Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The development of the international criminal law regime
- Part II Evaluating the regime
- 4 Selectivity in international criminal law
- 5 Selectivity and the law: I – definitions of crimes
- 6 Selectivity and the law: II – general principles of liability and defences
- Conclusion
- Select bibliography
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
5 - Selectivity and the law: I – definitions of crimes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The development of the international criminal law regime
- Part II Evaluating the regime
- 4 Selectivity in international criminal law
- 5 Selectivity and the law: I – definitions of crimes
- 6 Selectivity and the law: II – general principles of liability and defences
- Conclusion
- Select bibliography
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
Summary
Introduction
As was shown in chapter 4, selectivity ratione personae is a critique that can be (and often has been) levelled at international criminal law. However, this is not to say that States never chose to prosecute their own nationals. With the turn to prosecution that occurred in the 1990s, of which the promulgation of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court in 1988 was both cause and effect, selectivity in the sense it was dealt with in chapter 4, appears to be becoming more limited, although it will be by no means eliminated.
However, selectivity bubbles to the surface in a more subtle way, in the parameters of criminal responsibility. Let us return to Kenneth Kulp Davis' explication of selectivity: ‘when an enforcement agency or officer has discretionary power to do nothing about a case in which enforcement would be clearly justified, the result is a power of selective enforcement. Such power goes to selection of parties against whom the law is enforced. Selective enforcement may also mean selection of the law that will be enforced; an officer may enforce one statute fully, never enforce another and pick and choose in enforcing a third.’ This chapter, and chapter 6, concentrate on a form of selectivity derived from the second aspect of this definition.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Prosecuting International CrimesSelectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime, pp. 232 - 288Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005