Aelius Aristides: The Complete Works. Vol. II: Orations XVII–LIII. Edited by Behr, Charles A. P.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1981.Google Scholar

Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Translated by Tredennick, Hughet al. 23 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–91.Google Scholar

Athenaeus. Deipnosophists. Translated by Gulick, Charles Burton. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–41.Google Scholar

The Authorised Daily Prayer Book. Translated by Singer, S.. New York: Bloch Publishing Co., 1962.Google Scholar

Cicero. Translated by Keyes, C. W.et al. 29 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–99.Google Scholar

Demosthenes. Translated by Vince, J. H.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–49.Google Scholar

Dio Chrysostom. Translated by Crosby, H. Lamaret al. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932–51.Google Scholar

Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Hicks, R. H.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950–54.Google Scholar

Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Roman Antiquities. Translated by Cary, Ernest. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943–56.Google Scholar

Epictetus. Translated by Oldfather, W. A.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995–96.Google Scholar

The Hellenistic Philosophers. Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N.. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Isocrates. Translated by Norlin, George and Hook, Larue. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954–56.Google Scholar

Josephus. Translated by Thackeray, H. St. J.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–65.Google Scholar

Later Greek Religion. Edited by Bevan, Edwyn. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1926.Google Scholar

Livy. History of Rome. Translated by Foster, B. O.et al. 14 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–59.Google Scholar

Lucan, . The Civil War. Translated by J. D. Duff. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Lucian. Translated by Harmon, A. M. and MacLeod, M. D.. 8 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–67.Google Scholar

4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Translated by H. Anderson, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar

Manilius. Astronomica. Translated by Goold, G. P.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Marcus Aurelius. Translated by Haines, C. R.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pausanius. Description of Greece. Translated by Jones, W. H. S. and Ormerod, H. A.. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918–35.Google Scholar

Philo. Translated by Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H.. 12 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929–62.Google Scholar

Plato. Translated by Fowler, H. N.et al. 12 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–39.Google Scholar

Plutarch. The Parallel Lives. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte. 11 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–26.Google Scholar

Plutarch.Moralia. Translated by Babbitt, Frank Coleet al. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–69.Google Scholar

Physics of the Stoics. Edited and translated by Sambursky, S.. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Libanius. “Epistolary Styles.” In Ancient Epistolary Theorists, edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988: 66–81.Google Scholar

Quintilian. The Institutio Oratoria. Translated by Butler, H. E.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Seneca. Translated by Gummere, Richard M.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–72.Google Scholar

Sextus Empiricus. Translated by Bury, R. G.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933–49.Google Scholar

Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium. Wachsmuth, Curtis and Hense, Otto. 5 vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1894–1912.Google Scholar

Strabo. Geography. Translated by Jones, Horace Leonard. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–32.Google Scholar

Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Smith, Charles Foster. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–23.Google Scholar

Xenophon. Translated by Brownson, Carleton L.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–23.Google Scholar

Aletti, J.-N. “La dispositio rhétorique dans les épitres pauliniennes. Proposition de méthode.” New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, Keimpe. “Stoic Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson H. 4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. Dean Jr. Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Paul. Kampen: Kok Pharos Publishing House, 1996.Google Scholar

Atkins, E. M. “‘Domina et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis.” Phronesis 35 (1990): 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baasland, E. “Die περί -Formel und die Argumentation(ssituation) des Paulus.” Studia theologica 42 (1988): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, David L. “The Interpretation of 1 Cor. 12–14.” Evangelical Quarterly 46 (1974): 224–34.Google Scholar

Baldry, H. C.The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Barbour, Robin S. “Wisdom and the Cross in 1 Corinthians 1 and 2.” In Theologia Crucis – Signum Crucis: Festschrift für Erich Dinkler, edited by Andresen, Carl and Klein, Günter. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1979: 57–71.Google Scholar

Barlow, Claude W.Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam <quae vocantur>. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 10. Horn, Austria: Ferdinand Berger, 1938.Google Scholar

Barrett, C. K.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1968. (Repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996.)Google Scholar

Barton, S. C. “Paul's Sense of Place: An Anthropological Approach to Community Formation in Corinth.” New Testament Studies 32 (1986): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassler, Jouette M. “1 Cor. 12:3 – Curse and Confession in Context.” Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982): 415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Beasley G. R.Baptism in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar

Bertram, G. “νήπιος, νηπιάζω.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 912–23.

Best, Ernest. One Body in Christ. London: SPCK, 1955.Google Scholar

Betz, Hans Dieter. Galatians. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979.Google Scholar

Bittlinger, A.Gifts and Graces: A Commentary on 1 Cor. 12–14. Translated by H. Klassen. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968.Google Scholar

Blundell, Mary Whitlock. “Parental Nature and Stoic οἰκείωσις.” Ancient Philosophy 10 (1990): 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodson, Arthur. La morale sociale des derniers Stoîciens, Sénèque, Epictète et Marc Aurèle. Paris: Société d'Edition Les Belles Lettres, 1967.Google Scholar

Bonhöffer, Adolf. The Ethics of the Stoic Epictetus. Translated by William O. Stephens. New York: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther. Paul. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, George. “Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City.” Classical Quarterly 48 (1998): 168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braaten, C. E.Eschatology and Ethics. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1974.Google Scholar

Bringmann, K.Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Hypomnemata 29. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Alexandra R.The Cross & Human Transformation. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F.1 and 2 Corinthians. London: Oliphants, 1971.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F.1 & 2 Thessalonians. Word Biblical Commentary 45. Waco, TX: Word, 1982.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, Jacques. “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 92–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunt, P. A. “‘Amicitia’ in the Late Roman Republic.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 191 (1965): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunt, P. A.“Stoicism and the Principate.” Papers of the British School at Rome 43 (1975): 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1954–55.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf.“The Problem of Ethics in Paul.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.; translated by Christoph W. Stenschke. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 195–216.Google Scholar

Bünker, M.Briefformular und rhetorische Disposition im 1 Korintherbrief.Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1984.Google Scholar

Burgess, Theodore. Epideictic Literature. Studies in Classical Philology 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. Y. “Κοινωνία and Its Cognates in the New Testament.” Journal of Biblical Literature 51 (1932): 352–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cancik, Hildegaard. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967.Google Scholar

Carson, D. A.Showing the Spirit: A Theological Exposition of 1 Corinthians 12–14. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987.Google Scholar

Cerfaux, L.The Church in the Theology of St. Paul. New York: Herder and Herder, 1959.Google Scholar

Chevallier, Max-Alain. Esprit de Dieu, parole d'hommes. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé, 1966.Google Scholar

Clements, Ronald. God and Temple. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1965.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Vol. II: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought through the Sixth Century. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.“Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992): 334–79.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. “Chiasmus, the ‘ABA’ Pattern and the Text of Paul.” In Studiorum Paulinorum Congressus Internationalis Catholicus 2 (1963): 575–83.Google Scholar

Collins, Raymond F.First Corinthians. Sacra Pagina 7. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Conger, George Perrigo. Theories of Macrocosms and Microcosms in the History of Philosophy. New York: Russell & Russell, 1967.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. 1 Corinthians. Translated by J. W. Leitch. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975.Google Scholar

Cousar, Charles. “The Theological Task of 1 Corinthians: A Conversation with Gordon D. Fee and Victor Paul Furnish.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. II. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993: 90–102.Google Scholar

Cranfield, C. E. B.A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1975.Google Scholar

Cuming, G. J. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ (1 Corinthians 12,13).” New Testament Studies 27 (1981): 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Studies in Paul. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1977.Google Scholar

Daines, Brian. “Paul's Use of the Analogy of the Body of Christ.” Evangelical Quarterly 50 (1978): 71–78.Google Scholar

Davies, W. D.Paul and Rabbinic Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.Google Scholar

Broglie, G. “Le texte fondamentale de Saint Paul contre la foi naturelle.” Recherches de Science Religieuse 39 (1951): 253–66.Google Scholar

Deidun, T. J.New Covenant Morality. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Delling, G. “τέλειος.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 67–79.

Derrett, J. D. M. “Cursing Jesus (1 Cor. XII.3): The Jews as Religious ‘Persecutors.’ ” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

deSilva, David. “Paul and the Stoa: A Comparison.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 38 (1995): 549–64.Google Scholar

Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell, 1977.Google Scholar

Dodd, C. H.Gospel and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Dodd, Brian. Paul's Paradigmatic “I”: Personal Example as Literary Strategy. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 177. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.Google Scholar

du Plessis, P. J.ΤΕΛΕΙΟΣ, The Idea of Perfection in the New Testament. Kampen: J. H. Kok, 1959.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.Baptism in the Holy Spirit. London: SCM Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.“‘The Body of Christ’ in Paul.” In Worship, Theology and Ministry in the Early Church, edited by Wilkins, Michael J. and Paige, Terence. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992: 146–62.Google Scholar

Dyck, Andrew R.A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ellingworth, Paul and Hatton, Howard. A Translator's Handbook on Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians. London: United Bible Societies, 1985.Google Scholar

Elliot, John. A Home for the Homeless. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Discovering the Good: oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 145–83.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.“The Gospel and Social Practice According to 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 557–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.Paul and the Stoics. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 2000.Google Scholar

Eriksson, Anders. Traditions as Rhetorical Proof. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 27. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International, 1998.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Commentary on the New Testament Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D.Paul's Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Fiore, Benjamin SJ.The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles. Analecta biblica 105. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Fiore, Benjamin, SJ.“The Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 59–76.Google Scholar

Fiske, Adele M. “Hieronymus Ciceronianus.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 96 (1965): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, John T. “Philippians in the Light of Some Ancient Discussions on Friendship.” In Friendship, Flattery and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996: 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., SJ. Romans. Anchor Bible 33. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar

Fraisse, J. C.“Philia”: La notion d'amitié dans la philosophie antique. Essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé. Paris: Librairie J. Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar

Furnish, Victor Paul. Theology and Ethics in Paul. Nashville: Abingdon, 1968.Google Scholar

Furnish, Victor Paul. II Corinthians. Anchor Bible 32A. New York: Doubleday, 1984.Google Scholar

Gale, Herbert W.The Use of Analogy in the Letters of Paul. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Garland, David E.1 Corinthians. Baker Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar

Gärtner, B.The Temple and the Community Qumran and the New Testament. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgi, Dieter. Theocracy in Paul's Praxis and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar

Giblin, Charles Homer. In Hope of God's Glory: Pauline Theological Perspectives. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher. “Personhood and Personality: The Four Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6 (1988): 169–99.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher.“The School in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glad, Clarence. Paul and Philodemus: Adaptability in Epicurean and Early Christian Psychagogy. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goppelt, L.Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981–82.Google Scholar

Grant, Robert M. “Hellenistic Elements in 1 Corinthians.” In Early Christian Origins, edited by Wikgren, Allen. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961: 60–66.Google Scholar

Gressman, H. “Ν ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΩΝ.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 29 (1921): 224–30.Google Scholar

Grindheim, Sigurd: “Wisdom for the Perfect: Paul's Challenge to the Corinthian Church (1 Corinthians 2:6–16).” Journal of Biblical Literature (2002): 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gundry, Robert H.SOMA in Biblical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, George. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadas, Moses, ed. and trans. The Third and Fourth Book of Maccabees. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953.Google Scholar

Hadot, Ilsestraut. Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahm, David E.The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hainz, Josef. Ekklesia. Regensburg: Pustet, 1972.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. “Popular Morality, Philosophical Ethics, and the Rhetoric.” In Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Furley, David J. and Nehamas, Alexander. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994: 211–30.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen.“The Challenge of Rhetoric to Political and Ethical Theory in Aristotle.” In Essays of Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996: 175–90.Google Scholar

Hauck, F. “κοινός, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 III: 789–809.

Hawthorne, Gerald. Philippians. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TX: Word, 1983.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc'h, J.Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des parties politiques sous la République. Paris: Société d'Edition les Belles Lettres, 1963.Google Scholar

Hellerman, Joseph H.Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Crucifixion. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.Google Scholar

Hill, Andrew. “The Temple of Asclepius: An Alternative Source for Paul's Body Theology?” Journal of Biblical Literature 99 (1980): 437–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Forbes. “The Amorality of Aristotle's Rhetoric.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 22 (1981): 133–47.Google Scholar

Holladay, Carl R. “1 Corinthians 13: Paul as Apostolic Paradigm.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 80–98.Google Scholar

Hoover, Roy W. “The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution.” Harvard Theological Review 64 (1971): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsley, Richard A. “1 Corinthians: A Case Study of Paul's Assembly as an Alternative Society.” In Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 1997: 242–52.Google Scholar

Horsley, Richard A.Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000.Google Scholar

Horsley, Richard A.“Rhetoric and Empire – 1 Corinthians.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 72–102.Google Scholar

Hurd, John C.The Origin of 1 Corinthians. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hurtado, L. W. “Jesus as Lordly Example in Philippians 2:5–11.” In From Jesus to Paul, edited by Richardson, Peter and Hurd, John C.. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984: 113–26.Google Scholar

Iber, Gerhard. “Zum Verständnis von I Cor. 12:31.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 54 (1963): 43–52.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad. “Comments on Professor Görgemanns' Paper: The Two Forms of Oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa.” In On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus, edited by Fortenbaugh, W. W.. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1983: 190–201.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad. “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984): 151–83.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad.“Seneca and Psychological Dualism.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 150–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inwood, Brad.“Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 95–127.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. “Stoic and Aristotelian Conceptions of Happiness.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 205–44.Google Scholar

Jewett, Robert. Paul's Anthropological Terms: A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971.Google Scholar

Johnston, G.The Doctrine of the Church in the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1943.Google Scholar

Joly, Robert. Le vocabulaire chrétien de l'amour, est-il original?Brussels: Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1968.Google Scholar

Judge, E. A. “Paul as Radical Critic of Society.” Interchange 16 (1974): 191–203.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. Leib und Leib Christi. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1933.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. Perspectives in Paul. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. Essays on New Testament Themes. Translated by W. J. Montague. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidd, I. G. “Moral Actions and Rules in Stoic Ethics.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 247–58.Google Scholar

Kim, Seyoon. The Origin of Paul's Gospel. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1984.Google Scholar

Klauck, Hans-Josef. “Brotherly Love in Plutarch and in 4 Maccabees.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, and Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 144–56.Google Scholar

Knox, W. L. “Parallels to the N. T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 39 (1938): 243–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, W. L.Paul and the Church of the Gentiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Konstan, David. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Werner. Christ, Lord, Son of God. Naperville: Alec R. Allenson, 1966.Google Scholar

Kümmel, W. G.Theology of the New Testament. London: SCM Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Lapidge, Michael. “Stoic Cosmology.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 161–85.Google Scholar

Lapidge, Michael. “Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution.” Hermes 107 (1979): 344–70.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Andrew. Paradise Now and Not Yet. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litfin, Duane. St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Long, A. A.. “The Stoic Concept of Evil.” Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1968): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A.. Soul and Body in Stoicism. Berkeley: Center for Hermeneutical Studies, 1980.Google Scholar

Long, A. A.. “Soul and Body in Stoicism.” Phronesis 27 (1982): 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. “Stoic Eudaimonism.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Cleary, John J.. Vol. IV. Lanham: University Press of America, 1988: 77–101.Google Scholar

Longenecker, R. N.Paul: Apostle of Liberty. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1977.Google Scholar

Mack, B.Rhetoric and the NT. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J. “Antisthenes and Odysseus, and Paul at War.” Harvard Theological Review 76 (1983): 143–73.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.“Exhortation in First Thessalonians.” Novum Testamentum 25 (1983): 238–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Thessalonians. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.“Hellenistic Moralists and the New Testament.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992) 267–33.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. “Providence and the Destruction of the Universe in Early Stoic Thought.” In Studies in Hellenistic Religions, edited by Vermaseren, M. J.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1979: 129–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, T. W. “A Parallel to a N.T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1936): 385.Google Scholar

Manson, T. W.On Jesus and Paul. London: SCM Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Marrou, H.A History of Education in Antiquity. Translated by George Lamb. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1956.Google Scholar

Marshall, Peter. Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar

Martin, Dale. “Tongues of Angels and Other Status Indicators.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59 (1991): 547–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Dale.The Corinthian Body. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P.Carmen Christi. Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Ralph P.The Spirit and the Congregation: Studies in 1 Corinthians 12–15. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1984.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P.2 Corinthians. Word Biblical Commentary 40. Waco, TX: Word, 1986.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” History of Religions 13 (1974): 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A.The First Urban Christians. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A.“‘Since Then You Would Need to Go Out of the World’: Group Boundaries in Pauline Christianity.” In Critical History and Biblical Faith, edited by Ryan, Thomas J.. Villanova, PA: College Theology Society, 1985: 4–29.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A.The Moral World of the First Christians. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar

Meyer, Paul W. “The Holy Spirit in the Pauline Letters.” Interpretation 33 (1979): 3–18.Google Scholar

Michel, O. “ναός.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 880–90.

Mitchell, Margaret M. “Concerning ΠΕPΙ ΔΕ in 1 Corinthians.” Novum Testamentum 31 (1989): 229–56.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret M.Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1991.Google Scholar

Mitsis, Philip. “Seneca on Reason, Rules, and Moral Development.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Leon M.1 Corinthians. Leicester: InterVarsity, 1985.Google Scholar

Motto, Anna Lydia. Seneca: Moral Epistles. Chico: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Moule, C. F. D. “Further Reflexions on Philippians 2:5–11.” In Apostolic History and the Gospel. Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce, edited by Gasque, W. W. and Martin, R. P.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970: 264–76.Google Scholar

Mullins, Terence Y. “Disclosure: A Literary Form in the New Testament.” Novum Testamentum 7 (1964): 44–50.Google Scholar

Mullins, Terence Y.. “Formulas in New Testament Epistles.” Journal of Biblical Literature 91 (1972): 380–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munck, Johannes. Paul and the Salvation of Mankind. Atlanta: John Knox, 1959.Google Scholar

Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome. St. Paul's Corinth. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1983.Google Scholar

Neufeld, Vernon. The Earliest Christian Confessions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963.Google Scholar

Neyrey, Jerome H.Paul, In Other Words: A Cultural Reading of His Letters. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1990.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Obbink, Dirk. “The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 178–95.Google Scholar

Obbink, Dirk and Vander Waerdt, Paul A.. “Diogenes of Babylon: The Stoic Sage in the City of Fools.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 32 (1991): 355–96.Google Scholar

O'Brien, Peter T.Introductory Thanksgivings in the Letters of Paul. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Brien, Peter T.The Epistle to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, Catherine. Eros Unveiled: Plato and the God of Love. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar

Panikulam, G.Koinonia in the New Testament, a Dynamic Expression of Christian Life. Analecta biblica. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Parsons, Michael. “Being Precedes Act: Indicative and Imperative in Paul's Writing.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 217–47. (Reprinted from Evangelical Quarterly 60 [1988]: 99–127.)Google Scholar

Parunak, H. Van Dyke. “Transitional Techniques in the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature 102 (1983): 525–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Birger Albert. The Pneumatikos-Psychikos Terminology in 1 Corinthians. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 12. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Perdue, Leo. “Paraenesis and the Epistle of James.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 72 (1981): 241–56.Google Scholar

Perdue, Leo. “The Social Character of Paraenesis and Paraenetic Literature.” Semeia 59 (1990): 5–39.Google Scholar

Perelman, Ch. The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by William Kluback. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.. The New Rhetoric. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Perriman, Andrew. “‘His Body, Which Is the Church …’ Coming to Terms with Metaphor.” Evangelical Quarterly 62 (1990): 123–42.Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. “With Lucian: Who Needs Friends? Friendship in the Toxaris.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 163–80.Google Scholar

Pogoloff, Stephen M.LOGOS AND SOPHIA: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, Max. Paulus und die Stoa (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956).Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. “The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 100–22.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, A. E. J. “Corpus Christi.” In Mysterium Christi, edited by Bell, G. K. A. and Deissmann, Adolf. London: Longmans, 1930: 225–44.Google Scholar

Reed, Jeffrey T. “The Epistle.” In Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997: 171–93.Google Scholar

Renwick, David A.Paul, the Temple, and the Presence of God. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato's Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Rich, Audrey N. M. “The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God.” Mnemosyne 7 (1954): 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rist, J. M. “Categories and Their Uses.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by Long, A. A.. London: Athlone Press, 1971: 38–57.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M.“Seneca and Stoic Orthodoxy.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 36.3 (1989) 1993–2012.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M.“Plutarch's Amatorius: A Commentary on Plato's Theories of Love?” Classical Quarterly 51 (2001): 557–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, A. and Plummer, A.. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. International Critical Commentary. T. & T. Clark: Edinburgh, 1994.Google Scholar

Robinson, John A. T.The Body. London: SCM Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Rogers, E. R. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ Again.” New Testament Studies 29 (1983): 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, G. M. “Seneca's Philosophical Influence.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 116–65.Google Scholar

Ruef, John. Paul's First Letter to Corinth. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1977.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. “Letters to Lucilius.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 70–95.Google Scholar

Sambursky, S., ed. and trans. Physics of the Stoics. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Sanders, J. T. “The Transition from Opening Epistolary Thanksgiving to Body in the Letters of the Pauline Corpus.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962): 348–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, J. T.“First Corinthians 13: Its Interpretation Since the First World War.” Interpretation 20 (1966): 159–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandmel, Samuel. “Parallelomania.” Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Traugott. Der Leib Christi. Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1919.Google Scholar

Schmithals, Walter. Gnosticism in Corinth. Translated by John E. Steely. Nashville: Abingdon, 1971.Google Scholar

Schnackenburg, Rudolf. Baptism in the Thought of St. Paul. Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray. New York: Herder and Herder, 1964.Google Scholar

Schofield, Malcolm. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Fiorenza, Schüssler E. “Rhetorical Situation and Historical Reconstruction in 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 386–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1956.Google Scholar

Schweizer, Edward. “σω ̑μα, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 1024–94.

Scroggs, R. “The Exaltation of the Spirit by Some Early Christians.” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965): 359–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scroggs, R.The Last Adam. London: Basil Blackwell, 1966.Google Scholar

Sedley, David. “The Stoic–Platonist Debate on kathêkonta.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 128–52.Google Scholar

Sevenster, J. N.Paul and Seneca. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smit. J. “Argument and Genre of 1 Corinthians 12–14.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 211–30.Google Scholar

Smith, D. Moody. “Glossolalia and Other Spiritual Gifts in a New Testament Perspective.” Interpretation 28 (1974): 307–20.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z. “The Social Description of Early Christianity.” Religious Studies Review 1 (1975): 19–25.Google Scholar

Snow, David A., and Richard Machalek. “The Convert as a Social Type.” In Sociological Theory, edited by Collins, Randall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983: 259–89.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich. “Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (1963): 473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterling, Gregory E. “‘Wisdom among the Perfect’: Creation Traditions in Alexandrian Judaism and Corinthian Christianity.” Novum Testamentum 37 (1995): 355–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterling, Gregory E.“The Bond of Humanity: Friendship in Philo of Alexandria.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 203–23.Google Scholar

Sterling, Gregory E.“Hellenistic Philosophy and the New Testament.” In Handbook to Exegesis of the New Testament, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997: 313–58.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley. Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar

Stowers, Stanley.“Friends and Enemies in the Politics of Heaven: Reading Theology in Philippians.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. I. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991: 105–21.Google Scholar

Striker, Gisela. “The Role of Oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1 (1983): 145–68.Google Scholar

Stuhlmacher, P. “The Hermeneutical Significance of 1 Cor 2:6–16.” In Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament: Essays in Honor of E. Earle Ellis for His 60th Birthday, edited by Hawthorne, Gerald F. and Betz, Otto. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987: 328–47.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles. “Paul's Understanding of the Holy Spirit: The Evidence of 1 Corinthians 12–14.” In Perspectives on the New Testament, edited by Talbert, Charles H.. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1985: 95–108.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles. Reading Corinthians. New York: Crossroad, 1987.Google Scholar

Taylor, Nicholas H. “The Social Nature of Conversion in the Early Christian World.” In Modelling Early Christianity, edited by Esler, Philip F.. London: Routledge, 1995: 128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terrien, Samuel. The Elusive Presence: The Heart of Biblical Theology. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1978.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd. The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth. Edited and translated by Schütz, John H.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar

Thiselton, Anthony C.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar

Thrall, Margaret. I and II Corinthians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Todd, Robert B.Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976.Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Unnik, W. C. van. “Jesus: Anathema or Kyrios (1 Cor. 12:3).” In Christ and Spirit in the New Testament, edited by Lindars, Barnabus and Smalley, Stephen S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973: 113–26.Google Scholar

Verbeke, G.L'évolution de la doctrine de pneuma. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1945.Google Scholar

Vielhauer, Philipp. Oikodome: Das Bild vom Bau in der christlichen Literatur vom Neuen Testament bis Clemens Alexandrinus. Karlsruhe-Durlach: Tron, 1940.Google Scholar

Viner, Leigh Clasby. “Moral Paradigms and the Stoic Sage.” Ph.D. diss., Duquesne University, 2002.

Vollenweider, Samuel. Freiheit als neue Schöpfung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walter, Matthias. Gemeinde als Leib Christi. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.Google Scholar

Wardman, Alan. Plutarch's Lives. Berkeley: University of California, 1974.Google Scholar

Watson, Duane. “Paul's Rhetorical Strategy in 1 Corinthians 15.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 231–49.Google Scholar

Welborn, L. L. “On the Discord in Corinth: 1 Corinthians 1–4 and Ancient Politics.” Journal of Biblical Literature 106 (1987): 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, John. “Introductory Formulae in the Body of the Pauline Letter.” Journal of Biblical Literature 90 (1971): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. Michael. “Morality between Two Worlds: A Paradigm of Friendship in Philippians.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, D. L., Ferguson, E., and Meeks, W. A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 201–15.Google Scholar

White, Michael J. “Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology).” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Nicholas P. “The Basis of Stoic Ethics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83 (1979): 143–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wikenhauser, Alfred. Die Kirche als der mystische Leib Christi nach dem Apostel Paulus. Münster: Aschendorff, 1937.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich. Der Glaube der Hellenen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1955.Google Scholar

Willis, Wendell Lee. Idol Meat at Corinth. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Winter, Bruce. Philo and Paul among the Sophists. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Wire, Antoinette. The Corinthian Women Prophets. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar

Wischmeyer, O.Der höchste Weg. Das 13. Kapitel des 1. Korintherbriefes. Gutersloh: Gutersloher Verlagshaus, 1981.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben III. Conflict and Community in Corinth. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Der erste Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1996.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T. “ἁρπαγμός and the Meaning of Philippians 2:5–11.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1986): 321–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, N. T.“Paul's Gospel and Caesar's Empire.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 160–83.Google Scholar

Wuellner, W. “Greek Rhetoric and Pauline Argumentation.” In Early Christian Literature and the Classical Intellectual Tradition: In honorem Robert Grant, edited by Schoedel, W. F. and Wilken, R. L.. Paris: Editions Beauchesne, 1979: 177–88.Google Scholar

Wuellner, W.“Paul as Pastor. The Function of Rhetorical Questions in First Corinthians.” In L'apôtre Paul: personnalité, style, et conception du ministère, edited by Vanhoye, A.. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1986: 49–77.Google Scholar

Yorke, Gosnell L. O. R.The Church as the Body of Christ in the Pauline Corpus. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1991.Google Scholar

Zerwick, M.Biblical Greek. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1963.Google Scholar

Aelius Aristides: The Complete Works. Vol. II: Orations XVII–LIII. Edited by Behr, Charles A. P.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1981.Google Scholar

Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Translated by Tredennick, Hughet al. 23 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–91.Google Scholar

Athenaeus. Deipnosophists. Translated by Gulick, Charles Burton. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–41.Google Scholar

The Authorised Daily Prayer Book. Translated by Singer, S.. New York: Bloch Publishing Co., 1962.Google Scholar

Cicero. Translated by Keyes, C. W.et al. 29 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–99.Google Scholar

Demosthenes. Translated by Vince, J. H.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–49.Google Scholar

Dio Chrysostom. Translated by Crosby, H. Lamaret al. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932–51.Google Scholar

Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Hicks, R. H.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950–54.Google Scholar

Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Roman Antiquities. Translated by Cary, Ernest. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943–56.Google Scholar

Epictetus. Translated by Oldfather, W. A.. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995–96.Google Scholar

The Hellenistic Philosophers. Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N.. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Isocrates. Translated by Norlin, George and Hook, Larue. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954–56.Google Scholar

Josephus. Translated by Thackeray, H. St. J.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926–65.Google Scholar

Later Greek Religion. Edited by Bevan, Edwyn. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1926.Google Scholar

Livy. History of Rome. Translated by Foster, B. O.et al. 14 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–59.Google Scholar

Lucan, . The Civil War. Translated by J. D. Duff. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Lucian. Translated by Harmon, A. M. and MacLeod, M. D.. 8 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913–67.Google Scholar

4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Translated by H. Anderson, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar

Manilius. Astronomica. Translated by Goold, G. P.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Marcus Aurelius. Translated by Haines, C. R.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pausanius. Description of Greece. Translated by Jones, W. H. S. and Ormerod, H. A.. 5 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918–35.Google Scholar

Philo. Translated by Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H.. 12 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929–62.Google Scholar

Plato. Translated by Fowler, H. N.et al. 12 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–39.Google Scholar

Plutarch. The Parallel Lives. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte. 11 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–26.Google Scholar

Plutarch.Moralia. Translated by Babbitt, Frank Coleet al. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–69.Google Scholar

Physics of the Stoics. Edited and translated by Sambursky, S.. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Libanius. “Epistolary Styles.” In Ancient Epistolary Theorists, edited by Malherbe, Abraham J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988: 66–81.Google Scholar

Quintilian. The Institutio Oratoria. Translated by Butler, H. E.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Seneca. Translated by Gummere, Richard M.et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–72.Google Scholar

Sextus Empiricus. Translated by Bury, R. G.. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933–49.Google Scholar

Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium. Wachsmuth, Curtis and Hense, Otto. 5 vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1894–1912.Google Scholar

Strabo. Geography. Translated by Jones, Horace Leonard. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–32.Google Scholar

Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Smith, Charles Foster. 4 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919–23.Google Scholar

Xenophon. Translated by Brownson, Carleton L.et al. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914–23.Google Scholar

Aletti, J.-N. “La dispositio rhétorique dans les épitres pauliniennes. Proposition de méthode.” New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, Keimpe. “Stoic Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson H. 4 Maccabees. In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by Charlesworth, James H.. Vol. II. New York: Doubleday, 1985: 531–64.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. Dean Jr. Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Paul. Kampen: Kok Pharos Publishing House, 1996.Google Scholar

Atkins, E. M. “‘Domina et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis.” Phronesis 35 (1990): 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baasland, E. “Die περί -Formel und die Argumentation(ssituation) des Paulus.” Studia theologica 42 (1988): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, David L. “The Interpretation of 1 Cor. 12–14.” Evangelical Quarterly 46 (1974): 224–34.Google Scholar

Baldry, H. C.The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Barbour, Robin S. “Wisdom and the Cross in 1 Corinthians 1 and 2.” In Theologia Crucis – Signum Crucis: Festschrift für Erich Dinkler, edited by Andresen, Carl and Klein, Günter. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1979: 57–71.Google Scholar

Barlow, Claude W.Epistolae Senecae ad Paulum et Pauli ad Senecam <quae vocantur>. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 10. Horn, Austria: Ferdinand Berger, 1938.Google Scholar

Barrett, C. K.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1968. (Repr., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996.)Google Scholar

Barton, S. C. “Paul's Sense of Place: An Anthropological Approach to Community Formation in Corinth.” New Testament Studies 32 (1986): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassler, Jouette M. “1 Cor. 12:3 – Curse and Confession in Context.” Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982): 415–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Beasley G. R.Baptism in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar

Bertram, G. “νήπιος, νηπιάζω.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 912–23.

Best, Ernest. One Body in Christ. London: SPCK, 1955.Google Scholar

Betz, Hans Dieter. Galatians. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979.Google Scholar

Bittlinger, A.Gifts and Graces: A Commentary on 1 Cor. 12–14. Translated by H. Klassen. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968.Google Scholar

Blundell, Mary Whitlock. “Parental Nature and Stoic οἰκείωσις.” Ancient Philosophy 10 (1990): 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodson, Arthur. La morale sociale des derniers Stoîciens, Sénèque, Epictète et Marc Aurèle. Paris: Société d'Edition Les Belles Lettres, 1967.Google Scholar

Bonhöffer, Adolf. The Ethics of the Stoic Epictetus. Translated by William O. Stephens. New York: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther. Paul. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, George. “Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City.” Classical Quarterly 48 (1998): 168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braaten, C. E.Eschatology and Ethics. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1974.Google Scholar

Bringmann, K.Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero. Hypomnemata 29. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Alexandra R.The Cross & Human Transformation. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F.1 and 2 Corinthians. London: Oliphants, 1971.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F.1 & 2 Thessalonians. Word Biblical Commentary 45. Waco, TX: Word, 1982.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, Jacques. “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 92–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunt, P. A. “‘Amicitia’ in the Late Roman Republic.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 191 (1965): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunt, P. A.“Stoicism and the Principate.” Papers of the British School at Rome 43 (1975): 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1954–55.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf.“The Problem of Ethics in Paul.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.; translated by Christoph W. Stenschke. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 195–216.Google Scholar

Bünker, M.Briefformular und rhetorische Disposition im 1 Korintherbrief.Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1984.Google Scholar

Burgess, Theodore. Epideictic Literature. Studies in Classical Philology 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. Y. “Κοινωνία and Its Cognates in the New Testament.” Journal of Biblical Literature 51 (1932): 352–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cancik, Hildegaard. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967.Google Scholar

Carson, D. A.Showing the Spirit: A Theological Exposition of 1 Corinthians 12–14. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987.Google Scholar

Cerfaux, L.The Church in the Theology of St. Paul. New York: Herder and Herder, 1959.Google Scholar

Chevallier, Max-Alain. Esprit de Dieu, parole d'hommes. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé, 1966.Google Scholar

Clements, Ronald. God and Temple. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1965.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Vol. II: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought through the Sixth Century. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L.“Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992): 334–79.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. “Chiasmus, the ‘ABA’ Pattern and the Text of Paul.” In Studiorum Paulinorum Congressus Internationalis Catholicus 2 (1963): 575–83.Google Scholar

Collins, Raymond F.First Corinthians. Sacra Pagina 7. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Conger, George Perrigo. Theories of Macrocosms and Microcosms in the History of Philosophy. New York: Russell & Russell, 1967.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. 1 Corinthians. Translated by J. W. Leitch. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975.Google Scholar

Cousar, Charles. “The Theological Task of 1 Corinthians: A Conversation with Gordon D. Fee and Victor Paul Furnish.” In Pauline Theology, edited by Bassler, Jouette M.. Vol. II. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993: 90–102.Google Scholar

Cranfield, C. E. B.A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1975.Google Scholar

Cuming, G. J. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ (1 Corinthians 12,13).” New Testament Studies 27 (1981): 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Studies in Paul. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1977.Google Scholar

Daines, Brian. “Paul's Use of the Analogy of the Body of Christ.” Evangelical Quarterly 50 (1978): 71–78.Google Scholar

Davies, W. D.Paul and Rabbinic Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.Google Scholar

Broglie, G. “Le texte fondamentale de Saint Paul contre la foi naturelle.” Recherches de Science Religieuse 39 (1951): 253–66.Google Scholar

Deidun, T. J.New Covenant Morality. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Delling, G. “τέλειος.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 VII: 67–79.

Derrett, J. D. M. “Cursing Jesus (1 Cor. XII.3): The Jews as Religious ‘Persecutors.’ ” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

deSilva, David. “Paul and the Stoa: A Comparison.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 38 (1995): 549–64.Google Scholar

Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell, 1977.Google Scholar

Dodd, C. H.Gospel and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Dodd, Brian. Paul's Paradigmatic “I”: Personal Example as Literary Strategy. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 177. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.Google Scholar

du Plessis, P. J.ΤΕΛΕΙΟΣ, The Idea of Perfection in the New Testament. Kampen: J. H. Kok, 1959.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.Baptism in the Holy Spirit. London: SCM Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.“‘The Body of Christ’ in Paul.” In Worship, Theology and Ministry in the Early Church, edited by Wilkins, Michael J. and Paige, Terence. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992: 146–62.Google Scholar

Dyck, Andrew R.A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ellingworth, Paul and Hatton, Howard. A Translator's Handbook on Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians. London: United Bible Societies, 1985.Google Scholar

Elliot, John. A Home for the Homeless. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. “Discovering the Good: oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 145–83.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.“The Gospel and Social Practice According to 1 Corinthians.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 557–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels.Paul and the Stoics. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 2000.Google Scholar

Eriksson, Anders. Traditions as Rhetorical Proof. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 27. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International, 1998.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D.The First Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Commentary on the New Testament Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D.Paul's Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Fiore, Benjamin SJ.The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles. Analecta biblica 105. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Fiore, Benjamin, SJ.“The Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 59–76.Google Scholar

Fiske, Adele M. “Hieronymus Ciceronianus.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 96 (1965): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, John T. “Philippians in the Light of Some Ancient Discussions on Friendship.” In Friendship, Flattery and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996: 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A., SJ. Romans. Anchor Bible 33. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar

Fraisse, J. C.“Philia”: La notion d'amitié dans la philosophie antique. Essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé. Paris: Librairie J. Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar

Furnish, Victor Paul. Theology and Ethics in Paul. Nashville: Abingdon, 1968.Google Scholar

Furnish, Victor Paul. II Corinthians. Anchor Bible 32A. New York: Doubleday, 1984.Google Scholar

Gale, Herbert W.The Use of Analogy in the Letters of Paul. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Garland, David E.1 Corinthians. Baker Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar

Gärtner, B.The Temple and the Community Qumran and the New Testament. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgi, Dieter. Theocracy in Paul's Praxis and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar

Giblin, Charles Homer. In Hope of God's Glory: Pauline Theological Perspectives. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher. “Personhood and Personality: The Four Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6 (1988): 169–99.Google Scholar

Gill, Christopher.“The School in the Roman Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by Inwood, Brad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glad, Clarence. Paul and Philodemus: Adaptability in Epicurean and Early Christian Psychagogy. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goppelt, L.Theology of the New Testament. 2 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981–82.Google Scholar

Grant, Robert M. “Hellenistic Elements in 1 Corinthians.” In Early Christian Origins, edited by Wikgren, Allen. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961: 60–66.Google Scholar

Gressman, H. “Ν ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΩΝ.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 29 (1921): 224–30.Google Scholar

Grindheim, Sigurd: “Wisdom for the Perfect: Paul's Challenge to the Corinthian Church (1 Corinthians 2:6–16).” Journal of Biblical Literature (2002): 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gundry, Robert H.SOMA in Biblical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, George. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadas, Moses, ed. and trans. The Third and Fourth Book of Maccabees. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953.Google Scholar

Hadot, Ilsestraut. Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahm, David E.The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hainz, Josef. Ekklesia. Regensburg: Pustet, 1972.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. “Popular Morality, Philosophical Ethics, and the Rhetoric.” In Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Furley, David J. and Nehamas, Alexander. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994: 211–30.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen.“The Challenge of Rhetoric to Political and Ethical Theory in Aristotle.” In Essays of Aristotle's Rhetoric, edited by Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996: 175–90.Google Scholar

Hauck, F. “κοινός, κτλ.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 III: 789–809.

Hawthorne, Gerald. Philippians. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TX: Word, 1983.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc'h, J.Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des parties politiques sous la République. Paris: Société d'Edition les Belles Lettres, 1963.Google Scholar

Hellerman, Joseph H.Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Crucifixion. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.Google Scholar

Hill, Andrew. “The Temple of Asclepius: An Alternative Source for Paul's Body Theology?” Journal of Biblical Literature 99 (1980): 437–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Forbes. “The Amorality of Aristotle's Rhetoric.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 22 (1981): 133–47.Google Scholar

Holladay, Carl R. “1 Corinthians 13: Paul as Apostolic Paradigm.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 80–98.Google Scholar

Hoover, Roy W. “The Harpagmos Enigma: A Philological Solution.” Harvard Theological Review 64 (1971): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsley, Richard A. “1 Corinthians: A Case Study of Paul's Assembly as an Alternative Society.” In Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 1997: 242–52.Google Scholar

Horsley, Richard A.Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000.Google Scholar

Horsley, Richard A.“Rhetoric and Empire – 1 Corinthians.” In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, edited by Horsley, Richard A.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2000: 72–102.Google Scholar

Hurd, John C.The Origin of 1 Corinthians. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hurtado, L. W. “Jesus as Lordly Example in Philippians 2:5–11.” In From Jesus to Paul, edited by Richardson, Peter and Hurd, John C.. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984: 113–26.Google Scholar

Iber, Gerhard. “Zum Verständnis von I Cor. 12:31.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 54 (1963): 43–52.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad. “Comments on Professor Görgemanns' Paper: The Two Forms of Oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa.” In On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus, edited by Fortenbaugh, W. W.. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1983: 190–201.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad. “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984): 151–83.Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad.“Seneca and Psychological Dualism.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 150–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inwood, Brad.“Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 95–127.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. “Stoic and Aristotelian Conceptions of Happiness.” In The Norms of Nature, edited by Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 205–44.Google Scholar

Jewett, Robert. Paul's Anthropological Terms: A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971.Google Scholar

Johnston, G.The Doctrine of the Church in the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1943.Google Scholar

Joly, Robert. Le vocabulaire chrétien de l'amour, est-il original?Brussels: Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1968.Google Scholar

Judge, E. A. “Paul as Radical Critic of Society.” Interchange 16 (1974): 191–203.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. Leib und Leib Christi. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1933.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. Perspectives in Paul. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. Essays on New Testament Themes. Translated by W. J. Montague. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidd, I. G. “Moral Actions and Rules in Stoic Ethics.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 247–58.Google Scholar

Kim, Seyoon. The Origin of Paul's Gospel. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1984.Google Scholar

Klauck, Hans-Josef. “Brotherly Love in Plutarch and in 4 Maccabees.” In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, edited by Balch, David L., Ferguson, Everett, and Meeks, Wayne A.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990: 144–56.Google Scholar

Knox, W. L. “Parallels to the N. T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 39 (1938): 243–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, W. L.Paul and the Church of the Gentiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Konstan, David. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Werner. Christ, Lord, Son of God. Naperville: Alec R. Allenson, 1966.Google Scholar

Kümmel, W. G.Theology of the New Testament. London: SCM Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Lapidge, Michael. “Stoic Cosmology.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist, John M.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978: 161–85.Google Scholar

Lapidge, Michael. “Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution.” Hermes 107 (1979): 344–70.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Andrew. Paradise Now and Not Yet. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litfin, Duane. St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Long, A. A.. “The Stoic Concept of Evil.” Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1968): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A.. Soul and Body in Stoicism. Berkeley: Center for Hermeneutical Studies, 1980.Google Scholar

Long, A. A.. “Soul and Body in Stoicism.” Phronesis 27 (1982): 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. “Stoic Eudaimonism.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Cleary, John J.. Vol. IV. Lanham: University Press of America, 1988: 77–101.Google Scholar

Longenecker, R. N.Paul: Apostle of Liberty. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1977.Google Scholar

Mack, B.Rhetoric and the NT. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J. “Antisthenes and Odysseus, and Paul at War.” Harvard Theological Review 76 (1983): 143–73.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.“Exhortation in First Thessalonians.” Novum Testamentum 25 (1983): 238–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Thessalonians. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar

Malherbe, Abraham J.“Hellenistic Moralists and the New Testament.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 26.1 (1992) 267–33.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. “Providence and the Destruction of the Universe in Early Stoic Thought.” In Studies in Hellenistic Religions, edited by Vermaseren, M. J.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1979: 129–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, T. W. “A Parallel to a N.T. Use of σω ̑μα.” Journal of Theological Studies 37 (1936): 385.Google Scholar

Manson, T. W.On Jesus and Paul. London: SCM Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Marrou, H.A History of Education in Antiquity. Translated by George Lamb. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1956.Google Scholar

Marshall, Peter. Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar

Martin, Dale. “Tongues of Angels and Other Status Indicators.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59 (1991): 547–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Dale.The Corinthian Body. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P.Carmen Christi. Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Ralph P.The Spirit and the Congregation: Studies in 1 Corinthians 12–15. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1984.Google Scholar

Martin, Ralph P.2 Corinthians. Word Biblical Commentary 40. Waco, TX: Word, 1986.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” History of Religions 13 (1974): 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A.The First Urban Christians. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A.“‘Since Then You Would Need to Go Out of the World’: Group Boundaries in Pauline Christianity.” In Critical History and Biblical Faith, edited by Ryan, Thomas J.. Villanova, PA: College Theology Society, 1985: 4–29.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne A.The Moral World of the First Christians. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar

Meyer, Paul W. “The Holy Spirit in the Pauline Letters.” Interpretation 33 (1979): 3–18.Google Scholar

Michel, O. “ναός.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by G. Kittel and G. Friedrich. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, 1964–76 IV: 880–90.

Mitchell, Margaret M. “Concerning ΠΕPΙ ΔΕ in 1 Corinthians.” Novum Testamentum 31 (1989): 229–56.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret M.Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1991.Google Scholar

Mitsis, Philip. “Seneca on Reason, Rules, and Moral Development.” In Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brunschwig, Jacques and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Leon M.1 Corinthians. Leicester: InterVarsity, 1985.Google Scholar

Motto, Anna Lydia. Seneca: Moral Epistles. Chico: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Moule, C. F. D. “Further Reflexions on Philippians 2:5–11.” In Apostolic History and the Gospel. Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce, edited by Gasque, W. W. and Martin, R. P.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1970: 264–76.Google Scholar

Mullins, Terence Y. “Disclosure: A Literary Form in the New Testament.” Novum Testamentum 7 (1964): 44–50.Google Scholar

Mullins, Terence Y.. “Formulas in New Testament Epistles.” Journal of Biblical Literature 91 (1972): 380–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munck, Johannes. Paul and the Salvation of Mankind. Atlanta: John Knox, 1959.Google Scholar

Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome. St. Paul's Corinth. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1983.Google Scholar

Neufeld, Vernon. The Earliest Christian Confessions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963.Google Scholar

Neyrey, Jerome H.Paul, In Other Words: A Cultural Reading of His Letters. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1990.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Obbink, Dirk. “The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City.” In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, Katerina. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999: 178–95.Google Scholar

Obbink, Dirk and Vander Waerdt, Paul A.. “Diogenes of Babylon: The Stoic Sage in the City of Fools.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 32 (1991): 355–96.Google Scholar

O'Brien, Peter T.Introductory Thanksgivings in the Letters of Paul. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Brien, Peter T.The Epistle to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy. London: Methuen, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, Catherine. Eros Unveiled: Plato and the God of Love. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar

Panikulam, G.Koinonia in the New Testament, a Dynamic Expression of Christian Life. Analecta biblica. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Parsons, Michael. “Being Precedes Act: Indicative and Imperative in Paul's Writing.” In Understanding Paul's Ethics, edited by Rosner, Brian S.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995: 217–47. (Reprinted from Evangelical Quarterly 60 [1988]: 99–127.)Google Scholar

Parunak, H. Van Dyke. “Transitional Techniques in the Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature 102 (1983): 525–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Birger Albert. The Pneumatikos-Psychikos Terminology in 1 Corinthians. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 12. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Perdue, Leo. “Paraenesis and the Epistle of James.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 72 (1981): 241–56.Google Scholar

Perdue, Leo. “The Social Character of Paraenesis and Paraenetic Literature.” Semeia 59 (1990): 5–39.Google Scholar

Perelman, Ch. The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by William Kluback. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.. The New Rhetoric. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Perriman, Andrew. “‘His Body, Which Is the Church …’ Coming to Terms with Metaphor.” Evangelical Quarterly 62 (1990): 123–42.Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. “With Lucian: Who Needs Friends? Friendship in the Toxaris.” In Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, edited by Fitzgerald, John T.. Society of Biblical Literature Resources for Biblical Study 34. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997: 163–80.Google Scholar

Pogoloff, Stephen M.LOGOS AND SOPHIA: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, Max. Paulus und die Stoa (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956).Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. “The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature.” In Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press, 1993: 100–22.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, A. E. J. “Corpus Christi.” In Mysterium Christi, edited by Bell, G. K. A. and Deissmann, Adolf. London: Longmans, 1930: 225–44.Google Scholar

Reed, Jeffrey T. “The Epistle.” In Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997: 171–93.Google Scholar

Renwick, David A.Paul, the Temple, and the Presence of God. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato's Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Rich, Audrey N. M. “The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God.” Mnemosyne 7 (1954): 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rist, J. M. “Categories and Their Uses.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by Long, A. A.. London: Athlone Press, 1971: 38–57.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M.“Seneca and Stoic Orthodoxy.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York, 1992 36.3 (1989) 1993–2012.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M.“Plutarch's Amatorius: A Commentary on Plato's Theories of Love?” Classical Quarterly 51 (2001): 557–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, A. and Plummer, A.. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. International Critical Commentary. T. & T. Clark: Edinburgh, 1994.Google Scholar

Robinson, John A. T.The Body. London: SCM Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Rogers, E. R. “ΕΠΟΤΙΣΘΗΜΕΝ Again.” New Testament Studies 29 (1983): 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, G. M. “Seneca's Philosophical Influence.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 116–65.Google Scholar

Ruef, John. Paul's First Letter to Corinth. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1977.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. “Letters to Lucilius.” In Seneca, edited by Costa, C. D. N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974: 70–95.Google Scholar