). Miller Analogies Test: Scoring and Score Reporting. Retrieved 5 June 2005, from www.milleranalogies.com.

Harder, D. (1979). The assessment of ambitious–narcissistic character style with three projective tests: the early memories, TAT and Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, I, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harold, C. M., McFarland, L. A. & Weekley, J. A. (2006). The validity of verifiable and non-verifiable biodata items: an examination across applicants and incumbents. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4), 336–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrell, T. W. & Harrell, M. S. (1945). Army general classification test scores for civilian occupations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 5, 229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, D. M. (1972). Effects of instructions to ‘Be creative’ on three tests of divergent thinking abilities. PhD thesis, University of California Berkeley.

Harris, M. M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: a review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 691–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartford, H. (1973). You Are What You Write. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hartigan, J. & Wigdor, A. K. (eds.) (1989). Fairness in Employment Testing. Validity Generalization, Minority Issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Harvey, J. & Katz, C. (1985). If I'm So Successful, Why Do I Feel Like a Fake? The Imposter Phenomenon. New York: St Martins.Google Scholar

Hassin, R. & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hattrup, K., Rock, J. & Scalia, C. (1997). The effects of varying conceptualizations of job performance on adverse impact, minority hiring, and predicted performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 656–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausknecht, J. P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo, N. T. & Di Paulo, M. M. (2007). Retesting in selection: a meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 373–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hayes, J. R. (1978). Cognitive Psychology. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar

Helgesen, S. (1990). The Female Advantage: Women's Ways of Leadership. New York: Doubleday Currency.Google Scholar

Heller, K., Monks, F. & Passow, A. (eds.) (1993). International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent. New York: Pergamon.

Helson, R. (1970). Sex-specific patterns in creative literary fantasy. Journal of Personality, 38, 344–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Helson, R. (1971). Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 210–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hemphill, J. K. & Coons, A. E. (1957). Development of the leader behaviour description questionnaire. In Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, A. E. (eds.), Leader Behaviour: Its Description and Measurement, pp. 6–38. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Business Research.Google Scholar

Herzberg, F. (1965). The motivation to work among Finnish supervisors. Personnel Psychology, 18(4), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heston, J. J. (1966). Psychiatric disorders in foster home reared children of schizophrenic mothers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 819–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heyns, R. W., Veroff, J. & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). A scoring manual for the affiliation motive. In Atkinson, J. W. (ed.), Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society, pp. 205–18. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Hirsh, H. R., Northrop, L. & Schmidt, F. L. (1986). Validity generalization results for law enforcement occupations. Personnel Psychology, 39, 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, J. & Hogan, R. (2002). Leadership and sociopolitical intelligence. In Riggio, R. E., Murphy, S. E. & Pirozzolo, F. J. (eds.), Multiple Intelligences and Leadership, pp. 75–88. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hogan, J. & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: a socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hogan, J., Rybicki, S. L., Motowildo, S. J. & Borman, W. C. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 11(2–3), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, R. T. (1986). Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Natonal Computer Systems.Google Scholar

Hogan, R. T. (1992). Personality and personality measurement. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd edn, pp. 873–919. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Hogan, R. T. (2005). In defense of personality measurement: new wine for old whiners. Human Performance, 18, 331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J. & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, R., Hogan, J. & Roberts, B. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51(5), 469–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments, 3rd edn. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1999). Why interest inventories are also personality inventories. In Savickas, M. & Spokane, A. R. (eds.), Vocational Interests: Meaning, Measurement, and Counseling Use, pp. 87–101. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.Google Scholar

Hollander, E. P. (1993). Legitimacy, power, and influence: a perspective on relational features of leadership. In Chemers, M. M. & Ayman, R. (eds.), Leadership Theory and Research, pp. 29–48. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hollinger, R. C. & Clark, J. P. (1983). Theft by Employees. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath / Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Hoppock, R. (1937). Job satisfaction of psychologists. Journal of Applied Psychology, 21(3), 300–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1976). Human abilities: a review of research and theory in the early 1970's. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 437–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, L. M. (1984). Development and evaluation of the ‘accomplishment record’ method of selecting and promoting professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, L. M. (1995). Applicant self descriptions: evaluating strategies for reducing distortion. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Orlando, FL.

Hough, L. M. (1998a). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11(2–3), 209–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, L. M. (1998b). The millennium for personality psychology: new horizons or good ole daze. Applied Psychology, 47(2), 233–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D. & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, L. M. & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: looking toward the future – remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L. & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, L. M. & Paullin, C. (1994). Construct-oriented scale construction: the rational approach. In Stokes, G. S., Mumford, M. D. & Owens, W. A. (eds.), Biodata Handbook: The Use of Biographical Information in Selection and Performance Prediction, pp. 109–46. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

House, R. J. & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: quo vadis?Journal of Management, 23, 409–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

House, R. & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic and visionary theories. In Chemers, M. & Ayman, R. (eds.), Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions, pp. 81–107. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Howard, A. & Bray, D. (1988). Managerial Lives in Transition: Advancing Age and Changing Times (Adult Development and Aging). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Howell, J. M. (1988). Two facets of charisma: socialized and personalized leadership in organisations. In Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (eds.), Charismatic Leadership, pp. 213–36. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Huffcutt, A. & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: interview validity for entry level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L. & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 897–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huffcutt, A. & Woehr, D. (1999). Further analysis of employment interview validity. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 20, 549–60.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, C. L. & Montgomery, R. B. (1919). An experimental investigation of certain alleged relations between character and handwriting. Psychological Review, 26, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphreys, L. G. (1988). Trends in levels of academic achievement of blacks and other minorities. Intelligence, 12(3), 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunsley, J. & Bailey, J. (1999). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment, 11, 266–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (1980). Test Validation for 12,000 Jobs: An Application of Synthetic Validity and Validity Generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (1983a). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In Landy, S. Z. F. & Cleveland, J. (eds.), Performance Measurement Theory, pp. 257–66. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (1983b). The prediction of job performance in the military using ability composites: the dominance of general cognitive ability over specific aptitudes (no. F41689–83-C-0025).

Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, J. E. & Hirsh, H. R. (1987). Applications of meta-analysis. In Cooper, C. L. & Robertson, I. T. (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 321–57. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 447–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurtz, G. M. & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: the big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hurvich, M., Benveniste, P., Howard, J. & Coonerty, S. (1993). Assessment of annihilation anxiety from projective tests. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 77, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H.et al. (1972). Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Jennings, R., Cos, C. & Cooper, C. (1994). Business Elites: The Psychology of Entrepreneurs. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1986). G: artifact or reality?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 301–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

John, C. A. (1991). Adolescent competence and the life course: or why one social psychologist needed a concept of personality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(1), 4–14.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. & Bouchard, T. J. Jr (2005). The structure of human intelligence: it is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, A. & Harrison, E. (1982). Prediction of performance in initial officer training using reference reports. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, F. E. (1964). Predictor variables for creativity in industrial science. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(2), 134–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A. & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A. & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: the role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 257–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Illies, R. & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E. & Illies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: a quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A. & Erez, A. (2007). Interaction and intersection: the constellation of emotional stability and extraversion in predicting performance. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., Heller, D. & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A. & Higgins, C. A. (1998). Affective disposition and the letter of reference. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(3), 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A. & Cable, D. M. (2000). The employment interview: a review of recent research and recommendations for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J. & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A. & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A. & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A. & Rich, B. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 762–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed