Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 10
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2010
Print publication year:
2006
Online ISBN:
9780511541469

Book description

This concise guide to planning, writing, and presenting research is intended for biology students of all levels, especially those in behavioral ecology, The reader is guided through a discussion of the nature of scientific research, how to plan research, and how to obtain funding. The authors give advice and guidelines for presenting results at research seminars and scientific meetings, and also provide useful tips on preparing abstracts and posters for scientific meetings. They discuss how to write an effective C.V. and give general tips on how to write clearly. The book is illuminated throughout with personal examples from the authors' own experiences and emphasis is placed on problems associated with field studies. All biologists will find this a valuable resource and guide for the early years of their scientific careers and established faculty will find it an essential instructional tool.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Further reading
Alley, M. (1996). The Craft of Scientific Writing, 3rd edn. New York: Springer. [Examples of strong and weak scientific writing and suggestions for improving one's own.]
Alley, M. (2003). The Craft of Scientific Presentations: Critical Steps to Succeed and Critical Errors to Avoid. New York: Springer. [Presentations.]
American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the APA, 5th edn. Washington, DC: APA. [A style manual followed not only by the many periodicals of the APA itself but also by several other journals. More than half a million copies in print.]
Anholt, R. R. H. (1994). Dazzle 'Em with Style: The Art of Oral Scientific Presentations. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co. [Communicating and lecturing.]
Berg, K. E. and Latin, R. W. (1994). Essentials of Modern Research Methods in Health, Physical Education, and Recreation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Research and methodology in special biological areas, and technical writing.]
Beveridge, W. I. B. (2005). The Art of Scientific Investigation. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press. [Originally published in 1950, a time-honored work on doing science, with many good examples of inductive reasoning.]
Beveridge, W. I. B. (1980). Seeds of Discovery: A Sequel to The Art of Scientific Investigation. New York: Norton. [More of Beveridge's germane analyses; see previous reference.]
Bishop, W. (1990). Something Old, Something New: College Writing Teachers and Classroom Change. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [Writing and rhetoric in education.]
Booth, V. (1993). Communicating in Science: Writing a Scientific Paper and Speaking at Scientific Meetings, 2nd edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press [Communicating, lecturing, and writing.]
Brent, D. (1992). Reading as Rhetorical Invention: Knowledge, Persuasion, and the Teaching of Research-based Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. [Rhetoric and reading.]
Briscoe, M. H. (1995). Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A Guide to Better Posters, Presentations, and Publications, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag. [Visual presentations and publications.]
Carr, J. J. (1992). The Art of Science: A Practical Guide to Experiments, Observations, and Handling Data. San Diego, CA: HighText Publications. [Experimentation, methodology, laboratory.]
Chamberlin, T. C. (1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 148:754–9. [A reprint of Thomas C. Chamberlin's 1890 article from Science (old series) in which he artfully describes how to consider alternative hypotheses without bias.]
Cleveland, W. S. (1994). Elements of Graphing Data. Murray Hill, NJ: AT&T Bell Laboratories. [A standard comprehensive treatise on graphing.]
Cone, J. D. and Foster, S. L. (1993). Dissertations and Theses from Start to Finish: Psychology and Related Fields. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [Practical suggestions for psychology graduate students.]
Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. V. (eds.) (1994). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [Storage and retrieval systems, general and statistical methods.]
Council of Biology Editors (1994). Scientific Style and Format: The CBE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, 6th edn. New York: Cambridge University Press. [A standard guide for writing in biology.]
Davis, M. (2004). Scientific Papers and Presentations. New York: Academic Press. [Writing and presenting science.]
Dawkins, M. S. and M. Gosling (eds.) (1992). Ethics in Research on Animal Behaviour. London: Academic Press for the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour and the Animal Behavior Society. [Reprintings of eight articles originally appearing in the journal Animal Behaviour, including the revised guidelines for the use of animals in research, with an introduction by the editors.]
Day, R. A. (1998). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 5th edn. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. [Writing and publishing in scientific journals; a widely used reference.]
Day, R. A. (1995). Scientific English: A Guide for Scientists and Other Professionals, 2nd edn. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. [Guide to technical writing.]
Friedland, A. and Folt, C. (2000). Writing Successful Science Proposals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. [Proposal writing.]
Gastel, B. (1983). Presenting Science to the Public. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press. [Treats a related topic beyond the bounds of this book; a very complete guide.]
Goldstein, M. and Goldstein, I. (1984). The Experience of Science. New York: Plenum Press. [Discusses hypotheses, precision, accuracy, and other relevant topics for scientists.]
Gutavii, B. (2003). How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Writing and, especially, presenting figures.]
Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. [Communicating and technical writing.]
Hirsch, T. J. (1992). Working Research: Strategies for Inquiry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Problem-solving, research methodology, and technical writing.]
Hopkins, R. A. (1974). The International (SI) Metric System and How It Works, 2nd edn. Tarzana, CA: Polymetric Services. [A book of nearly 300 pages on the SI system of numbers and units.]
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [A famous book, the first edition of which defended more strongly than did the revision the thesis that science advances mainly through discarding old models for wholly new ones.]
Leather, S. R. (1966). The case for the passive voice. Nature 381:467. [Objections to blanket advice for always writing in the active voice.]
Lehner, P. N. (1998). Handbook of Ethological Methods, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Classic descriptions of ethological sampling methods.]
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp. [Language and languages in education and science.]
Lindemann, E. (2001). A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press. [Writing English.]
Lobban, C. S. and Schefter, M. (1992). Successful Lab Reports: A Manual for Science Students. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Laboratory report writing.]
Mahaffey, R. R. (1990). LIMS: Applied Information Technology for the Laboratory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. [Laboratory management, data processing, and information systems.]
Martin, P. R. and Bateson, P. (2007). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, 3rd edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. [Methodology in studies of animal behavior.]
Montgomery, S. L. (2002). The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science (Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Writing and presentations; also includes communicating with the public.]
O'Connor, M. and F. P. Woodford (1975). Writing Scientific Papers in English: An ELSE-Ciba Foundation Guide for Authors. The Hague: Ciba Foundation. [A guide conceived for writers whose first language is not English but very useful to native English speakers. Reprinted in 1977 by Elsevier/Excerpta Medica/North Holland.]
Ogden, T. E. and Goldberg, I. A. (2002). Research Proposals: A Guide to Success, 3rd edn. New York: Academic Press. [Proposal writing and review process.]
Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science 146:347–53. [An influential paper urging that the hypothetico-deductive method be applied more explicitly in all branches of science.]
Secor, M. and Charney, D. (eds.) (1992). Constructing Rhetorical Education. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [Language and teaching.]
Smith, R. C., Reid, W. M., and Luchsinger, A. E. (1980). Smith's Guide to the Literature of the Life Sciences, 9th edn. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Co. [Although outdated and apparently no longer periodically revised, this remains a useful entry into biological literature searching and has special chapters on graduate theses.]
Sternberg, D. (1981). How to Complete and Survive a Doctoral Dissertation. New York: St Martin's Press. [Includes tips on many unexpected problems that graduate students may encounter.]
Strunk, W. and White, E. B. (2000). The Elements of Style, 4th edn. New York: Longman. [The parsimonious classic on grammar and usage, comprising the lecture notes of Professor William Strunk (1869–1946) as originally edited by his once-student, the US essayist E. B. White (1899–1985), who added an introduction and a chapter on writing. This edition includes a foreword by R. Angell.]
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [How language can be used in research and teaching. One reviewer of our book in manuscript especially recommended the way this author discusses the purpose of a paper's introduction.]
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd edn. Cheshire, CTGraphics Press. [One of several works by Tufte that have become standard reference material; see next reference.]
Tufte, E. R. (2003). Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. [A concise guide to presenting data visually, mainly with reference to computer interfacing; the 2003 edition is its ninth edition.]
University of Chicago Press (1987). Chicago Guide to Preparing Electronic Manuscripts for Authors and Publishers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Now outdated because of the rapid advances in microcomputer hardware and software, but most of the basic material remains valid.]
University of Chicago Press (2003). The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Arguably the best-known standard of style manuals since the first edition in 1906.]
US Government Printing Office (2000). Style Manual. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. [The standard manual for writing by federal employees, updated at long intervals; especially known for its detailed treatment of syllabification and hyphenation, which in the days of typewriters was a critical issue for breaking up words at the ends of lines.]
Watson, J. D. (1993). Succeeding in science: some rules of thumb. Science 261:1812–13. [Advice from a Nobel laureate, who says to avoid dumb people, take risks, have someone back you up, and never do anything that bores you. See also the news article on grantsmanship in the pages preceding Watson's article.]
Zimmerman, D. E. and Muraski, M. L. (1995). The Elements of Information Gathering: A Guide for Technical Communicators, Scientists, and Engineers. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. [Communicating, technical information, storage and retrieval systems.]

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.