Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T12:29:53.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 62 - Small bowel intussusception

from Section 9 - Gastrointestinal tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Fergus V. Coakley
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

Intussusception is the telescoping or prolapse of one portion of the bowel into the adjacent downstream segment. Small bowel intussusception appears at CT as a targetlike or sausage-shaped intraluminal soft-tissue mass with fat attenuation due to invaginated mesentery; the so-called bowel-within-bowel appearance (Figures 62.1–62.4) [1–4]. Intussusception is the commonest cause of acute intestinal obstruction in young children, and pediatric intussusception can usually be successfully managed by pressure reduction using barium, air, or saline enema [5]. Conversely, small bowel intussusception in adults is sometimes detected unexpectedly at CT and may result in considerable uncertainty as to appropriate management.

Importance

Adult small bowel intussusception has traditionally been regarded as a surgical condition, because up to 90% of cases are said to be associated with a lead point tumor or other abnormality [6–12]. These older reports related to the frequency of lead point pathology are generally based on surgical series where patients presented with obstructive symptoms and the diagnosis of intussusception was made intra-operatively. These results are not applicable to adult intussusception identified on CT, since CT detects many subclinical cases. More recent studies confirm many CT-detected small bowel intussusceptions are transient. The reported rates of small bowel intussusception that is self-limiting in the CT era range from 79% (23 of 29) to 84% (31 of 37) to 96% (143 of 149) [13–15].

Typical clinical scenario

Adult small bowel intussusception is occasionally seen unexpectedly at CT, with a reported frequency in large unselected series of patients undergoing abdominal CT ranging from 1 in 1865 to 1 in 2557 [14, 15].

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal Imaging
Pseudotumors, Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 206 - 209
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Curcio, CM, Feinstein, RS, Humphrey, RL, et al. Computed tomography of entero-enteric intussusception. J Comput Tomogr 1982; 6: 969–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gourtsoyiannis, NC, Papakonstantinou, O, Bays, D, Malamas, M.Adult enteric intussusception: additional observations on enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 1994; 19: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorigan, JG, DuBrow, RA. The computed tomographic appearances and clinical significance of intussusception in adults with malignant neoplasms. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 257–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merine, DS, Fishman, EK, Jones, B.Enteroenteric intussusception: CT findings in nine patients. Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 1129–1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huppertz, HI, Soriano-Gabarró, M, Grimprel, E, et al. Intussusception among young children in Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006; 25: S22–S29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, FP. Intussusception in adults. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 527–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azar, T, Berger, DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 134–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begos, DG, Sandor, A, Modlin, IM. The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, N, Wayne, MG, Taub, PJ, et al. Intussusception in adults. Mt Sinai J Med 1999; 66: 336–340.Google ScholarPubMed
Khurrum, BM, Hussain, S, Wise, M, et al. Controversy in the treatment of adult long ileocolic intussusception: case report. Am Surg 2000; 66: 742–743.Google Scholar
Nagorney, DM, Sarr, MG, McIlrath, DC. Surgical management of intussusception in the adult. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 230–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weillbaecher, D, Bolin, JA, Hearn, D, Ogden, W.Intussusception in adults: review of 160 cases. Am J Surg 1971; 121: 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshauer, DM, Lee, JK.Adult intussusception detected at CT or MR imaging: clinical-imaging correlation. Radiology 1999; 212: 853–860.Google ScholarPubMed
Lvoff, N, Breiman, RS, Coakley, FV, Lu, Y, Warren, RS. Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult small-bowel intussusception identified at CT. Radiology 2003; 227: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rea, JD, Lockhart, ME, Yarbrough, , et al. Approach to management of intussusception in adults: a new paradigm in the computed tomography era. Am Surg 2007; 73: 1098–1105.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, YH, Blake, MA, Harisinghani, MG, et al. Adult intestinal intussusception: CT appearances and identification of a causative lead point. Radiographics 2006; 26: 733–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Small bowel intussusception
  • Fergus V. Coakley, University of California, San Francisco
  • Book: Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal Imaging
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763229.063
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Small bowel intussusception
  • Fergus V. Coakley, University of California, San Francisco
  • Book: Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal Imaging
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763229.063
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Small bowel intussusception
  • Fergus V. Coakley, University of California, San Francisco
  • Book: Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal Imaging
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763229.063
Available formats
×