Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:38:49.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The changing nature of almshouses and hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Marjorie Keniston McIntosh
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

The almshouses and hospitals that operated during the second half of the sixteenth century, especially newly founded or re-founded ones, differed from their predecessors in many respects. The number of houses had dropped sharply as a result of the closing of religious institutions and royal confiscation of property between 1536 and 1553. Because institutions founded after 1540 were also generally smaller than their predecessors, the total number of people supported in the 1560s and even in the 1590s was considerably lower than in the 1520s. England’s population was rising rapidly, so residential institutions provided accommodation for a much smaller fraction of the population in the late sixteenth century than they had in the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Institutions established after 1540 (the great majority of which were almshouses) were heavily weighted towards elderly poor people, often women, and privacy for residents increased.

Because almshouses could no longer offer prayers for the dead, the reasons for establishing and maintaining such institutions had to be reassessed. Many houses still required prayer and thanksgiving for the generosity of founders and benefactors, but their social role as providers of care within the community became more important and expectations for good behavior increased. Dislike of begging and a belief in labor led many founders of new houses to provide a cash allowance to their residents and sometimes to prohibit idleness. A desire to make the beneficence of the donor visible within the community brought expanded use of distinctive liveries for inmates to wear when they were away from the institution, which in turn reinforced a collective identity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×