Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:57:29.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THREE - Laboratory evaluation techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In comparing the reactions of different aquatic organisms to toxic chemicals (whether they are inorganic in the form of heavy metals, ammonia, cyanides etc. or more complex organic pesticides), it has long been the aim of the toxicologists involved to attain some standardisation or uniformity in the experimental techniques they devise. This approach to unification of methods has been particularly marked in the case of freshwater fish, for which group there are now standard methods acceptable in most countries.

These standard methods lay down guidelines on the exact conditions of the tests vis-à-vis water quality, temperature, number and size of test organisms, duration of exposure to the chemical dilution and, finally, the criteria to be adopted when measuring the effect in terms of immobility or mortality.

The need for the same degree of uniformity in testing other forms of freshwater life, invertebrates in particular, though slow to develop has gained increasing momentum in the last 10 years or so. Much of this incentive has come from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which now plays an international role in the screening and clearance of all pesticides and other toxic chemicals likely to have a harmful effect on the environment. One of the first fruits of this increased interest in aquatic invertebrates appeared in 1972 in the form of an exhaustive summary – compiled by the EPA – of all published information on their reactions in the laboratory to a wide range of pesticides, mainly insecticides, and herbicides (NTIS, 1972).

Type
Chapter
Information
Pesticide Impact on Stream Fauna
With Special Reference to Macroinvertebrates
, pp. 23 - 51
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×