Dukhovny, S, Zera, C, Little, SE, McElrath, T, Wilkins-Haug, L. Eliminating first trimester markers: Will replacing PAPP-A and βhCG miss women at risk for small for gestational age? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nicolaides, KH, Wright, D, Poon, LC, Syngelaki, A, Gil, MM. First-trimester contingent screening for trisomy 21 by biomarkers and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 Jul;42(1):41–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus: Greentop Guideline 31. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK; 2013.Google Scholar

Cnossen, JS, Morris, RK, Ter Riet, G, Mol, BWJ, Van der Post, JAM, Coomarasamy, A, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008 Mar 11;178(6):701–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Verlohren, S, Melchiorre, K, Khalil, A, Thilaganathan, B. Uterine artery Doppler, birth weight and timing of onset of pre-eclampsia: Providing insights into the dual etiology of late-onset pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 Oct;44(3):293–8.Google Scholar

Mayer, C, Joseph, KS. Fetal growth: A review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 Feb;41(2):136–45.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Madurasinghe, V, Williams, M, Malik, A, Francis, A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: Population based study. BMJ 2013;346:f108.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, PG, Molin, J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005 Mar;25(3):258–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roberge, S, Nicolaides, KH, Demers, S, Villa, P, Bujold, E. Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low-dose aspirin: A meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:491–9.Google Scholar

Sanz-Cortés, M, Carbajo, RJ, Crispi, F, Figueras, F, Pineda-Lucena, A, Gratacós, E. Metabolomic profile of umbilical cord blood plasma from early and late intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) neonates with and without signs of brain vasodilation. PLoS One 2013 Jan;8(12):e801217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mifsud, W, Sebire, NJ. Placental pathology in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014 Jan;36(2):117–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kovo, M, Schreiber, L, Ben-Haroush, A, Wand, S, Golan, A, Bar, J. Placental vascular lesion differences in pregnancy-induced hypertension and normotensive fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 Jul;202(6):561.e1–5.Google Scholar

Schwartz, N, Sammel, MD, Leite, R, Parry, S. First-trimester placental ultrasound and maternal serum markers as predictors of small-for-gestational-age infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol Elsevier; 2014 Sep 9;211(3):253.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Romero, R, Kusanovic, JP, Than, NG, Erez, O, Gotsch, F, Espinoza, J, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PP13 in the risk assessment for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol Elsevier; 2008 Aug 8;199(2):122.e1–122.e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stamatopoulou, A, Cowans, NJ, Matwejew, E, Von Kaisenberg, C, Spencer, K. Placental protein-13 and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A as first trimester screening markers for hypertensive disorders and small for gestational age outcomes. Hypertens Pregnancy 2011:384–95.Google Scholar

Schneuer, FJ, Nassar, N, Khambalia, AZ, Tasevski, V, Ashton, AW, Morris, JM, et al. First trimester screening of maternal placental protein 13 for predicting preeclampsia and small for gestational age: In-house study and systematic review. Placenta 2012;33:735–40.Google ScholarPubMed

Cowans, NJ, Stamatopoulou, A, Khalil, A, Spencer, K. PP13 as a marker of pre-eclampsia: A two platform comparison study. Placenta 2011;32.Google Scholar

Plasencia, W, Akolekar, R, Dagklis, T, Veduta, A, Nicolaides, KH. Placental volume at 11–13 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of birth weight percentile. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011;30:23–8.Google Scholar

Odibo, AO, Patel, KR, Spitalnik, A, Odibo, L, Huettner, P. Placental pathology, first-trimester biomarkers and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Perinatol 2014;34:186–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Avgidou, K, Molina, F, Nicolaides, KH. First-trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:15–19.Google Scholar

D’Antonio, F, Rijo, C, Thilaganathan, B, Akolekar, R, Khalil, A, Papageourgiou, A, et al. Association between first-trimester maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and obstetric complications. Prenat Diagn 2013 Sep;33(9):839–47.Google ScholarPubMed

Dugoff, L, Hobbins, JC, Malone, FD, Porter, TF, Luthy, D, Comstock, CH, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: A population-based screening study (The FASTER Trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004:1446–51.Google Scholar

Karagiannis, G, Akolekar, R, Sarquis, R, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of small-for-gestation neonates from biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011;29:148–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wortelboer, EJ, Koster, MPH, Kuc, S, Eijkemans, MJC, Bilardo, CM, Schielen, PCJI, et al. Longitudinal trends in fetoplacental biochemical markers, uterine artery pulsatility index and maternal blood pressure during the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011 Oct;38(4):383–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, J, Wu, J, Guo, F, Wang, D, Chen, K, Li, J, et al. Maternal serum disintegrin and metalloprotease protein-12 in early pregnancy as a potential marker of adverse pregnancy outcomes. PLoS One 2014 Jan 15;9(5):e97284.Google Scholar

Poon, LCY, Chelemen, T, Granvillano, O, Pandeva, I, Nicolaides, KH. First-trimester maternal serum a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 (ADAM12) and adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008 Nov;112(5):1082–90.Google Scholar

Lacroix, MC, Guibourdenche, J, Frendo, JL, Muller, F, Evain-Brion, D. Human placental growth hormone – a review. Placenta 2002 Apr;23 Suppl A:S87–94.Google Scholar

Sifakis, S, Akolekar, R, Kappou, D, Mantas, N, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal serum placental growth hormone at 11–13 weeks’ gestation in pregnancies delivering small for gestational age neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012:1796–9.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Nien, JK, Espinoza, J, Todem, D, Fu, W, Chung, H, et al. A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008 Jan;21(1):9–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poon, L, Zaragoza, E, Akolekar, R, Anagnostopoulos, E, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal serum placental growth factor (PlGF) in small for gestational age pregnancy at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:1110–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dessì, A, Marincola, F, Fanos, V. Metabolomics and the great obstetrical syndromes – GDM, PET, and IUGR. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014 Aug 21;29(2):156–64.Google Scholar

Dessì, A, Atzori, L, Noto, A, Visser, GHA, Gazzolo, D, Zanardo, V, et al. Metabolomics in newborns with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR): Urine reveals markers of metabolic syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011 Oct;24 Suppl 2:35–9.Google Scholar

Barker, DJ, Gluckman, PD, Godfrey, KM, Harding, JE, Owens, JA, Robinson, JS. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 1993 Apr 10;341(8850):938–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barberini, L, Noto, A, Fattuoni, C, Grapov, D, Casanova, A, Fenu, G, et al. Urinary metabolomics (GC-MS) reveals that low and high birth weight infants share elevated inositol concentrations at birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014 Oct;27 Suppl 2:20–6.Google Scholar

Lin, G, Liu, C, Feng, C, Fan, Z, Dai, Z, Lai, C, et al. Metabolomic analysis reveals differences in umbilical vein plasma metabolites between normal and growth-restricted fetal pigs during late gestation. J Nutr 2012 Jun;142(6):990–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Favretto, D, Cosmi, E, Ragazzi, E, Visentin, S, Tucci, M, Fais, P, et al. Cord blood metabolomic profiling in intrauterine growth restriction. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012 Jan;402(3):1109–21.Google Scholar

Van Vliet, E, Eixarch, E, Illa, M, Arbat-Plana, A, González-Tendero, A, Hogberg, HT, et al. Metabolomics reveals metabolic alterations by intrauterine growth restriction in the fetal rabbit brain. PLoS One 2013 Jan;8(5):e64545.Google Scholar

Heazell, AEP, Brown, M, Worton, SA, Dunn, WB. Review: The effects of oxygen on normal and pre-eclamptic placental tissue – insights from metabolomics. Placenta 2011 Mar 32 Suppl 2:S119–24.Google Scholar

Diaz, SO, Barros, AS, Goodfellow, BJ, Duarte, IF, Galhano, E, Pita, C, et al. Second trimester maternal urine for the diagnosis of trisomy 21 and prediction of poor pregnancy outcomes. J Proteome Res American Chemical Society 2013 Jun 7;12(6):2946–57.Google Scholar

Maitre, L, Fthenou, E, Athersuch, T, Coen, M, Toledano, MB, Holmes, E, et al. Urinary metabolic profiles in early pregnancy are associated with preterm birth and fetal growth restriction in the Rhea mother-child cohort study. BMC Med 2014 Jan;12:110.Google Scholar

Sulek, K, Han, T-L, Villas-Boas, SG, Wishart, DS, Soh, S-E, Kwek, K, et al. Hair metabolomics: Identification of fetal compromise provides proof of concept for biomarker discovery. Theranostics 2014 Jan;4(9):953–9.Google Scholar

Onwudiwe, N, Yu, CKH, Poon, LCY, Spiliopoulos, I, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of pre-eclampsia by a combination of maternal history, uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008 Dec;32(7):877–83.Google Scholar

Hafner, E, Metzenbauer, M, Höfinger, D, Stonek, F, Schuchter, K, Waldhör, T, et al. Comparison between three-dimensional placental volume at 12 weeks and uterine artery impedance/notching at 22 weeks in screening for pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in a low-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006 Jun;27(6):652–7.Google Scholar

Seravalli, V, Block-Abraham, DM, Turan, OM, Doyle, LE, Kopelman, JN, Atlas, RO, et al. First-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates incorporating fetal Doppler parameters and maternal characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol Elsevier; 2014 Sep 9;211(3):261.e1–8.Google Scholar

Khalil, A, Sodre, D, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks of gestation in pregnancies delivering small for gestational age neonates. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012 Jan;32(4):231–8.Google Scholar

De Paco, C, Kametas, N, Rencoret, G, Strobl, I, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal cardiac output between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation in the prediction of preeclampsia and small for gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:292–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poon, LCY, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Lai, J, Nicolaides, KH. Combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33:16–27.Google Scholar

Kane, S, da Silva Costa, B. First trimester biomarkers in the prediction of later pregnancy complications. Biomed Res Int 2014 (Article ID 807196).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crovetto, F, Crispi, F, Scazzocchio, E, Mercade, I, Meler, E, Figueras, F, et al. First-trimester screening for early and late small-for-gestational-age neonates using maternal serum biochemistry, blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:34–40.Google Scholar

Imdad, A, Yakoob MY, Siddiqui S, Bhutta ZA. Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: A systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths. BMC Public Health 2011;11 Suppl 3:S1. DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S1.Google Scholar

Wilson, JMG, Jungner, G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1968.Google ScholarPubMed

Cetin, I, Huppertz B, Burton G, Cuckle H, Gonen R, Lapaire O, Mandia L, Nicolaides K, Redman C, Soothill P, Spencer K, Thilaganathan B, Williams D, Meiri H. Pregenesys pre-eclampsia markers consensus meeting: What do we require from markers, risk assessment and model systems to tailor preventive strategies? Placenta 2011;32 Suppl:S4–16. DOI 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.11.022.Google Scholar

Breeze, AC, Lees, CC. Prediction and perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;12:383–97. DOI 10.1016/j.siny.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, RK, Malin GL, Tsourapas A, Roberts TE, Khan KS. An economic evaluation of alternative test-intervention strategies to prevent fetal growth restriction in singleton pregnancies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010;95:F12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bujold, E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, Bureau M, Audibert F, Marcoux S, Forest JC, Giguere Y. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:402–14. DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, Wolf H, Berg C, Rigano S, Germer U, Moyano D, Turan S, Hartung J, Bhide A, Muller T, Bower S, Nicolaides KH, Thilaganathan B, Gembruch U, Ferrazzi E, Hecher K, Galan HL, Harman CR. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:253–61. DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Royal College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists (2013). Green-top guidelines No. 31. The investigation and management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. London: Royal College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists. Available at www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg31 (accessed 11/10/2014).Google Scholar

NICE. In Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. London, 2008.Google Scholar

Lausman, A, Kingdom J, Gagnon CR, Basso M, Bos H, Crane J, Davies G, Delisle MF, Hudon L, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Pylypjuk C, Roggensack A, Sanderson F. Intrauterine growth restriction: Screening, diagnosis, and management. JOGC 2013;35:741–57.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1122–33. DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9.Google Scholar

Robert Peter, J, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S. Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;7:CD008136. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008136.pub2.Google Scholar

Morse, K, Williams A, Gardosi J. Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:809–18. DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.004.Google Scholar

Stampalija, T, Gyte GM, Alfirevic Z. Utero-placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD008363. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008363.pub2.Google Scholar

Napolitano, R, Melchiorre K, Arcangeli T, Dias T, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Thilaganathan. Screening for pre-eclampsia by using changes in uterine artery Doppler indices with advancing gestation. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:180–4. DOI 10.1002/pd.2930.Google Scholar

Fox, C, Khan KS, Coomarasamy A. How to interpret randomised trials of test-treatment combinations: A critical evaluation of research on uterine Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2010;117:801–8. DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02577.x.Google Scholar

Goffinet, F, Aboulker D, Paris-Llado J, Bucourt M, Uzan M, Papiernik E, Breart G. Screening with a uterine Doppler in low risk pregnant women followed by low dose aspirin in women with abnormal results: A multicenter randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2001;108:510–18.Google Scholar

Subtil, D, Goeusse P, Houfflin-Debarge V, Puech F, Lequien P, Breart G, Uzan S, Quandalle F, Delcourt YM, Malek YM, Essai G, Regional Aspirine Mere-Enfant Collaborative. Randomised comparison of uterine artery Doppler and aspirin (100 mg) with placebo in nulliparous women: The Essai Regional Aspirine Mere-Enfant study (Part 2). BJOG 2003;110:485–91.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Yu CK, Cicero S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: A review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;12:78–88. DOI 10.1080/jmf.12.2.78.88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Papageorghiou, AT, Leslie K, . Uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:103–9. DOI 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32809bd964.Google Scholar

Cnossen, JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Coomarasamy A, Zwinderman AH, Robson SC, Bindels PJ, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008;178:701–11. DOI 10.1503/cmaj.070430.Google Scholar

Deeks, JJ, Altman DG, . Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. BMJ 2004;329:168–9. DOI 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fayyad, AM, Harrington KF, . Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia and IUGR. Early Hum Dev 2005;81:865–76. DOI 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.09.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, RK, Cnossen JS, Langejans M, Robson SC, Kleijnen J, Ter Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Khan KS. Serum screening with Down’s syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008;8:33. DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-8-33.Google Scholar

Hui, D, Okun N, Murphy K, Kingdom J, Uleryk E, Shah PS. Combinations of maternal serum markers to predict preeclampsia, small for gestational age, and stillbirth: A systematic review. JOGC 2012;34:142–53.Google Scholar

Conde-Agudelo, A, Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Villar J. Novel biomarkers for predicting intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013;120:681–94. DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12172.Google Scholar

Napolitano, R, Santo S, D’Souza R, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Sensitivity of higher, lower and mean second-trimester uterine artery Doppler resistance indices in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:573–6. DOI 10.1002/uog.7645.Google Scholar

Meads, CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, ter Riet G, Duley L, Roberts TE, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Leeflang MM, Barton PM, Hyde CJ, Gupta JK, Khan KS. Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: Systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2008;12:iii–iv, 1–270.Google Scholar

Kleinrouweler, CE, Bossuyt PM, Thilaganathan B, Vollebregt KC, Arenas Ramirez J, Ohkuchi A, Deurloo KL, Macleod M, Diab AE, Wolf H, van der Post JA, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Value of adding second-trimester uterine artery Doppler to patient characteristics in identification of nulliparous women at increased risk for pre-eclampsia: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:257–67. DOI 10.1002/uog.12435.Google Scholar

Audibert, F, Benchimol Y, Benattar C, Champagne C, Frydman R. Prediction of preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction by second trimester serum screening and uterine Doppler velocimetry. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20:48–53. DOI 10.1159/000081369.Google Scholar

Bricker, L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD001451. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3.Google Scholar

Napolitano, R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: A systematic review of charts. BJOG 2014;121:556–65. DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12478.Google Scholar

Ioannou, C, Talbot K, Ohuma E, Sarris I, Villar J, Conde-Agudelo A, Papageorghiou A. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. BJOG 2012;119:1425–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gardosi, J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992;339:283–7.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Francis A, . Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:28 e21-28. DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.034.Google Scholar

Owen, P, Ogston S, . Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:110–17. DOI 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020110.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Papageorghiou, AT, Kennedy SH, Salomon LJ, Ohuma EO, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Bhutta ZA, Villar J, International and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:641–8. DOI 10.1002/uog.13448.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Cheikh Ismail L, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Salomon LJ, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J, International and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: The Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014;384:869–79. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Souka, AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, Michalitsi V, Kassanos D. Performance of third-trimester ultrasound for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates and evaluation of contingency screening policies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:535–42. DOI 10.1002/uog.10078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindqvist, PG, Molin J, . Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:258–64. DOI 10.1002/uog.1806.Google Scholar

Ben-Haroush A, , Yogev Y, , Hod, M, Bar J, . Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;130:187–92. DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018.Google Scholar

De Reu, PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, and Nijhuis JG. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population. J Perinat Med 2008;36:324–9. DOI 10.1515/JPM.2008.057.Google Scholar

Sylvan K, , Ryding, EL, Rydhstroem H, . Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:1154–8. DOI 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00649.x.Google Scholar

Sovio, U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GC. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2015;386:2089–97. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2.Google Scholar

Fadigas, C, Saiid Y, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: Screening by fetal biometry at 35–37 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:559–65. DOI 10.1002/uog.14816.Google ScholarPubMed

Roma, E, Arnau A, Berdala R, Bergos C, Montesinos J, Figueras F. Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks’ gestation: A randomized trial (ROUTE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:391–7. DOI 10.1002/uog.14915.Google Scholar

Evans, S, Newnham J, MacDonald W, Hall C. Characterisation of the possible effect on birthweight following frequent prenatal ultrasound examinations. Early Hum Dev 1996;45:203–14.Google Scholar

Chang, TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S. Identification of fetal growth retardation: Comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:230–6.Google Scholar

Owen, P, Khan KS, . Fetal growth velocity in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation in a low risk population. BJOG 1998;105:536–40.Google Scholar

Sarris, I, Ohuma E, Roseman F, Hoch L, Altman DG, Papageorghiou AT. Sonographer standardisation of fetal biometry ultrasound measurements: An exercise to improve quality and consistency in a large, prospective, multi-centre study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:681–87.Google Scholar

Sarris, I, Ioannou C, Chamberlain P, Ohuma E, Roseman F, Hoch L, Altman DG, Papageorghiou AT. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:266–73. DOI 10.1002/uog.10082.Google Scholar