Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:56:05.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Performance, people and the political system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Harold D. Clarke
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Dallas
David Sanders
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Marianne C. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Dallas
Paul F. Whiteley
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access

Summary

In previous chapters, we show that valence judgments have powerful effects on party choice and electoral participation. In this chapter, we consider how these judgments affect people's orientations towards themselves as political actors and their orientations towards various institutions of the British political system. A focus on people's sense of themselves as political actors enables us to explore the sources of several key independent variables that drive electoral turnout and other forms of political participation. Specifically, we develop and test models that explain why some people are more interested in politics, feel more politically efficacious, or have a stronger sense of civic duty than do others. In turn, a focus on orientations towards political institutions — on support for the ‘political regime’ (Easton, 1965) — enables us to study the extent to which effective government performance affects trust in major political institutions, attitudes towards parties and elections, and extent of satisfaction with the practice of democracy in Britain.

The first section develops a typology of citizens’ orientations towards the political system and describes operational measures of key concepts. The second section outlines the theoretical reasoning motivating our argument that valence considerations affect people's orientations towards politics in general just as they affect electoral choice in particular. Our core claim is that people are more likely to respond positively towards political institutions and processes when they think that those institutions and processes have delivered, or are likely to deliver, valued goods and services. They are more likely to respond negatively when institutions and processes have failed to deliver (or are seen as unlikely to deliver) them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×