Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:57:40.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7B - Menstrual Dysfunction in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Practice

Common Surgical Causes of Pelvic Pain in the Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Patient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

By
Anne-Marie Amies Oelschlager ,
Lina Michala  and
Jennifer E. Dietrich
Edited by
Sarah M. Creighton ,
Adam Balen ,
Lesley Breech  and
Lih-Mei Liao
Sarah M. Creighton
Affiliation:
University College Hospital, London
Adam Balen
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Lesley Breech
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
Lih-Mei Liao
Affiliation:
University College Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
A Problem-Based Approach
 , pp. 73 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suvitie, PA, Hallamaa, MK, Matomaki, JM et al. Prevalence of pain symptoms suggestive of endometriosis among Finnish adolescent girls (teen maps study). J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29: 97–103.Google Scholar
Zannoni, L, Giorgi, M, Spagnolo, E et al. Dysmenorrhea, absenteeism from school and symptoms suspicious for endometriosis in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014; 27: 258–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacovides, S, Avidon, I, Baker, F. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum Rep Update 2015; 21: 762–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naiditch, J, Barsness, K. The positive and negative predictive value of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound for diagnosing ovarian torsion in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48: 1283–87.Google Scholar
Deutch, T, Abuhamad, A. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of mullerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 413–23.Google Scholar
Caliskan, E, Ozkan, S, Cakiroglu, Y et al. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Ultrasound 2010; 38: 123–27.Google Scholar
Saleem, S. MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the art. Radiographics 2003; 23: e13.Google Scholar
Lee, J, Park, S, Shin, S. Value of intra-adnexal and extra-adnexal computed tomographic imaging features diagnosing torsion of adnexal tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 872–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amies Oelschlager, A, Gow, K, Morse, C et al. Management of large ovarian neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent females. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, A, Westhoff, C, O’Connell, K et al. Oral contraceptives for dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dun, E, Kho, K, Morozov, V et al. Endometriosis in adolescents. J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surg 2015; 19: 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Greene, R, Stratton, P, Cleary, S et al. Diagnostic experience among 1334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 32–39.Google Scholar
Dalsgaard, T, Hjordt Hansen, MV, Hartwell, D et al. Reproductive prognosis in daughters of women with and without endometriosis. Hum Repr 2013; 28: 2284–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Nnoaham, K, Webster, P, Kumbang, J et al. Is early age at menarche a risk factor for endometriosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 702–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reese, KA, Reddy, S, Rock, JA. Endometriosis in an adolescent population: the Emory experience. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1996; 9: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion Number 310. Endometriosis in adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 921–27.Google Scholar
Laufer, M, Sanfilippo, J, Rose, G. Adolescent endometriosis: diagnosis and treatment approaches. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2003; 16: S3–11.Google Scholar
Doyle, J, Missmer, S, Laufer, M. The effect of combined surgical-medical intervention on the progression of endometriosis in an adolescent and young adult population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2009; 22: 257–63.Google Scholar
Brosens, I, Gordts, S, Benagiano, G. Endometriosis in adolescents is a hidden, progressive and severe disease that deserves attention, not just compassion. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 2026–31.Google Scholar
Lara-Torre, E, Edwards, C, Pearlman, S et al. Bone mineral density in adolescent females using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2004; 17: 17–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. ACOG Committee opinion Number 539. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 983–88.Google Scholar
Ott, M, Sucato, G and Committee on Adolescence. American Academy of Pediatrics. Technical report: contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e1257–81.Google Scholar
Abou-Setta, A, Houston, B, Al-Inany, H et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; Jan 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoost, J, LaJoie, A, Hertweck, P et al. Use of the LNG IUS in adolescents with endometriosis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013; 26: 120–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Graaff, A, D’Hooghe, T, Dunselman, G et al. The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 2677–85.Google Scholar
Simon, C, Martinez, I, Pardo, F et al. Mullerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 1192–93.Google Scholar
Breech, L. Gynecologic concerns in patients with cloacal anomaly. Semin Pediatr Surg 2016; 25: 90–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, J, Miller, D, Quint, E. Obstructive reproductive tract anomalies. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014; 27: 396–402.Google Scholar
Wierrani, F, Boner, K, Spangler, B et al. “Z”-plasty of the transverse vaginal septum using Garcia’s procedure and the Grunberger modification. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 608–12.Google Scholar
Williams, C, Nakhal, R, Hall-Craggs, M et al. Transverse vaginal septae: management and long-term outcomes. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 121: 1653–58.Google Scholar
Will, M, Marsh, C, Smorgick, N et al. pearls: laparoscopic removal of uterine remnants with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013; 26: 224–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deffarges, J, Haddad, B, Musset, R et al. Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance. A study of 18 cases. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1722–25.Google Scholar
Silveira, S, Laufer, M. Persistence of endometriosis after correction of an obstructed reproductive tract anomaly. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013; 26: e93–94.Google Scholar
Grimbizis, G, Camus, M, Tarlatzis, B et al. linical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, J. Ovarian cysts in neonates, children and adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 459–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieger, M, Santos, X, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H et al. Laparoscopic outcomes for pelvic pathology in children and adolescent among patients presenting to the pediatric and adolescent gynecology service. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28: 157–62.Google Scholar
Kirkham, Y, Kives, S. Ovarian cysts in adolescents: medical and surgical management. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 2012; 23: 178–91.Google Scholar
Billmire, D, Vinocur, F, Rescorla, B et al.Outcome and staging evaluation in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary in children and adolescents: An intergroup study. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 424–29.Google Scholar
Pecorelli, S, Benedet, J, Creasman, W et al. FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994–1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 65: 243–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Eckler, K, Laufer, M, Perlman, S. Conservative management of bilateral asynchronous adnexal torsion with necrosis in a prepubertal girl. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 1248–51.Google Scholar
Galinier, P, Carfagna, I, Delsol, M et al. Ovarian torsion. Management and ovarian prognosis: a report of 45 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: 1759–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, X, Cass, D, Dietrich, J. Outcome following detorsion of torsed adnexa in children. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28: 136–38.Google Scholar
Karayalcin, R, Ozcan, S, Ozyer, S et al. Conservative laparoscopic management of adnexal torsion. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12: 4–8.Google Scholar
Ashwal, E, Hiersch, L, Krissi, H et al. Characteristics and management of ovarian torsion in premenarchal compared with postmenarchal patients. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 514–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, B, Ference, E, Zurakowski, D et al. The clinical presentation and surgical management of adnexal torsion in the pediatric and adolescent population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2012; 25: 109–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Styer, A, Laufer, M. Ovarian bivalving after detorsion. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 1053–55.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×