Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T21:11:46.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Liability for environmental damage

from Part III - Techniques for implementing international principles and rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Philippe Sands
Affiliation:
University College London
Jacqueline Peel
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Adriana Fabra
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona
Ruth MacKenzie
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

General principles of international law imposing liability on actors for their illegal acts, or for the adverse consequences of their lawful activities, are relatively well developed at a general level, and are also reflected in the Articles on State Responsibility adopted by the International Law Commission (ILC) in 2001. In relation to environmental damage, however, the liability rules are still evolving and are in need of further development. Environmental damage refers here to damage to the environment, which has generally been defined in treaties and other international acts to include four possible elements: (1) fauna, flora, soil, water and climatic factors; (2) material assets (including archaeological and cultural heritage); (3) the landscape and environmental amenity; and (4) the interrelationship between the above factors. Most legal definitions of environment do not, therefore, include people and their property, although this is changing as a result of the increasing intersection of international environmental law with the area of human rights protection.

Liability rules at the domestic or international level serve a variety of purposes. They may be a form of economic instrument that provides an incentive to encourage compliance with environmental obligations. They may also be used to impose sanctions for wrongful conduct, or to require corrective measures to restore a given environmental asset to its pre-damage condition. Finally, they may provide a technique for internalising environmental and other social costs into production processes and other activities in implementation of the polluter pays principle.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Murgatroyd, C‘The World Bank: A Case for Lender Liability’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 436 1992Google Scholar
Goldie, L. F. E.‘Liability for Damage and the Progressive Development of International Law’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1189 1965Google Scholar
Jenks, W.‘Liability for Ultra-Hazardous Activities in International Law’Recueil des Cours 99 1966Google Scholar
Kelson, J. M.‘State Responsibility and the Abnormally Dangerous Activity’Harvard International Law Journal 197 1972Google Scholar
Hoffman, K. R.‘State Responsibility in International Law and Transboundary Pollution Injuries’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 509 1976Google Scholar
d'Arge, R. C.Kneese, A. V.‘State Liability for International Environmental Degradation: An Economic Perspective’Natural Resources Journal 427 1980Google Scholar
Handl, G.‘State Liability for Accidental Transnational Environmental Damage by Private Persons’American Journal of International Law 525 1980Google Scholar
Allott, P.‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’Harvard International Law Journal 1 1988Google Scholar
Doeker, G.Gehring, T.‘Private or International Liability for Transnational Environmental Damage – The Precedent of Conventional Liability Regimes’Journal of Environmental Law 1 1990Google Scholar
Rosas, A.‘Issues of State Liability for Transboundary Environmental Damage’Nordic Journal of International Law 5 1991Google Scholar
Vaissiere, T.‘L’Ethique de Résponsabilité Chez Hans Jonas a l'Epreuve du Droit International de l'Environnement'Revue Interdisciplinaire d'Etudes Juridiques 135 1999Google Scholar
Brunnée, J.‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 351 2004Google Scholar
Boyle, A.‘Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law’Journal of Environmental Law 3 2005Google Scholar
Goldie, L. F. E.‘Concepts of Strict and Absolute Liability and the Ranking of Liability in Terms of Relative Exposure to Risk’Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 175 180 1985Google Scholar
Mavroides, P.‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’European Journal of International Law 763 2000Google Scholar
Goldie, L. F. E.‘Concepts of Strict and Absolute Liability and the Ranking of Liability in Terms of Relative Exposure to Risk’Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 175 1985Google Scholar
Jenks, W.‘The Scope and Nature of Ultra-Hazardous Liability in International Law’Recueil des Cours 99 144 1966Google Scholar
Sands, P.Stewart, R.‘Valuation of Environmental Damage – US and International Law Approaches’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 290 1996Google Scholar
Burlington, L.‘Valuing Natural Resource Damages: A Transatlantic Lesson’Environmental Law Review 77 2004Google Scholar
Margolis, E.‘The Hydrogen Bomb Experiments and International Law’Yale Law Journal 629 638 1955Google Scholar
Oral Arguments of Australia v. 481 1973
Sand, P. H.‘Compensation for Environmental Damage from the 1991 Gulf War’Environmental Policy and Law 244 2005Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R.Khalastchi, R.‘Liability and Compensation for Environmental Damage in the Context of the Work of the UNCC’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 281 1996Google Scholar
Sand, P. H.‘Compensation for Environmental Damage from the 1991 Gulf War’Environmental Policy and Law 244 248 2005Google Scholar
Gilbert, G.‘The Criminal Responsibility of States’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 345 1990Google Scholar
Vercher, A.‘The Use of Criminal Law for the Protection of the Environment in Europe: Council of Europe Resolution 77(28)’Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 442 1990Google Scholar
Sharp, P.‘Prospects for Environmental Liability in the International Criminal Court’Virginia Environmental Law Journal 217 1999Google Scholar
Wyatt, J.‘Law-making at the Intersection of International Environmental, Humanitarian and Criminal Law: The Issue of Damage to the Environment in International Armed Conflict’International Review of the Red Cross 593 2010Google Scholar
Alexander, R. E.‘Measuring Damages under the Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects’Journal of Space Law 151 1978Google Scholar
Christol, C. Q.‘International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects’American Journal of International Law 346 1980Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.Berlin, N. L.‘After the Fall: An Analysis of Canadian Legal Claims for Damage Caused by Cosmos 954’McGill Law Journal 676 1982Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska-Czechowksa, B.‘States’ Responsibility for Pollution Damage Resulting from the Exploration for and Exploitation of Sea-Bed Mineral Resources'Polish Yearbook of International Law 157 1980Google Scholar
Kasoulides, G.‘State Responsibility and Assessment of Liability for Damage Resulting from Dumping Operations’San Diego Law Review 497 1989Google Scholar
de la Fayette, L.‘New Approaches for Addressing Damage to the Marine Environment’International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 167 2005Google Scholar
Wetterstein, P.‘Complete Freedom of the Seas or the Polluter Pays for Everything – How Far Should We Go in Order to Protect the Environment?’Environmental Liability 86 2009Google Scholar
Burmester, H. C.‘Liability for Damage from Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities’Virginia Journal of International Law 621 1989Google Scholar
Poole, M.‘Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica’Journal of Environmental and Natural Resources Law 246 1992Google Scholar
Scott, K.‘Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica: Annex VI to the Environmental Protocol on Liability Arising from Emergencies’Environmental Liability 87 2006Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, P. A‘Internationale Aansprakelijkheid Voor Klimaatverandering’Nederlands Juristenblad 2873 2007Google Scholar
Magraw, D. B.‘Transboundary Harm: The International Law Commission's Study of International Liability’American Journal of International Law 305 1986Google Scholar
McCaffrey, S. C.‘The Work of the International Law Commission Relating to Transfrontier Environmental Harm’New York Journal of International Law and Politics 608 1988Google Scholar
Boyle, A.‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1 1990Google Scholar
Barboza, J.‘International Liability for the Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law and Protection of the Environment’Recueil des Cours 295 1994Google Scholar
Brunnée, J.‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 351 2004Google Scholar
McCaffrey, S. C.‘Private Remedies for Transfrontier Pollution Damage in Canada and the United States: A Comparative Survey’University of Western Ontario Law Review 35 1981Google Scholar
Gaines, S. E.‘International Principles for Transnational Environmental Liability: Can Developments in Municipal Law Help Break the Impasse?’Harvard International Law Journal 311 1989Google Scholar
Von Bar, C.‘Environmental Damage in Private International Law’Recueil des Cours 291 1997Google Scholar
Reid, E.‘Liability for Dangerous Activities: A Comparative Analysis’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 731 1999Google Scholar
Daniel, A.‘Civil Liability Regimes as a Complement to Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Sound International Policy or False Comfort?’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 255 2003Google Scholar
Hardy, M. J. L.‘Nuclear Liability: The General Principles of Law and Further Proposals’British Year Book of International Law 223 1960Google Scholar
Berman, W.Hyderman, L. M.‘A Convention on Third Party Liability for Damage from Nuclear Incidents’American Journal of International Law 966 1969Google Scholar
Malone, L. A.‘The Chernobyl Accident: A Case Study in International Law Regulating State Responsibility for Transboundary Nuclear Pollution’Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 203 1987Google Scholar
Von Busekist, O.‘A Bridge Between Two Conventions on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage: The Joint Protocol Relating to the Application of the Vienna Convention and the Paris Convention’Nuclear Law Bulletin 10 1990Google Scholar
de la Fayette, L.‘Nuclear Liability Revisited’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 443 1992Google Scholar
Brussels Convention on the Liability of Operators of Nuclear ShipsAmerican Journal of International Law 268 1963
Hardy, M. J. L.‘The Liability of Operators of Nuclear Ships’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 778 1963Google Scholar
Szasz, P.‘The Convention on the Liability of Operators of Nuclear Ships’Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 541 1970Google Scholar
Handrlica, J.‘Facing Plans for Multiplying Nuclear-Powered Vessels: Lessons Gained from the Brussels Convention on the Liability of Operators of Nuclear Ships of 1962’International Journal of Nuclear Law 313 2009Google Scholar
Swan, P. N.‘International and National Approaches to Oil Pollution Responsibility: An Emerging Regime for a Global Problem’Oregon Law Review 504 1971Google Scholar
Bergman, S.‘No Fault Liability for Oil Pollution Damage’Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 1 1973Google Scholar
Treves, T.‘Les Tendences Récentes du Droit Conventionnel de la Responsabilité et le Nouveau Droit de la Mer’Annuaire Français de Droit International 767 1975Google Scholar
Stein, R. E.‘Responsibility and Liability for Harm to the Marine Environment’Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 41 1976Google Scholar
Handl, G.‘International Liability of States for Marine Pollution’Canadian Yearbook of International Law 85 1983Google Scholar
Jacobsson, M.Trotz, N.‘The Definition of Pollution Damage in the 1984 Protocols to the 1969 Civil Liability Convention and the 1971 Fund Convention’Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 467 1986Google Scholar
Smith, S. T.‘An Analysis of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and the 1984 Protocols on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage’Houston Journal of International Law 115 1991Google Scholar
Cummings, A. D.‘The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill and the Confidentiality of Natural Resource Damage Assessment Data’Ecology Law Quarterly 363 1992Google Scholar
Popp, A. H. E.‘Legal Aspects of International Oil Spills in the Canada/US Context’Canada–US Law Journal 309 1992Google Scholar
Birnie, P.‘Liability for Damage Resulting from the Transport of Hazardous Cargoes by Sea’Law of the Sea Institute Proceedings 377 1993Google Scholar
Kende, C. B.‘Liability for Pollution Damage and Legal Assessment of Damage to the Marine Environment’Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 105 1993Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. J.‘Moving the Boundaries of Compensable Damage Caused by Marine Oil Spills: The Effect of Two New International Protocols’Journal of Environmental Law 71 1993Google Scholar
Wetterstein, P.‘Trends in Maritime Environmental Impairment Liability’Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 230 1994Google Scholar
Faure, M.Wang, H.‘Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage: China Versus the International Regime’Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 11 2005Google Scholar
Juanesa, J. A.Puentea, A.Revillaa, J. A.‘The Prestige Oil Spill in Cantabria (Bay of Biscay)’Journal of Coastal Research 978 2007Google Scholar
Papadopolou, D.‘The Role of French Environmental Associations in Civil Liability for Environmental Harm: Courtesy of Erika’Journal of Environmental Law 87 2009Google Scholar
Papadopolou, D.‘The Role of French Environmental Associations in Civil Liability for Environmental Harm: Courtesy of Erika’Journal of Environmental Law 87 2009Google Scholar
Hancock, W. N.Stone, R. M.‘Liability for Transnational Pollution Caused by Offshore Oil Rig Blowouts’Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 377 1982Google Scholar
Choksi, S.‘The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal: 1999 Protocol on Liability and Compensation’Ecology Law Quarterly 509 2001Google Scholar
Lefeber, R.‘General Developments: International/Civil Liability and Compensation’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 158 164 1998Google Scholar
Brunnée, J‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 351 2004Google Scholar
de Sola, C.‘The Council of Europe Convention on Environmental Damage’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 411 1992Google Scholar
Rest, A.‘Ecological Damage in Public International Law’Environmental Policy and Law 31 1992Google Scholar
Handl, G.‘Balancing of Interests and International Liability for the Pollution of International Watercourses: Customary Principles of Law Revisited’Canadian Yearbook of International Law 156 1975Google Scholar
Polakiewicz, J. G.‘La Responsabilité de l'Etat en Matière de Pollution des Eaux Fluviales ou Souterraines Internationales’Journal de Droit International 283 1991Google Scholar
Rest, A.‘New Tendencies in Environmental Responsibility/Liability Law: The Work of the UNECE Task Force on Responsibility and Liability Regarding Transboundary Water Pollution’Environmental Policy and Law 135 1991Google Scholar
Brunnée, J.‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 351 2004Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×