Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:20:19.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - In Search of the Writer's Creative Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

By
Todd Lubart
Edited by
Scott Barry Kaufman  and
James C. Kaufman
Scott Barry Kaufman
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

Once upon a time there was a young child named Alice who wanted to become a writer. Inspired by numerous children's books and the imaginative tales that these books told, Alice dreamed of a literary career. One day at school, Alice's teacher proposed an exciting task for a young author: Each student had to invent a short story, write the text, and then read it aloud to the class. Alice was delighted, but when she got home and started to work on the assignment she realized that the teacher had never indicated how to proceed. There were no clear instructions on how to write a story, how to generate ideas, or how to put them together. This assignment was quite different from most schoolwork, such as solving math problems, because normally the teacher showed students how to proceed by giving examples and working through a sample problem while specifying the method to use at each step. Schoolwork, in general, was similar to making a cake: The teacher provided the ingredients, there were instructions about how to put them together, and everyone was supposed to end up, more or less, with the same cake. Apparently writing a story was quite different. Students were supposed to find their own ingredients, decide how to put them together in their own way, and end up with something different from each other.

Alice decided to get started right away with her literary composition.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Creative Writing , pp. 149 - 165
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scaramalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(2), 91–103, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calwelti, S., Rappaport, A., & Wood, B. (1992). Modeling artistic creativity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(2), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Doyle, C. L. (1998). The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eindhoven, J. E., & Vinacke, W. E. (1952). Creative processes in painting. Journal of General Psychology, 47, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, B. (1956). The creative process and its relation to the identification of creative talent. In Taylor, C. W. (Ed.), The 1955 University of Utah research conference on the identification of creative scientific talent (pp. 195–203). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, B. (1963). Automatism, intention, and autonomy in the novelist's production. Daedalus, 92(2), 297–311.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1985). The creative process: A symposium. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published in 1952)
Glover, J. A. (1979). Levels of questions asked in interview and reading sessions by creative and relatively non-creative college students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 135(1), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goleman, D., Kaufman, P., & Ray, M. (1992). The creative spirit. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1979). Some incubated thoughts on incubation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg, L. & Steinberg, E. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 4(10), 1106–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Nash, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 29–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, E. D. (1949). How to think creatively. New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury.Google Scholar
Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.Google Scholar
Israeli, N. (1962). Creative processes in painting. Journal of General Psychology, 67, 251–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israeli, N. (1981). Decision in painting and sculpture. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 3(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding: The search for mechanism. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Kay, S. (1991). The figural problem solving and problem finding of professional and semiprofessional artists and nonartists. Creativity Research Journal, 4(3), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipling, R. (1985). Working tools. In Ghiselin, B. (Ed.), The creative process: A symposium (pp. 161–163). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1937)Google Scholar
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic exploration in art. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Kubie, L. S. (1958). Neurotic distortion of the creative process. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (1994). Product-centered self-evaluation and the creative process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Moore, M. T. (1985). The relationship between the originality of essays and variables in the problem discovery process: A study of creative and noncreative middle school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(1), 84–95.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: I. Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 3–39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Threlfall, K. V., & Baughman, W. A. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: III. Category selection. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olton, R. M. (1979). Experimental studies of incubation: Searching for the elusive. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Little Rock, AK: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar
Plimpton, G. (Ed.) (1958). Writers at work: The Paris Review interviews. New York: Viking.
Poincaré, H. (1908/1985). Mathematical creation. In Ghiselin, B. (Ed.), The creative process: A symposium (pp. 22–31). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O'Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science and other fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2–3), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Dow, G. T. (1999). Problem finding and creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 367–371). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sapp, D. D. (1992). The point of creative frustration and the creative process: A new look at an old model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, M. (1996). An account of writing as creative design. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 127–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smilansky, J. (1984). Problem solving and the quality of invention: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Dodds, R. A. (1999). Incubation. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 39–43). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity: Individual procedures. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, M., Thomas, G., & Robinson, E. J. (1996). Finding something to write about: Strategic and automatic processes in idea generation. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 189–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Turner, S. (1994). The creative process: A computer model of storytelling and creativity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (2001). Creative cognition, conceptual combination, and the creative writing of Stephen R. Donaldson. American Psychologist, 56(4), 350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (1997). Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×