Book contents
- Police Innovation
- Police Innovation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Community Policing
- Part II Procedural Justice Policing
- Part III Broken Windows Policing
- Part IV Problem–Oriented Policing
- Part V Pulling Levers (Focused Deterrence) Policing
- Part VI Third–Party Policing
- Part VII Hot Spots Policing
- Part VIII Predictive Policing
- Part IX CompStat
- Part X Evidence-Based/ Risk-Focused Policing
- Part XI Technology Policing
- Index
- References
Part VII - Hot Spots Policing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 August 2019
Book contents
- Police Innovation
- Police Innovation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Community Policing
- Part II Procedural Justice Policing
- Part III Broken Windows Policing
- Part IV Problem–Oriented Policing
- Part V Pulling Levers (Focused Deterrence) Policing
- Part VI Third–Party Policing
- Part VII Hot Spots Policing
- Part VIII Predictive Policing
- Part IX CompStat
- Part X Evidence-Based/ Risk-Focused Policing
- Part XI Technology Policing
- Index
- References
Summary
Looking at the major police innovations of the last few decades, what is most striking from a criminologist’s perspective is the extent to which new programs and practices have been developed without reference to either criminological theory or research evidence. Some institutional theorists might argue that this is understandable given the limited ability of police agencies to reliably demonstrate their successes, and the political environments within which police agencies must operate (Meyer & Rowan, 1977; Mastrofski & Ritti, 2000; Willis, Mastrofski & Weisburd, 2004). However, this reality is very much at odds with a model of policing that would seek to draw new policies and practices from a solid research base (Sherman, 1998; Weisburd & Neyroud, 2011), and suggests an approach to policing that is based more on intuition and luck than on research and experimentation. Studies of the adoption of police innovation reinforce this problematic portrait of American police innovation. Widely touted programs such as community policing or CompStat have been widely diffused across the landscape of American policing absent any reliable evidence that they accomplish the goals that they set out to achieve (Weisburd et al., 2003; Weisburd & Eck, 2004).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Police InnovationContrasting Perspectives, pp. 289 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–84.Google Scholar
Agnew, R. (1999). A general strain theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 123–155.Google Scholar
Akers, R. (1973). Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Baumer, E., Lauritsen, J., Rosenfeld, R., & Wright, R. (1998). The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates: A cross-city, longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 316–340.Google Scholar
Block, C., Dabdoub, M., & Fregly, S. (eds.). (1995). Crime Analysis through Computer Mapping. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2005). Hot spots policing and crime prevention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., & Bond, B. J. (2008). Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 46, 577–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., & Bond, B. J. (2009). Community perceptions of police crime prevention efforts: Using interviews in small areas to evaluate crime reduction strategies. In Knutsson, J., & Tilley, N. (eds.), Evaluating Crime Reduction Initiatives. Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 24. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Andresen, M., & Lawton, B. (2017). The law of crime concentration at places: Editors’ introduction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 421–426.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. (2011). An ex-post-facto evaluation framework for place-based police interventions. Evaluation Review, 35, 592–626.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31, 633–663.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Weisburd, D., Waring, E., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541–580.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1975). Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies, 12, 273–284.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (eds.), Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1990). Situational crime prevention in practice. Canadian Journal of Criminology, January, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursik, R. J. Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime. San Francisco: Lexington.Google Scholar
Caeti, T. (1999). Houston’s targeted beat program: A quasi-experimental test of police patrol strategies. Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.Google Scholar
Chermak, S., McGarrell, E. F., & Weiss, A. (2001). Citizens’ perceptions of aggressive traffic enforcement strategies. Justice Quarterly, 18, 365–391.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In Tonry, M., & Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, vol 4 (pp. 225–256). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1992). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention: Achievements and challenges. In Tonry, M., & Farrington, D. (eds.), Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 19, 91–150. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (eds.). (1993). Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theory, 5, 1–14. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, 2 (pp. 165–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Gorr, W., & Singh, P. (2003). Estimating intervention effects in varying risk settings: Do police raids reduce illegal drug dealing at nuisance bars? Criminology, 41, 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–605.Google Scholar
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, N., Hunt, E. D., Hipple, N. K., & McGarrell, E. F. (2012). The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 167–199.Google Scholar
Criminal Justice Commission. (1998). Beenleigh Calls for Service Project: Evaluation Report. Brisbane, Queensland: Criminal Justice Commission.Google Scholar
DiTella, R., & Schargrodsky, E. (2004). Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review, 94, 115–133.Google Scholar
Duffala, D. C. (1976). Convenience stores, robbery, and physical environmental features. American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (eds.). (1995). Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 4. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1983). Offending from 10 to 25 years of age. In Van Dusen, K., & Mednick, S. A. (eds.), Prospective Studies of Crime and Delinquency (pp. 17–38). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L., & Wilson, J. Q. (1986). Understanding and Controlling Crime. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. Police Research Series: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Paper 98. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1996). Policing Places with Drug Problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. J., Petersilia, J., & Chaiken, J. (1977). The Criminal Investigation Process. Lexington: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In Clarke, R. V. (eds.), Crime Prevention Studies vol. 2 (pp. 5–31). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. D. (1988). Environmental characteristics of convenience store robberies in the state of Florida. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kelling, G., Pate, A. M., Dieckman, D., & Brown, C. E. (1974). The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: Summary Report. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R. (2011). Constructing hot spots policing: Unexamined consequences for disadvantaged populations and for police legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 350–374.Google Scholar
Kochel, T., & Weisburd, D. (2017). Assessing community consequences of implementing hot spots policing in residential areas: Findings from a randomized field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 143–170.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S. (2014). Assessing the practice of hot spots policing: survey results from a national convenience sample of local police agencies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koper, C. S., Taylor, B. G., & Woods, D. J. (2013). A randomized test of initial and residual deterrence from directed patrols and use of license plate readers at crime hot spots. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 213–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, B., Taylor, R., & Luongo, A. (2005). Police officers on drug corners in Philadelphia, drug crime, and violent crime: Intended, diffusion, and displacement impacts. Justice Quarterly, 22, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBeau, J. (1987). The methods and measures of centrography and the spatial dynamics of rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 125–141.Google Scholar
Levine, J. P. (1975). Ineffectiveness of adding police to prevent crime. Public Policy, 23, 523–545.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In Cook, T. D., Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., Louis, T. A., & Mosteller, F. (eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83–127). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Loftin, C., & Hill, R. (1974). Regional subculture and homicide: An examination of the Gastil-Hackney thesis. American Sociological Review, 39, 714–724.Google Scholar
Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2013). Evidence-based policing in smaller agencies: Challenges, prospects, and opportunities. The Police Chief, 80, 42–47.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Hibdon, J., Cave, B., Koper, C. S., & Merola, L. (2011). License plate reader (LPR) police patrols in crime hot spots: An experimental evaluation in two adjacent jurisdictions. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 321–345.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 3–26.Google Scholar
Mamalian, C., LaVigne, N., Groff, E., Loftin, C., & Hill, R. (1999). The Use of Computerized Crime Mapping by Law Enforcement: Survey Results (NIJ Research Preview). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/fs000237.Google Scholar
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? – Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S., & Ritti, R. (2000). Making sense of community policing: A theoretical perspective. Police Practice and Research Journal, 1(2), 183–210.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D., & Fridell, L. (n.d.). Police Departments’ Adoption of Innovative Practice. National Police Research Platform. Retrieved from http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/733761/26580910/1443907094233/Department+Characteristics+Survey.pdf?token=1xxue9jmC71p%2BeA7gpKCf2WEf7U%3D [January2016].Google Scholar
Mayhew, P., Clarke, R. V., Sturman, A., & Hough, M. (1976). Crime as Opportunity: Home Office Research Study 34, Longon: H.M. Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Price, J., & Roehl, J. (2000). Civil remedies and drug control: A randomized field trial in Oakland, California. Evaluation Review, 24, 212–241.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Formal structure as myth. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 4, 674.Google Scholar
Pierce, G. L., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. R. (1986). The Character of Police Work: Strategic and Tactical Implications. Boston, MA: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. J. (1842). A Treatise of Man. Gainesville, FL: Scholar’s Facsimiles and Reprints (1969 ed.).Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J., Taniguchi, T., Groff, E., & Wood, J. (2011). The Philadelphia foot patrol experiment: A randomized controlled trial of police patrol effectiveness in violent crime hot spots. Criminology, 49, 795–831.Google Scholar
Reaves, B. A. (2010). Local police departments, 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Reinier, G. H. (1977). Crime Analysis in Support of Patrol. National Evaluation Program: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rengert, G. F. (1980). Theory and practice in urban police response. In Georges-Abeyie, D., & Harries, K. (eds.), Crime: A Spatial Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rengert, G. F. (1981). Burglary in Philadelphia: A critique of an opportunity structure model. In Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (eds.), Environmental Criminology (pp. 189–201). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2006). The limits of hot spots policing. In Weisburd, D. L., & Braga, A. A. (eds.), Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives (pp. 245–266). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7–40.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sechrest, L. B., White, S. O., & Brown, E. O. (1979). The Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders: Problems and Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. (1972). Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. R., & Myers, E. D. (1929). The juvenile delinquent. In Illinois Crime Survey. Chicago: Illinois Association for Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. (1995). Community policing against guns: Public opinion of the Kansas City gun experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 695–710.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. Crime and Justice, 12, 1–48.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1995). Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 4 (pp. 35–52). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Ideas in American policing series. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1987). Repeat Calls to the Police in Minneapolis. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. (1995a). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: Hot spots patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673–694.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. (1995b). Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 755–782.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1988). Policing the hot spots of crime: A redesign of the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. Research proposal submitted to the US National Institute of Justice, Program on Research in Public Safety and Security.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot-spots”: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 626–648.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Buerger, M. E., & Gartin, P. R. (1989). Repeat Call Address Policing: The Minneapolis RECAP Experiment. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–56.Google Scholar
Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. (eds). (2004). Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, W., & Brown, D. K. (1984). Calling the police: Citizen reporting of serious crime. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sviridoff, M., Sadd, S., Curtis, R., & Grinc, R. (1992). The Neighborhood Effects of Street-Level Drug Enforcement: Tactical Narcotics Teams in New York. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Taylor, B., Koper, C., & Woods, D. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 149–181.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.Google Scholar
Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2018). Crime concentrations at place. In Johnson, S., & Bruinsma, G. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trasler, G. (1993). Conscience, opportunity, rational choice, and crime. In Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (eds.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 5 (pp. 305–322). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Visher, C., & Weisburd, D. (1998). Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention strategies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 28, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot-spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–735.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (Green-Mazerolle) (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMA system. In MacKenzie, D. L., & Uchida, C.D. (eds.), Drugs and Crime: Evaluating Public Policy Initiatives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Lum, C. (2005). The diffusion of computerized crime mapping policing: Linking research and practice. Police Practice and Research, 6, 433–448.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. (eds.). (2018). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Committee on Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime, Communities, and Civil Liberties. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & McEwen, T. (eds.). (1997). Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention: Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 8. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. (2011). Police Science: Towards a New Paradigm. Washington: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Telep, C. W. (2014). Hot spots policing what we know and what we need to know. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30, 200–220.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–321.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Braga, A. A., Groff, E. R., & Wooditch, A. (2017). Can hot spots policing reduce crime in urban areas? An agent-based simulation. Criminology, 55, 137–173.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S. M. (2012). The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2011). The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: An experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 297–320.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Maher, L., & Sherman, L.W. (1992). Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot-spots of crime. In Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 4 (pp. 45–70). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S., McNally, A. M., & Greenspan, R. (2001). Compstat and organizational change: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S. D., McNally, A. M., Greenspan, R., & Willis, J. J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 421–456.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L., Ready, J., Eck, J., Hinkle, J., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549–592.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2015a). Small Worlds of Crime and Criminal Justice Interventions: Discovering Crime Hot Spots. In Maltz, M., & Rice, S. (eds.), Envisioning Criminology: Researchers on Research as a Process of Discovery. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2018). Hot spots of crime and place-based prevention. Criminology and Public Policy, 17(1): 5–25.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. (2001). The police and road safety. Paper prepared for The National Research Council Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practice.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. T., & Lab, S. P. (1989). A meta-analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 276–295.Google Scholar
Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Weisburd, D. (2004). Compstat and bureaucracy: A case study of challenges and opportunities for change. Justice Quarterly, 21, 463–496.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2001). Meta-analytical methods for criminology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 71–89.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, M. E., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The Subculture of Violence: Toward an Integrated Theory in Criminology. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
References
Alderden, M. A., Schuck, A. M., Lavery, T. A., Stephens, C. D., Johnston, R. M., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2010). Gang Hot Spots Policing in Chicago: An Evaluation of the Deployment Operations Center Process. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Chicago: Chicago Police Department and Center for Research in Law and Justice, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. (2011). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Barnum, J. D., Campbell, W. L., Trocchio, S., Caplan, J. M., & Kennedy, L. W. (2016). Examining the environmental characteristics of drug dealing locations. Crime and Delinquency, 1–26. doi: 10.1177/0011128716649735.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. The Annals of American Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Piehl, A. M., & Waring, E. J. (2001). Reducing Gun Violence: The Boston Gun Project’s Operation Ceasefire. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31, 633–663.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. L. (2012). The effects of “pulling levers” focused deterrence strategies on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E., Green Mazerolle, L., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37(3), 541–580.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In Clarke, R.V., & Felson, M. (eds.), Routine Activity and Rationale Choice. Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.Google Scholar
Bursik, R. J. Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
Bushway, S. (1996). The impact of a criminal history record on access to legitimate employment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. H. John Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–605.Google Scholar
Collinson, S., & Jarrett, L. (2017). Trump embraces law and order agenda. CNN. Updated 9:47 AM ET, Tue August 29. www.cnn.com/2017/08/29/politics/trump-law-order-jeff-sessions/index.html.Google Scholar
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (eds.). (1986). The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Donner, C., Maskaly, J., Fridell, L., & Jennings, W. G. (2015). Policing and procedural justice: A state-of-the-art review. Policing, 38(1), 153–172.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1994). The new police order: Effectiveness, equity, and efficiency in community policing. In Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises (pp. 3–23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 1–33.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Wartell, J. (1996). Reducing crime and drug dealing by improving place management: A randomized experiment. Report to the San Diego Police Department. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markek, D. (2014). Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Esbensen, F., Peterson, D., Taylor, T. J., Hawkins, D., & Freng, A. (2010). Youth Violence: Sex and Race Differences in Offending, Victimization, and Gang Membership Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. A. (2017). Policing and segregation. A paper presented at New York University’s Furman Center, Dream Revisited series. July. http://furmancenter.org/research/iri/essay/policing-and-segregation.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Fagan, J., & Kiss, A. (2007). An analysis of the New York City police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(479), 813–823.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Weisburd, D. L., Telep, C.W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, B. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428.Google Scholar
Graziano, L. M., Rosenbaum, D. P., & Schuck, A. M. (2014). Building group capacity for problem solving and police-community partnerships through survey feedback and training: A Randomized Control Trial within Chicago’s community policing program. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(1), 79–103.Google Scholar
Greene, J. R. (2000). Community policing in America: Changing the nature, structure, and function of the police. In Horney, J., Martin, J., MacKenzie, D. L., Peterson, R., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (eds.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (vol. 3, Criminal Justice 2000 series). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Green Mazerolle, L., & Roehl, J. (1998). Civil Remedies and Crime Prevention. Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Groff, E. R., Ratcliffe, J. H., Haberman, C. P., Sorg, E. T., Joyce, N. M., & Taylor, R. B. (2015). Does what police do at hot spots matter? The Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment. Criminology, 53(1), 23–53.Google Scholar
Henrichson, C., Rinaldi, J., & Delaney, R. (2015). The Price of Jails: Measuring the Taxpayer Cost of Local Incarceration. New York: Vera Institute of Justice. www.vera.org/price-of-jails.Google Scholar
Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Hinkle, J. C., & Weisburd, D. L. (2008). The irony of broken windows policing: A micro-place study of the relationship between disorder, focused police crackdowns and fear of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(6), 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld Davis, J. (2017). Trump to revive push on immigration crackdown on Long Island trip. New York Times, July 28. www.nytimes.com/2017/07/28/us/politics/trump-immigration-gangs.htmlGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. D., & Smith, B. W. (2008). Race and Police Brutality: Roots of an Urban Dilemma. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 2. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2013). Just Authority? Trust in the Police in England and Wales. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kane, R. J. (2002). The social ecology of police misconduct. Criminology, 40(4), 867–896.Google Scholar
Kendi, I. X. (2017). A history of race and racism in American, in 24 chapters. Book Review, New York Times, February 22. www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/books/review/a-history-of-race-and-racism-in-america-in-24-chapters.html.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1993). Closing the Market: Controlling the Drug Trade in Tampa, Florida. NIJ Program Focus. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Kleiman, M. (1988). Street-Level Drug Enforcement: Examining the Issues. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1986). Labeling theory and delinquency policy: An empirical test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 47–79.Google Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1999). Attempting gang control by suppression: The misuse of deterrence principles. In Gaines, L. K., & Cordner, G. W. (eds.), Policing Perspectives: An Anthology. Ch. 18 (pp. 269–282). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R. (2011). Constructing hot spots policing: Unexamined consequences for disadvantaged populations and for police legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(3), 350–374.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R., & Weisburd, D. (2017). Assessing community consequences of implementing hot spots policing in residential areas: Findings from a randomized field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 143–170.Google Scholar
Koper, C. (1995). Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Lamberth, J. (1998). Driving while black: A statistician proves that prejudice still rules the road. Washington Post, August 16. Pg. C01.Google Scholar
Langton, L., & Durose, M. R. (2013). Police behavior during traffic and street stops, 2011. A Special Report. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice. NCJ 242937 September.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
Lum, C., & Nagin, D. S. (2017). Reinventing American policing. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 339–393.Google Scholar
Maciag, M. (2017). The alarming consequences of police working overtime. Governing: The States and Localities. October issue. www.governing.com/topics/public-justice-safety/gov-police-officers-overworked-cops.html.Google Scholar
Maher, L., & Dixon, D. (2001). The cost of crackdowns: Policing Cabramatta’s heroin market. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 13(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Main, F. (2016). Street cops say “ACLU effect” drives spike in gun violence. Chicago Tribune, January 31, 2016, 8:24 pm. https://chicago.suntimes.com/chicago-politics/street-cops-say-aclu-effect-drives-spike-in-gun-violence/.Google Scholar
Maltz, M., Gordon, A. C., & Friedman, W. (1990). Mapping Crime in Its Community Setting: Event Geography Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mamalian, C. A., & LaVigne, N. G. (1999). The Use of Computerized Mapping by Law Enforcement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Manning, M., Ferguson, P., & Sargeant, E. (2012). Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review of procedural justice. Brisbane: Campbell Crime and Justice Group, ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. F., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2015). From CompStat to RespectStat: Accountability for respectful policing. The Police Chief, August, 76–77.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E. F., Chermak, S., Weiss, A., & Wilson, J. (2001). Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 119–148.Google Scholar
Meisner, J. (2015). Chicago sued over police department’s alleged stop-and-frisk practices. Chicago Tribune, April 21.Google Scholar
Mueller, B. (2017). New York Police Dept. agrees to curb Stop-and-Frisk tactics. New York Times, February 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Confidence, neighbourhood policing, and contact: Drawing together the evidence. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https: doi.org/10.17226/24928.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2014). The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18613.Google Scholar
New York Civil Liberties Union. (2017). Stop-and-Frisk Data. www.nyclu.org/en/stop-and-frisk-data Annual Stop-and-Frisk.Google Scholar
New York Times Editorial Board. (2013). Racial discrimination in Stop-and-Frisk. New York Times. August 13. www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/opinion/racial-discrimination-in-stop-and-frisk.html.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A. V. (2003). The social structure of gang homicide in Chicago. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society of Criminology, November 21, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2017). Behind the Badge: Amid Protests and Calls for Reform, How Police View Their Jobs, Key Issues and Recent Fatal Encounters between Blacks and Police. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. January.Google Scholar
Pope, C., Lovell, R., & Hsia, H. M. (2003). Disproportionate Minority Confinement: A Review of Research Literature from 1989 to 2001. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Potter, G., Gaines, L., & Holbrook, B. (1990). Blowing smoke: An evaluation of marijuana eradication in Kentucky. American Journal of Police, 9(1), 97–116.Google Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015). Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J. H., Groff, E. R., Sorg, E. T., & Haberman, C. P. (2015). Citizens’ reactions to hot spots policing: Impacts on perceptions of crime, disorder, safety and police. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 393–417.Google Scholar
Reaves, B. A. (2015). Local Police Departments, 2013: Personnel, Policies, and Practices. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. May. NCJ 248677. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/lpd13ppp.pdf.Google Scholar
Rice, S. K., & White, M. D. (eds.). (2010). Race, Ethnicity and Policing: New and Essential Readings. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (1993). Civil liberties and aggressive enforcement: Balancing the rights of individuals and society in the drug war. In Davis, R. C., Lurigio, A. J., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (eds.), Drugs and the Community (pp. 55–82). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.). (1994). The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2002). Evaluating multi-agency anti-crime partnerships: Theory, design and measurement issues. Crime Prevention Studies, 14, 171–225.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2007). Just say no to D.A.R.E. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 1701–1711.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2015a). Reflections on the President’s Task Force Report: Time to re-think our core crime control strategies in American policing. Plenary Session: President’s Task Force on Policing. 2015 Symposium by the George Mason University Center for Evidence-based Crime Policy and the Police Foundation. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2015b). Strike up a conversation, not an interrogation: The Respectful Engaged Policing (REP) model. Testimony before the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Phoenix, Arizona, February 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (2016). The National Police Research Platform: Advancing knowledge and practice in American policing. NIJ panel presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1995). Self-reports about place: The application of survey and interview methods to the study of small areas. Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 285–314.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., Lawrence, D. S., Hartnett, S. M., McDevitt, J., & Posick, C. (2015). Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: The Police-Community Interaction Survey. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 335–366.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., Lurigio, A. J., & Davis, R. C. (1998). The Prevention of Crime: Social and Situational Strategies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., Maskaly, J., Lawrence, D. S., Escamilla, J. H., Enciso, G., Christoff, T. E., Posick., C. (2017). The Police-Community Interaction Survey: Measuring police performance in new ways. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40 (1), 112–127.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., & McCarty, W. P. (2017). Organizational justice and officer “buy in” in American Policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40 (1), 11–25.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P., & Schuck, A. (2012). Comprehensive community partnerships for preventing crime. In Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Crime Prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (2002). The community. In Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J. (eds.), Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control (pp. 225–252). Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.Google Scholar
Sanchez, R. Police push back against Trump’s law-and-order speech. CNN, Updated 11:27 PM ET, Sat July 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Savage, C., & Goode, E. (2013). Two powerful signals of a major shift on crime. New York Times. August 12, 2013.Google Scholar
Schuck, A. M., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2006). Promoting safe and healthy neighborhoods: What research tells us about intervention. In Fulbright-Anderson, K. (ed.), Community Change: Theories, Practices and Evidence (pp. 61–140). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 12. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1997). Policing for crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J. E., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (eds.), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Ch. 8. Report to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice. (NCJ 165366).Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–55.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (eds.). (1997). Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Report to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice (NCJ 165366).Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995a). Deterrent effects of police raids on crackdowns: A randomized, controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 755–781.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995b). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “Hot spots” patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 673–693.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and Community in Chicago: A Tale of Three Cities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (1997). Community Policing Chicago Style. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, Wesley G., Steiner, L., Hartnett, S. M., DuBois, J., Bennis, J., Rottinghaus, B., Young Kim, S., Van, K., Rosenbaum, D. P. et al. (2002). Community Policing in Chicago, Years Eight and Nine: An Evaluation of Chicago’s Alternative Policing Strategy and Information Technology Initiative. Final report to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research. December.Google Scholar
Smith, M., Sviridoff, M., Sadd, S., Curtis, R., & Grinc, R. (1992). The Neighborhood Effects of Street-Level Drug Eenforcement. Tactical Narcotics Teams in New York: An evaluation of TNT. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Spelman, W. (1995). Criminal careers of public places. In Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime and Place, Crime Prevention Studies, 4 (pp. 115–144).Google Scholar
Sullivan, J., Thebault, R., Tate, J., & Jenkins, J. (2017). Number of fatal shootings by police is nearly identical to last year. The Washington Post, July 1.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. B. (1998). Crime and small-scale places: What we know, what we can prevent, and what else we need to know. Crime and place: Plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice (NIJ 168618).Google Scholar
Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2018). Crime concentration at place. In Johnson, S., & Bruinsma, G. (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terrill, W., & Reisig, M. D. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(3), 291–321.Google Scholar
Tittle, C. R., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Social Deviance and Crime: An Organizational and Theoretical Approach. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Tonry, M., & Farrington, D. P. (1995). Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 19.Google Scholar
Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From Prison to Home: The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2001). Trust and law-abiding behavior: Building better relationships between the police, the courts, and the minority community. Boston University Law Review, 81, 361–406.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Uchida, C., Forst, B., & Annan, S. (1992). Modern Policing and the Control of Illegal Drugs: Testing New Strategies in Two American Cities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
United States Department of Justice. (2017). The Civil Rights Division’s Pattern and Practice Police Reform Work: 1994-Present. Washington, DC: Civil Rights Division, US Department of Justice. www.justice.gov/crt/file/922421/download.Google Scholar
Wain, N., Ariel, B., & Tankebe, J. (2017). The collateral consequences of GPS-LED supervision in hot spots policing. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 18(4), 376–390.Google Scholar
Watson, A. C., Ottati, V. C., Morabito, M., Draine, J., Kerr, A. N., & Angell, B. (2010). Outcomes of police contacts with persons with mental illness: The impact of CIT. Administration and Policy, Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(4), 302–317.Google Scholar
Weinborn, C., Ariel, B., Sherman, L. W., & O’ Dwyer, E. (2017). Hotspots vs. harmspots: Shifting the focus from counts to harm in the criminology of place. Applied Geography, 86 (September), 226–244.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 54, 133–157.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L. (2016). Does hot spots policing inevitably lead to unfair and abusing policing practices or can we maximize both fairness and effectiveness in the new proactive policing? The University of Chicago Legal Forum. 2016 U. Chi. Legal F. 661.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Telep, C. W. (2008). Effects of problem-oriented policing on crime and disorder. Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews. www.campbellcollaboration.org/library.php.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., & Green, L. (1995a). Measuring immediate spatial displacement: Methodological issues and problems. In Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime and Place, Crime Prevention Studies 4, 349–361.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., & Green, L. (1995b). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 711–735.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S. M. (2012). The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. L., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2011). The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: An experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 297–320.Google Scholar
Weiss, A., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2009). Illinois Traffic Stop Statistics Study, 2008 Annual Report. Springfield: Illinois Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2006). Race and Policing in America: Conflicts and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P., & Sherman, L .W. (2001). Costs and Benefits of Preventing Crime. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Werner, A. (2017). Murder rate in NYC drops to lowest level in decades. CBS News. December 29, 2017, 6:38 PM. www.cbsnews.com/news/murder-rate-in-nyc-drops-to-lowest-level-in-decades/.Google Scholar
Werthman, C., & Piliavin, I. (1967). Gang members and the police. In Bordua, D. (ed.). The Police: Six Sociological Essays (pp. 56–98). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
White, C., & Weisburd, D. (2017). A co-responder model of policing mental health problems at crime hot spots: Findings from a pilot study. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(2), 194–209.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, I. (2010). The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America’s Great Migration. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Williams, H., & Murphy, P. V. (1990). The evolving strategy of police: A minority view. Perspectives in Policing, January issue (No. 13). National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J., (eds.). (2002). Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
Worden, R., Bynum, T., & Frank, J. (1994). Police crackdowns on drug abuse and trafficking. In McKenzie, D., & Uchida, C. (eds.), Drugs and Crime: Evaluating Public Policy Initiatives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Xue, Y., Leventhal, T., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Earls, F. J. (2005). Neighborhood residence and mental health problems of 5- to 11-year-olds. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(5), 554–563.Google Scholar