Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:37:03.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for evaluating pancreatic neoplasms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Jay Heiken
Affiliation:
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The imaging of pancreatic neoplasms often presents a diagnostic challenge to the interpreting radiologist. The radiological questions that need to be answered include the differentiation between benign and malignant entities and the determination of extent of disease and resectability. The latter includes evaluation of the lesion's relationship to the surrounding vasculature and assessment of the presence of local lymphadenopathy and metastatic disease to the liver and peritoneum. This thorough evaluation allows the referring clinician to determine the appropriateness of surgical resection of the lesion in question.

The superior soft tissue contrast provided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with other imaging tests has proven highly effective for imaging of the abdomen. Over the past decade, advancements in MRI techniques have resulted in a dramatic improvement in the ability of the radiologist to analyze pancreatic neoplasms. These advancements include the introduction of faster breath-hold sequences to limit motion artifact, the development of improved protocols for optimization of pancreatic contrast enhancement, the use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to evaluate the relationship of pancreatic lesions to the pancreaticobiliary system, and the use of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the relationship of pancreatic masses to the adjacent vasculature. Use of these techniques results in accurate diagnosis of malignant pancreatic lesions with 95% sensitivity and specificity. Of similar importance, positive and negative predictive values of cancer non-resectability as high as 90% and 83%, respectively, can be achieved [1].

Type
Chapter
Information
Pancreatic Cancer , pp. 46 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hanninen, EL, Amthauer, H, Hosten, N, et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology 2002; 224: 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, SL, Lee, VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 295–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiraishi, K, Narabayashi, I, Fujita, O, et al. Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194: 119–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, SL, Lee, VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 295–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pamulkar, E, Semelka, R. MR imaging of the pancreas. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 313–330.Google Scholar
Miller, F, Rini, N, Keppke, A. MRI of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W365–W374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rofsky, NM, Lee, VS, Laub, G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999; 212: 876–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birchard, KR, Semelka, RC, Hyslop, WB, et al. Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 700–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foo, TK, Saranthan, M, Prince, MR, et al. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanematsu, M, Shiratori, Y, Hoshi, H, et al. Pancreas and peripancreatic vessels: effect of imaging delay on gadolinium enhancement at dynamic gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 215: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto, JA, Barish, MA, Yucel, EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 459–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhold, C, Bret, PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1285–1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, SL, Lee, VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 295–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zech, CJ, Herrmann, KA, Huber, A, et al. High-resolution MR-imaging of the liver with T2-weighted sequences using integrated parallel imaging: comparison of prospective motion correction and respiratory triggering. J Magn Res Imag 2004; 20: 443–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhold, C, Bret, PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1285–1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Israel, GM, Hecht, EM, et al. Isotropic #d T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 1564–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, JA, Barish, MA, Yucel, EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 459–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeffel, C, Azizi, L, Lewin, M, et al. Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1603–1620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nael, K, Laub, G, Finn, JP. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoraco-abdominal vessels. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 359–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ichikawa, T, Erturk, SM, Motosugi, U, et al. High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 409–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamashita, Y, Namimoto, T, Mitsuzaki, K, et al. Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging. Radiology 1998; 208: 605–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, SG, Lee, DH, Lee, KY, et al. Differentiation of chronic focal pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 163–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×