Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:27:58.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Friendships of Indonesian, South Korean, and U.S. Youth: Exclusivity, Intimacy, Enhancement of Worth, and Conflict

from Part V - Friendships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

Doran C. French
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois, USA
Okhwa Lee
Affiliation:
Chungbuk National University Heungdukku Cheongju City Chungbuk, Korea
Sri Untari Pidada
Affiliation:
Padjadjaran University Bandung, Indonesia
Xinyin Chen
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Doran C. French
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University
Barry H. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

Friendships, although generally conceptualized as voluntary associations between individuals, invariably occur within a cultural context. McCall (1988) argued that friendships are institutionalized, and that individuals are guided by cultural blueprints, which may specify persons who can and cannot be friends, the types of interactions that friends expected to have, and the emotional connectedness that friends are typically experience (see Bigelow, Tesson, & Lewko 1996, for a similar analysis). Participants in the friendship as well as others observing this friendship may experience tension if the friendship deviates from these blueprints. Unfortunately little attention has been devoted to understanding the cultural context within which friendships exist in part because anthropologists have paid limited attention to this subject (Bell & Coleman, 1999).

In this chapter, we review our research on the friendships of Indonesian, Korean, and U.S. youth in an effort to understand cultural variation in these relationships. We begin with a discussion of friendship in Indonesia, Korea, and the United States, followed by a brief review of some of the methodological underpinning of our work. We then focus on understanding cultural differences in the structure of friendship by exploring friendship exclusivity, which is the extent to which close friendship groups are open to inclusion of others. In the next section, we present our work on the characteristics of relationships across cultures, specifically focusing on provisions (i.e., intimacy and enhancement of worth), longevity, and conflict.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. G., & Allan, G. (1998). Placing friendship in context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell S., & Coleman, S. (1999). The anthropology of friendship: Enduring themes and future possibilities. In Bell, S. & Coleman, S. (Eds.), The anthropology of friendship (pp. 1–19). Oxford, England: Berg.Google Scholar
Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22, 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettelheim, B. (1969). The children of the dream: Communal child-rearing and its implications for society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bigelow, B. J., Tesson, G., & Lewko, J. H. (1996). Learning the rules: The anatomy of children's relationships. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (1988). Findings universal dimensions of individual variation in multi-cultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009–10015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brain, R. (1976). Friends and lovers. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brandt, V. S. R. (1974). Skiing cross-culturally. Current Anthropology, 15, 64–74.Google Scholar
Brown, B. B. (1990). A life-span approach to friendship: Age related dimensions of an ageless relationship. In Lopata, H. Z. & Maines, D. R. (Eds.), Friendship in context. (pp. 23–50). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Brown, B. B., Larson, R. W., & Saraswathi, T. S. (2002). The world's youth: Adolescence in eight regions of the globe. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Boivan, M., & Hoza, B. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In Berndt, T. J. & Ladd, G. W. (Eds.), Peer relations in child development (pp. 15–45). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A. F. (1994). Using rating scale and nomination techniques to measure friendship and popularity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 485–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., Newcomb, A. F., & Hoza, B. (1996). Popularity as an affordance for friendship: The link between group and dyadic experience. Social Development, 5, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Kaspar, V., Zhang, Y., Wang. L., & Zheng, S. (2004). Peer relationships among Chinese and North American boys: A cross-cultural perspective. In Way, N. & Chu, J. (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood. (pp. 197–218). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response styles and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. C., Kim, U., & Choi, S. H. (1993). Indigenous analysis of collective representations: A Korean perspective. In Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 193–210). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (2002). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, W. (1995). Greater expectations: Overcoming the culture of indulgence in America's homes and schools. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Spacklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Gardner, L. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 915–980). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fitch, K. L. (1998). Speaking relationally: Culture, communication, and interpersonal connection. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
French, D. C., Bae, A., Pidada, S., & Lee, O. (in press). Friendships of Indonesian, S. Korean and U.S. College Students. Personal Relationships.Google Scholar
French, D. C., Jansen, E. A., Riansari, M., & Setiono, K. (2003). Friendships of Indonesian children: Adjustment of children who differ in friendship presence and similarity between mutual friends. Social Development, 12, 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C., Lee, O., & Pidada, S. (2004). College student friendships: S. Korea, Indonesia, and the United States. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
French, D. C., Pidada, S., Denoma, J., Lawton, A., & McDonald, K. (2005). Reported Peer Conflicts of Children in the United States and Indonesia. Social Development, 17, 458–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C., Pidada, S., & Lee, O. (2004). Friendships of Indonesian and Korean adolescents. Manuscript in preparation.
French, D. C., Pidada, S., & Victor, A. (2005). Friendships of Indonesian and United States youth. International Journal for Behavioral Development, 29, 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C., Riansari, M., Pidada, S., Nelwan, P., & Buhrmester, D. (2001). Social support of Indonesian and U.S. children and adolescents by family members and friends. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C., Setiono, K., & Eddy, J. M. (1999). Bootstrapping through the cultural comparison minefield: Childhood social status and friendships in the United States and Indonesia. In Collins, W. A. & Laursen, B. (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts: Minnesota Symposium of Child Psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 109–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Furman, W. (1996). The measurement of friendship perceptions: Conceptual and methodological issues. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 41–65). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Parker, J. G. (1986). Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B., Yoon, Y., & Nishida, T. (1987). The influence of individualism-collectivism on perceptions of communication in ingroup and outgroup relationships. Communication Monographs, 54, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1992). Conflict and friendship relations. In Shantz, C. U. & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 186–215). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hays, R. B. (1988). Friendship. In Duck, S. W. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 391–408). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofsteade, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, R. R. (1969). Javanese villagers: Social relations in rural Modjokuto. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Josselson, R., Lieblich, A., Sharabany, R., & Wiseman, H. (1997). Conversation as method: Analyzing the relational world of people who were raised communally. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kim, K. (1996). The reproduction of Confucian culture in contemporary Korea: An anthropological study. In Wei-Ming, T. (Ed.), Confucian traditions in east Asian modernity: Moral education and economic culture in Japan and the four mini-dragons. (pp. 202–227) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Markus, H., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koentjaraningrat, (1985). Javanese Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, R. (1989). Beeping children and adolescents: A method for studying time use and daily experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, K., & Wu, P. G. (1990). Dispute processing: Across-cultural analysis. In Brislin, R. W. (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 209–231). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, T. S., & Choi, S. H. (1996). Interpersonal relationships in Korea. In Gudykunst, W. B., Ting-Toomey, S., & Nishida, T. (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 122–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Maeda, E., & Ritchie, L. D. (2003). The concept of shinyuu in Japan: A replication and comparison of Cole and Bradac's study on U.S. friendships. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 20, 579–598,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnis-Suseno, F. (1997). Javanese ethics and world-view: The Javanese idea of the good life. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Lin, L. R. (1999). Conflictways: Cultural diversity in the meanings and practices of conflict. In Prentice, D. A. & Miller, D. T. (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 302–333). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Marshall, R. (1997). Variances in levels of individualism across two cultures and three social classes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 490–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, G. J. (1988). The organizational life cycle of relationships. In Duck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 467–486). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McDonald, K. (2003). Cultural scripts of parental intervention into young children's conflicts. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
McLoyd, V. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, N. (1992). Individual and society in Java: A cultural analysis. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University Press.Google Scholar
Mulder, N. (1996). Southeast Asia: Religion, everyday life, cultural change. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm.Google Scholar
Noesjirwan, J. (1977). Contrasting cultural patterns of interpersonal closeness in doctors' waiting rooms in Sydney and Jakarta. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 8, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noesjirwan, J. (1978). A rule-based analysis of cultural differences in social behavior: Indonesia and Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 13, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogbu, J. U. (1981). The origins of human competence: A cultural-ecological perspective. Child Development, 52, 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. G. (1997). The friendship attribute Q-sort. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University, PA: University Park.Google Scholar
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T.J (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Rabin, A. I., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1982). Twenty years later: Kibbutz children grow up. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 269–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothbaum, F., Pott, M., Azuma, H., Miyake, K., & Weisz, J. (2000). The development of close relationships in Japan and the United States: Paths of symbiotic harmony and generative tension. Child Development, 71, 1121–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, L. B. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2001). Cross-cultural social influence. In Matsumoto, D. (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 361–374). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tietjen, A. M. (1989). The ecology of children's social support networks. In Belle, D. (Ed.), Children's social support networks and social supports (pp. 37–69). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. L. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yoon, G., & Choi, S. C. (1994). Psychology of the Korean people: Collectivism and individualism. Seoul, South Korea: Dong-A Publishing.Google Scholar
Wainryb, C., & Turiel, E. (1995). Diversity in social development: Between or within cultures? In Killen, M. & Hart, D. (Eds.), Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waldrop, M. F., & Halverson, C. F. (1975). Intensive and extensive peer behavior: Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses. Child Development, 46, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Rubin, Z. (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Weisz, J. R., Chaiyasit, W., Weiss, B., Eastman, K. L., & Jackson, E. W. (1995). A multi-modal study of problem behavior among Thai and American children at school: Teacher reports versus direct observation. Child Development, 66, 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zevalkink, J. (1997). Attachment in Indonesia: The mother-child relationship in context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×