Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T20:20:55.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Towards a Novel Approach to Semi-Classical Gravity

from Part IV - Quantum Foundations and Quantum Gravity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2017

Ward Struyve
Affiliation:
University of Liège, Belgium
Khalil Chamcham
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Joseph Silk
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Quantum gravity is often considered to be the holy grail of theoretical physics. One approach is canonical quantum gravity, which concerns the Wheeler–DeWitt equation and which is obtained by applying the usual quantization methods (which were so successful in the case of high energy physics) to Einstein's field equations. However, this approach suffers from a host of problems, some of technical and some of conceptual nature (such as finding solutions to the Wheeler–DeWitt equation, the problem of time, …). For this reason one often resorts to a semi-classical approximation where gravity is treated classically and matter quantum mechanically [1, 2]. The hope is that such an approximation is easier to analyse and yet reveals some effects of quantum gravitational nature.

In the usual approach to semi-classical gravity, matter is described by quantum field theory on curved space-time. For example, in the case the matter is described by a quantized scalar field, the state vector can be considered to be a functional on the space of fields, which satisfies a particular Schrödinger equation

where the Hamiltonian operator depends on the space-time metric g. This metric satisfies Einstein's field equations

where the source term is given by the expectation value of the energy-momentum tensor operator.

This semi-classical approximation of course has limited validity. For example, it will form a good approximation when the matter state approximately corresponds to a classical state (i.e. a coherent state), but will fail to be so when the state is a macroscopic superposition of such states. Namely, for such a superposition we have so that the gravitational field is affected by two matter sources, one coming from each term in the superposition. However, one expects that according to a full theory for quantum gravity, the states each have their own gravitational field and that the total state is a superposition of those. And, indeed, Page and Geilker showed with an experiment that this semi-classical theory is not adequate [2, 3].

Of course, as already noted by Page and Geilker, it could be that this problem is not due to the fact that gravity is treated classically, but due to the choice of the version of quantum theory. Namely, Page and Geilker adopted the many worlds point of view, according to which the wave function never collapses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] R., M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics..(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994).
[2] C., Kiefer, Quantum Gravity.. International Series of Monographs on Physics 124. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).
[3] D.N., Page and C.D., Geilker (1981) Indirect Evidence for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.. 47, 979–82.Google Scholar
[4] A., Diez-Tejedor and D., Sudarsky (2012) Towards a formal description of the collapse approach to the inflationary origin of the seeds of cosmic structure. JCAP. 07, 045 and arXiv:1108.4928 [gr-qc].Google Scholar
[5] M., Derakhshani (2014) Newtonian semiclassical gravity in the Ghirardi–Rimini– Weber theory with matter density ontology. Phys. Lett. A. 378, 990–8 and arXiv:1304.0471 [gr-qc].Google Scholar
[6] D., Bohm and B.J., Hiley. The Undivided Universe. (New York: Routledge, 1993).
[7] P.R., Holland. The Quantum Theory of Motion. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
[8] D., Dürr and S., Teufel. Bohmian Mechanics. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009).
[9] D., Dürr, S., Goldstein and N., Zanghì. Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012).
[10] D., Dürr, S., Goldstein and N., Zanghì. (1992) Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty. J. Stat. Phys.. 67, 843–907 and arXiv:quant-ph/0308039.Google Scholar
[11] W., Struyve (2011) Pilot-wave approaches to quantum field theory, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.. 306, 012047 and arXiv:1101.5819v1 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
[12] W., Struyve (2015) Semi-classical approximations based on Bohmian mechanics. arXiv:1507.04771 [quant-ph].
[13] W., Struyve and A., Valentini. (2009) de Broglie–Bohm guidance equations for arbitrary Hamiltonians. J. Phys. A. 42, 035301 and arXiv:0808.0290v3 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
[14] T., Norsen and W., Struyve. (2014) Weak Measurement and Bohmian Conditional Wave Functions. Ann. Phys.. 350, 166–78 and arXiv:1305.2409 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
[15] W., Struyve. (2010) Pilot-wave theory and quantum fields. Rep. Prog. Phys.. 73, 106001 and arXiv:0707.3685v4 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
[16] S., Goldstein, T., Norsen, D.V., Tausk and N., Zanghì. (2011) Bell's theorem. Scholarpedia. 6(10), 8378.Google Scholar
[17] D., Dürr, S., Goldstein, T., Norsen, W., Struyve and N., Zanghì. (2014) Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic? Proc. R. Soc. A. 470, 20130699 and arXiv:1307.1714 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
[18] K.V., Kucha˘r. (2011) Time and interpretations of quantum gravity. In G., Kunstatter, D., Vincent and J., Williams, eds. Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics. ed. (Singapore: World Scientific), 1992), reprinted in Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 20, 3–86.
[19] Y.V., Shtanov. (1996) Pilot wave quantum cosmology. Phys. Rev. D. 54, 2564–70 and arXiv:gr-qc/9503005.Google Scholar
[20] S., Goldstein and S., Teufel. (2004) Quantum spacetime without observers: ontological clarity and the conceptual foundations of quantum gravity. In C., Callender and N., Huggett, eds. Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 275–89 and arXiv:quant-ph/9902018.
[21] N., Pinto-Neto. (2005) The Bohm Interpretation of Quantum Cosmology. Found. Phys.. 35, 577–603 and arXiv:gr-qc/0410117.Google Scholar
[22] B.J., Hiley and A.H., Aziz Mufti. (1995) In M., Ferrero and A., van der Merwe, eds. Fundamental Theories of Physics. 73, (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 141–56.
[23] N., Pinto-Neto, G., Santos and W., Struyve. (2012) The quantum-to-classical transition of primordial cosmological perturbations. Phys. Rev. D. 85, 083506 and arXiv:1110.1339 [gr-qc].Google Scholar
[24] N., Pinto-Neto, F.T., Falciano, R., Pereira and E., Sergio Santini. (2012) Wheeler– DeWitt quantization can solve the singularity problem. Phys. Rev. D. 86, 063504 and arXiv:1206.4021 [gr-qc].Google Scholar
[25] N., Pinto-Neto and J.C., Fabris. (2013) Quantum cosmology from the de Broglie– Bohm perspective. Class. Quantum Grav.. 30, 143001 and arXiv:1306.0820 [gr-qc].Google Scholar
[26] F.T., Falciano, N., Pinto-Neto and W., Struyve. (2015) Wheeler–DeWitt quantization and singularities. Phys. Rev. D. 91, 043524 and arXiv:1501.04181 [gr-qc].Google Scholar
[27] E., Gindensperger, C., Meier and J.A., Beswick. (2000) Mixing quantum and classical dynamics using Bohmian trajectories. J. Chem. Phys.. 113, 9369–72.Google Scholar
[28] O.V., Prezhdo and C., Brooksby. (2001) Quantum Backreaction through the Bohmian Particle. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 86, 3215–9.Google Scholar
[29] E., Gindensperger, C., Meier and J.A., Beswick. (2002) Quantum-classical dynamics including continuum states using quantum trajectories. J. Chem. Phys.. 116, 8–13.Google Scholar
[30] E., Gindensperger, C., Meier, J.A., Beswick and M.-C., Heitz. (2002) Quantumclassical description of rotational diffractive scattering using Bohmian trajectories: Comparison with full quantum wave packet results. J. Chem. Phys.. 116, 10051–9.Google Scholar
[31] C., Meier. (2014) Mixed Quantum-Classical Treatment of Vibrational Decoherence. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 93, 173003.Google Scholar
[32] C., Kiefer. (1992) Functional Schrödinger equation for scalar QED. Phys. Rev. D. 45, 2044–56.Google Scholar
[33] A., Valentini. (1992) On the Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum and Subquantum Physics. PhD Thesis, International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste. http://www.sissa.it/ap/PhD/Theses/valentini.pdf.
[34] J.J., Halliwell. (1991) Introductory lectures on quantum cosmology. In S., Coleman, J. B., Hartle, T., Piran and S., Weinberg, eds. Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes. (Singapore: World Scientific), pp. 159–243 and arXiv:0909.2566 [gr-qc].
[35] J.C., Vink. (1992) Quantumpotential interpretation of the wave function of the universe. Nucl. Phys. B. 369, 707–28.Google Scholar
[36] J., Acacio de Barros and N., Pinto-Neto. (1998) The Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Singularity Problem and Time Issue in Quantum Cosmology. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 07, 201–13.Google Scholar
[37] F.T., Falciano, N., Pinto-Neto and E., Sergio Santini. (2007) Inflationary nonsingular quantum cosmological model. Phys. Rev. D. 76, 083521 and arXiv:0707.1088 [grqc].Google Scholar
[38] J., Kowalski-Glikman and J.C., Vink. (1990) Gravity-matter mini-superspace: quantum regime, classical regime and in between. Class. Quantum Grav.. 7, 901–18.Google Scholar
[39] T., Norsen. (2010) The Theory of (Exclusively) Local Beables. Found. of Phys.. 40, 1858–84 and arXiv:0909.4553v2 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
[40] T., Norsen, D., Marian and X., Oriols. (2015) Can the wave function in configuration space be replaced by single-particle wave functions in physical space? synthese. 132, 3125–51 and arxiv:1410.3676 [quant-ph].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×