Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:05:25.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Police Innovation and the Future of Policing

from Part XI - Technology Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

David Weisburd
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

In this volume, a group of leading scholars presented contrasting perspectives on eleven major innovations in American policing developed over the course of the last three decades. Police departments needed to improve their performance and relationships with the community and innovation provided the opportunity to make these improvements. These innovations represent fundamental changes to the business of policing. However, as many of our authors point out, improving police performance through innovation is often not straightforward. Police departments are highly resistant to change and police officers often experience difficulty in implementing new programs (Sparrow, Moore, & Kennedy, 1990; Bayley & Nixon, 2010; Maguire, 2014; Lum & Koper, 2017). The available evidence on key dimensions of police performance associated with these innovations, such as crime control effectiveness and community satisfaction with services provided, is sometimes limited. These observations are not unique to the policing field. For example, as Elmore (1997) suggests, the field of education was awash in innovation during the 1990s, but there is little evidence examining whether those innovations advanced the performance of schools, students, or graduates.

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
, pp. 544 - 563
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayley, D. H. (1994). Police for the Future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, D. H., & Nixon, C. (2010). The Changing Environment for Policing, 1985–2008. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management.Google Scholar
Blumstein, A., and Wallman, J. (2000). The recent rise and fall of American violence. In Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (eds.), The Crime Drop in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31, 633663.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2012). Hot spots policing effects on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8, 196.Google Scholar
Chappell, A. T., & Gibson, S. A. (2009). Community policing and homeland security policing: Friend or foe?. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 326343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J., & Rosenbaum, D. (1994). The new police order: Effectiveness, equity, and efficiency in community policing. In Rosenbaum, D. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Elmore, R. (1997). The paradox of innovation in education: Cycles of reform and the resilience of teaching. In Altshuler, A., & Behn, R. (eds.), Innovations in American Government: Challenges, Opportunities, and Dilemmas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented Policing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackman, T. (2016). U.S. police chiefs group apologizes for “historical mistreatment” of minorities. Washington Post, October 17. Retrieved January 2017 from www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/10/17/head-of-u-s-policechiefs-apologizes-for-historic-mistreatment-of-minorities/?utm_term=.80737fda0070.Google Scholar
Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2017). Evidence-Based Policing: Translating Research into Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacQueen, S., & Bradford, B. (2015). Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: Results from randomized controlled trial in Scotland. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 419443.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. (2014). Police organizations and the iron cage of rationality. In Reisig, M., & Kane, R. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on Police and Policing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 3364.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E. F., Freilich, J. D., & Chermak, S. M. (2007). Intelligence-led policing as a framework for responding to terrorism. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 142158.Google Scholar
Moore, M., Sparrow, M., & Spelman, W. (1997). Innovations in policing: From production lines to job shops. In Altshuler, A., & Behn, R. (eds.), Innovations in American Government: Challenges, Opportunities, and Dilemmas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, D., & Telep, C. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 528.Google Scholar
Neyroud, P., & Weisburd, D. (2014). Transforming the police through science: Some new thoughts on the controversy and challenge of translation. Translational Criminology, Spring, 1618.Google Scholar
Pate, T., & Skogan, W. (1985). Coordinated community policing: The Newark experience. Technical Report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015). Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J. 2016. Intelligence-Led Policing. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Willan.Google Scholar
Sahin, N., Braga, A., Apel, R., & Brunson, R. (2017). The impact of procedurally just policing on citizen perceptions of police during traffic stops: The Adana randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 701726.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and Justice, 42, 377451.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Williams, S., Ariel, B., Strang, L. R., Wain, N., Slothower, M., & Norton, A. (2014). An integrated theory of hot spots patrol strategy: implementing prevention by scaling up and feeding back. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30, 95122.Google Scholar
Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. (2004). Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. H. (2007). Racial profiling – Then and now. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 6570.Google Scholar
Sparrow, M. K., Moore, M. H., & Kennedy, D. M. (1990). Beyond 911: A New Era for Policing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (2017). Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 2953.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., Jackson, J., & Mentovich, A. (2015). The consequences of being an object of suspicion: Potential pitfalls of proactive police contact. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 12, 602636.Google Scholar
Walker, S. (1992). The Police in America: An Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 4265.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. (eds.). (2018). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J., Braga, A., & Wooditch, A. (2015). Understanding the mechanisms underlying broken windows policing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 589608.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Lum, C. M., & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 5070.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2004). Does crime just move around the corner? A study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, NJ. US Department of Justice National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Wycoff, M., & Skogan, W. (1986). Storefront police offices: The Houston field test. In Rosenbaum, D. (ed.), Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×