Book contents
- The Political Value of Time
- The Political Value of Time
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Sovereign Temporal Borders around Nation-States, Populations, and Citizenries
- 3 Democracy, Duration, and Lived Consent
- 4 Time’s Political Value
- 5 The Political Economy of Time
- 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 February 2018
Book contents
- The Political Value of Time
- The Political Value of Time
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Sovereign Temporal Borders around Nation-States, Populations, and Citizenries
- 3 Democracy, Duration, and Lived Consent
- 4 Time’s Political Value
- 5 The Political Economy of Time
- 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Political Value of TimeCitizenship, Duration, and Democratic Justice, pp. 164 - 177Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abizadeh, Arash, “On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem,” American Political Science Review 106, no. 4 (2012): 867–82.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M., Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
“Age of Consent Position Statement,” Canadian Federation for Sexual Health (archived July 11, 2011), https://web.archive.org/web/20110714075413/www.cfsh.ca/What-We-Do/Archived-Position-Statements/Age-of-Consent.aspxGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Michelle The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (New York: The New Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Allen, Thomas M. A Republic in Time: Temporality and Social Imagination in Nineteenth-Century America (University of North Carolina Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ambrosio, Thomas Irredentism: Ethnic Conflict and International Politics (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001).Google Scholar
Aminzade, Ronald, “Historical Sociology and Time,” Sociological Methods and Research 20, no. 4 (1992): 456–80.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (New York: Verso, 2006).Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Ansart, Guillaume, Condorcet: Writings on the United States (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt, 1973).Google Scholar
“Army ROTC Service Commitment,” US Army, www.goarmy.com/rotc/service-commitment.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bagaric, Mirko, Edney, Richard Fred, and Alexander, Theo, “(Particularly) Burdensome Prison Time Should Reduce Imprisonment Length – and not merely in theory,” Melbourne University Law Review 38, no. 2 (2014): 409–42.Google Scholar
Barshack, Lior, “Time and the Constitution,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 4 (2009): 553–76.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 1995), vol. xxxix.Google Scholar
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany in the revised version published in the Federal Law Gazette Part iii, classification number 100–1, as last amended by the Act of 11 July 2012 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 1478).Google Scholar
Baubock, Rainier, “Sharing History and Future?” Constellations 4, no. 3 (1998): 320–45.Google Scholar
Baubock, Rainier, Migration and Citizenship: Legal Status Rights, and Political Participation (Amsterdam University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Beers, Thomas M., “Flexible Schedules and Shift Work: Replacing the ‘9-to-5’ Workday?” Monthly Labor Review 123 (2000): 33–40.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile, “Le langage et l’expérience humaine,” in Problèmes du langage, ed. Benveniste, Emile (Paris: Gallimard, 1966).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (New York: Dover Publications, 2001).Google Scholar
Bertenthal, Alyse and Lynch, Mona, “The Calculus of the Record: Criminal History in the Making of US Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” Theoretical Criminology 20, no. 2 (2015): 145–64.Google Scholar
Bilder, Mary Sarah, “The Struggle Over Immigration: Indentured Servants, Slaves, and Articles of Commerce,” Missouri Law Review 61 (Fall 1996): 3–84.Google Scholar
Bilder, Mary Sarah, The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bittman, Michael and Wajcman, Judy, “The Rush Hour: The Character of Leisure Time and Gender Equality,” Social Forces 79, no. 1 (2000): 165–89.Google Scholar
Bobo, Kim, Wage Theft in America: Why Millions of Americans Are Not Getting Paid – And What We Can Do About It (New York: The New Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean, Bodin: On Sovereignty, ed. Franklin, Julian H. (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Boscarino, Jessica E., Kersh, Rogan T., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M., “Congressional Intrusion to Specify Specific Voting Dates for National Office,” Publius 38, no. 1 (2008): 137–51.Google Scholar
Boyd, Julian P. ed., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (Princeton University Press, 1958), vol. xv.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand, On History, trans. Matthews, Sarah (University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Brendese, P. J., “Black Noise in White Time: Segregated Temporality and Mass Incarceration,” in Radical Future Pasts: Untimely Political Theory, eds. Coles, Romand, Reinhardt, Mark, and Shulman, George (University Press of Kentucky, 2014).Google Scholar
Brickner, Mike, “The Outskirts of Hope: How Ohio’s Debtors’ Prisons Are Ruining Lives and Costing Communities,” American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio (2013).Google Scholar
Brockmann, Stephen, “German Culture at the Zero Hour,” Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences (Research Showcase at Carnegie Mellon University, 1996).Google Scholar
Brunner, Jose, “Modern Times: Law, Temporality and Happiness in Hobbes, Locke and Bentham,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8, no. 1 (2007): 277–310.Google Scholar
Busse, Anna Grzymala, “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes,” Comparative Political Studies (2010): 1–31.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H., “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” Review of Politics 49, no. 2 (Spring 1987): 251–73.Google Scholar
Casella, Alessandra, Palfrey, Thomas, and Reizman, Raymond G., “Minorities and Storable Votes,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3, no 2 (2005): 165–200.Google Scholar
Casper, Gerhard, “Forswearing Allegiance” (University of Chicago, Maurice and Muriel Fulton Lecture Series, 2008).Google Scholar
Chinn, Jeff and Truex, Lise A., “The Question of Citizenship in the Baltics,” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 1 (1996): 133–47.Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan and Gerstel, Naomi, Unequal Time: Gender, Class, and Family in Employment Schedules (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2014).Google Scholar
Cohen, Elizabeth F., Semi-Citizenship in Democratic Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Cohen, Elizabeth F., “Jus Tempus in the Magna Carta: The Sovereignty of Time in Modern Politics and Citizenship,” PS: Political Science & Politics 43, no. 3 (2010): 463–6.Google Scholar
Cohen, Elizabeth F., “Reconsidering US Immigration Reform: The Temporal Principle of Citizenship,” Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 3 (2011): 575–83.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ira J., Solitary Action: Acting on Our Own in Everyday Life (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology, eds. Matravers, Derek and Pike, Jon (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Colbern, Allan, “Regulating Movement in a Federalist System: Slavery’s Connection to Immigration Law in the United States” (unpublished manuscript) (on file with the author).Google Scholar
Conca, James, “Children Win Another Climate Change Legal Case in Mass Supreme Court,” Forbes: Opinion (May 19, 2016), www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2016/05/19/children-win-another-climate-change-legal-case-in-mass-supreme-court/%235dc9412c556bGoogle Scholar
de Condorcet, Le Marquis, “On the Constitution and Function of Provisional Assemblies,” in Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory, trans. and eds. McLean, Iain and Hewitt, Fiona (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
de Condorcet, Le Marquis, “On the Forms of Elections,” in Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory, trans. and eds. McLean, Iain and Hewitt, Fiona (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
de Condorcet, Le Marquis, “A Survey of the Principles Underlying the Draft Constitution (1793),” in Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory, trans. and eds. McLean, Iain and Hewitt, Fiona (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
de Condorcet, Le Marquis, “The Theory of Voting,” in Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory, trans. and eds. McLean, Iain and Hewitt, Fiona (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
Connolly, William E., Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, and Speed (University of Minnesota Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Cox, Adam B., “The Temporal Dimension of Voting Rights,” Virginia Law Review 93, no. 2 (2007): 361–413.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen, Periodization and Sovereignty (Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Desjardins, Lisa: interview by Diane Rehm, PBS Newshour, Diane Rehm Show, National Public Radio (April 1, 2016, 10 am), http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2016–04–01/friday-news-roundup-domesticGoogle Scholar
Diskant, Gregory L., “Obama Can Appoint Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court If the Senate Does Nothing,” Washington Post: Opinion (Apr. 8, 2016), www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-can-appoint-merrick-garland-to-the-supreme-court-if-the-senate-does-nothing/2016/04/08/4a696700-fcf1-11e5-886f-a037dba38301_story.html.Google Scholar
Dodds, Graham G. and Skowronek, Stephen, “Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41, no. 4 (2008): 1033–4.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, “Ethical Individualism and Presentism,” The Monist 76, no. 3 (1993): 333–48.Google Scholar
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Persad, Govind, and Wertheimer, Alan, “Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions,” The Lancet 373, no. 9661 (2009).Google Scholar
Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, “The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Political Theology and the Democratic State” (PhD diss., Johns Hopkins University, 2006).Google Scholar
Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, The Time of Popular Sovereignty (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, “People, Territory, and Legitimacy in Democratic States,” American Journal of Political Science 58, no. 2 (2014): 466–78.Google Scholar
Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, “Taking Place Seriously: Territorial Presence and the Rights of Immigrants,” Journal of Political Philosophy 24, no. 1 (2016): 67–87.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael, Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2016).Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Stevens, Mitchell L., “Commensuration as a Social Process,” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 313–43.Google Scholar
Feldman, Leonard C., “The Banality of Emergency: On the Time and Space of ‘Political Necessity,’” in Sovereignty, Emergency, Legality, ed. Sarat, Austin (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Fishkin, James, Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage, 1979).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, eds. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin and Miller, Peter (University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, and Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, ed. Davidson, Arnold I. (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Franklin, Frank George, Legislative History of Naturalization in the United States (New York: Arno Press, 1906).Google Scholar
French, Rebecca R., “Time in the Law,” University of Colorado Law Review 72 (2001): 663–748.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter, Stranded in the Present: Modern Time and the Melancholy of History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul, “‘A Rush and a Push and the Land Is Ours,’: Territorial Land Expansion, Land Policy, and U.S. State Formation,” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 1 (2014): 119–44.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956): 167–98.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H., “How Does the EU Tick? Five Propositions on Political Time,” Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 2 (2009): 202–20.Google Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H. and Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, “The EU Timescape: From Notion to Research Agenda,” Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 2 (2009): 325–36.Google Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H. and Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, “Political Time in the EU: Dimensions, Perspectives, Theories,” Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 2 (2009): 180–201.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35, no. 2 (2007): 40–68.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., “Temporal Justice,” Journal of Social Policy 39, no. 1 (2010): 1–16.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., Rice, James Mahmud, Bittman, Michael, and Saunders, Peter, “The Time–Pressure Illusion: Discretionary Time vs. Free Time,” Social Indicators Research 73, no. 1 (2005): 43–70.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., Rice, James Mahmud, Parpo, Antti, and Eriksson, Lina, Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Gopnik, Adam, “Learning From the Slaughter in Attica: What the 1971 Uprising and Massacre Reveal about Our Prison System and the Democratic State,” New Yorker (Aug. 29, 2016), www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/08/29/learning-from-the-slaughter-in-atticaGoogle Scholar
Gould, Joe and Shane, Leo III, “U.S. Congress Passes Waiver for Mattis to Lead Pentagon,” DefenseNews (Jan. 13, 2017), www.defensenews.com/articles/us-congress-passes-waiver-for-mattis-to-lead-pentagonGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth W., Strings Attached: Untangling the Ethics of Incentives (Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Greene, David, “Crimean Tatars Pressured to Become Russian Citizens,” National Public Radio (Oct. 28, 2014, 4:39 am ET), www.npr.org/2014/10/28/359512062/crimean-tatars-pressured-to-become-russian-citizensGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J., “Just in Time: Temporality and the Cultural Legitimation of Law,” Yale Law Journal 98, no. 8 (1989): 1631–51.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J., A Moment’s Notice: Time Politics Across Cultures (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Greenstein, Theodore N., “Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension,” Journal of Marriage and Family 62, no. 2 (2000): 322–35.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul, Galanes-Rosenbaum, Eva, and Miller, Peter A., “Symposium: Early Voting and Turnout,” PS: Political Science and Politics 40, no. 4 (2007): 639–45.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul, Galanes-Rosenblum, Eva, Miller, Peter A., and Toffey, Daniel, “Convenience Voting,” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 437–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen and Rehg, William, “Constitutional Democracy: A Contradictory Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29, no. 6 (2001): 766–81.Google Scholar
Hager, Eli, “The Willie Bosket Case: How Children Became Adults in the Eyes of the Law,” Marshall Project (Dec. 29, 2014), www.themarshallproject.org/2014/12/29/the-willie-bosket-caseGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David, “Time–Space Compression and the Postmodern Condition,” in Modernity: Critical Concepts in Sociology, ed. Waters, Malcolm (London: Routledge, 1999), vol. ix.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Homer and Thomas, Richard, “White Policing of Black Populations: A History of Race and Social Control in America,” in Out of Order? Policing Black People, eds. Cashmore, Ellis and McLaughlin, Eugene (New York: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Hayduk, Ronald, Democracy for All: Restoring Immigrant Voting Rights in the United States (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Hayduk, Ronald,
“Noncitizen Voting Rights: Extending the Franchise in the United States,” National Civic Review 92, no. 4 (2003): 57–62.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick, “Early Voting Limits Donald Trump’s Time to Turn Campaign Around,” New York Times: Election 2016 (Aug. 16,2016), www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/us/politics/early-voting-limits-donald-trumps-time-to-turn-campaign-around.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Fiona and McLean, Iain, trans. and eds., Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, “Time and the Law: International Perspectives on an Old Problem,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 46, no. 3 (1997): 501–20.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran and Shachar, Ayelet, “On Citizenship, States, and Markets,” Journal of Political Philosophy 22, no. 2 (2014): 231–57.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Peter B., “Twenty Years of Operational Use of a Risk Prediction Instrument: The United States Parole Commission’s Salient Factor Score,” Journal of Criminal Justice 22, no. 6 (1994): 477–94.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn Avery, Measuring Time, Making History (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jerry A. and Gerson, Kathleen, “Overworked Individuals, or Overworked Families? Explaining Trends in Work, Leisure, and Family Time,” Work and Occupations 28, no. 1 (2001): 40–63.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas, Letter to James Madison (Paris, Sept. 6, 1789), www.let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/thomas-jefferson/letters-of-thomas-jefferson/jefl81.phpGoogle Scholar
Jehlen, Myra, American Incarnation: The Individual, the Nation, and the Continent (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob, “Time and Space in the Globalization of Capital and Their Implications for State Power,” in Rethinking Marxism 14, no. 1 (2002): 97–117.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark and Lakoff, George, “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language,” Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 8 (1980): 453–86.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel et al., Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kaprielian-Churchill, Isabel, “Rejecting ‘Misfits’: Canada and the Nansen Passport,” International Migration Review 28 (1994): 281–306.Google Scholar
Kettner, James, The Development of American Citizenship, 1608–1870 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Khan, Liaquat Ali, “Jurodynamics of Islamic Law,” Rutgers Law Review 61 (2008): 263–93.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Space Concepts, trans. Presner, Todd Samuel (Stanford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Ronald J. Jr., “A Poll Tax By Another Name,” New York Times: Opinion (Nov. 14, 2016), www.nytimes.com/2016/11/14/opinion/a-poll-tax-by-another-name.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
Kryder, Daniel and Staszak, Sarah, “Constitution as Clockwork: The Temporal Foundations of American Politics” (prepared for annual meeting, American Political Science Association, working paper, 2006).Google Scholar
Kutner, Jenny, “Louisiana Is Imposing a 3-Day ‘Reflection’ Period on Women Seeking Abortions,” Mic (May 23, 2016), https://mic.com/articles/144150/louisiana-will-force-women-to-spend-three-days-thinking-about-if-they-want-abortions#.THpgCu9nrGoogle Scholar
Kuwait: Ministerial Decree No. 15 of 1959 promulgating the Nationality Law, http://gulfmigration.eu/kuwait-ministerial-decree-no-15-of-1959-promulgating-the-nationality-lawGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer, “The Irrationality of Life Sentences,” New York Times (Feb. 1, 2016), http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/02/01/the-irrationality-of-natural-life-sentencesGoogle Scholar
LaCroix, Alison L., “Temporal Imperialism,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158 (2010): 1329–73.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène, Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many (Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Landes, David S., Revolution in Time: Clocks and Making of the Modern World (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa S., Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Lane, Melissa S., “Political Theory and Time,” in Time in Contemporary Political Thought, ed. Baert, P.J.N. (1st edn, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000).Google Scholar
Law, Anna O., “Lunatics, Idiots, Paupers, and Negro Seamen – Immigration Federalism and the Early American State,” Studies in American Political Development 28, no. 02 (2014): 107–28.Google Scholar
Law on Nationality, Federal Foreign Office, www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/EinreiseUndAufenthalt/Staatsangehoerigkeitsrecht_node.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jaeah, “Why Cops Are Told to Keep Quiet After a Shooting: The Controversial Science Between the 48-Hour Rule,” Mother Jones (Aug. 12, 2015), www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/08/why-do-police-departments-delay-interviewing-officers-involved-shootingsGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, “Constituting Communities through Words that Bind: Reflections on Loyalty Oaths,” Michigan Law Review 84 (June 1986): 1440–70.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, “‘WHO COUNTS?’ ‘SEZ WHO?,’” St. Louis Law Journal 58 (2014), 937–1189.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Hans, “Breaking Promises to Keep Them: Immigration and the Bounds of Distributive Justice,” in A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Fault Lines of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, ed. Lindahl, Hans (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Linstead, Stephen and Malarkey, John, “Time, Creativity, and Culture: Introducing Bergson,” Culture and Organization 9, no. 1 (2010): 3–13.Google Scholar
Lister, Matthew J., “Citizenship, in the Immigration Context,” Maryland Law Review 70 (2011): 175–233.Google Scholar
Locke, John, 1690. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven and Urbinati, Nadia, Condorcet: Political Writings (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Maas, Willem, “Freedom of Movement Inside ‘Fortress Europe,’” in Global Surveillance and Policing: Borders, Security, Identity, eds. Zureik, Elia and Salter, Mark B. (Cullompton, UK: Willan, 2005).Google Scholar
McFarland, Andrew S., “Interest Groups and Political Time: Cycles in America,” British Journal of Political Science 21, no. 3 (1991): 257–84.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain and Urken, Arnold B., “Did Jefferson Or Madison Understand Condorcet’s Theory of Social Choice?” Public Choice 73, no. 4 (1992): 445–7.Google Scholar
McNally, David, Political Economy and the Rise of Capitalism: A Reinterpretation (University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Madison, James, Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 (Ohio University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, “Rethinking Representation,” American Political Science Review 97, no. 4 (Nov. 2003): 515–28.Google Scholar
Mauer, Marc, “The Impact of Mandatory Minimum Penalties in Federal Sentencing,” Judicature 94, no. 1 (2010): 6–9.Google Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, “Time and European Governance: An Inventory,” Archive of European Integration (paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the European Studies Association, Panel ‘The Temporality of Europeanisation and Enlargement,’ Montreal, Canada, May 17–20, 2007).Google Scholar
Meyler, Bernadette, “The Gestation of Birthright Citizenship, 1868–1898: States’ Rights, the Law of Nations, and Mutual Consent,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 15 (2001): 519–62.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank, “Morality, Identity, and Constitutional Patriotism,” University of Colorado Law Review 76 (1998): 399–427.Google Scholar
Milkman, Ruth, Gonzalez, Anna Luz, and Narro, Victor, Wage Theft and Workplace Violations in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, 2010).Google Scholar
Miller, David, “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification,” Political Studies 60, no. 2 (2012): 252–68.Google Scholar
Morris, Norval and Rothman, David J., The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Society (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Muller, J.C., The Temporality of Political Obligation (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis and Winner, Langdon, Technics and Civilization (University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Munz, Rainer and Ohliger, Rainer eds. Diasporas and Ethnic Migrants: Germany, Israel and Russia in Comparative Perspective (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Murakawa, Naomi, The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
“Nation’s Historians Warn the Past is Expanding at an Alarming Rate,” The Onion 51, no. 3 (Jan. 22, 2015), www.theonion.com/articles/nations-historians-warn-the-past-is-expanding-at-a,37827Google Scholar
Nelson, William Max, “The Weapon of Time: Constructing the Future in France, 1750 to Year I” (PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 2006).Google Scholar
Nelson, William Max, The Weapon of Time: Constructing the Future in France, 1750 to Year I (University of California Press, 2006).Google Scholar
New York Times Editorial Board, “The Wrong Way to Count Prisoners,” New York Times (July 15, 2016), www.nytimes.com/2016/07/16/opinion/the-wrong-way-to-count-prisoners.html?_r=0Google Scholar
Ngai, Mae M., Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America (Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Nix, Simon, “Elections, Parties, and Institutional Design: A Comparative Perspective on European Union Democracy,” West European Politics 21, no. 3 (1998): 19–52.Google Scholar
Noble, David W., Death of a Nation: American Culture and the End of Exceptionalism (University of Minnesota Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Noisette, Leonard, “The Risks of Permanent Punishment,” New York Times (Nov. 15, 2011), www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/11/14/taking-and-restoring-the-rights-of-felons/the-risks-of-permanent-punishmentGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Jeff, “Free Time as a Necessary Condition of Free Life,” Contemporary Political Theory 8, no. 4 (2009): 377–93.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2001), vol. ii.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. and Hursthouse, Rosalind, “Plato on Commensurability and Desire,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58 (1984): 55–96.Google Scholar
Ogle, Vanessa, The Global Transformation of Time: 1870–1950 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
O’Kane, Rosemary H.T., “Cambodia in the Zero Years: Rudimentary Totalitarianism,” Third World Quarterly 14, no. 4 (1993): 735–48.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen, “Order and Time in Institutional Study: A Brief for the Historical Approach,” in Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions, eds. Farr, James, Dryzek, John S., and Leonard, Stephen T. (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen, The Search for American Political Development (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, “On the Concept of Political Power,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107, no. 3 (1963): 232–62.Google Scholar
Perovic, Sanja, The Calendar in Revolutionary France: Perceptions of Time in Literature, Culture, Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Pinfari, Marco, Peace Negotiations and Time: Deadline Diplomacy in Territorial Disputes (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel, The Concept of Representation (University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Planas, Roque, “Thousands of Dominicans Woke Up This Week without Citizenship in Any Country,” Huffington Post (Feb. 3, 2015), www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/03/dominicans-citizenship_n_6606336.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pocock, John Greville Agard, Virtue, Commerce, and History (Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Pocock, John Greville Agard, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Pocock, John Greville Agard, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Price, Polly, “Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin’s Case (1608),” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 9, no. 1 (1997): 73–146.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, Marking Time: On the Anthropology of the Contemporary (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane, Contested Commodities: The Trouble with Trade in Sex, Children, Body Parts, and Other Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rakoff, Todd D., A Time for Every Purpose: Law and the Balance of Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Raskin, Jamin B., “Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical, Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141, no. 4 (1993): 1391–470.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew, The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Rogers, Brishen, “Passion and Reason in Labor Law,” Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review 47 (Summer 2012): 314–69.Google Scholar
Roland, Driadonna, “Sovereign Law Made Cliven Bundy a ‘Patriot’ But Korryn Gaines ‘Crazy’: An Explainer on the Controversial Beliefs Gaines May Have Held,” Revolt (Aug. 8, 2016), https://revolt.tv/stories/2016/08/10/sovereign-law-made-cliven-bundy-patriot-korryn-gaines-crazy-3517d33d30Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut, “Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High-Speed Society,” Constellations 10, no. 1 (2003): 3–33.Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut, Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity (Columbia University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut and Scheuerman, William E. eds., High-Speed Society: Social Acceleration, Power, and Modernity (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton ed., “Federalist no. 70,” The Federalist Papers (New York: Penguin Putnam, 1961).Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton ed., “Federalist no. 71,” The Federalist Papers (New York: Penguin Putnam, 1961).Google Scholar
Rowland, Kate Mason, The Life of George Mason, 1725–1792 (New York:Putnam’s, 1892), vol. ii.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed, Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
St. John, Rachel, Line in the Sand: A History of the Western US–Mexico Border (Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Sanchez, Laura and Thomson, Elizabeth, “Becoming Mothers and Fathers: Parenthood, Gender, and the Division of Labor,” Gender & Society 11, no. 6 (1997): 757.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J., What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (London: Penguin, 2012).Google Scholar
Santiso, Javier and Schedler, Andreas, “Democracy and Time: An Invitation,” International Political Science Review 19, no. 1 (1998): 5–18.Google Scholar
Sarabi, Brigette, “The Prison Index: Taking the Pulse of the Crime Control Industry,” ed. Wagner, Peter, The Prison Index (Springfield, MA: Prison Policy Initiative, 2003), section III, “Prison Labor: Prison Labor in the Federal Prison; Prison Labor in the States.”Google Scholar
Satz, Debra, Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sayer, Linda C., “Gender, Time, and Inequality: Trends in Women’s and Men’s Paid Work, Unpaid Work, and Free Time,” Social Forces 84, no. 1 (2005): 285–303.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E., Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time (Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E., “Emergency Powers,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (2006): 257–77.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. and Smith, Rogers M., Citizenship Without Consent (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Scott, James C., Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Scott, James C., Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Shropshire, Terry, “Mayor Kasim Reed Considers Curfew in Atlanta,” Atlanta Daily World (July 15, 2016), http://atlantadailyworld.com/2016/07/15/mayor-kasim-reed-considers-curfew-in-atlantaGoogle Scholar
Simmons, John A., “Tacit Consent and Political Obligation,” Philosophy & Public Affairs (1976): 274–91.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A., “Theories of Bounded Rationality,” in Decision and Organization, eds. McGuire, C.B. and Radner, Roy (London/Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1972).Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen, Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal (University Press of Kansas Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Scott, “Population and Political Ethics: Thomas Jefferson’s Demography of Generations,” William and Mary Quarterly, no. 3 (1999): 591–612.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M., Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in US History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R., “Where is Sociology after the Historic Turn? Knowledge Cultures, Narrativity, and Historical Epistemologies,” in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, ed. McDonald, Terrence J. (University of Michigan Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R., Genealogies of Citizenship: Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Song, Sarah, “The Significance of Territorial Presence and the Rights of Immigrants,” in Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership, eds. Fine, Sarah and Ypi, Lea (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Song, Sarah, “Democracy and Noncitizen Voting Rights,” Citizenship Studies 13, no. 6 (2009): 607–20.Google Scholar
Southwick, Katherine and Lynch, Maureen, “Nationality Rights for All: A Progress Report and Global Survey on Statelessness,” Refugees International (March 2009).Google Scholar
State Water Resources Control Board, “The Water Rights Process,” California Environmental Protection Agency, www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/board_info/water_rights_process.shtml (last visited Aug. 8, 2016)Google Scholar
Stevens, Jacqueline, States Without Nations: Citizenship for Mortals (Columbia University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna, Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Stimson, Shannon, “Rethinking the State: Perspective on the Legibility and Reproduction of Political Societies,” Political Theory 28, no. 6 (2000): 822–34.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., “Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law,” Social Research 74, no. 1 (2007): 1733–72.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F., “Democracy in Time: Popular Sovereignty and Temporal Representation,” Constellations 12, no. 2 (2005): 245–61.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.P., “Time, Work–Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” Past & Present 38 (1967): 56–97.Google Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel J., Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America (Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy (University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Urry, John, “Time, Leisure, and Social Identity,” Time & Society 3, no. 2 (1994): 131–49.Google Scholar
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, “Continuous Residence and Physical Presence Requirements for Naturalization,” United States Department Homeland Security, www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-naturalization/continuous-residence-and-physical-presence-requirements-naturalization (accessed Aug. 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Vohs, Kathleen D., Baumeister, Roy F., Schmeichel, Brandon J., Twenge, Jean M., Nelson, Noelle M., and Tice, Dianne M., “Making Choices Impairs Subsequent Self-Control: A Limited-Resource Account of Decision Making,” Motivation Science 1 (2014): 19–42.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene, “Statutory Rape Laws and Statutory Consent Laws in the U.S.,” Washington Post (May 1, 2015), www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/01/statutory-rape-laws-in-the-u-s/?utm_term=.0b291c845d52Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Wardle, Lynn D., “Loving v. Virginia and the Constitutional Right to Marry, 1790–1990,” Howard Law Journal 41 (1998): 289–347.Google Scholar
Warren, Tracey, “Class and Gender-Based Working Time? Time Poverty and the Division of Domestic Labor,” Sociology 37, no. 4 (2003): 733–52.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Young, Katharine, “Rights and Queues: On Distributive Contests in the Modern State,” Columbia Journal of Transportation Law 55 (2016): 65–137.Google Scholar
Rotman Zelizer, Viviana A., The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies (Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar, “The Standardization of Time: A Sociohistorical Perspective,” American Journal of Sociology 88, no. 1 (1982): 1–23.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar, Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past (University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar