Abdel Raouf, M. (2009), ‘How Should International Arbitrators Tackle Corruption Issues?’, 24 ICSID Review 116Google Scholar

Aidt, T.S. (2011), ‘Corruption and sustainable development’, in: Rose-Ackerman, S. and Søreide, T. (eds.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume Two, Cheltenham, 3Google Scholar

Albanesi, C. and Jolivet, E. (2014), ‘Dealing with Corruption in Arbitration: A Review of ICC Experience’, 24 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin (2013), Special Supplement, ‘Tackling Corruption in Arbitration’, 27Google Scholar

Arfazadeh, H. (2001), ‘Considérations pragmatiques sur la compétence respective de l’arbitre et du juge en matière de corruption’, 19 ASA Bulletin 672Google Scholar

Ashford, P. (2013), The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, A Guide, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Banifatemi, Y. (2010), ‘The Law Applicable in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in: Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, A Guide to the Key Issues, Oxford, 191Google Scholar

Banifatemi, Y. (2015), ‘The Impact of Corruption on “Gateway Issues” of Arbitrability, Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Procedural Issues’, in: Baizeau, D. and Kreindler, R.H. (eds.), Addressing Issues of Corruption in Commercial and Investment Arbitration, ICC Dossiers, Vol. 13, Paris, 16Google Scholar

Barraclough, A. and Waincymer, J. (2005), ‘Mandatory Rules of Law in International Commercial Arbitration’, 6 Melbourne Journal of International Law 205Google Scholar

Berger, B. and Kellerhals, F. (2015), International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland, 3rd edn, BerneGoogle Scholar

Berger-Steiner, I. (2008), Das Beweismass im Privatrecht, Eine dogmatische Untersuchung mit Erkenntniswert für die Praxis und die Rechtsfigur der Wahrscheinlichkeitshaftung, BernGoogle Scholar

Bermann, G.A. (2011), ‘The Origin and Operation of Mandatory Rules’, in: Bermann, G.A. and Mistelis, L.A. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, Huntington, 1Google Scholar

Besson, S. (2006), ‘Arbitration and Human Rights’, 24 ASA Bulletin 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besson, S. (2015), ‘Corruption and Arbitration’, in: Baizeau, D. and Kreindler, R.H. (eds.), Addressing Issues of Corruption in Commercial and Investment Arbitration, ICC Dossiers, Vol. 13, Paris, 103Google Scholar

Bhojwani, R. (2012), ‘Deterring Global Bribery: Where Public and Private Enforcement Collide’, 112 Columbia Law Review 66Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A.K. (2011), ‘Investment Arbitration’, in: Bermann, G.A. and Mistelis, L.A. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, Huntington, 233Google Scholar

Blackaby, N. et al. (2015), Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 6th edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Blessing, M. (1997), ‘Mandatory Rules of Law versus Party Autonomy in International Arbitration’, 14 Journal of International Arbitration 23Google Scholar

Böckstiegel, K.-H. (1987), ‘Public Policy and Arbitrability’, in: Sanders, P. (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration, Deventer, 177Google Scholar

Bonell, M.J. and Meyer, O. (2015), ‘The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts – General Report’, in: Bonell, M.J. and Meyer, O. (eds.), The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts, Cham et al., 1Google Scholar

Bonucci, N. (2014), ‘Article 12 – Monitoring and Follow-up’, in: Pieth, M., Low, L.A. and Bonucci, N. (eds.), The OECD Convention on Bribery, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 534Google Scholar

Born, G.B. (2014), International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd edn, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar

Born, G. (2015a), International Arbitration, Cases and Materials, 2nd edn, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Born, G.B. (2015b), International Arbitration: Law and Practice, 2nd edn, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar

Borris, C. and Hennecke, R. (2008), ‘Das Kriterium der Einhaltung von Vorschriften nationalen Rechts in ICSID-Schiedsverfahren – Anmerkungen zum Schiedsspruch in der Sache Fraport v. Philippines’, Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren (SchiedsVZ), 49Google Scholar

Brönnimann, C.J. (1989), Die Behauptungs- und Substanzierungslast im schweizerischen Zivilprozessrecht, BernGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. (2000), ‘Illegality and Public Policy – Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in England: Hilmarton Limited v. Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation S.A.’, 3 International Arbitration Law Review 31Google Scholar

Bruch, G.S. and Adkins, A.N. (2014), ‘Article 8 – Accounting’, in: Pieth, M., Low, L.A. and Bonucci, N. (eds.), The OECD Convention on Bribery, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 447Google Scholar

Cairns, D.J.A. (2009), ‘Transnational Public Policy and the Internal Law of State Parties, 6(1) Transnational Dispute ManagementGoogle Scholar

Carreteiro, M.A. (2016), ‘Burden and Standard of Proof In International Arbitration: Proposed Guidelines For Promoting Predictability’, 13 Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, B. (1987), General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Cockcroft, L. (2014), Global Corruption, Money, Power and Ethics in the Modern World, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, G. (2013), ‘International arbitration is not only international’, in: Cordero-Moss, G. (ed.), International Commercial Arbitration, Different Forms and Their Features, Cambridge, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coşar, U. (2015), ‘Claims of Corruption in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Proof, Legal Consequences and Sanctions’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, Alphen aan den Rijn, 531Google Scholar

Court de Fontmichel, A. (2004), L’arbitre, le juge et les pratiques illicites du commerce international, ParisGoogle Scholar

Craig, W.L., Park, W.W. and Paulsson, J. (2000), International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration, 3rd edn, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Cremades, B.M. (2005), ‘Corruption and Investment Arbitration’, in: Aksen, G. et al. (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution, Liber Amicorum in honour of Robert Briner, ParisGoogle Scholar

Cremades, B.M. and Cairns, D.J.A. (2003a), ‘Transnational public policy in international arbitral decision-making: The cases of bribery, money laundering and fraud’, in: Karsten, K. and Berkeley, A. (eds.), Arbitration: Money Laundering, Corruption and Fraud, ICC Dossiers, Paris, 65Google Scholar

Cremades, B.M. and Cairns, D.J.A. (2003b), ‘Corruption, International Public Policy and the Duties of Arbitrators’, 58(4) Dispute Resolution Journal 76Google Scholar

Crivellaro, A. (2003), ‘Arbitration case law on bribery: Issues of arbitrability, contract validity, merits and evidence’, in: Karsten, K. and Berkeley, A. (eds.), Arbitration: Money Laundering, Corruption and Fraud, ICC Dossiers, Paris, 109Google Scholar

Crivellaro, A. (2014), ‘The courses of action available to international arbitrators to address issues of bribery and corruption’, in: Bonelli, F. and Mantovani, M. (eds.), Corruzione nazionale e internazionale, Milan, 225Google Scholar

De Boisséson, M. (2009), ‘Adducing evidence – anything goes?’, Transcript, 12th IBA International Arbitration Day, Due Process in International Arbitration, 16 February 2009Google Scholar

Derains, Y. (1987), ‘Public Policy and the Law Applicable to the Dispute in International Arbitration’, in: Sanders, P. (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration, Deventer, 227Google Scholar

Doak, J., McGourlay, C. and Thomas, M. (2015), Evidence in Context, 4th edn, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Donatsch, A. and Schmid, N. (1996 et seq.), Kommentar zur Strafprozessordnung des Kantons Zürich, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Donovan, D.F. (2011), ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in: Bermann, G.A. and Mistelis, L.A. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, Huntington, 275Google Scholar

Donovan, D.F. and Greenawalt, A.K.A. (2006), ‘Mitsubishi After Twenty Years: Mandatory Rules Before Courts and International Arbitrators’, in: Mistelis, L.A. and Lew, J.D.M. (eds.), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, 11Google Scholar

Douglas, Z. (2014), ‘The Plea of Illegality in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 29 ICSID Review 155Google Scholar

Dumberry, P. and Dumas-Aubin, G. (2013), ‘The Doctrine of ‘Clean Hands’ and the Inadmissibility of Claims by Investors Breaching International Human Rights Law’, 10(1) Transnational Dispute Management Special Issue: Aligning Human Rights and Investment Protection, January 2013Google Scholar

El Kosheri, A.S. and Leboulanger, P. (1984), ‘L’arbitrage face a la corruption et aux trafics d’influence’, 3 Revue de l’arbitrage 3Google Scholar

Engel, C. (2009), ‘Preponderance of the Evidence versus Intime Conviction, A Behavioral Perspective on a Conflict between American and Continental European Law’, 33 Vermont Law Review 435Google Scholar

Eveleigh, E. (1994), ‘General Standards of Proof in Litigation and Arbitration Generally’, 10 Arbitration International 354Google Scholar

Gaillard, E. and Banifatemi, Y. (2003), ‘The Meaning of “and” in Article 42(1), Second Sentence, of the Washington Convention: The Role of International Law in the ICSID Choice of Law Process’, 18 ICSID Review 375Google Scholar

Gaillard, E. and Savage, J. (eds.) (1999), Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Gazzini, T. (2012), ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties’, in: Gazzini, T. and De Brabandere, E. (eds.), International Investment Law, The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden, 99Google Scholar

Geisinger, E. and Ducret, P. (2011), ‘The Uncomfortable Truth: Once Discovered, What to Do with It?’, in: Wirth, M., Rouvinez, C. and Knoll, J. (eds.), The Search for ‘Truth’ in Arbitration, Is Finding the Truth What Dispute Resolution Is About?, Huntington NY, 113Google Scholar

Gless, S. (2014), Commentary on Arts. 139, 140 and 141, in: Niggli, M.A., Heer, M. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Jugendstrafprozessordnung, Art. 1–195 StPO, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Gless, S. (2015), Internationales Strafrecht, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Glover, R. (2015), Murphy on Evidence, 14th edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

González García, L.A. (2013), ‘Corruption, Money Laundering and International Arbitration’, 1 Latin American Journal of International Trade Law 509Google Scholar

Greenberg, S. and Lautenschlager, F. (2011), ‘Adverse Inferences in International Arbitral Practice’, in: Kröll, S. et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Eric Bergsten, International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution, Alphen aan den Rijn, 179Google Scholar

Greenwald, B. (2015), ‘The Viability of Corruption Defenses in Investment Arbitration When the State Does Not Prosecute’, Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 15 April 2015Google Scholar

Grubenmann, B. (2010), Der Begriff der Investition in Schiedsgerichtsverfahren in der ICSID-Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, BaselGoogle Scholar

Guldener, M. (1955), Beweiswürdigung und Beweislast nach schweizerischem Zivilprozessrecht, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Gurovits, A., Livschitz, T. and Frenkel, D. (2013), ‘Admissibility of Illegally Procured Evidence in CAS Proceedings – Some Comments to the Adamu Decision’, www.sportslawcircle.com, 14 January 2013Google Scholar

Habscheid, W.J. (1990a), ‘Beweislast und Beweismass, Ein kontinentaleuropäisch-angelsächsischer Rechtsvergleich’, in: Prütting, H. (ed.), Festschrift für Gottfried Baumgärtel zum 70. Geburtstag, Köln et al.Google Scholar

Habscheid, W.J. (1990b), Schweizerisches Zivilprozess- und Gerichtsorganisationsrecht, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Hagenstein, N. (2014), Commentary on Art. 302, in: Niggli, M.A., Heer, M. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Jugendstrafprozessordnung, Art. 196–457 StPO, Art. 1–54 JStPO, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Hahn, A.-C. (2010), ‘Schweizer Schiedsgerichte und der internationale Kampf gegen Korruption’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Finanzmarktrecht, 382Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B. (1994), ‘Satisfying the Burden of Proof: The Viewpoint of a “Civil Law” Lawyer’, 10 Arbitration International 341Google Scholar

Happ, R. (2013), ‘Chapter XIV – ICSID Rules’, in: Schütze, R.A. (ed.), Institutional Arbitration, Article-by-Article Commentary, Munich, 923Google Scholar

Harari, M. and Jobin, D. (2014), ‘Articles 9–11 – International Co-operation’, in: Pieth, M., Low, L.A. and Bonucci, N. (eds.), The OECD Convention on Bribery, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 486Google Scholar

Hasenböhler, F. (2016), Commentary on Arts. 150, 152, 161, 162 and 164, in: Sutter-Somm, T., Hasenböhler, F. and Leuenberger, C. (eds.), Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO), 3rd edn, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Hassemer, W. (1990), Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts, 2nd edn, MunichGoogle Scholar

Haugeneder, F. and Liebscher, C. (2009), ‘Corruption and Investment Arbitration: Substantive Standards and Proof’, Austrian Arbitration Yearbook, 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hauser, R. (1974), Der Zeugenbeweis im Strafprozess mit Berücksichtigung des Zivilprozesses, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Hauser, R., Schweri, E. and Hartmann, K. (2005), Schweizerisches Strafprozessrecht, 6th edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Heine, G. (2003), ‘Part III – Comparative Analysis’, in: Heine, G., Huber, B. and Rose, T.O. (eds.), Private Commercial Bribery, A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures, Freiburg i.Br., 603Google Scholar

Heine, G., Huber, B. and Rose, T.O. (eds.) (2003), Private Commercial Bribery, A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures, Freiburg i.Br.Google Scholar

Heiskanen, V. (2014), ‘Ménage à trois? Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Competence in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 29 ICSID Review 231Google Scholar

Hess, D. (2009), ‘Corruption in the value chain: private-to-private and private-to-public corruption’, in: Transparency International, Global Corruption Report 2009, Corruption and the Private Sector, Cambridge, 19Google Scholar

Hiber, D. and Pavić, V. (2008), ‘Arbitration and Crime’, 25 Journal of International Arbitration 461Google Scholar

Higi, P. (2016), Commentary on Art. 162, in: Brunner, A., Gasser, D. and Schwander, I. (eds.), Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO), Kommentar, 2nd edn, Zürich and St. GallenGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, M. (2011), ‘Sources of International Investment Law’, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1892564Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, D. and Fuchs, S. (2013), Introduction to ch. 12 SPILA, in: Honsell, H. et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Hodges, P. (2007), ‘The Relevance of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights in the Context of Arbitration Proceedings’, 10 International Arbitration Law Review 163Google Scholar

Horder, J. (2016), Ashworth’s Principles of Criminal Law, 8th edn, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horvath, G.J. et al. (2013), ‘Categories of Guerilla Tactics’, in: Horvath, G.J. and Wilske, S. (eds.), Guerilla Tactics in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, 3Google Scholar

Huguenin, C. and Meise, B. (2015), Commentary on Arts. 19/20, in: Honsell, H., Vogt, N.P. and Wiegand, W. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Obligationenrecht I, Art. 1–529 OR, 6th edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Hunter, M. and Conde e Silva, G. (2003), ‘Transnational Public Policy and its Application in Investment Arbitrations’, 4 Journal of World Investment 367Google Scholar

Hwang, M. and Lim, K. (2012), ‘Corruption in Arbitration – Law and Reality’, 8 Asian International Arbitration Journal 1Google Scholar

Ibrahim, N.M. (2013), ‘Proof of Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary on the ICC Award 12732 of February 2007’, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178435 (in Arabic, with an English abstract)Google Scholar

Ivory, R. (2014), Corruption, Asset Recovery, and the Protection of Property in Public International Law, The Human Rights of Bad Guys, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Kaiafa-Gbandi, M. (2012), ‘The Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on the Fight Against Fraud to the Union’s Financial Interests by Means of Criminal Law (COM(2012) 363 final) – An Assessment Based on the Manifesto for a European Criminal Policy’, 2 European Criminal Law Review (EuCLR) 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karrer, P.A. (2013a), ‘Chapter V – Swiss Rules of International Arbitration of the Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution’, in: Schütze, R.A. (ed.), Institutional Arbitration, Article-by-Article Commentary, Munich, 361Google Scholar

Karrer, P.A. (2013b), Commentary on Art. 187, in: Honsell, H. et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Karsten, K. (2003), ‘Money laundering: How it works and why you should be concerned’, in: Karsten, K. and Berkeley, A. (eds.), Arbitration: Money Laundering, Corruption and Fraud, ICC Dossiers, Paris, 15Google Scholar

Karsten, K. and Berkeley, A. (eds.) (2003), Arbitration: Money Laundering, Corruption and Fraud, ICC Dossiers, ParisGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2007), ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?’, 23 Arbitration International 357Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Rigozzi, A. (2015), International Arbitration, Law and Practice in Switzerland, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Keane, A. and McKeown, P. (2016), The Modern Law of Evidence, 11th edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Kendra, T. and Bonini, A. (2014), ‘Dealing with Corruption Allegations in International Investment Arbitration: Reaching a Procedural Consensus?’, 31 Journal of International Arbitration 439Google Scholar

Kessedjan, C. (2007), ‘Transnational Public Policy’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics?, Alphen aan den Rijn, 857Google Scholar

Kessler, M.A. (2015), ‘Commentary on Art. 53’, in: Honsell, H., Vogt, N.P. and Wiegand, W. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Obligationenrecht I, Art. 1–529 OR, 6th edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Khvalei, V. (2014), ‘Using Red Flags to Prevent Arbitration from Becoming a Safe Harbour for Contracts that Disguise Corruption’, 24 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin (2013), Special Supplement, ‘Tackling Corruption in Arbitration’, 15Google Scholar

Kissling, C. (2015), ‘Impact of Bribery on Contracts Under Swiss Civil Law’, in: Bonell, M.J. and Meyer, O. (eds.), The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts, Cham et al., 351Google Scholar

Kjos, H.E. (2013), Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration, The Interplay Between National and International Law, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Klaw, B.W. (2015), ‘State Responsibility for Bribe Solicitation and Extortion: Obligations, Obstacles, and Opportunities’, 33 Berkeley Journal of International Law 60Google Scholar

Knahr, C. (2008), ‘Investitionen “in Übereinstimmung mit nationalen Rechtsvorschriften”’, in: Knahr, C. and Reinisch, A. (eds.), Aktuelle Probleme und Entwicklungen im Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Stuttgart et al., 125Google Scholar

König, V. (2013), Präzedenzwirkung internationaler Schiedssprüche, Dogmatisch-empirische Analysen zur Handels- und Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Berlin and BostonGoogle Scholar

Konrad, S. and Hunter, R. (2013), ‘Chapter VI – LCIA Rules’, in: Schütze, R.A. (ed.), Institutional Arbitration, Article-by-Article Commentary, Munich, 413Google Scholar

Kramer, E.A. (1991), Berner Kommentar, Obligationenrecht, Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Inhalt des Vertrages, Art. 19–22 OR, BernGoogle Scholar

Krauss, D. (1980), ‘Das Prinzip der materiellen Wahrheit im Strafprozess’, in: Jäger, H. (ed.), Kriminologie im Strafprozess, Zur Bedeutung psychologischer, soziologischer und kriminologischer Erkenntnisse für die Strafrechtspraxis, Frankfurt a.M., 65Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2003a), ‘Aspects of Illegality in the Formation and Performance of Contracts’, 6 International Arbitration Law Review 1Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2003b), ‘Approaches to the Application of Transnational Public Policy by Arbitrators’, 4 Journal of World Investment & Trade 239Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2004), ‘The Law Applicable to International Investment Disputes’, in: Kröll, S.M. and Horn, N. (eds.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes: Procedural and Substantive Legal Aspects, The Hague, 401Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2005a), ‘Arbitrators and Illegality: The Challenge of Determining the Proper Applicable Law’, The International Who’s Who of Commercial Arbitration, available at: www.shearman.comGoogle Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2005b), ‘Schiedsgerichte und Rechtsverstösse der Vertragsparteien: Das für die Beurteilung von Rechtsverletzungen anzuwendende Recht’, in: Bachmann, B. et al. (eds.), Grenzüberschreitungen, Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrensrecht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Tübingen, 429Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2005c), Strafrechtsrelevante und andere anstössige Verträge als Gegenstand von Schiedsverfahren, Zum Vorgehen von Schiedsgerichten bei Rechtsverletzungen von Vertragsparteien – ein rechtsvergleichender Beitrag zur nationalen und internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2010a), ‘Corruption in International Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and the Unclean Hands Doctrine’, in: Hobér, K., Magnusson, A. and Öhrström, M. (eds.), Between East and West: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke, Huntington NY, 309Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2010b), ‘Die Internationale Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit und die Korruption: Eine alte Herausforderung mit neuen Antworten’, Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren (SchiedsVZ), 2Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2013a), ‘Competence-Competence in the Face of Illegality in Contracts and Arbitration Agreements’, 361 Recueil des Cours, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 131Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. (2013b), ‘The Role of State Courts in Assisting Arbitral Tribunals Confronted With Guerilla Tactics’, in: Horvath, G.J. and Wilske, S. (eds.), Guerilla Tactics in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, 102Google Scholar

Kreindler, R.H. and Gesualdi, F. (2015), ‘The Civil Law Consequences of Corruption Under the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: An Analysis in Light of International Arbitration Practice’, in: Bonell, M.J. and Meyer, O. (eds.), The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts, Cham et al., 391Google Scholar

Kulick, A. (2012), Global Public Interest in International Investment Law, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Kulick, A. and Wendler, C. (2010), ‘A Corrupt Way to Handle Corruption? Thoughts on the Recent ICSID Case Law on Corruption’, 37 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 61Google Scholar

Kurkela, M.S. (2008), ‘Criminal Laws in International Arbitration – the May, the Must, the Should and the Should Not’, 26 ASA Bulletin 280Google Scholar

Lalive, P. (1987), ‘Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration’, in: Sanders, P. (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration, Deventer, 258Google Scholar

Lalive, P. (2009), ‘L’ordre public transnational et l’arbitre international’, in: Nuovi strumenti del diritto internazionale privato, Liber Fausto Pocar, Vol. 2, Milano, 599Google Scholar

Lamm, C.B. (2011), ‘Internationalization of the Practice of Law and Important Emerging Issues for Investor-State Arbitration’, The Hague Academy of International Law Opening Lecture, 25 July 2011, available at: www.law.yale.eduGoogle Scholar

Lamm, C.B., Greenwald, B.K. and Young, K.M. (2014), ‘From World Duty Free to Metal-Tech: A Review of International Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases Involving Allegations of Corruption’, 29 ICSID Review 328Google Scholar

Lamm, C.B., Hellbeck, E.R. and Khan, M.I. (2015), ‘Pleading and Proof of Fraud and Comparable Forms of Abuse in Treaty Arbitration’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, Alphen aan den Rijn, 557Google Scholar

Lamm, C.B., Pham, H.T. and Moloo, R. (2010), ‘Fraud and Corruption in International Arbitration’, in: Fernández-Ballesteros, M.Á. and Arias, D. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades, Madrid, 699Google Scholar

Landolt, P. (2012), ‘Arbitrators’ Initiatives to Obtain Factual and Legal Evidence’, 28 Arbitration International 173Google Scholar

Lardelli, F. (2014), ‘Commentary on Art. 8’, in: Honsell, H., Vogt, N.P. and Geiser, T. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Zivilgesetzbuch I, Art. 1–456 ZGB, 5th edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, E. (2009), ‘Foreword’, in: Schreuer, C. et al., The ICSID Convention, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, ixGoogle Scholar

Leuenberger, C. (2008), ‘Parteibefragung und Beweisaussage im Entwurf für eine Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung’, in: Leupold, M. et al. (eds.), Der Weg zum Recht, Festschrift für Alfred Bühler, Zurich, 47Google Scholar

Leuenberger, C. and Uffer-Tobler, B. (2016), Schweizerisches Zivilprozessrecht, 2nd edn, BernGoogle Scholar

Levine, J. (2015), ‘Can Arbitrators Choose Who to Call as Witnesses? (And What Can Be Done If They Don’t Show Up?)’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, Alphen aan den Rijn, 315Google Scholar

Lew, J.D.M. (1978), Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Lew, J.D.M., Mistelis, L.A. and Kröll, S.M. (2003), Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Lim, K. (2013), ‘Upholding Corrupt Investors’ Claims against Complicit or Compliant Host States – Where Angels Should Not Fear to Tread’, in: Sauvant, K.P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2011–2012, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Litwin, D. (2013), ‘On the Divide between Investor-State Arbitration and the Global Fight against Corruption’, 10(3) Transnational Dispute ManagementGoogle Scholar

Llamzon, A.P. (2014), Corruption in International Investment Arbitration, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Llamzon, A. (2015), ‘Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation, The State of the ‘Unclean Hands’ Doctrine in International Investment Law: Yukos as both Omega and Alpha’, 30 ICSID Review 315Google Scholar

Llamzon, A. and Sinclair, A. (2015), ‘Investor Wrongdoing in Investment Arbitration: Standards Governing Issues of Corruption, Fraud, Misrepresentation and Other Investor Misconduct’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, Alphen aan den Rijn, 451Google Scholar

Losco, M.A. (2014), ‘Streamlining the Corruption Defense: A Proposed Framework for FCPA-ICSID Interaction’, 63 Duke Law Journal 1201Google Scholar

Lüderssen, K. (1984), Kriminologie, Einführung in die Probleme, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar

Mächler-Erne, M. and Wolf-Mettier, S. (2013), Commentary on Art. 19, in: Honsell, H. et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Makinwa, A.O. (2009), ‘Civil Remedies for International Corruption: The Role of International Arbitration’, in: Meyer, O. (ed.), The Civil Law Consequences of Corruption, Baden-Baden, 257Google Scholar

Makinwa, A.O. (2013), Private Remedies for Corruption, Towards an International Framework, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Manciaux, S. (2008), ‘The Notion of Investment: New Controversies’, 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 443Google Scholar

Mantilla-Serrano, F. (2004), ‘Towards a Transnational Procedural Public Policy’, 20 Arbitration International 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, A.T. (2003), ‘International Arbitration and Corruption: An Evolving Standard’, available at: www.timmartin.caGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. (2014), English Legal System, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Mayer, P. (1986), ‘Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration’, 2 Arbitration International 274Google Scholar

Mayer, P. (2006), ‘Effect of International Public Policy in International Arbitration?’, in: Mistelis, L.A. and Lew, J.D.M. (eds.), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, 61Google Scholar

Mbiyavanga, S. (2017), ‘Improving domestic governance through international investment law: Should bilateral investment treaties learn from international anti-corruption conventions?’, Research Paper, 2017 OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum, available at: www.oecd.orgGoogle Scholar

McDougall, A. de Lotbiniére (2005), ‘International Arbitration and Money Laundering’, 20 American University International Law Review 1021Google Scholar

Mégevand, G. (2013), Confiscation et corruption, L’application des articles 70 et 71 CP dans le contexte des infractions réprimées par les articles 322^ter ss CP et 4a LCD, BaselGoogle Scholar

Mehren, R.B. von (1996), ‘Burden of Proof in International Arbitration’, in: A.J. van den Berg (ed.), Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings, the Law Applicable in International Arbitration, 123Google Scholar

Menaker, A.J. (2010), ‘The Determinative Impact of Fraud and Corruption on Investment Arbitrations’, 25 ICSID Review 67Google Scholar

Mendes, R.O.B. (2009), ‘A Private Transnational Law to Transnational Legal Regimes?’, in: Calliess, G.-P. et al. (eds.), Soziologische Jurisprudenz, Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag, Berlin, 827Google Scholar

Meshel, T. (2013), ‘The Use and Misuse of the Corruption Defence in International Investment Arbitration’, 30 Journal of International Arbitration 267Google Scholar

Meyer, O. (2013), ‘The Formation of a Transnational Ordre Public against Corruption: Lessons for and from Arbitral Tribunals’, in: Rose-Ackerman, S. and Carrington, P.D. (eds.), Anti-Corruption Policy, Can International Actors Play a Constructive Role?, Durham, North Carolina, 229Google Scholar

Meyer, O. (2017), Korruption im Vertrag, TübingenGoogle Scholar

Mills, K. (2002), ‘Corruption and Other Illegality in the Formation and Performance of Contracts and in the Conduct of Arbitration Relating Thereto’, 5 International Arbitration Law Review 126Google Scholar

Mirzayev, R. (2012), ‘International Investment Protection Regime and Criminal Investigations’, 29 Journal of International Arbitration 71Google Scholar

Mistelis, L.A. (2009), ‘Legal Issues Arising Out of Disputes Involving Fraud, Bribery, Corruption and Other Illegality and Illicitness Issues’, in: Gaillard, E. and Di Pietro, D. (eds.), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards, The New York Convention in Practice, London, 573Google Scholar

Moloo, R. (2010), ‘A Comment on the Clean Hands Doctrine in International Law’, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2358229Google Scholar

Moloo, R. and Khachaturian, A. (2011), ‘The Compliance with the Law Requirement in International Investment Law’, 34 Fordham International Law Journal 1473Google Scholar

Mosk, R.M. and Ginsburg, T. (2001), ‘Evidentiary Privileges in International Arbitration’, 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 345Google Scholar

Mouawad, C. and Silbert, E. (2013), ‘A Guide to Interim Measures in Investor-State Arbitration’, 29 Arbitration International 381Google Scholar

Mourre, A. (2009), ‘Arbitration and Criminal Law: Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Duties of the Arbitral Tribunal’, in: Mistelis, L.A. and Brekoulakis, S.L. (eds.), Arbitrability, International and Comparative Perspectives, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar

Muller, W.H., Kälin, C.H. and Goldsworth, J.G. (eds.) (2007), Anti-Money Laundering, International Law and Practice, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Nadakavukaren Schefer, K. (2016), International Investment Law, Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd edn, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar

Nadeau-Séguin, S. (2013), ‘Commercial Arbitration and Corrupt Practices: Should Arbitrators Be Bound by a Duty to Report Corrupt Practices?’, 10(3) Transnational Dispute ManagementGoogle Scholar

Nasarre, C. (2013), ‘International Commercial Arbitration and Corruption: The Role and Duties of the Arbitrator’, 10(3) Transnational Dispute ManagementGoogle Scholar

Newcombe, A. (2011), ‘Investor misconduct: Jurisdiction, admissibility or merits?’, in: Brown, C. and Miles, K. (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge, 187Google Scholar

Newcombe, A. and Marcoux, J.-M. (2015), ‘Hesham Talaat M. Al-Warraq v Republic of Indonesia, Imposing International Obligations on Foreign Investors’, 30 ICSID Review 525Google Scholar

Nicholls, C. et al. (2011), Corruption and Misuse of Public Office, 2nd edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Niggli, M.A. and Maeder, S. (2013), Commentary on Art. 12, in: Niggli, M.A. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Strafrecht I, Art. 1–110 StGB, Jugendstrafgesetz, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Nueber, M. (2015), ‘The Arbitration Agreement and Arbitrability, Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration – Selected Issues’, Austrian Arbitration Yearbook, 3Google Scholar

Obersteiner, T. (2014), ‘“In Accordance with Domestic Law”’ Clauses: How International Investment Tribunals Deal with Allegations of Unlawful Conduct of Investors’, 31 Journal of International Arbitration 265Google Scholar

Olaya, J. (2009), Good Governance and International Investment Law, The Challenges of Lack of Transparency, Corruption and Legal Stability with a Particular Reference to Colombia, BonnGoogle Scholar

O’Malley, N.D. (2012), Rules of Evidence in International Arbitration, An Annotated Guide, LondonGoogle Scholar

Partasides, C. (2010), ‘Proving Corruption in International Arbitration: A Balanced Standard for the Real World’, 25 ICSID Review 47Google Scholar

Patocchi, P.M. and Meakin, I.L. (1996), ‘Procedure and the Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration, The Interaction of Civil Law and Common Law Procedures’, 7 International Business Law Journal 884Google Scholar

Patocchi, P.M. and Niedermaier, T. (2013), ‘Chapter XV – UNCITRAL Rules’, in: Schütze, R.A. (ed.), Institutional Arbitration, Article-by-Article Commentary, Munich, 1007Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. (2005), ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in: Aksen, G. et al. (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution, Liber amicorum in honour of Robert Briner, Paris, 601Google Scholar

Peters, A. (2016), Völkerrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, 4th edn, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Peterson, L.E. (2002), ‘All Roads Lead Out of Rome, Divergent Paths of Dispute Settlement in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, available at: www.iisd.orgGoogle Scholar

Petrochilos, G. (2004), Procedural Law in International Arbitration, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Pfisterer, S. (2013), Commentary on Art. 190, in: Honsell, H. et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Philip, A. (2003), ‘Arbitration – money laundering, corruption and fraud: The role of the tribunals’, in: Karsten, K. and Berkeley, A. (eds.), Arbitration: Money Laundering, Corruption and Fraud, ICC Dossiers, Paris, 147Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (1984), Der Beweisantrag des Beschuldigten im Schweizer Strafprozessrecht, Basel and Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2007), ‘The Wolfsberg Process’, in: Muller, W.H., Kälin, C.H. and Goldsworth, J.G. (eds.), Anti-Money Laundering, International Law and Practice, West Sussex, UK, 93Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (ed.) (2008), Recovering Stolen Assets, BernGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (2011), ‘Contractual Freedom v. Public Policy Considerations in Arbitration’, in: Büchler, A. and Müller-Chen, M. (eds.), Private Law, national-global-comparative, Festschrift für Ingeborg Schwenzer zum 60. Geburtstag, Band II, Bern, 1375Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (ed.) (2012a), Collective Action: Innovative Strategies to Prevent Corruption, Zurich and St. GallGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (2012b), ‘Der Einfluss des internationalen Rechts auf das Schweizer Strafrecht’, 131 Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht 233Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2013), Commentary on Arts. 305^bis and 322^ter, in: Niggli, M.A. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Strafrecht II, Art. 111–392 StGB, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (2014a), ‘Introduction’, in: Pieth, M., Low, L.A. and Bonucci, N. (eds.), The OECD Convention on Bribery, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 3Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2014b), ‘Article 7 – Money Laundering’, in: Pieth, M., Low, L.A. and Bonucci, N. (eds.), The OECD Convention on Bribery, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 422Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2014c), Strafrecht Besonderer Teil, BaselGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (2015), Strafrechtsgeschichte, BaselGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (2016a), Schweizerisches Strafprozessrecht, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. (2016b), Wirtschaftsstrafrecht, BaselGoogle Scholar

Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (2003), ‘The Private Sector becomes Active: The Wolfsberg Process’, in: Clark, A. and Burrell, P. (eds.), A Practitioner’s Guide to International Money Laundering Law and Regulation, Surrey, UK, 267Google Scholar

Polkinghorne, M. and Rosenberg, C.B. (2015), ‘The Adverse Inference in ICSID Practice’, 30 ICSID Review 741Google Scholar

Poudret, J.-F. and Besson, S. (2007), Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd edn, LondonGoogle Scholar

Powles, S., Waine, L. and May, R. (2015), Criminal Evidence, 6th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L. (2013), ‘International arbitration and domestic law’, in: Cordero-Moss, G. (ed.), International Commercial Arbitration, Different Forms and Their Features, Cambridge, 40Google Scholar

Raeschke-Kessler, H. (2004), ‘Corrupt Practices in the Foreign Investment Context: Contractual and Procedural Aspects’, in: Horn, N. (ed.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes, Procedural and Substantive Legal Aspects, The Hague, 471Google Scholar

Redfern, A. (1994), ‘The Practical Distinction between the Burden of Proof and the Taking of Evidence – An English Perspective’, 10 Arbitration International 317Google Scholar

Redfern, A. and Hunter, M. (2004), Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 4th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar

Reed, L., Paulsson, J. and Blackaby, N. (2011), Guide to ICSID Arbitration, 2nd edn, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar

Reiner, A. (1994), ‘Burden and General Standards of Proof’, 10 Arbitration International, 328Google Scholar

Reiner, A. and Aschauer, C. (2013), ‘Chapter II – ICC Rules’, in: Schütze, R.A. (ed.), Institutional Arbitration, Article-by-Article Commentary, Munich, 25Google Scholar

Reinisch, A. (2008), ‘The Role of Precedent in ICSID Arbitration’, Austrian Arbitration Yearbook, 495Google Scholar

Reisman, W.M. (2007), ‘Law, International Public Policy (So-called) and Arbitral Choice in International Commercial Arbitration’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics?, Alphen aan den Rijn, 849Google Scholar

Reymond, C. (1994), ‘The Practical Distinction between the Burden of Proof and Taking of Evidence – A Further Perspective’, 10 Arbitration International, 323Google Scholar

Riedo, C. and Boner, B. (2014), Commentary on Art. 301, in: Niggli, M.A., Heer, M. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Jugendstrafprozessordnung, Art. 196–457 StPO, Art. 1–54 JStPO, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Rose, C. (2014), ‘Questioning the Role of International Arbitration in the Fight against Corruption’, 31 Journal of International Arbitration 183Google Scholar

Rosell, J. and Prager, H. (1999), ‘Illicit Commissions and International Arbitration: The Question of Proof’, 15 Arbitration International 329Google Scholar

Rubins, N. (2004), ‘The Notion of “Investment” in International Investment Arbitration’, in: Horn, N. and Kröll, S.M. (eds.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes, Procedural and Substantive Legal Aspects, The Hague, 283Google Scholar

Rüedi, Y. (2009), Materiell rechtswidrig beschaffte Beweismittel im Zivilprozess, Zurich and St. GallenGoogle Scholar

Sacerdoti, G. (2009), ‘Corruption in Investment Transactions: Policy Initiatives, Legal Principles and Arbitral Practice’, 24 ICSID Review 565Google Scholar

Safferling, C. (2009), ‘Das Recht zu schweigen und seine Konsequenzen, Entwicklungen in nationalen und internationalen Strafverfahren’, 4 Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 784Google Scholar

Sanders, A. and Young, R. (2012), ‘From Suspect to Trial’, in: Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 5th edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Sandifer, D.V. (1939), Evidence Before International Tribunals, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Sattar, S. (2011), ‘Document Production and the 2010 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, A Commentary’, International Arbitration Law Review 210Google Scholar

Sayed, A. (2001), ‘La question de la corruption dans l’arbitrage commercial international: Inventaire des solutions’, 19 ASA Bulletin 653Google Scholar

Sayed, A. (2004), Corruption in International Trade and Commercial Arbitration, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Scherer, M. (2002), ‘Circumstantial Evidence in Corruption Cases Before International Arbitral Tribunals’, 5 International Arbitration Law Review 29Google Scholar

Schill, S.W. (2012), ‘Illegal Investments in International Arbitration’, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1979734Google Scholar

Schlabrendorff, F. von (2005), ‘Geldwäsche in internationalen Schiedsverfahren’, in: B. Bachmann et al. (eds.), Grenzüberschreitungen, Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrensrecht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Festschrift für Peter Schlosser zum 70. Geburtstag, 851Google Scholar

Schlosser, P. (1989), Das Recht der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 2nd edn, TübingenGoogle Scholar

Schmid, H. (2000), ‘Art. 8 ZGB: Überblick und Beweislast’, in: Leuenberger, C. (ed.), Der Beweis im Zivilprozess, BernGoogle Scholar

Schmid, N. (2013), Handbuch des schweizerischen Strafprozessrechts, 2nd edn, Zurich and St. GallenGoogle Scholar

Schmidlin, B. (2013), Berner Kommentar, Obligationenrecht, Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Mängel des Vertragsabschlusses, Art. 23–31 OR, 2nd edn, BernGoogle Scholar

Schneider, M.E. and Scherer, M. (2013), Commentary on Art. 184, in: Honsell, H. et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Schnyder, A.K. (1995), ‘Anwendung ausländischer Eingriffsnormen durch Schiedsgerichte, Überlegungen zu einem Grundsatzentscheid des Schweizer Bundesgerichts’, 59 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 293Google Scholar

Schreuer, C. et al. (2009), The ICSID Convention, A Commentary, 2nd edn, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Schwebel, S.M. and Lahne, S.G. (1987), ‘Public Policy and Arbitral Procedure’, in: Sanders, P. (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration, Deventer, 205Google Scholar

Seelmann, K. and Geth, C. (2016), Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 6th edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Segesser, G. von, Leimbacher, E. and Bell, K. (2014), ‘Admitting illegally obtained evidence in CAS proceedings – Swiss Federal Supreme Court Shows Match-Fixing the Red Card’, kluwerarbitrationblog.com, 17 October 2014Google Scholar

Sharpe, J.K. (2006), ‘Drawing Adverse Inferences from the Non-production of Evidence’, 22 Arbitration International 549Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. (2011), ‘Mandatory Rules in International Commercial Arbitration: An English Law Perspective’, in: Bermann, G.A. and Mistelis, L.A. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, Huntington, 171Google Scholar

Shihata, I.F.I. and Parra, A.R. (1994), ‘Applicable Substantive Law in Disputes Between States and Private Foreign Parties: The Case of Arbitration Under the ICSID Convention’, 9 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 183Google Scholar

Shore, L. (2009), ‘State Courts and Document Production’, in: Giovannini, T. and Mourre, A. (eds.), Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration, Paris, 57Google Scholar

Shore, L. (2011), ‘Applying Mandatory Rules of Law in International Commercial Arbitration’, in: Bermann, G.A. and Mistelis, L.A. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, Huntington, 131Google Scholar

Smit, H. (2011), ‘Mandatory Law in Arbitration’, in: Bermann, G.A. and Mistelis, L.A. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration, Huntington, 207Google Scholar

Smith, J. and Nadeau-Séguin, S. (2015), ‘The Illusive Standard of Proof in International Commercial Arbitration’, in: van den Berg, A.J. (ed.), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges, Alphen aan den Rijn, 134Google Scholar

Spühler, K. (2004), ‘Verwendung von legal und illegal beschafften Beweismitteln unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Daten- und Geheimnisschutzes’, 2 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess- und Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht 147Google Scholar

Srinivasan, D. et al. (2014), ‘Effect of bribery in international commercial arbitration’, 4 International Journal of Public Law and Policy 131Google Scholar

Stacher, M. (2011), ““Die Nichtigkeit ist von Amtes wegen zu beachten’”, Zur Regel und ihrer Bedeutung bei Korruptionsverdacht in Schiedsverfahren’, in: Lorandi, F. and Staehelin, D. (eds.), Innovatives Recht, Festschrift für Ivo Schwander, Zurich and St. GallGoogle Scholar

Stacher, M. (2014), ‘Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichts in Schiedssachen (2013 und 2014)’, Aktuelle Juristische Praxis, 1545Google Scholar

Steinbeisser, A. (1977), Die Bestechung von Bediensteten in obligationen-, arbeits- und wettbewerbsrechtlicher Hinsicht, BaselGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, J.E. and Pieth, M. (2016), Overcoming the Shadow Economy, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Stratenwerth, G. (2011), Schweizerisches Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil I, Die Straftat, 4th edn, BernGoogle Scholar

Stree, W. and Hecker, B. (2014), Commentary on § 261, in: Schönke, /Schröder, , Strafgesetzbuch, Kommentar, 29th edn, MunichGoogle Scholar

Sutter-Somm, T. (2017), Schweizerisches Zivilprozessrecht, 3rd edn, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Tercier, P. (1999), ‘La corruption et le droit des contrats’, 121(10) Semaine Judiciaire 225Google Scholar

Tirado, J., Page, M. and Meagher, D. (2014), ‘Corruption Investigations by Governmental Authorities and Investment Arbitration: An Uneasy Relationship’, 29 ICSID Review 493Google Scholar

Tophinke, E. (2014), Commentary on Art. 10, in: Niggli, M.A., Heer, M. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Jugendstrafprozessordnung, Art. 1–195 StPO, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Van den Berg, A.J. (1996), ‘Argentine engineer v British Company, Award, ICC Case No. 1110, 1963’, Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXI, 47Google Scholar

Van Houtte, V. (2009), ‘Adverse Inferences in International Arbitration’, in: Giovannini, T. and Mourre, A. (eds.), Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration, Paris, 195Google Scholar

Vasani, B.S. and Foden, T.L. (2010), ‘Burden of Proof Regarding Jurisdiction’, in: Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, A Guide to the Key Issues, Oxford, 271Google Scholar

Verniory, J.-M. (2000), ‘La libre appréciation de la preuve pénale et ses limites’, 118 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 378Google Scholar

Vervaele, J.A.E. (1992), Fraud against the Community, The Need for European Fraud Legislation, DeventerGoogle Scholar

Vest, H. and Horber, S. (2014), Commentary Vor Art. 168–176 and on Art. 169, in: Niggli, M.A., Heer, M. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Jugendstrafprozessordnung, Art. 1–195 StPO, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar

Vincke, F. (2014), ‘Recent Anti-Corruption Initiatives and Their Impact on Arbitration’, 24 ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin (2013), Special Supplement, ‘Tackling Corruption in Arbitration’, 5Google Scholar

Voser, N. (1996), ‘Mandatory Rules of Law as a Limitation on the Law Applicable in International Commercial Arbitration’, 7 The American Review of International Arbitration 319Google Scholar

Voser, N. and Moss, B. (2014), ‘Arbitral tribunal’s admission of unlawfully obtained evidence did not violate procedural public policy (Swiss Supreme Court)’, uk.practicallaw.com, 28 May 2014Google Scholar

Waincymer, J. (2012), Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar

Wälde, T.W. (2010), ‘“Equality of Arms” in Investment Arbitration: Procedural Challenges’, in: Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, A Guide to the Key Issues, Oxford, 161Google Scholar

Wehrli, D. and Stacher, M. (2013), ‘Arbitration Under the Swiss Rules’, in: Cordero-Moss, G. (ed.), International Commercial Arbitration, Different Forms and their Features, Cambridge, 345Google Scholar

Weibel, T. and Walz, C. (2016), Commentary on Art. 168, in: Sutter-Somm, T., Hasenböhler, F. and Leuenberger, C. (eds.), Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO), 3rd edn, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Wells, J. (2014), ‘Corruption and collusion in construction: A view from the industry’, in: Søreide, T. and Wells, A. (eds.), Corruption, Grabbing and Development, Cheltenham, 23Google Scholar

Wetter, J.G. (1994), ‘Issues of Corruption Before International Arbitral Tribunals: The Authentic Text and True Meaning of Judge Gunnar Lagergren’s 1963 Award in ICC Case No. 1110’, 10 Arbitration International 277Google Scholar

Williams, D.A.R. and Foote, S. (2011), ‘Recent developments in the approach to identifying an ‘investment’ pursuant to Article 25(1) of the ICSID Convention’, in: Brown, C. and Miles, K. (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge, 42Google Scholar

Wilske, S. (2010), ‘Sanctions for Unethical and Illegal Behavior in International Arbitration, A Double-Edged Sword?’, 3 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 211Google Scholar

Wilske, S. and Fox, T.J. (2011), ‘Corruption in International Arbitration and Problems with Standard of Proof, Baseless Allegations or Prima Facie Evidence?’, in: Kröll, S. et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Eric Bergsten, International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution, Alphen aan den Rijn, 489Google Scholar

Wilske, S. and Obel, W. (2013), ‘The “corruption objection” to jurisdiction in investment arbitration: Does It really protect the poor?’, in: Schefer, K. Nadakavukaren (ed.), Poverty and the International Economic Legal System, Duties to the World’s Poor, Cambridge, 177Google Scholar

Wilske, S. and Raible, M. (2009), ‘The Arbitrator as Guardian of International Public Policy? Should Arbitrators Go Beyond Solving Legal Issues?’, in: Rogers, C.A. and Alford, R.P. (eds.), The Future of Investment Arbitration, Oxford, 249Google Scholar

Wilson, S. et al. (2016), English Legal System, 2nd edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Wirth, M. (2009), ‘Production of Documents and Fraud in International Arbitration’, in: Giovannini, T. and Mourre, A. (eds.), Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration, Paris, 177Google Scholar

Wohlers, W. (2014), Commentary on Arts. 10 and 141, in: Donatsch, A., Hansjakob, T. and Lieber, V. (eds.), Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung (StPO), 2nd edn, ZurichGoogle Scholar

Yackee, J.W. (2012), ‘Investment Treaties & Investor Corruption: An Emerging Defense for Host States’, 52 Virginia Journal of International Law 723Google Scholar

Yannaca-Small, K. (2010), ‘Definition of “Investment”: An Open-Ended Search for a Balanced Approach’, in: Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, A Guide to the Key Issues, Oxford, 243Google Scholar

Yseult, M. (2015), ‘English Judges: Little Mice in the Big Business of Corruption?’, in: Bonell, M.J. and Meyer, O. (eds.), The Impact of Corruption on International Commercial Contracts, Cham et al., 141Google Scholar

Zadkovich, J. (2011), ‘International Commercial Arbitration and the Bribery Act 2010 (United Kingdom): A Matter of Common Sense’, 14 International Arbitration Law Review 103Google Scholar

Zerbes, I. (2014), ‘Article 1 – The Offence of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials’, in: Pieth, M., Low, L.A. and Bonucci, N. (eds.), The OECD Convention on Bribery, A Commentary, 2nd edn, Cambridge, 59Google Scholar

Zivkovic, V. (2012), ‘Recognition of Contracts as Investments in International Investment Arbitration’, 5(1) European Journal of Legal Studies 174Google Scholar

Zuberbühler, T. and Schregenberger, A. (2016), ‘Corruption in Arbitration – The Arbitrator’s Duty to Investigate’, in: Müller, C., Besson, S. and Rigozzi, A. (eds.), New Developments in International Commercial Arbitration 2016, Zurich, 1Google Scholar

Zuberbühler, T. et al. (2012), IBA Rules of Evidence, Commentary on the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, ZurichGoogle Scholar

AfDB 2014, Sanctions Procedures of the African Development Bank Group, 18 November 2014Google Scholar

AU 2003, African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (adopted 11 July 2003; entry into force 5 August 2006)Google Scholar

Botschaft Korruptionsstrafrecht 2014, Botschaft über die Änderung des Strafgesetzbuchs (Korruptionsstrafrecht) vom 30. April 2014 (14.035), BBl 2014 3591Google Scholar

CIArb 2010, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Guideline 12, The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Guidance for arbitrators and mediators, 2010, available at: www.ciarb.orgGoogle Scholar

CoE 1990, Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime, ETS No. 141 (open for signature 8 November 1990; entry into force 1 September 1993)Google Scholar

CoE 1999a, Council of Europe Criminal Law Convention on Corruption, ETS No. 173 (open for signature 27 January 1999; entry into force 1 July 2002)Google Scholar

CoE 1999b, Council of Europe Civil Law Convention on Corruption, ETS No. 174 (open for signature 4 November 1999; entry into force 1 November 2003)Google Scholar

CoE 2005, Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism, ETS No. 198 (open for signature 16 May 2005; entry into force 1 May 2008)Google Scholar

CoE ECHR 1950, Council of Europe, European Convention on Human Rights (open for signature 4 November 1950; entry into force 3 September 1953)Google Scholar

Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards, Vol. I (1974–1985), Vol. II (1986–1990), Vol. III (1991–1995), Vol. IV (1996–2000), Vol. V (2001–2007), Vol. VI (2008–2011)Google Scholar

Commentary on the Vienna Convention 1988, Commentary on the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, New York 1998Google Scholar

EBRD 2014, Document of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Enforcement Policy and Procedures, 25 April 2014Google Scholar

Energy Charter Treaty 1994, The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) (signed 17 December 1994; entry into force 16 April 1998)Google Scholar

EU 1991, Council Directive 91/308/EEC of 10 June 1991 on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering (OJ L 166, 77–82)Google Scholar

EU 1995, Convention Drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, 26 July 1995 (OJ C 316, 49–57)Google Scholar

EU 1997a, Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 (2) (c) of the Treaty on European Union on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, 26 May 1997 (OJ C 195, 2–11)Google Scholar

EU 1997b, Second Protocol, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, 19 June 1997 (OJ C 221, 12–22)Google Scholar

EU 2003, Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 54–56)Google Scholar

EU 2012, European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law, 11 July 2012 (COM[2012] 363 final)Google Scholar

EU 2015, Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (OJ L 141, 73–117)Google Scholar

FATF Recommendations 2012, Financial Action Task Force, International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, The FATF Recommendations, February 2012Google Scholar

FCPA Resource Guide 2012, US Department of Justice and US Securities and Exchange Commission, A Resource Guide to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 14 November 2012Google Scholar

Geneva Convention 1927, Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards (signed 26 September 1927; entry into force 25 July 1929), League of Nations Treaty Series (Vol. XCII, 301)Google Scholar

Geneva Protocol 1923, Protocol on Arbitration Clauses (signed 24 September 1923; entry into force 28 July 1924), League of Nations Treaty Series (Vol. XXVII, 157)Google Scholar

IADB 2015, Sanctions Procedures of the Inter-American Development Bank, 9 June 2015Google Scholar

IBA 2010, International Bar Association, IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (adopted 29 May 2010)Google Scholar

ICC 2012, Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (in force as from 1 January 2012)Google Scholar

ICCPR 1966, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966; entry into force 23 March 1976)Google Scholar

ICJ Statute 1945, United Nations, Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice (signed 26 June 1945; entry into force 24 October 1945)Google Scholar

ICSID Annual Report 2014, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Annual Report, 29 August 2014Google Scholar

ICSID 1965, Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (open for signature 18 March 1965; entry into force 14 October 1966)Google Scholar

ICSID 2006, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules) (amended and effective 10 April 2006)Google Scholar

ICSID 2006a, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (Additional Facility Rules) (amended and effective 10 April 2006)Google Scholar

ILA 2000, International Law Association, London Conference (2000), Committee on International Commercial Arbitration, Interim Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral AwardsGoogle Scholar

ILA 2002, International Law Association, New Delhi Conference (2002), Committee on International Commercial Arbitration, Final Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral AwardsGoogle Scholar

ILC 2001, International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (UNGA resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001, annex)Google Scholar

LCIA 2014, LCIA Arbitration Rules (effective 1 October 2014)Google Scholar

NAFTA 1992, North American Free Trade Agreement (signed 17 December 1992; entry into force 1 January 1994)Google Scholar

New York Convention 1958, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (adopted 10 June 1958; entry into force 7 June 1959), United Nations Treaty Series (Vol. 330, 38)Google Scholar

OAS 1996, Organization of American States, Inter-American Convention against Corruption, (adopted 29 March 1996; entry into force 6 March 1997)Google Scholar

OECD 1997, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (adopted 21 November 1997; entry into force 15 February 1999)Google Scholar

OECD 2009, Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (adopted 26 November 2009) with Annexes I and IIGoogle Scholar

OECD 2013, Bribery and Corruption Awareness Handbook for Tax Examiners and Tax Auditors, 7 November 2013Google Scholar

PCA 2012, Permanent Court of Arbitration, Arbitration Rules 2012 (effective 17 December 2012)Google Scholar

Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177/6, 4 July 2008)Google Scholar

Rome Convention 1980, Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 (OJ L 266/1, 9 October 1980)Google Scholar

SRIA 2012, Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution, the Swiss Chambers of Commerce Association for Arbitration and Mediation, Swiss Rules of International Arbitration (version in force 1 June 2012)Google Scholar

UK MoJ Guidance 2011, UK Ministry of Justice, The Bribery Act 2010, Guidance about procedures which relevant commercial organisations can put into place to prevent persons associated with them from bribing (section 9 of the Bribery Act 2010), March 2011Google Scholar

UN 1945, Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice (signed 26 June 1945, entry into force 24 October 1945)Google Scholar

UN 1988, United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (adopted 20 December 1988; entry into force 11 November 1990)Google Scholar

UN 2000, United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (adopted 15 November 2000 by UNGA resolution 55/25; entry into force 29 September 2003)Google Scholar

UNCAC 2003, United Nations Convention against Corruption (adopted 31 October 2003 by UNGA resolution 58/4; entry into force 14 December 2005)Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 1985, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (United Nations document A/40/17, annex I) (as adopted by the UNCITRAL on 21 June 1985)Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2006, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (United Nations documents A/40/17, annex I and A/61/17, annex I) (as adopted by the UNCITRAL on 21 June 1985, and as amended by the UNCITRAL on 7 July 2006)Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2013a, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new article 1, paragraph 4, as adopted in 2013), UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State ArbitrationGoogle Scholar

UNCITRAL 2013b, UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State ArbitrationGoogle Scholar

VCLT 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969; entry into force 27 January 1980)Google Scholar

Wolfsberg Principles 2012, The Wolfsberg Group, Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles for Private Banking, May 2012Google Scholar

Woolf Committee 2008, Woolf Committee, Business ethics, global companies and the defence industry, Ethical business conduct in BAE Systems plc – the way forward, May 2008, available at: www.baesystems.comGoogle Scholar

World Bank 2012, World Bank Sanctions Procedures, 15 April 2012Google Scholar