Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:37:06.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Advocate Hot spots policing as a model for police innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
David Weisburd  and
Anthony A. Braga
Edited by
David Weisburd  and
Anthony A. Braga
David Weisburd
Affiliation:
Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law and Criminal Justice Hebrew University Law School in Jerusalem; Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland, College Park
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate in the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management of the Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government
David Weisburd
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Looking at the major police innovations of the last decade, what is most striking from a criminologist's perspective is the extent to which new programs and practices have been developed without reference to either criminological theory or research evidence. Some institutional theorists might argue that this is understandable given the limited ability of police agencies to reliably demonstrate their successes, and the political environments within which police agencies must operate (Meyer and Rowan 1977; Mastrofski and Ritti 2000; Willis, Mastrofski, and Weisburd 2004). However, this reality is very much at odds with a model of policing that would seek to draw new policies and practices from a solid research base (Sherman 1998), and suggests an approach to policing that is based more on intuition and luck than on research and experimentation. Recent studies of the adoption of police innovation reinforce this problematic portrait of American police innovation. Widely touted programs such as Community Policing or Compstat have been widely diffused across the landscape of American policing absent any reliable evidence that they accomplish the goals that they set out to achieve at the outset (Weisburd, Mastrofski, McNally et al. 2003; Weisburd and Eck 2004).

In this context, “hot spots policing” represents a particularly important innovation on the American police scene. Its origins can be traced to innovations in criminological theory, and it was subjected to careful empirical study before it was diffused widely across American police agencies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
 , pp. 225 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, R. (1999). A general strain theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akers, R. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Baumer, E., Lauritsen, J., Rosenfeld, R., and Wright, R. (1998). The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates: A cross-city, longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35 (3), 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, D. (1994). Police for the future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Block, C., Dabdoub, M., and Fregly, S. (eds.). (1995). Crime analysis through computer mapping. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., Weisburd, D., Waring, E., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., and Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37 (3), 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. and Brantingham, P. L. (1975). Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies, 12 (3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. and Brantingham, P. L. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In Brantingham, P. J. and Brantingham, P. L. (eds.), Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. and Brantingham, P. L. (1990). Situational crime prevention in practice. Canadian Journal of Criminology, January, 17–40.Google Scholar
Bursik, R. J. Jr. and Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime. San Francisco: Lexington.Google Scholar
Caeti, T. (1999). Houston's targeted beat program: A quasi-experimental test of police patrol strategies. Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research, 4 (pp. 225–256). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1992). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention: Achievements and challenges. In Tonry, M. and Farrington, D. (eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention, crime and justice: A review of research, 19 (pp. 91–150). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. and Felson, M. (eds.). (1993). Routine activity and rational choice. Advances in Criminological Theory, 5, 1–14. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. and Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime prevention studies, 2 (pp. 165–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Cloward, R. and Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. E. and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Cornish, D. B. and Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criminal Justice Commission. (1998). Beenleigh calls for service project: Evaluation report. Brisbane, Queensland: Criminal Justice Commission.
Duffala, D. C. (1976). Convenience stores, robbery, and physical environmental features. American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Spelman, W. (1987). Problem solving: Problem-oriented policing in Newport News. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Wartell, J. (1996). Reducing crime and drug dealing by improving place management: A randomized experiment. Report to the San Diego Police Department. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Weisburd, D. (eds.). (1995). Crime and place: Crime prevention studies, 4. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1983). Offending from 10 to 25 years of age. In Dusen, K. and Mednick, S. A. (eds.), Prospective studies of crime and delinquency (pp. 17–38). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L., and Wilson, J. Q. (1986). Understanding and controlling crime. New York: Springer-Veriag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, M. and Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. Police Research Series: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Paper 98. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Franks, W. D. (1980). Montpelier, Vermont's directed patrol experiment. Police Chief, January, 24–26.Google Scholar
Gay, W. G., Beall, T. M., and Bowers, R. A. (1984). A four-site assessment of the integrated criminal apprehension program. Washington, DC: University City Science Center.Google Scholar
Gay, W. G., Schell, T., and Schack, S. (1977). Prescriptive package: Improving patrol productivity, volume I – routine patrol. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R and Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1996). Policing places with drug problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Green-Mazerolle, L. and Roehl, J. (1998). Controlling drugs and social disorder using civil remedies: Final report of a randomized field experiment in Oakland, California. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Greene, J. A. (1999). Zero tolerance: A case study of police practices and policies in New York City. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P. J., Petersilia, J., and Chaiken, J. (1977). The criminal investigation process. Lexington: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Guerry, A. M. (1833). Essai sur la Statistique morale de la France. Paris: Crochard.Google Scholar
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In Clarke, R. V. (eds.), Crime prevention studies, 2 (pp. 5–31). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. D. (1988). Environmental characteristics of convenience store robberies in the state of Florida. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kelling, G., Pate, A. M., Dieckman, D., and Brown, C. E. (1974). The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment: Summary report. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
LeBeau, J. (1987). The methods and measures of centrography and the spatial dynamics of rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. P. (1975). Ineffectiveness of adding police to prevent crime. Public Policy, 23, 523–545.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In Cook, T. D., Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartman, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., Louis, T. A., and Mosteller, F. (eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83–127). New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lipton, D., Martinson, R., and Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Loftin, C. and Hill, R. (1974). Regional subculture and homicide: An examination of the Gastil-Hackney thesis. American Sociological Review, 39, 714–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamalian, C., LaVigne, N., and Groff, E. (1999). The use of computerized crime mapping by law enforcement: Survey results. NIJ Research Preview. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Available online at http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/fs000237.Google Scholar
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? – Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. and Ritti, R. (2000). Making sense of community policing: A theoretical perspective. Police Practice and Research Journal, 1 (2), 183–210.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P., Clarke, R. V., Sturman, A., and Hough, M. (1976). Crime as opportunity. (Home Office Research Study 34). London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977). Formal structure as myth. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 4, 674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettler, G. (1978). Explaining crime. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Pierce, G. L., Spaar, S., and Briggs, L. R. (1986). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. Boston, MA: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. J. (1842). A treatise of man. Gainesville, FL: Scholar's Facsimiles and Reprints (1969 ed.).Google Scholar
Raine, A. (1993). The psychopathy of crime. New York: Academic Press.
Reinier, G. H. (1977). Crime analysis in support of patrol. National Evaluation Program: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rengert, G. F. (1980). Theory and practice in urban police response. In Georges-Abeyie, D. and Harries, K. (eds.), Crime: A spatial perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rengert, G. F. (1981). Burglary in Philadelphia: A critique of an opportunity structure model. In Brantingham, P. J. and Brantingham, P. L. (eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 189–201). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22 (1), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J. and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J. and Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sechrest, L. B., White, S. O., and Brown, E. O. (1979). The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problems and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. (1995). Community policing against guns: Public opinion of the Kansas City gun experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. R. and McKay, H. (1972). Delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. R. and Myers, E. D. (1929). The juvenile delinquent. In Illinois Crime Survey. Chicago: Illinois Association for Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1995). Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In Eck, J. E. and Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime Prevention Studies, 4 (pp. 35–52). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Ideas in American policing series. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Rogan, D. (1995a). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: Hot spots patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Rogan, D. (1995b). Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 755–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot-spots”: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 626–648.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., and Buerger, M. E. (1989a). Repeat call address policing: The Minneapolis RECAP experiment. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., and Buerger, M. E. (1989b). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, W. and Brown, D. K. (1984). Calling the police: Citizen reporting of serious crime. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
Sutherland, E. (1947). Principals of criminology. Chicago: J. B. Lippincott Co.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34 (1), 113–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trasler, G. (1993). Conscience, opportunity, rational choice, and crime. In Clarke, R. V. and Felson, M. (eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory, 5 (pp. 305–322). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (2000). Social justice: Outcomes and procedures. International Journal of Psychology, 35 (2), 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority groups members want from the law and legal institutions?Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19 (2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visher, C. and Weisburd, D. (1998). Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention strategies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 28, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Green, L. (Green-Mazerolle) (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMA system. In MacKenzie, D. L. and Uchida, C. D. (eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot-spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D. and McEwen, T. (eds.). (1997). Crime mapping and crime prevention: Crime prevention studies, 8. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Lum, C. (2005). The diffusion of computerized crime mapping policing: Linking research and practice. In Police Practice and Research, 6 (5), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Maher, L., and Sherman, L. W. (1992). Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot-spots of crime. Advances in criminological theory, 4 (pp. 45–70). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S., McNally, A. M., and Greenspan, R. (2001). Compstat and organizational change: Findings from a national survey. Washington DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., and Yang, S. M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42 (2), 283–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S. D., McNally, A. M., Greenspan, R., and Willis, J. J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology and Public Policy, 2 (3), 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J., Hinkle, J., and Gajewski, F. (2004). Does crime just move around the corner? A study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, NJ. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. (2001). The police and road safety. Paper prepared for The National Research Council Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practice.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. T. and Lab, S. P. (1989). A meta-analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 276–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., and Weisburd, D. (2004). Compstat and bureaucracy: A case study of challenges and opportunities for change. Justice Quarterly, 21 (3), 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfgang, M. E. and Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Toward an integrated theory in criminology. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Advocate Hot spots policing as a model for police innovation
    • By David Weisburd, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law and Criminal Justice Hebrew University Law School in Jerusalem; Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland, College Park, Anthony A. Braga, Senior Research Associate in the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management of the Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government
  • Edited by David Weisburd, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Anthony A. Braga, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Police Innovation
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489334.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Advocate Hot spots policing as a model for police innovation
    • By David Weisburd, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law and Criminal Justice Hebrew University Law School in Jerusalem; Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland, College Park, Anthony A. Braga, Senior Research Associate in the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management of the Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government
  • Edited by David Weisburd, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Anthony A. Braga, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Police Innovation
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489334.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Advocate Hot spots policing as a model for police innovation
    • By David Weisburd, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law and Criminal Justice Hebrew University Law School in Jerusalem; Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland, College Park, Anthony A. Braga, Senior Research Associate in the Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management of the Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government
  • Edited by David Weisburd, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Anthony A. Braga, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Police Innovation
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489334.012
Available formats
×