Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: December 2011

7 - Understanding the RAND Commitment

from Part II - Perspectives on the Problems of Anticommons and Patent Thickets

Summary

Introduction

Prior to adopting a technical standard, standard-setting organizations typically endeavor either to make sure that the standard does not infringe any patent rights or to clear the necessary permissions. The task is a difficult one. The protocol that governs how information is stored on DVD-R media, for example, is known to implicate at least 342 different patents. The encoding, decoding, and transmission protocols relevant to just one type of cellular telephony touch well over 1,000. And radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology – those electronic tags that Wal-Mart and the Department of Defense hope will someday transform inventory management – is at this point rumored to labor under the weight of over 4,000 issued patents in the United States alone.

Those large numbers are problematic because it takes substantial time and money to evaluate a patent. To do the job right, consensus would have to be achieved as to whether the patent is valid, whether it covers a truly essential aspect of the standard at issue, and exactly how much the patent contributes as compared to next-best alternatives. Worse, all of that would need to be done in a context where patent holders have strong incentives to exaggerate; where information about pending patent applications is understandably hard to come by; and where there will often rage an independently contentious debate over nonpatent issues such as the specifics of what should and should not be included in the standard.

Understanding the RAND Commitment 47 2010
2009
Robert, Mark 2004
Lemley, Mark A.Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations 90 2002
Layne-Farrar, AnnePadilla, A. JorgeSchmalensee, RichardPricing Patents for Licensing in Standard-Setting Organizations: Making Sense of FRAND Commitments 74 2007
Layne-Farrar, AnneLlobet, GerardPadilla, A. JorgePreventing Patent Hold Up: An Economic Assessment of Ex Ante Licensing Negotiations in Standard Setting 37 2009
Lemley, Mark A.Ten Things to Do about Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not to) 48 2007
Lemley, Mark A.Shapiro, CarlPatent Holdup and Royalty Stacking 85 2007
Miller, Joseph ScottStandard Setting, Patents, and Access Lock-In: RAND Licensing and the Theory of the Firm 40 2007
Patterson, Mark R.Antitrust and the Costs of Standard-Setting: A Comment on Teece & Sherry 87 2003
Patterson, Mark R.Inventions, Industry Standards, and Intellectual Property 17 2002
Shapiro, CarlNavigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, in 1 2000
Shapiro, CarlVarian, Hal R. 1999
Swanson, Daniel G.Baumol, William J.Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power 73 2005
Geradin, DamienRato, MiguelCan Standard-Setting Lead to Exploitative Abuse? A Dissonant View on Patent Hold-Up, Royalty Stacking and the Meaning of FRAND 3 2007
Brooks, Roger G.Geradin, Damien 2010
Skitol, Robert A.Concerted Buying Power: Its Potential for Addressing the Patent Holdup Problem in Standard Setting 72 2005
Smith, Tony 2004
2008
Whitt, Richard S.Adaptive Policymaking: Evolving and Applying Emergent Solutions for U.S. Communications Policy 61 2009
Lichtman, Doug 2006
Omri Ben-Shahar
Ayres, IanGertner, RobertFilling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules 99 1989
Besen, Stanley M.Farrell, JosephChoosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization 8 1994
Katz, Michael L.Shapiro, CarlTechnology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities 94 1986
Katz, Michael L.Shapiro, CarlNetwork Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility 75 1985
Chiang, Tun-Jen 2008
Blair, Roger D.Cotter, Thomas F.An Economic Analysis of Damages Rules in Intellectual Property Law 39 1998
1996
Goldscheider, RobertThe Employment of Licensing Expertise in the Arena of Intellectual Property Litigation 36 1996
2004
Smith, Adam 1776
2010
Cowie, Michael G.Lavelle, Joseph P.Patents Covering Industry Standards: The Risks to Enforceability Due to Conduct Before Standard-Setting Organizations 30 2002
Curran, Patrick D.Standard-Setting Organizations: Patents, Price Fixing, and Per Se Legality 70 2003
Christopher R. Leslie 2004
Edlin, Aaron S.Do Guaranteed-Low-Price Policies Guarantee High Prices, and Can Antitrust Rise to the Challenge? 111 1997
Lichtman, DouglasProperty Rights in Emerging Platform Technologies 29 2000
Koppikar, VivekEvaluating the International Trade Commission's Section 337 Investigation 86 2004