Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:45:40.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Critic

The Limits of Police Technology

from Part XI - Technology Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

By
Christopher S. Koper  and
Cynthia Lum
Edited by
David Weisburd  and
Anthony A. Braga
David Weisburd
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

Technological advancements have shaped policing in many important ways over the years. One needs only to consider that the primary police strategy for much of the twentieth century – motorized preventive patrol and rapid response to calls for service – was developed in response to the invention and use of the automobile, two-way radio communications, and computer-aided dispatch systems in policing. In recent decades, there have been many significant developments with respect to information technologies, analytic systems, video surveillance systems, license plate readers, DNA testing, body-worn cameras, and other technologies that have had far-reaching effects on police agencies. Technology acquisition and deployment decisions are high priority topics for police (e.g., Koper, Taylor & Kubu, 2009), and law enforcement agencies at all levels of governments are spending vast sums on technology in the hopes of improving agency efficiency and effectiveness.

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
 , pp. 517 - 543
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, M., Rao, R. H., & Sanders, L. G. (2003). Impact of mobile computing terminals in police work. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 73–89.Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 509–535.Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A. Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R. (2016). Report: Increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: A protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(3), 453–463.Google Scholar
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Flynn, E. A., Kelling, G. L., & Cole, C. M. (2011). Moving the work of criminal investigators toward crime control. New Perspectives in Policing. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Brown, M. M. (2001). The benefits and costs of information technology innovations: An empirical assessment of a local government agency. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(4), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. M. (2015). Revisiting the It productivity paradox. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(5), 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (2003). Learning organizations in the public sector? A study of police agencies employing information and technology to advance knowledge. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 30–43.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., & Witt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.Google Scholar
Burch, A. M. (2012). Sheriffs’ Offices, 2007 – Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Byrne, J., & Marx, G. (2011). Technological innovations in crime prevention and policing. A review of the research on implementation and impact. Journal of Police Studies, 20(3), 17–40.Google Scholar
Chan, J. (2001). The technological game: How information technology is transforming police practice. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1(2), 139–159.Google Scholar
Chan, J. (2003). Police and new technologies. In Newburn, T. (ed.), Handbook of Policing (pp. 655–679). Portland: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Chan, J., Brereton, D., Legosz, M., & Doran, S. (2001). E-Policing: The Impact of Information Technology on Police Practices. Brisbane: Criminal Justice Commission.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. M., Plecas, D., & McCormick, A. V. (2007). A Report on the Utility of the Automated License Plate Recognition System in British Columbia. Abbotsford, British Columbia: School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University College of the Fraser Valley.Google Scholar
Colvin, C. (2001). Evaluation of innovative technology: implications for the community policing roles of law enforcement officers. San Francisco: Psychology Department, San Francisco State University.Google Scholar
Cope, N. (2004). Intelligence led policing or policing led intelligence? Integrating volume crime analysis into policing. British Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 188–203.Google Scholar
Cordner, G., & Biebel, E. P. (2005). Problem-oriented policing in practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(2), 155–80.Google Scholar
Danziger, J. N., & Kraemer, K. L. (1985). Computerized data-based systems and productivity among professional workers: The case of detectives. Public Administration Review (January/February), 196–209.Google Scholar
Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Farrar, W. A., & Ariel, B. (2013). Self-Awareness to Being Watched and Socially-Desirable Behavior: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Body-Worn Cameras on Police Use of Force. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Frank, J., Brandl, S. G., & Watkins, R. C. (1997). The content of community policing: A comparison of the daily activities of community and “beat” officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20(4), 716–728.Google Scholar
Foley, P., & Alfonso, X. (2009). eGovernment and the transformation agenda. Public Administration, 87(2), 371–396.Google Scholar
Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., & Haynes, R. B. (2005). Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA, 293(10), 1223–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garicano, L., & Heaton, P. (2010). Information technology, organization, and productivity in the public sector: Evidence from police departments. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 167–201.Google Scholar
Goodall, M. (2007). Guidance for the Police Use of Body-Worn Video Devices. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Goldfinch, S. (2007). Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 917–929.Google Scholar
Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2006). The impact of internet subsidies in public schools. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 336–347.Google Scholar
Groff, E. R., & McEwen, T. (2008). Identifying and Measuring the Effects of Information Technologies on Law Enforcement Agencies. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice.Google Scholar
Harris, C. J. (2007). The police and soft technology: How information technology contributes to police decision making. In Byrne, J. M., & Rebovich, D. J. (eds.), The New Technology of Crime, Law and Social Control (pp. 153–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, P., Saunders, J., & Hollywood, J. (2014). Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Ioimo, R. E., & Aronson, J. E. (2003). The benefits of police field mobile computing realized by non-patrol sections of a police department. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 5(3), 195–206.Google Scholar
Ioimo, R. E., & Aronson, J. E. (2004). Police field mobile computing: Applying the theory of task-technology fit. Police Quarterly, 7(4), 403–428.Google Scholar
Jaitman, L. (2017). Evaluating Predictive Policing in Latin America. Presentation at the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy annual symposium. Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Katz, C. M., Choate, D. E., Ready, J. R., & Nuño, L. (2014). Evaluating the Impact of Officer Worn Body Cameras in the Phoenix Police Department. Phoenix: Center for Violence Prevention & Community Safety, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Katz, C. M., Kurtenbach, M., Choate, D. E., & White, M. D. (2015). Phoenix, Arizona, Smart Policing Initiative: Evaluating the Impact of Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.Google Scholar
Kennedy, L., Caplan, J., & Piza, E. (2015). A Multi‐Jurisdictional Test of Risk Terrain Modeling and a Place‐Based Evaluation of Environmental Risk‐Based Patrol Deployment Strategies. Newark, NJ: Rutgers Center on Public Security, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Koen, M. (2016). Technological Frames: Making Sense of Body-Worn Cameras in a Police Organization. PhD Dissertation, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Lum, C., & Hibdon, J. (2015b). The uses and impacts of mobile computing technology in hot spots policing. Evaluation Review, 39(6), 587–624.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Lum, C., & Willis, J. J. (2014). Optimizing the use of technology in policing: results and implications from a multi-site study of the social, organizational, and behavioral aspects of implementing police technologies. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 8(2), 212–221.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Lum, C., Willis, J. J., Happeny, S., Johnson, W. D., Nichols, J., Stoltz, M., Vovak, H., Wu, X., & Nagin, D. (2018). Evaluating the Crime Control and Cost-Benefit Effectiveness of License Plate Reader Technology. Report to the National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Lum, C., Willis, J. J., Woods, D. J., & Hibdon, J. (2015a). Realizing the Potential of Technology in Policing: A Multi-Site Study of the Social, Organizational, and Behavioral Aspects of Implementing Policing Technologies. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University and Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Moore, G. E., & Roth, J. A. (2002). Putting 100,000 Officers on the Street: A Survey-Based Assessment of the Federal Cops Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., & Roth, J. A. (2000). Putting 100,000 Officers on the Street: Progress as of 1998 and Preliminary Projections Through 2003. In Roth, J. A., Ryan, J. F. et al. (eds.). National Evaluation of the COPS Program – Title I of the 1994 Crime Act. Research Report (pp. 149–178). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Taylor, B. G., & Kubu, B. E. (2009). Law Enforcement Technology Needs Assessment: Future Technologies to Address the Operational Needs of Law Enforcement. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum and the Lockheed Martin Corporation.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Taylor, B. G., & Woods, D. J. (2013). A randomized test of initial and residual deterrence from directed patrols and use of license plate readers at crime hot spots. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(2), 213–244.Google Scholar
Kraemer, K. L., & Danziger, J. N. (1984). Computers and control in the work environment. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
Lee, G., & Perry, J. L. (2002). Are computers boosting productivity? A test of the paradox in state governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(1), 77–102.Google Scholar
Lehr, B., & Lichtenberg, F. (1999). Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sources, 1977–1993. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 335–362.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. (2003). Getting away with the stolen vehicle: An investigation of journey-after-crime. The Professional Geographer, 55(4), 422–433.Google Scholar
Lum, C. (2010). Technology and the Mythology of Progress in American Law Enforcement. Science Progress (Center for American Progress). Feb. 11. Retrieved from www.Scienceprogress.Org/2010/02/Police-Technology/.Google Scholar
Lum, C. (2013). Is crime analysis evidence-based? Translational Criminology, (Fall), 12–14.Google Scholar
Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2017). Evidence-Based Policing: Translating Research into Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., Merola, L. M., Scherer, A., & Reioux, A. (2015). Existing and Ongoing Body Worn Camera Research: Knowledge Gaps and Opportunities. Report for the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Willis, J. (2017). Understanding the limits of technology’s impact on police effectiveness. Police Quarterly, 20(2), 135–163.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., Willis, J., Happeny, S., Vovak, H., & Nichols, J. (2016c). The Rapid Diffusion of License Plate Readers in U.S. Law Enforcement Agencies: A National Survey . Report to the National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C. S., Willis, J., Happeny, S., Vovak, H., & Nichols, J. (2018). The rapid diffusion of license plate readers in US law enforcement agencies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, DOI 10.1108/PIJPSM-04-2018-0054.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Merola, L., Willis (Hibdon), J., & Cave, B. (2010). License Plate Recognition Technology: Impact Evaluation and Community Assessment. Final Report to SPAWAR and the National Institute of Justice. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Stoltz, M., Koper, C. S., & Scherer, J. A. (2019, forthcoming). Research on body worn cameras: What we know, what we need to know. Criminology and Public Policy, 18(1).Google Scholar
Lum, C., Wellford, C., Scott, T., & Vovak, H. (2016a). Trajectories of U.S. Crime Clearance Rates. Report for the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Willis (Hibdon), J., Cave, B., Koper, C. S., & Merola, L. (2011). License plate reader (lpr) police patrols in crime hot spots: An experimental evaluation in two adjacent jurisdictions. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, P. K. (1992). Technological dramas and the police: Statement and counterstatement in organizational analysis. Criminology, 30(3), 327–346.Google Scholar
Manning, P. K. (2008). The Technology of Policing. New York, NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Maryland State Highway Authority. (2005). Evaluation of the License Plate Recognition System. Retrieved from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials at Http://Ssom.Transportation.Org/Documents/Lpr_Report_Part3.PdfGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D., & Wadman, R. (1991). Personnel and agency performance measurement. In Garmire, B. L. (ed.), Local Government Police Management (pp. 363–397). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D., & Willis, J. J. (2010). Police organization continuity and change: Into the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 39(1), 55–144.Google Scholar
Merola, L. M., & Lum, C.. (2013). Predicting public support for the use of license plate recognition technology by police. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2013.814906.Google Scholar
Merola, L. M., Lum, C., Cave, B., & Hibdon, J. (2014). Community support for the use of license plate recognition by police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 37(1), 30–51.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Manning, M., Davis, J., & Sargeant, E. (2013). Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, No. 1 (January).Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Rogan, D., Frank, J., Famega, C., & Eck, J. E. (2002). Managing citizen calls to the police: The impact of Baltimore’s 3‐1‐1 call system. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(1), 97–124.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.Google Scholar
Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Malinowski, S., Johnson, M., Tita, G E., Bertozzi, A., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015). Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110 (512), 1399–1411.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https: doi.org/10.17226/24928.Google Scholar
Nunn, S. (1994). How capital technologies affect municipal service outcomes: The case of police mobile digital terminals and stolen vehicle recoveries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(3), 539–559.Google Scholar
Nunn, S., & Quinet, K. (2002). Evaluating the effects of information technology on problem-oriented-policing: If it doesn’t fit, must we quit? Evaluation Review, 26(1), 81–108.Google Scholar
ODS Consulting. (2011). Body Worn Video Projects in Paisley and Aberdeen, Self Evaluation. Glasgow: ODS Consulting.Google Scholar
Ohio State Highway Patrol. (2005). Automatic Plate Reader Technology. Ohio Planning Services Section, Research and Development Unit.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 174–207.Google Scholar
O’Shea, T., & Nicholls, K. (2003). Police crime analysis: A survey of US police departments with 100 or more sworn personnel. Police Practice and Research, 4(3), 233–250.Google Scholar
Owens, C., Mann, D., & Mckenna, R. (2014). The Essex BWV Trial: The Impact of BWV on Criminal Justice Outcomes of Domestic Abuse Incidents. London, United Kingdom: College of Policing.Google Scholar
Pa Consulting Group. (2003). Engaging Criminality – Denying Criminals Use of the Roads. London: Author.Google Scholar
Palys, T. S., Boyanowsky, E. O., & Dutton, D. G. (1984). Mobile data access terminals and their implications for policing. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 113–127.Google Scholar
Patch, D. (2005). License Plate Scanners Lead to Recovery of Stolen Vehicles. Toledoblade.Com. Retrieved January 11, 2007, from Http://Toledoblade.Com/Apps/Pbcs.Dll/Article?Aid=/20050105/News11/501050412.Google Scholar
Paulsen, D. J. (2004). To map or not to map: Assessing the impact of crime maps on police officer perceptions of crime. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 6(4), 234–246.Google Scholar
Ready, J. T., & Young, J. T. (2015). The impact of on-officer video cameras on police-citizen contacts: Findings from a controlled experiment in Mesa, AZ. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 445–458.Google Scholar
Reaves, B. A. (2010). Local Police Departments, 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Rose, G. M. (2000). Information technology and organizational learning: A review and assessment of research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(2), 125–155.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. J., & Casanova, M. (2012). Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Systems: Policy and Operational Guidance for Law Enforcement. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Chiefs of Police.Google Scholar
Rocheleau, B. (1993). Evaluating public sector information systems: Satisfaction versus impact. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16(2), 119–129.Google Scholar
Roman, J. K., Reid, S., Reid, J., Chalfin, A., Adams, W., & Knight, C. (2008). The DNA Field Experiment: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High-Volume Crimes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Roth, J. A., Ryan, J. F., Gaffigan, S. J., Koper, C. S., Moore, M. H., Roehl, J. A., Johnson, C. C. et al. (2000). National Evaluation of the Cops Program Title I of the 1994 Crime Act. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. B., & Henderson, S. (2013). Police “empires” and information technologies: Uncovering material and organisational barriers to information sharing in Canadian police services. Policing and Society, 23(2), 243–260.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. B., Weston, C., & Schott, N. (2015). Police innovations, “secret squirrels” and accountability: Empirically studying intelligence-led policing in Canada. British Journal of Criminology, 55(4), 711–729.Google Scholar
Santos, R. Boba. (2014). The effectiveness of crime analysis for crime reduction: Cure or diagnosis? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 147–168.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Eck, J. E. (2002). Policing for crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L., Evidence-Based Crime Prevention (pp. 295–329). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sparrow, M. K., Moore, M. H., & Kennedy, D. M. (1990). Beyond 9–1-1: A New Era for Policing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stiroh, K. J. (2002). Information technology and the US productivity revival: What do the industry data say? The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1559–1576.Google Scholar
Taylor, B., & Boba, R. (2011: updated in 2013). The Integration of Crime Analysis into Patrol Work: A Guidebook. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Taylor, B., Koper, C. S., & Woods, D. (2011a). A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(2), 149–181.Google Scholar
Taylor, B., Koper, C. S., & Woods, D. (2011b). Combating Auto Theft in Arizona: A Randomized Experiment with License Plate Recognition Technology. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Taylor, B., Koper, C. S., & Woods, D. (2012). Combating vehicle theft in arizona: A randomized experiment with license plate recognition technology. Criminal Justice Review, 37(1), 24–50.Google Scholar
Triplett, J. E. (1999). The Solow productivity paradox: What do computers do to productivity? Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 309–334.Google Scholar
Vovak, H. (2016). Examining the Relationship between Crime Rates and Clearance Rates Using Dual Trajectory Analysis. PhD Dissertation, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Zaworski, M. J. (2004). Assessing an Automated, Information Sharing Technology in the Post “9–11” Era – Do Local Law Enforcement Officers Think It Meets Their Needs? PhD Dissertation, Florida International University.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×