Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T00:31:44.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - American Attitudes and Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Robert J. Lieber
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

“The great privilege of the Americans does not consist in being more enlightened than any other nations, but in being able to repair the faults they may commit.”

– Alexis de Tocqueville

Can America sustain an international role comparable to the one it has played in world affairs for the past seven decades, that is, from the early years of World War II to the present time? The answer depends both on the domestic basis on which this leadership rests and on the international setting in which it takes place. This chapter delves into the attitudes, policies, and institutions that shape this special role and determine America's ability to lead.

As Tocqueville’s words written in the 1830s suggest, informed observers have long noted America’s capacity to adapt, repair, and constantly renew itself. But if there is an enduring basis for the robustness and resilience of the United States as an economy, society, and polity, there remain other attributes that can impede successful adaptation to new challenges and threats. The unique characteristics of America, embodied in exceptionalism and the openness of its society, have made it a leader in world affairs and a magnet for people from other lands. The costs of exceptionalism can be found, however, in the often raucous political climate, the unwieldiness of some of the institutions bequeathed by the Founding Fathers, and the difficulty of crafting solutions for pressing problems until these reach crisis proportions. Political polarization and domestic dissensus exacerbate these tendencies and have been increasingly evident among political elites since at least the early 1990s. As a result, partisan rancor and inability to agree on national policies and strategies could prove to be greater impediments to America’s staying power than the more commonly cited problems of economic difficulty and military overstretch.

Type
Chapter
Information
Power and Willpower in the American Future
Why the United States Is Not Destined to Decline
, pp. 59 - 79
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1945
2004
Sorcher, Sara 2011
2010
2011
2011
Gaddis, John LewisSurprise, Security, and the American ExperienceCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2004Google Scholar
2006
Ikenberry, JohnAfter Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order After Major WarsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2001Google Scholar
2004
Daalder, IvoKagan, Robert 2007
Andres, Richard B. 2010
2010
McCarty, NolanPoole, Keith T.Rosenthal, HowardPolarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal RichesCambridge, MAMIT Press 2006Google Scholar
Sharpe, James R.American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in CrisisNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1993 227Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D.Campbell, David E.American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites UsNew YorkSimon & Schuster 2010Google Scholar
Kupchan, CharlesTrubowitz, PeterGrand Strategy for a Divided AmericaForeign Affairs 86 2007Google Scholar
Mueller, John E.who argued that declining support for war was directly related to increasing casualtiesWar, Presidents, and Public OpinionNew YorkWiley 1973Google Scholar
2006
Friedberg, AaronThe Long Haul: Fighting and Funding America's Next WarsForeign Affairs 86 2007 140Google Scholar
2007
Rauch, JonathanDemosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American GovernmentNew YorkCrown 1994Google Scholar
Olson, MancurThe Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of GroupsCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1965Google Scholar
Moffit, E. 2010
Neustadt, Richard E.Presidential Power, the Politics of LeadershipNew YorkJohn Wiley & Sons 1960Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×