Abian, A. 1978. “Passages between Finite and Infinite.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19:452–6.
Allis, V., and Koetsier, T.. 1991. “On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 42:187–94.
Allis, V., and Koetsier, T.. 1995. “On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite II.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 46:235–47.
Almog, J. 1999. “Nothing, Something, Infinity.” Journal of Philosophy 96:462–78.
Alper, J., and Bridger, M.. 1997. “Mathematics, Model and Zeno's Paradoxes.” Synthese 110:143–66.
Angel, L. 2002. “Zeno's Arrow, Newton's Mechanics, and Bell's Inequalities.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53:161–82.
Arntzenius, F., and McCarthy, D.. 1997. “The Two Envelope Paradox and Infinite Expectations.” Analysis 57:42–50.
Arsenijivic, M. 1989. “How Many Physically Distinguished Parts Can a Limited Body Contain?” Analysis 49:36–42.
Baker, G., and Hacker, P.. 1984. Language, Sense and Nonsense. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bell, J. 1979. “The Infinite Past Regained: A Reply to Whitrow.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:161–5.
Bell, J. 1988. “Infinitesimals.” Synthese 75:285–315.
Belot, G. 2001. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98:55–74.
Benacerraf, P. 1962. “Tasks, Supertasks, and the Modern Eleatics.” Journal of Philosophy 59:765–84.
Benacerraf, P. 1965. “What Numbers Could Not Be.” Philosophical Review 74:47–73.
Benacerraf, P. 1985. “Skolem and the Sceptic.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. 59:85–115.
Benardete, J. 1964. Infinity: An Essay in Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bennett, J. 1971. “The Age and Size of the World.” Synthese 23:127–46.
Berresford, G. 1981. “A Note on Thomson's Lamp ‘Paradox.’” Analysis 41:1–3.
Black, M. 1951. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 11:91–101.
Blake, R. 1926. “The Paradox of Temporal Process.” Journal of Philosophy 23:645–54.
Blum, R., and Rosenblatt, J.. 1972. Probability and Statistics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Boolos, G., and Jeffrey, R.. 1980. Computability and Logic, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bostock, D. 1972/3. “Aristotle, Zeno, and the Potential Infinite.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73:37–5.
Brook, P. 1965. “White at the Shooting Gallery.” Mind 74:256.
Broome, J. 1995. “The Two-Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 55:6–11.
Brown, P. 1965. “A Medieval Analysis of Infinity.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 3:242–3.
Cain, J. 1995. “Infinite Utility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:401–4.
Cajori, F. 1915. “The History of Zeno's Arguments on Motion.” American Mathematical Monthly 22:1–7, 39–47, 77–83, 109–15, 143–9, 179–86, 215–21, 253–8, 292–7.
Cargile, J. 1992. “On a Problem about Probability and Decision.” Analysis 52:211–16.
Carnap, R. 1956. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” In Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, (2nd ed., enlarged.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Castell, P., and Batens, D.. 1994. “The Two Envelope Paradox: The Infinite Case.” Analysis 54:46–9.
Chad, A. 1997. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Dialogue 36:555–62.
Chalmers, D. 2002. “The St. Petersburg Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 62:155–7.
Champlin, T. 1988. Reflexive Paradoxes. London: Routledge.
Chase, J. 2002. “The Non-Probabilistic Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 62:157–60.
Chihara, C. 1965. “On the Possibility of Completing an Infinite Process.” Philosophical Review 74:74–87.
Christensen, R., and Utts, J.. 1992. “Bayesian Resolution of the ‘Exchange Paradox.’” American Statistician 46:274–6.
Clark, M., and Schackel, N.. 2000. “The Two Envelope Paradox.” Mind 109:415–42.
Clark, P., and Read, S.. 1984. “Hypertasks.” Synthese 61:387–90.
Clark, R. 1988. “Vicious Infinite Regress Arguments.” In Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 2: Epistemology. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview, 369–80.
Clayton, P. 1996. “The Theistic Argument from Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy.” International Philosophical Quarterly 36:5–17.
Cleve, J. 1971. “Cauchy, Convergence and Continuity.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 22:27–37.
Cohen, R., and Lauden, L., eds. 1983. Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Conway, D. 1974. “Possibility and Infinite Time: A Logical Paradox in St. Thomas' Third Way.” International Philosophical Quarterly 14:201–8.
Conway, D. 1983. “Concerning Infinite Chains, Infinite Trains, and Borrowing a Typewriter.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14:71–86.
Conway, D. 1984. “‘It Would Have Happened Already’: On One Argument for a First Cause.” Analysis 44:159–66.
Conway, J. 1976. On Numbers and Games. London: Academic.
Corbett, S. 1988. “Zeno's Achilles: A Reply to John McKie.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49:325–31.
Cornman, J., and Lehrer., K. 1968. Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Cowen, T., and High, J.. 1988. “Time, Bounded Utility, and the St. Petersburg Paradox.” Theory and Decision 25:219–23.
Craig, W. 1979a. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan.
Craig, W. 1979b. “Whitrow, Popper, and the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:166–70.
Craig, W. 1985. “Professor Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 20:367–75.
Craig, W. 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55:453–5.
Craig, W. 1991a. “Time and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 31:387–401.
Craig, W. 1991b. “Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:492–503.
Craig, W. 1993. “Graham Oppy on the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Sophia 32:1–11.
Craig, W., and Smith., Q. 1993. Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cutland, N. et al. 1988. “On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 39:375–8.
Dauben, J. 1977. “Georg Cantor and Pope Leo XIII: Mathematics, Theology, and the Infinite.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38:85–108.
Dauben, J. 1990. Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Davis, M. 1977. Applied Non-Standard Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
Day, T. 1987a. “Aquinas on Infinite Regress.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22:151–64.
Day, T. 1987b. “Infinite Regress Arguments.” Philosophical Papers 16:155–64.
Detlefsen, M. 1986. Hilbert's Program: An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Devlin, K. 1991. The Joy of Sets. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Diamond, P. 1965. “The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams.” Econometrica 33:170–7.
Diamond, R. 1964. “Resolution of the Paradox of Tristram Shandy.” Philosophy of Science 31:55–8.
Drake, F. 1974. Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dreier, J. 2003. “Boundless Good.” Unpublished ms.
Dretske, F. 1965. “Counting to Infinity.” Analysis 25:99–101.
Earman, J. 1975. “Infinities, Infinitesimals, and Indivisibles: The Leibnizian Labyrinth.” Studia Logica 7:236–51.
Earman, J. 1995. Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Earman, J., and Norton, J.. 1993. “Forever Is a Day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth Spacetimes.” Philosophy of Science 60:22–42.
Earman, J., and J. Norton. 1996. “Infinite Pains: The Trouble with Supertasks.” In Morton, A. and Stich, S. (eds.), Benacerraf and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eells, E. 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55:453–5.
Ehrlich, P. 1982. “Negative, Infinite and Hotter Than Infinite Temperatures.” Synthese. 50:233–77.
Ehrlich, P. 1994. Real Numbers, Generalisations of the Real, and Theories of Continua. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ehrlich, P. 1997. “From Completeness to Archimedean Completeness.” Synthese 110:57–76.
Evans, G. 1978. “Can There Be Vague Objects?” Analysis 38:208.
Faris, J. 1996. The Paradoxes of Zeno. Gateshead: Athenaeum.
Feferman, S. 1989. “Infinity in Mathematics: Is Cantor Necessary?” Philosophical Topics 17:23–45.
Fenstad, J. 1985. “Is Non-Standard Analysis Relevant for the Philosophy of Mathematics?” Synthese 62:289–301.
Fetzer, J. (ed.) 1984. Principles of Philosophical Reasoning. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.
Fishburn, P. 1972. Mathematics of Decision Theory. Paris: Mouton.
Fitch, F. 1955. “A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 28:135–42.
Forrest, P. 1996. “How Innocent Is Mereology?” Analysis 56:127–31.
Fraenkel, A., Bar-Hillel, Y., and Levy., A. 1973. Foundations of Set Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gale, R., and Pruss, A.. 1999. “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35:461–76.
Gamow, G. 1946. 1, 2, 3, … Infinity. London: Macmillan.
Gellman, J. 1994. “Experiencing God's Infinity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31:53–61.
George, A. 1991. “Goldbach's Conjecture Can Be Decided in One Minute: On an Alleged Problem for Intuitionism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:187–9.
Godfrey, R. 1993. “Paradoxes and Infinite Numbers.” Philosophy 68:541–5.
Gonshor, H. 1986. An Introduction to the Theory of Surreal Numbers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodman, L. 1971. “Ghazālī's Argument from Creation.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 2:67–85, 168–88.
Grier, M. 1998. “Transcendental Illusion and Transcendental Realism in Kant's Second Antinomy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 98:47–70.
Gruender, C. 1966. “The Achilles Paradox and Transfinite Numbers.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 17:219–31.
Grünbaum, A. 1950. “Relativity and the Atomicity of Becoming.” Review of Metaphysics 4:143–86.
Grünbaum, A. 1952a. “A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum as an Aggregate of Unextended Elements.” Philosophy of Science 19:288–306.
Grünbaum, A. 1952b. “Messrs. Black and Taylor on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 12:144–8.
Grünbaum, A. 1953. “Whitehead's Method of Extensive Abstraction.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 4:215–26.
Grünbaum, A. 1955. “Modern Science and Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno.” Scientific Monthly 81:234–9. Reprinted in Salmon (1970), 164–75.
Grünbaum, A. 1967. Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes. Middleton, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press; especially “Zeno's Metrical Paradox of Extension,” 115–35. Reprinted in Salmon (1970), 176–99.
Grünbaum, A. 1968. “Are ‘Infinity Machines’ Paradoxical?” Science 159:396–406.
Grünbaum, A. 1973a. “Can an Infinitude of Operations Be Performed in a Finite Time?” In Grünbaum (1973b).
Grünbaum, A. 1973b. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hájek, A. 2003. “Waging War on Pascal's Wager.” Philosophical Review 112:27–56.
Haldane, J. 1983. “A Benign Regress.” Analysis 43:115–16.
Harrison, C. 1996. “The Three Arrows of Zeno.” Synthese 107:271–92.
Harrison, E. 1987. Darkness at Night: A Riddle of the Universe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hart, W. 1975/6. “The Potential Infinite.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76:247–64.
Hazen, A. 1976. “Expressive Completeness in Modal Language.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 5:25–46.
Hazen, A. 1993. “Slicing It Thin.” Analysis 53:189–92.
Hazewinkel, M., ed. 1989. Encyclopedia of Mathematics, vol. 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hinton, J., and Martin., C. 1953/4. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 14:56–68.
Holgate, P. 1994. “Mathematical Notes on Ross' Paradox.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45:302–4.
Horgan, T. 2000. “The Two-Envelope Paradox, Non-Standard Expected Utility, and the Intensionality of Probability.” Nous 34:578–602.
Huby, P. 1971. “Kant or Cantor: That the Universe, If Real, Must Be Finite in Both Space and Time.” Philosophy 46:121–32.
Huby, P. 1973. “Cosmology and Infinity.” Philosophy 48:186–7.
Huggett, N. 1999. “Atomic Metaphysics.” Journal of Philosophy 96:5–24.
Hughes, P., and Brecht., G. 1975. Vicious Circles and Infinity. New York: Doubleday.
Humphrey, T. 1974. “How Descartes Avoids the Hidden Faculties Trap.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12:371–7.
Isles, D. 1992. “What Evidence Is There That 265536 Is a Natural Number?” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33:465–80.
Jackson, F., Menzies, P., and Oppy, G.. 1994. “The Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 54:43–5.
Jacquette, D. 1993. “Kant's Second Antinomy and Hume's Theory of Extensionless Indivisibles.” Kant-Studien 84:38–50.
Jaki, S. 1969. The Paradox of Olber's Paradox. New York: Herder and Herder.
Jeffrey, R. 1983. The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, P. 1993. “Wholes, Parts, and Infinite Collections.” Philosophy 67:367–79.
Johnson, P. 1994. “More about Infinite Numbers.” Philosophy 69:369–70.
Jones, P. 1946. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Mind 55:341–5.
Jordan, J., ed. 1994. Gambling on God. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Jourdain, P. 1910. “The Flying Arrow: An Anachronism.” Mind 19:42–55.
Jozsa, R. 1986. “An Approach to the Modelling of the Physical Continuum.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:395–404.
Kanomori, A. 1991. The Higher Infinite. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Katĕtor, M., and P. Simon. 1997. “Origins of Dimension Theory.” In Aull, C. and Lower, R. (eds.), Handbook of the History of General Topology, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 113–34.
King, H. 1949. “Aristotle and the Paradoxes of Zeno.” Journal of Philosophy 46:657–70.
Klein, P. 2003. “When Infinite Regresses Are Not Vicious.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66:718–29.
Knorr, 1982. “Infinity and Continuity: The Interaction of Mathematics and Philosophy in Antiquity.” In Kretzmann (1982).
Knuth, D. 1974. Surreal Numbers. London: Addison-Wesley.
Koetsier, T., and Allis, V.. 1997. “Assaying Supertasks.” Logique et Analyse 159:291–313.
Kolmogorov, A. 1933/56. Foundations of the Theory of Probability, translated by N. Morrison. New York: Chelsea.
Koons, R. 1997. “A New Look at a Cosmological Argument.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34:193–211.
Kragh, H. 1996. Cosmology and Controversy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krausser, P. 1988. “On the Antinomies and the Appendix to Kant's Dialectic in Kant's Critique and Philosophy of Science.” Synthese 77:375–401.
Kretzmann, N., ed. 1982. Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Kusraer, A., and Kutateladze., S. 1990. Non-Standard Methods of Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lauwers, L. 1997. “Infinite Utility: Insisting on Strong Monotonicity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75:222–33.
Lavine, S. 1991. “Is Quantum Mechanics an Atomistic Theory?” Synthese 89:253–71.
Lavine, S. 1994. Understanding the Infinite. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lavine, S. 1995. “Finite Mathematics.” Synthese 103:389–420.
Lawrence, N. 1950. “Whitehead's Method of Extensive Abstraction.” Philosophy of Science 17:142–63.
Lear, J. 1981. “A Note on Zeno's Arrow.” Phronesis 26:91–104.
Lee, H. 1965. “Are Zeno's Paradoxes Based on a Mistake?” Mind 74:563–70.
Levi, I. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. 1991. Parts of Classes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Littlewood, J. 1953. A Mathematician's Miscellany. London: Methuen.
Loparic, Z. 1990. “The Logical Structure of the First Antinomy.” Kant-Studien 81:280–303.
Machover, M. 1993. “The Place of Non-Standard Analysis in Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 44:205–12.
Mackie, J. 1982. The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon.
Maor, E. 1987. To Infinity and Beyond. Boston: Birkhaüser.
Marmura, M. 1957. “The Logical Role of the Argument from Time in the Tahāfut's Second Proof for the World's Pre-Eternity.” Muslim World 47:306–14.
McClennan, E. 1994. “Finite Decision Theory.” In Jordan (1994).
McGrew, T., Shier, D., and Silverstein, H.. 1997. “The Two Envelope Paradox Resolved.” Analysis 57:28–33.
McLaughlin, W. 1994. “Resolving Zeno's Paradoxes.” Scientific American (November): 66–71.
McLaughlin, W. 1998. “Thomson's Lamp Is Dysfunctional.” Synthese 116:281–301.
McLaughlin, W., and Miller, S.. 1992. “An Epistemological Use of Non-Standard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections against Motion.” Synthese 92:371–84.
McClennen, E. 1994. “Pascal's Wager and Finite Decision Theory.” In Jordan (1994).
Monk, N. 1997. “Conceptions of Space-Time: Problems and Possible Solutions.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, no. 1:1–34.
Moore, A. 1988. “Aspects of the Infinite in Kant.” Mind 97:205–23.
Moore, A. 1989. “A Problem for Intuitionism: The Apparent Possibility of Performing Infinitely Many Tasks in a Finite Time.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89:17–34.
Moore, A. 1990. The Infinite. London: Routledge.
Moore, A. 1992. “A Note on Kant's First Antinomy.” Philosophical Quarterly 42:480–5.
Moore, A., ed. 1993. Infinity. Dartmouth: Aldershot.
Moore, M. 2002. A Cantorian Argument against Infinitesimals.” Synthese 133:305–30.
Morriston, W. 1999. “Must the Past Have a Beginning?” Philo 2:5–19.
Morriston, W. 2002c. “Craig on the Actual Infinite.” Religious Studies 38:147–66.
Mundy, B. 1987. “Faithful Representation, Physical Extensive Measurement Theory and Archimedean Axioms.” Synthese 70:373–400.
Mycielski, J. 1981. “Analysis without Actual Infinity.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 46:625–33.
Mycielski, J. 1986. “Locally Finite Theories.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 51:59–62.
Nalebuff, B. 1989. “The Other Person's Envelope Is Always Greener.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:171–81.
Nelson, E. 1977. “Internal Set Theory: A New Approach to Non-Standard Analysis.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83, no. 6:1165–98.
Nelson, E. 1987. Radically Elementary Probability Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelson, M. 1991. “Utilitarian Eschatology.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28:339–47.
Ng, Y. 1995. “Infinite Utility and van Liedekerke's Impossibility: A Solution.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:408–12.
Nolan, D. 1996. “Recombination Unbound.” Philosophical Studies 84:239–62.
Nolan, D. 2001. “What Wrong with Infinite Regresses?” Metaphilosophy 32:523–38.
Nolan, D. 2002. Topics in the Philosophy of Possible Worlds. London: Routledge.
North, J. 1983. “Finite and Otherwise: Aristotle and Some Seventeenth Century Views.” In Shea (1983):113–48.
Oakes, R. 1997. “The Divine Infinity: Can Traditional Theists Justifiably Reject Pantheism.” Monist 80:251–65.
O'Briant, W. 1979. “Is Descartes' Evil Spirit Finite or Infinite?” Sophia 18:28–32.
Oderberg, D. 2002a. “Traversal of the Infinite, the ‘Big Bang,’ and the Kalam Cosmological Argument.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 303–34.
Oderberg, D. 2002b. “The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Reply to Graham Oppy.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 351–60.
O'Leary-Hawthorne, J., and Cortens, A.. 1995. “Towards Ontological Nihilism.” Philosphical Studies 79, no. 2:143–65.
Oppy, G. 1990. “On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30:159–68.
Oppy, G. 1991. “Craig, Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 27:189–97.
Oppy, G. 1995a. “Inverse Operations with Transfinite Numbers and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” International Philosophical Quarterly 35, no. 2:219–21.
Oppy, G. 1995b. “Kalām Cosmological Arguments: Reply to Professor Craig.” Sophia 34:15–29.
Oppy, G. 1995c. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, G. 1995d. “Professor William Craig's Criticisms of Critiques of Kalām Cosmological Arguments by Paul Davies, Stephen Hawking, and Adolf Grünbaum.” Faith and Philosophy 12:237–50.
Oppy, G. 1996a. “Pascal's Wager Is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40:101–16.
Oppy, G. 1996b. “Review of W. Craig and Q. Smith, Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Faith and Philosophy 13:125–33.
Oppy, G. 1997a. “Countable Fusion Not Yet Proven Guilty: It May Be the Whiteheadian Account of Space Whatdunnit.” Analysis 57, no. 4:249–53.
Oppy, G. 1997b. “Pantheism, Quantification, and Mereology.” Monist 80, no. 2:320–36.
Oppy, G. 2000a. “Humean Supervenience?” Philosophical Studies 101, no. 1:75–105.
Oppy, G. 2000b. “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument.’” Religious Studies 36:345–53.
Oppy, G. 2001. “Time, Successive Addition, and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philosophia Christi 3:181–91.
Oppy, G. 2002a. “Arguing about the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philo 5, no 1:34–61.
Oppy, G. 2002b. “More Than a Flesh Wound: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 2:1–11. [Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org].
Oppy, G. 2002c. “The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Response to David S. Oderberg.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2:335–49.
Oppy, G. 2003. “From the Tristram Shandy Paradox to the Christmas Shandy Paradox: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 3:1–24. [Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org].
Oppy, G. 2004. “Faulty Reasoning about Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments.” Faith and Philosophy 21:242–9.
Owen, G. 1958. “Zeno and the Mathematicians.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:199–222.
Pasyakov, B. 1989. “Dimension.” In Hazewinkel (1989), pp. 188–90.
Peers, A. 1975. Dimension Theory of General Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 1997. “Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism, and a Supertask.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48:49–54.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 1998. “Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo.” Synthese 115:259–65.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2000. “Priest on the Paradox of the Gods.” Analysis 60:152–5.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2002a. “On the Dynamics of Alper and Bridger.” Synthese 131:157–71.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2002b. “Just as Beautiful but Not (Necessarily) a Supertask.” Mind 111:281–7.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2002c. “Two Ways of Looking at a Newtonian Supertask.” Synthese 131:173–89.
Perez-Laraudogoitia, J. 2003. “A Variant of Benardette's Paradox.” Analysis 63:124–31.
Pomerlau, W. 1985. “Does Reason Demand That God Be Infinite?” Sophia 24:18–27.
Potter, M. 1996. “Taming the Infinite.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47:609–19.
Price, H. 1992. “Metaphysical Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophy 89:387–409.
Priest, G. 1987. In Contradiction. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Priest, G. 1991. “The Limits of Thought — and Beyond.” Mind 100:361–70
Priest, G. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Priest, G. 1999. “On a Version of One of Zeno's Paradoxes.” Analysis 59:1–2.
qFiasco, F. 1980. “Another Look at Some of Zeno's Paradoxes.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10:119–30.
Quine, W. 1953. “On What There Is.” In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1–19.
Radner, M. 1998. “Unlocking the Second Antinomy: Kant and Wulff.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 36:413–41.
Rapaport, A. 1998. Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour. London: Macmillan.
Robinson, A. 1961. “Non Standard Analysis.” Indagationes Mathematicae 23:432–40.
Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Robinson, A. 1973. “Metamathematical Problems.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 38:500–16.
Ross, S. 1988. A First Course in Probability, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.
Rucker, R. 1982. Infinity and the Mind. Sussex: Harvester.
Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. 1929. Our Knowledge of the External World. New York: Norton, 182–98. Reprinted in Salmon (1970), 45–58.
Sainsbury, M. 1995. Paradoxes. New York: Cambridge.
Salmon, W., ed. 1970. Zeno's Paradoxes. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Samuelson, P. 1977. “St. Petersburg Paradoxes: Defanged, Dissected and Historically Described.” Journal of Economic Literature 15:24–55.
Sanford, D. 1969. “Time May Have a Stop.” Analysis 29:206
Sanford, D. 1975. “Infinity and Vagueness.” Philosophical Review 87:520–35.
Sanford, D. 2003. “Fusion Confusion.” Analysis 63:1–4.
Schlesinger, G. 1994. “A Central Theistic Argument.” In Jordan (1994).
Schock, R. 1982. “Dividing by Zero.” Logique et Analyse 25:213–15.
Schoen, E. 1990. “The Sensory Presentation of Divine Infinity.” Faith and Philosophy 7:3–18.
Scott, A., and Scott, D.. 1997. “What Is in the Two Envelope Paradox?” Analysis 57:34–41.
Segel, L. 1991. “The Infinite and Infinitesimal in Models for Natural Phenomena.” Reviews of Modern Physics 63:225–38.
Segerberg, K. 1976. “A Neglected Family of Aggregation Problems in Ethics.” Nous 10:221–47.
Shannon, G. 1997. “Some Definitions of ‘The Smallest Infinity.’” Logique et Analyse 160:345–56.
Shearman, J. 1908. “Infinite Divisibility.” Mind 17:394–6.
Sherry, D. 1988. “Zeno's Metrical Paradox Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 55:58–73.
Sierpinski, W. 1965. Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers. Warsaw: PWN-Polish Scientific.
Simons, P. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Skyrms, B. 1966. Choice and Chance. Belmont: Dickenson.
Skyrms, B. 1983. “Zeno's Paradox of Measure.” In Cohen and Lauden (1983):223–54.
Skyrms, B. 1993. “A Uniform Positive Probability on Natural Numbers.” Unpublished ms.
Skyrms, B., and Harper, W., eds. 1988. Causation, Chance and Credence, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Small, R. 1986. “Tristram Shandy's Last Page.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:213–16.
Smith, Q. 1985. “Kant and the Beginning of the World.” New Scholasticism 59:339–48.
Smith, Q. 1987. “Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 54:63–75.
Smith, Q. 1988. “The Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Philosophy of Science 55:39–57.
Smith, Q. 1991. “Atheism, Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:48–65.
Smith, Q. 1993. “Reply to Craig: The Possible Infinitude of the Past.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33:109–15.
Smith, Q. 1995a. “A Defence of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26:97–106.
Smith, Q. 1995b. “Internal and External Causal Explanation of the Universe.” Philosophical Studies 79:283–310.
Smith, Q. 1997. “Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists.” Philosophy 72:125–32.
Smith, Q. 1999. “The Reason the Universe Exists Is That It Caused Itself to Exist.” Philosophy 74:579–86.
Smith, Q. 2000. “Problem's with John Earman's Attempt to Reconcile Theism with General Relativity.” Erkenntnis 52:1–27.
Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation and the Continuum. London: Duckworth.
Sorenson, R. 1994. “Infinite Decision Theory.” In Jordan (1994).
Stroyon, K., and Luxemburg., W. 1976. Introduction to the Theory of Infinitesimals. London: Academic.
Stump, E. 1997. “Simplicity.” In Quinn, P. and Taliaferro, C. (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sweeney, E. 1993. “Thomas Aquinas' Double Metaphysics of Simplicity and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33:297–317.
Swinburne, R. 1966. “The Beginning of the Universe.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40:125–38.
Swinburne, R. 1968. Space and Time. London: Macmillan.
Taylor, R. 1951. “Mr. Black on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 12:38–44.
Taylor, R. 1952. “Mr. Wisdom on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 13:15–17.
Taylor, R. 1963. Metaphysics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Teller, P. 1989. “Infinite Renormalisation.” Philosophy of Science 56:238–57.
Thomason, S. 1982. “Euclidean Infinitesimals.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63:168–85.
Thomson, J. 1954. “Tasks and Supertasks.” Analysis 15:1–13.
Thomson, J. 1970. “Comments on Professor Benacerraf's Paper.” In Salmon (1970), 130–8.
Tomberlin, J., ed. 1988. Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 2. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview.
Ushenko, A. 1946. “Zeno's Paradoxes.” Mind 55:151–65.
Vallentyne, P. 1993. “Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71:212–17.
Vallentyne, P. 1995. “Infinite Utility: Anonymity and Person-Centredness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:413–20.
Vallentyne, P., and Kagan, S.. 1997. “Infinite Utility and Finitely Additive Value Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 94:5–26.
Bendegem, J. 1987. “Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument.” Philosophy of Science 54:295–302.
Bendegem, J. 1994. “Ross' Paradox Is an Impossible Super-task.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45:743–8.
Cleve, J. 1981. “Reflections on Kant's Second Antimony.” Synthese 47:481–94.
Dantzig, D. 1955. “Is a Finite Number?” Dialectica 9:273–7.
Fraassen, B. 1995. “‘World’ Is Not a Count Noun.” Nous 29:139–57.
Liederkerke, L. 1995. “Should Utilitarians Be Cautious about an Infinite Future?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:405–7.
Vaught, R. 1995. Set Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Boston: Birkhaüser.
Vilenkin, N. 1995. In Search of Infinity. Boston: Birkhaüser.
Vlastos, G. 1966a. “A Note on Zeno's Arrow.” Phronesis 11:3–18.
Vlastos, G. 1966b. “Zeno's Race Course.” Journal of History of Philosophy 4:95–108.
Wagner, C. 1999. “Misadventures in Conditional Expectation: The Two Envelope Paradox.” Erkenntnis 51:233–41.
Walker, R. 1997. “Sufficient Reason.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97:109–23.
Watling, J. 1952. “The Sum of an Infinite Series.” Analysis 13:39–46.
Weingard, R. 1979. “General Relativity and the Length of the Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:170–2.
Weirich, P. 1984. “The St. Petersburg Gamble and Risk.” Theory and Decision 17:193–202.
Weyl, H. 1946. Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
White, A. 1965. “Achilles at the Shooting Gallery.” Mind 74:141–2.
White, M. 1987. “The Spatial Arrow Paradox.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68:71–7.
Whitrow, G. 1978. “On the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 29:39–45.
Wiggins, D. 1996. “Sufficient Reason: A Principle in Diverse Guises, Both Ancient and Modern.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 61:117–32.
Williams, J. 1981. “Justified Belief and the Infinite Regress Argument.” American Philosophical Quarterly 18:85–8.
Wilson, P. 1991. “What Is the Explanandum of the Anthropic Principle?” American Philosophical Quarterly 28:167–73.
Wisdom, J. 1941. “Why Achilles Does Not Fail to Catch the Tortoise.” Mind 50:58–73.
Wisdom, J. 1952. “Achilles on a Physical Racecourse.” Analysis 12:67–72.
Wittgenstein, L. 1975. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wolfson, H. 1966. “Patristic Arguments against the Eternity of the World.” Harvard Theological Review 59:354–67.
Wolfson, H. 1976. The Philosophy of the Kalām. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wright, C. 1985. “Skolem and the Sceptic.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supp. vol.: 116–37.
Yablo, S. 2000. “A Reply to New Zeno.” Analysis 60:148–51.
Zabell, S. 1988. “Symmetry and Its Discontents.” In Skyrms and Harper (1988), 155–90.
Zangari, M. 1994. “Zeno, Zero, and Indeterminate Forms: Instants in the Logic of Motion.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72:187–204.
Zuckero, M. 2001. “A Dissolution of Zeno's Paradoxes of the Dichotomy and the Flight of the Arrow.” Dialogue 43:46–51.
