Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:43:47.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Order of market entry: empirical results from the PIMS data and future research topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

William T. Robinson
Affiliation:
Professor of Management Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University
Mark Parry
Affiliation:
Research Professor of Business Administration Darden Graduate Business School, University of Virginia
Paul W. Farris
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Michael J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

Over the past twenty years, numerous empirical research studies have examined the magnitude of market pioneer advantages and the associated sources of these advantages. Review articles by Kalyanaram, Robinson, and Urban (1995); Vander Werf and Mahon (1997); Kerin, Varadarajan, and Peterson (1992); Lieberman and Montgomery (1988, 1998); and Robinson, Kalyanaram, and Urban (1994) summarize these research studies.

The PIMS data played an important role in helping to start this research stream and advancing it over time. Because most of this empirical research has been done in marketing, Scherer (1994: 173) says, “we are in debt to business scholars for illuminating the relevant relationships.” The following discussion summarizes the important role PIMS data played in examining order of market entry topics. These topics cover market share, return on investment, firm skills, and marketing strategy development. Future research topics are also discussed.

Order of market entry and market share

In the late 1970s, industry studies in the economics literature documented long-lived market share advantages for first entrants in two specific markets: pharmaceutical products (Bond and Lean 1977) and cigarettes (Whitten 1979). Still, because market pioneers in other markets such as ballpoint pens (Reynolds International Pen), hand-held electronic calculators (Bowmar Instruments), and diet colas (Royal Crown Cola) were quickly overtaken by later entrants, it was not clear whether market pioneer advantages typically surfaced in most North American markets.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Profit Impact of Marketing Strategy Project
Retrospect and Prospects
, pp. 73 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpert, Frank H., Kamins, Michael A., and Graham, John L.. 1992. “An Examination of Reseller Buyer Attitudes Toward Order of Brand Entry.” Journal of Marketing 56 (July): 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, R. S., and D. F. Lean. 1977. “Sales Promotion and Product Differentiation in Two Prescription Drug Markets.” Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission (February)
Boulding, William, and hristen, Markus. 2003. “Sustainable Pioneering Advantage? Profit Implications of Market Entry Order.” Marketing Science 22 (3): 371–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Douglas, and Gatignon, Hubert. 1996. “Order of Entry as a Moderator of the Effect of the Marketing Mix on Market Share.” Marketing Science 15 (3): 222–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Christina, and Lattin, James M.. 1994. “Investigating the Relationship Between Time in Market and Pioneering Advantage.” Management Science 40 (October): 1361–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzell, Robert D., and Paul W. Farris. 1977. “Marketing Costs in Consumer Goods Industries.” In Hans Thorelli, ed. Strategy & Structure = Performance, 122–145. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Carpenter, Gregory S., and Nakamoto, Kent. 1989. “Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (August): 285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
Eichenwald, K. 2001. “Redesigning Nature: Hard Lessons Learned; Biotechnology Food: From the Lab to a Debacle.” New York Times (January 25): A2Google Scholar
Fornell, Claes, Robinson, William T., and Wernerfelt, Birger. 1985. “Consumption Experience and Sales Promotion Expenditures.” Management Science 31 (September): 1084–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Peter N., and Tellis, Gerard J.. 1993. “Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?Journal of Marketing Research 30 (May): 158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, John R., and Wernerfelt, Birger. 1990. “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (March): 393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, Lenard C., and Robinson, William T.. 1994. “The Impact of Leadtime and Years of Competitive Rivalry on Pioneer Market Share Advantages.” Management Science 40 (October): 1370–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy, and Urban, Glen L.. 1992. “Dynamic Effects of the Order of Entry on Market Share, Trial Penetration, and Repeat Purchases for Frequently Purchased Consumer Goods.” Marketing Science 11, 235–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy, Robinson, William T., and Urban, Glen L.. 1995. “Order of Market Entry: Established Empirical Generalizations, Emerging Generalizations, and Future Research.” Marketing Science 14 (2): G212–G221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardes, Frank R., and Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy. 1992. “Order of Entry Effects on Consumer Memory and Judgment: An Information Integration Perspective.” Journal of Marketing Research 29 (August): 343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardes, F. R., Kalyanaram, G., Chandrashekaran, M., and Dornoff, R. J.. 1993. “Brand Retrieval, Consideration Set Composition, Consumer Choice, and Pioneering Advantage.” Journal of Consumer Research 20: 62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerin, Roger A., Varadarajan, P. Rajan, and Peterson, R. A.. 1992. “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions.” Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambkin, Mary 1988. “Order of Entry and Performance in New Markets.” Strategic Management Journal 9: 127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambkin, M., and Day, G. S.. 1989. “Evolutionary Processes in Competitive Markets: Beyond the Product Life Cycle.” Journal of Marketing 3 (July): 4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Marvin B., and Montgomery, David B.. 1988. “First-Mover Advantages.” Strategic Management Journal 9: 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Marvin B., and Montgomery, David B.. 1998. “First-Mover (Dis)Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View.” Strategic Management Journal 19 (December): 1111–11253.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilien, Gary, and Yoon, Eusang. 1990. “The Timing of Competitive Market Entry: An Exploratory Study of New Industrial Products. Management Science 36: 568–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. 1991. “Dual Clocks: Entry Order Influences on Incumbent and Newcomer Market Share and Survival when Specialized Assets Retain their Value.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael J., Boulding, William, and Goodstein, Ronald C.. 1991. “Pioneering and Market Share: Is Entry Time Endogenous and Does It Matter?Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August): 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthi, B. P. S., Srinivasan, Kannan, and Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy. 1996. “Controlling for Observed and Unobserved Managerial Skills in Determining First-Mover Market Share Advantages.” Journal of Marketing Research 33 (August), 329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Mark. 1999. “The Launch of Roundup Ready Soybeans.” UVA-M-0619. University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville
Parry, Mark. 2001. “Crest: The Innovation Challenge.” UVA-M-0641. University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville
Parry, Mark. 2002. “Pampers: The Disposable Diaper War.” UVA-M-0643. University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville
Parry, Mark, and Bass, Frank M.. 1990. “When to Lead or Follow? It Depends.” Marketing Letters 3: 187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, Venkat, DeSarbo, Wayne S., Reibstein, David J., and Robinson, William T.. 1993. “An Empirical Pooling Approach for Estimating Marketing Mix Elasticities with PIMS Data.” Marketing Science 12 (Winter): 103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William T. 1988. “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries.” Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William T., and Chiang, Jeongwen. 2002. “Product Development Strategies for Established Market Pioneers, Early Followers, and late Entrants.” Strategic Management Journal 23: 855–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William T., and Fornell, Claes. 1985. “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries.” Journal of Marketing Research 22 (August): 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William T., and Min, Sungwook. 2002. “Is the First to Market the First to Fail?: Empirical Evidence for Industrial Goods Industries.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (February): 120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William T., Fornell, Claes, and Sullivan, Mary W.. 1992. “Are Market Pioneers Intrinsically Stronger than Later Entrants?Strategic Management Journal 13: 609–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William T., Kalyanaram, Gurumurthy, and Urban, Glen L.. 1994. “First-Mover Advantages from Pioneering New Markets: A Survey of Empirical Evidence.” Review of Industrial Organization 9: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, F. M. 1994. “First-Mover Advantages from Pioneering New Markets: Comment.” Review of Industrial Organization 9: 173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalensee, Richard 1982. “Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands.” American Economic Review 72: 349–365Google Scholar
Schnaars, Steven P. 1994. Managing Imitation Strategies. New York: The Free Press
Song, X. Michael, Benedetto, C. Anthony di, and Zhao, Yuzhen L.. 1999. “Pioneering Advantage in Manufacturing and Service Industries: Empirical Evidence from Nine Countries.” Strategic Management Journal 20: 811–8363.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellis, Gerard J., and Golder, Peter N.. 1996. “First to Market, First to Fail? Real Causes of Enduring Market Leadership.” Sloan Management Review (Winter): 65–75Google Scholar
Urban, Glen L., Carter, Theresa, Gaskin, Steven, and Mucha, Zofia. 1986. “Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications.” Management Science 32 (June): 645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Werf, Pieter A., and Mahon, John F.. 1997. “Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Research Methods on Findings of First-Mover Advantage.” Management Science 43 (November): 1510–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhonacker, Wilfred R., and Day, Diana. 1987. “Cross-Sectional Estimation in Marketing: Direct versus Reverse Regression.” Marketing Science 6: 254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, Ira T. 1979. “Brand Performance in the Cigarette Industry and the Advantage to Early Entry, 1913–74.” Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission (June)
Worth. 2000. “The Best CEOs.” (May): 133–134

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×