Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:30:17.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Cognitive Testing for Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder

from Section 3 - Symptomatology and Diagnosis for the Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2019

Roderic G. Eckenhoff
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Niccolò Terrando
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Murkin, JM, Newman, SP, Stump, DA, Blumenthal, JA. Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59(5):1289–95.Google Scholar
Folstein, MF, Robins, LN, Helzer, JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:812.Google Scholar
Ismail, Z, Rajji, TK, Shulman, KI. Brief cognitive screening instruments: an update. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(2):111–20.Google Scholar
Silbert, BS, Maruff, P, Evered, LA, Scott, DA, Kalpokas, M, Martin, KJ, et al. Detection of cognitive decline after coronary surgery: a comparison of computerized and conventional tests. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(6):814–20.Google Scholar
Hawkins, KA, Dean, D, Pearlson, GD. Alternative forms of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: a review. Behav Neurol. 2004;15(3–4):99107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, TA. Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change. Neuropsychology. 2010;24(5):563–72.Google Scholar
Duff, K. Evidence-based indicators of neuropsychological change in the individual patient: relevant concepts and methods. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27(3):248–61.Google Scholar
Silbert, B, Evered, L, Scott, DA, McMahon, S, Choong, P, Ames, D, et al. Preexisting cognitive impairment is associated with postoperative cognitive dysfunction after hip joint replacement surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(6):1224–34.Google Scholar
Evered, L, Scott, DA, Silbert, B, Maruff, P. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is independent of type of surgery and anesthetic. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(5):1179–85.Google Scholar
Newman, MF, Kirchner, JL, Phillips-Bute, B, Gaver, V, Grocott, H, Jones, RH, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(6):395402.Google Scholar
Silbert, BS, Scott, DA, Evered, LA, Lewis, MS, Kalpokas, M, Maruff, P, et al. A comparison of the effect of high- and low-dose fentanyl on the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(6):1137–45.Google Scholar
Jacobson, NS, Truax, P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(1):12–19.Google Scholar
Collie, ADD, Falleti, MG, Silbert, BS, Maruff, P. Determining the extent of cognitive change after coronary surgery: a review of statistical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:2005–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kneebone, AC, Andrew, MJ, Baker, RA, Knight, JL. Neuropsychologic changes after coronary artery bypass grafting: use of reliable change indices. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(5):1320–5.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, LS, Larsen, K, Houx, P, Skovgaard, LT, Hanning, CD, Moller, JT. The assessment of postoperative cognitive function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(3):275–89.Google Scholar
Ingraham, L, Aiken, C. An empirical approach to determine criteria for abnormality in test batteries with multiple results. Neuropsychology. 1996;10:120–4.Google Scholar
Keizer, AM, Hijman, R, Kalkman, CJ, Kahn, RS, van Dijk, D. The incidence of cognitive decline after (not) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: the impact of a controlled definition. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49(9):1232–5.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×