The important triad in crime nonfiction narratives, we have noted, is made up of the criminal, the detective or prosecutor who explains the crime by reconstructing how it “must have happened,” and the journalist who reports the story, imitating or supplementing the detective by recapitulating the solution in what becomes the privileged version. When the true-crime story is self-consciously narrated, it is easily read reflexively. Such a reading is likely when the journalist's relationship to his subject forms part of the plot or when the reader begins to attend to this relationship. An implicit concern of Janet Malcolm's analysis of reporters' relationship to their subjects, in The Journalist and the Murderer, is the effect their attitude has on the depiction of character and therefore on the reader. She is aware that readers are influenced to accept or reject a narrative's truth claims by the manner in which the subject is represented. In this account of how Joe McGinniss portrayed convicted murderer Jeffrey MacDonald in Fatal Vision, she is clearly appalled that the journalist had the power to convince numerous readers of MacDonald's guilt (“If it says so in a book, it must be true” [129]).