Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T15:36:03.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The impact of electoral debate on public opinions: an experimental investigation of the 2005 New York City mayoral election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Sendhil Mullainathan ,
Ebonya Washington  and
Julia R. Azari
Edited by
Ian Shapiro ,
Susan C. Stokes ,
Elisabeth Jean Wood  and
Alexander S. Kirshner
Sendhil Mullainathan
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Ebonya Washington
Affiliation:
Yale University
Julia R. Azari
Affiliation:
Marquette University
Ian Shapiro
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Susan C. Stokes
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elisabeth Jean Wood
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Alexander S. Kirshner
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Political debates have long been a part of the American polity. The early practice was aimed primarily at promoting parliamentary and elite deliberation, as well as informing the broader public about issues and candidates (Jamieson and Birdsell 1988: 37). Televised debates have altered this dynamic, structuring debate as a practice to educate the electorate. Yet the impact of televised debates on the quality of democracy has been somewhat controversial, with proponents casting debates as opportunities “to provide sustained analysis of issues and close comparison of candidates” (ibid.: 5), and others expressing the concern that the televised debates would increase the emphasis on image rather than substance (Druckman 2003).

Whether debates influence opinions by showcasing candidate viewpoints or by simply presenting shallow cues of candidate image, conventional wisdom assumes that televised debates will somehow influence viewers' opinions regarding the candidates. Information in the electoral process is presumed to help voters make decisions more in line with their preferences (Lupia and McCubbins 1998). In light of the emphasis on the informative potential of debates, it is natural to pose the question of whether debates truly provide citizens with information that influences their opinions or choices.

To this end, there is a large literature examining the impact of debates on citizens' political opinions and voting behavior. This research has concluded that debates are able to alter viewers' opinions of candidates, but only in a small way.

Type
Chapter
Information
Political Representation , pp. 324 - 341
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Kurt. 2004. “People Like Us.” New York 37 (November 22): 24–6.Google Scholar
,Anon. 2005. “The Shunned Debate.” New York Times, October 9, p. CY11.Google Scholar
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2003. “The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy–Nixon Debate Revisited.” Journal of Politics 65 (May): 559–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gales, Kathleen and Kendall, M. G.. 1957. “An Inquiry Concerning Interviewer Variability.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ser. A. (General) 120 (2): 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Donald, Green. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (June): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Donald, Green. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94 (September): 653–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Percy G. 1956. “Examples of Interviewer Variability Taken from Two Sample Surveys.” Applied Statistics 5 (June): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, Clyde. 2005. “Watch Debate? Sleep In? Boxers? Briefs?” New York Times, October 28, p. B1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Hanson, Robert H. and Marks, Eli S.. 1958. “Influence of the Interviewer on the Accuracy of Survey Results.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 53 (September): 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Patrick. 2005a. “Weiner Concedes Race for Mayor to Avert Runoff; Says Ferrer is Nominee.” New York Times, September 15, p. A1.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick. 2005b. “Ferrer Makes His Candidacy Look Stronger Than the Polls Suggest.” New York Times, October 31, p. B4.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick. 2005c. “Attacks Escalate in Final Debate of Mayor's Race; Rivals Go on Offensive.” New York Times, November 2, p. A1.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick. 2005d. “Bloomberg Cruises to Re-Election Victory; Corzine is Winner in Costly New Jersey Race.” New York Times, November 9, p. A1.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick, and Connelly, Marjorie. 2005. “Even Among Democratic Voters, Poll Finds Ferrer is Well Behind.” New York Times, October 28, p. A1.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick, and Lueck, Thomas. 2005. “Ferrer Levels Attack on Bloomberg Over Iraq War and the Need for Low-Cost Housing.” New York Times, October 27, p. B3.Google Scholar
Hellweg, Susan A., Pfau, Michael, and Brydon, Steven R.. 1992. Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Birdsell, David S.. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, Sidney. 2000. Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know?New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam, 1982.Google Scholar
Morone, James A. 1998. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Purnick, Joyce. 2005. “So Far, a Race Without Chutzpah.” New York Times, October 20, p. B1.Google Scholar
Rutenberg, Jim. 2005. “In Equal Footing of a Debate, Ferrer Gets Feisty.” New York Times, October 31, p. A1.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 1998. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×