Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Chapter 10 Henri-Louis Bergson and Plotinus
- Chapter 11 Plotinus and Modern Scholarship: From Ficino to the Twenty-First Century
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Chapter 10 - Henri-Louis Bergson and Plotinus
from Part V - The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Chapter 10 Henri-Louis Bergson and Plotinus
- Chapter 11 Plotinus and Modern Scholarship: From Ficino to the Twenty-First Century
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus' LegacyThe Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era, pp. 233 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.) (1966–1988) Plotinus, The Enneads, 7 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. J. (2012) “Bergson’s Environmental Aesthetic,” Environmental Philosophy 9: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, H. (1903) An Introduction to Metaphysics, authorized trans. Hulme, T. E. [2nd ed., 1912] New York.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1911) Creative Evolution, authorized trans. Mitchell, A., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, H. (1935) The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C., New York.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1946b) “La Pensée et le Mouvant,” translated as “Introduction” in Bergson (1946a), 9–106.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1946d) “The Life and Work of Ravaisson,” in Bergson (1946a), 261–300 [Appeared first in Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques 1904].Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1959) Bergson et nous: Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, Actes du Xe congrès des sociétés de philosophie de langue française, num. spéc., 3.Google Scholar
Bréhier, É. (1949–1955) “Images plotiniennes, images bergsoniennes,” Les études bergsoniennes 2: 105–128 [repr. in Bréhier, Études de philosophie antique, Paris, 292–307].Google Scholar
de Belloy, C. (2014) Dieu comme soi-même. Connaissance de soi et connaissance de dieu selon Thomas d’Aquin: l’herméneutique d’Ambroise Gardeil, Paris.Google Scholar
de Belloy, C. (2016) La visite de Dieu: Essai sur les missions des personnes divines selon saint Thomas d’Aquin, Geneva.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1990) “Immanence and the Historical Components of Expression,” in Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M., New York, 169–186.Google Scholar
Duméry, H. (1948) La Philosophie de l’action: essai sur l’intellectualisme blondelien, Paris.Google Scholar
Duméry, H. (1964) The Problem of God in Philosophy of Religion: A Critical Examination of the Category of The Absolute and the Scheme of Transcendence, trans. Courtney, C., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Gandillac, M. de (1973) “Le Plotin de Bergson,” Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie, 23: 173–183 [repr. in J. Trouillard, et al., Études néoplatoniciennes, Neuchâtel 1973, 97–109]Google Scholar
Gilson, É. (1988) Letters of Étienne Gilson to Henri de Lubac, with commentary by de Lubac, H., trans. Hamilton, M.E., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (2001) La philosophie comme manière de vivre: Entretiens avec Jeanne Carlier et Arnold I. Davidson, Paris.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (1998) “From Metaphysics to History, from Exodus to Neoplatonism, from Scholasticism to Pluralism: the fate of Gilsonian Thomism in English-speaking North America,” Dionysius 16: 157–188.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2003) “Philosophy as Way of Life for Christians? Iamblichan and Porphyrian Reflections on Religion, Virtue, and Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas,” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 59: 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2006) One Hundred Years of Neoplatonism in France: A Brief Philosophical History, Leuven/Paris/Dudley, MA [published together with Levinas and the Greek Heritage, by J.-M. Narbonne].Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2008) “The Ineffable Immediately Incarnate: Interplay between 20th century French Neoplatonism and Heidegger,” Heidegger and Religion: from Neoplatonism to the Posthuman, Oxford University Research Archive: http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid%3A05c4da8d-d3f0-44c2-b29c-12f8392b00e9/.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2010) Recurrens in te unum: Neoplatonic Form and Content in Augustine’s Confessions,” in Cary, P., Doody, J., and Paffenroth, K. (eds.) Augustine and Philosophy, Augustine in Conversation: Tradition and Innovation, New York, 127–144.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2017) “The Conversion of God in Aquinas’ Summa theologiae: Being’s Trinitarian and Incarnational Self Disclosure,” Dionysius 35: 132–70.Google Scholar
Janicaud, Dominique (1969) Une généalogie du spiritualisme français. Aux sources du bergsonisme: Ravaisson et la métaphysique, La Haye.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. (1932b) Annexe V. “Sur un ouvrage du Père A. Gardeil,” in Maritain (1932a), 855–867.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. (1944c) “The Bergsonian Philosophy of Morality and Religion,” in Maritain (1944a), 74–100.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. (1944d) “The Natural Mystical Experience and the Void,” in Maritain (1944a), 225–255.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. (2008) “Jacques Maritain,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maritain/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1961a) “Valeur critique de la mystique plotinienne,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 59/63: 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1961b) “The Logic of Attribution in Plotinus,” International Philosophical Quarterly 1: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1969) “Le néoplatonisme de Plotin à Damascios,” Histoire de la philosophie I, Encyclopédie de la Pléïade, Paris, 886–935.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (2014a) Raison et Mystique, Études néoplatoniciennes, ed. Goy, M., Paris.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (2014b) “Procession néoplatonicienne et création judéo-chrétienne,” in Néoplatonisme, Mélanges offerts à Jean Trouillard, Fontenay-aux-Roses 1981 [repr. in Trouillard (2014a), 79–108].Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (2014c) “Sagesse bergsonienne sagesse plotinienne,” Bergson et nous: Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, Actes du Xe congrès des sociétés de philosophie de langue française, 1959, numéro spécial. 307–10 [repr. in Trouillard (2014a), 155–158].Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. and Mossé-Bastide, R.-M. (2014) “Sources et histoire du bergonisme,” extrait de la discussion, Bergson et Nous, repr. in Trouillard (2014a), 159–162.Google Scholar