Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T07:15:50.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Napkin Art: Carmina contra paganos and the Difference Satire Made in Fourth-Century Rome

from Section A - Pagans and Religious Practices in Christian Rome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Dennis E. Trout
Affiliation:
professor of classical studies at the University of Missouri
Michele Renee Salzman
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Marianne Sághy
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Rita Lizzi Testa
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
Get access

Summary

It has become ever more clear that late ancient Rome's Christian writers were capable of sheer invention. Prudentius’ blood-drenched taurobolium has lately been forced to come clean as the fantasy it was: a burlesque of a far more sober rite still traceable in other sources. Similar, if less sensational, fictions surely underlie the outrage punctuating the roughly contemporary anti-pagan verse polemics considered in this chapter. Yet rather than quarantine these carmina contra paganos – or Prudentius’ lurid fantasy – simply because they bear the mark of deceit, the proper historical task entails their reintegration into a world where, as otherwise agreed, textual practices often had serious motivations and real consequences. The patent attraction of these verses to the tired clichés and vituperative zeal of pre-Constantinian apologetic, that is, should not be permitted to render this poetry irrelevant to the religious debates of the age. Indeed, that these broadsides – embedded in well-known poems or stranded among the manuscripts of other Christian authors – were ever intended to be taken for the kind of truth conceded to objective reportage or fair representation can hardly be the case. Truth, however, is manifold, an assertion whose validity crystalizes in the relentlessly satiric voices of this contra paganos poetry. What follows, then, is a bid for better understanding of how the “banal” fictions of this late fourth- and early fifth-century verse contributed to the work of forging Christian identity in a city where the problems well-heeled Christians faced had as much (or more) to do with resolving the issues dividing them than with fending off the challenges of pagan cult.

Ad Hominem?

Five texts will illustrate here the evidential value of a body of verse too often marginalized as either historically inconsequential or poetically second-rate. Best known of this group, perhaps, is the Contra Symmachum. Prudentius most likely assembled the final version of this two-book rebuttal of Symmachus’ defense of the altar of Victory in late 402, long after Symmachus had sent his famous relatio to Milan in 384. Yet, although Prudentius almost surely drafted parts of Contra Symmachum book one in the mid-390s, attention later in this chapter focuses on lines 42–407, a long section devoted to ridiculing the pagan gods and their myths, which could, in fact, have been composed almost any time during these years.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pagans and Christians in Late Antique Rome
Conflict, Competition, and Coexistence in the Fourth Century
, pp. 213 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkin, N.Juvenal and Jerome.” Classical Philology 89 (1994): 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandre, R. “Prudence et les trois poèmes anonymes de polémique anti-païenne: un manifeste caché pour une satire christianisée?” in P. Galand-Hallyn and V. Zarini, eds., Manifestes littéraires dans la latinité tardive: Poétique et rhétorique (Paris, 2009), 71–88.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
Barnes, T. Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality (Ithaca and London, 1998).Google Scholar
Bartalucci, A. <Contro i pagani> Carmen cod. Paris. lat. 8084 (Pisa, 1998).Google Scholar
Begley, R. “The Carmen ad quendam senatorem: Date, Milieu, and Tradition.” PhD diss. University of North Carolina (1984).
Blair-Dixon, K. “Damasus and the Fiction of Unity: The Urban Shrines of Saint Laurence,” in Guidobaldi, F. and Guidobaldi, A., eds. Ecclesiae Urbis: Atti del congresso internazionale di studi sulle chiese di Roma (Vatican City, 2002), 331–52.Google Scholar
Bogel, F. The Difference Satire Makes: Rhetoric and Reading from Jonson to Byron (Ithaca and London, 2001).Google Scholar
Braund, S. The Roman Satirists and Their Masks (London, 1996).Google Scholar
Bulson, E. “The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan (1963),” in K. Dettmar, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Bob Dylan (Cambridge, 2009), 125–30.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.Literary Allusions in the Historia Augusta.” Hermes 92 (1964): 363–77.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. The Last Pagans of Rome (New York and Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Cantwell, R. When We Were Good: The Folk Revival (Cambridge, MA, 1996).Google Scholar
Colton, R.Ausonius and Juvenal.” Classical Journal 69 (1973): 41–51.Google Scholar
Consolino, F. E. “Pagani, cristiani, e produzione letteraria latina da Giuliano l'Apostata al sacco di Roma,” in Franca E. Consolino, ed., Pagani e cristiani da Giuliano l'Apostata al sacco di Roma (Messina, 1995), 311–28.Google Scholar
Corsano, M.Un incontro problematico: cristiani e pagani in tre carmi adespoti.” Orpheus 21 (2000): 26–43.Google Scholar
Corsano, M. and Roberto Palla. Ps.-Paolino Nolano: <Poema Ultimum> (Pisa, 2002).Google Scholar
Corsano, M. Ps.-Cipriano: Ad un senatore convertitosi dalla religione cristiana alla schiavitù degli idoli (Pisa, 2006).Google Scholar
Cracco Ruggini, L. Il paganesimo romano tra religione e politica (384–394 d.C.): Per una reinterpretazione del “Carmen contra paganos.” Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei: Memorie. Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 8.23.1(Rome, 1979).Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. Aurelii Prudentii Clementis Carmina (Turnholt, 1966).Google Scholar
Dalton, D. Who Is that Man? In Search of the Real Bob Dylan (New York, 2012).Google Scholar
Davies, J. Rome's Religious History: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on Their Gods (Cambridge 2004).Google Scholar
Dettmar, K., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Bob Dylan (Cambridge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fariña, R. “Baez and Dylan: A Generation Singing Out.” Mademoiselle 59 (August 1964) reprinted in Thomson, E. and Gutman, D., eds., The Dylan Companion (Cambridge 2001), 81–8.Google Scholar
Filene, B. Romancing the Folk: Public Memory and American Roots Music (Chapel Hill and London, 2000).Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. Naissance de la poésie dans l'occident chrétien: Esquisse d'une histoire de la poésie latine chrétienne du IIIe au VIe siècle (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal (Cambridge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge and New York, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garambois-Vasquez, F. Les invectives de Claudien: Une poétique de la violence (Brussels, 2007).Google Scholar
Gilmore, M.Bob Dylan on His Dark New LP.” Rolling Stone 1163 (August 16, 2012): 15–16.Google Scholar
Goulon, A. “Les citations des poètes latins dans l'oeuvre de Lactance,” in Fontaine, J. and Perrin, M., eds. Lactance et son temps (Paris, 1978), 107–56.Google Scholar
Gray, M. Song and Dance Man III: The Art of Bob Dylan (London and New York, 2000).Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. The Poetry of Paulinus of Nola: A Study of His Latinity (Brussels, 1971).Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. The Works of Ausonius (Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. “The Libidinal Rhetoric of Satire,” in Freudenburg, K., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge and New York, 2005), 224–40.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. “Satire as Aristocratic Play,” in Freudenburg, K., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge and New York, 2005), 177–91.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study on the Apologists, Jerome and Other Christian Writers (Göteborg, 1958).Google Scholar
Harries, J.Prudentius and Theodosius.” Latomus 43 (1984): 69–84.Google Scholar
Heylin, C. Bob Dylan: Behind the Shades Revisited (New York, 2001).Google Scholar
Heylin, C. Revolution in the Air: The Songs of Bob Dylan, 1957–1973 (Chicago, 2009).Google Scholar
Heylin, C. Still on the Road: The Songs of Bob Dylan, 1974–2006 (Chicago, 2010).Google Scholar
Highet, G. Juvenal the Satirist: A Study (Oxford, 1954).Google Scholar
Hooley, D. Roman Satire (Malden and Oxford, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahlos, M. Vettius Agorius Praetextatus: A Senatorial Life in Between (Rome, 2002).Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. ed., The Faces of the Other: Religious Rivalry and Ethnic Encounters in the Later Roman World (Turnhout, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahlos, M. “The Shadow of the Shadow: Examining Fourth- and Fifth-Century Christian Depictions of Pagans,” in M. Kahlos, ed., The Faces of the Other (Turnhout, 2011), 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahlos, M “Who Is a Good Roman? Setting and Resetting Boundaries for Romans, Christians, Pagans, and Barbarians in the Later Roman Empire,” in M. Kahlos, ed., The Faces of the Other (Turnhout, 2011), 259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, C. Figuring Genre in Roman Satire (Oxford and New York, 2006).Google Scholar
Kelly, G. Ammianus Marcellinus: The Allusive Historian (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Knust, J. W. Abandoned to Lust: Sexual Slander and Ancient Christianity (New York, 2006).Google Scholar
Lomax, A., Guthrie, W., and Seeger, P.. Hard Hitting Songs for Hard-Hit People (Lincoln, 1999; original date of publication, 1967)Google Scholar
Long, J. Claudian's In Eutropium: Or, How, When, and Why to Slander a Eunuch (Chapel Hill and London, 1996).Google Scholar
Marie, S.Prudentius and Juvenal.” Phoenix 16 (1962): 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, R. “Paganism, Christianity, and the Latin Classics in the Fourth Century,” in J. W. Binns, ed., Latin Literature of the Fourth Century (London and Boston, 1974), 1–21.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. “The Letters of Symmachus,” in J. W. Binns, ed., Latin Literature of the Fourth Century (London and Boston, 1974), 58–99.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. “Paganism and Christianization,” in S. F. Johnson, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity (Oxford and New York, 2012), 849–75.Google Scholar
McGill, S. “Latin Poetry,” in S. F. Johnson, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity (Oxford and New York, 2012), 335–60.Google Scholar
McLynn, N.The Fourth-Century Taurobolium.” Phoenix 50 (1996): 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLynn, N. “Pagans in a Christian Empire,” in Rousseau, P., ed. A Companion to Late Antiquity (Malden and Oxford, 2009), 572–87.Google Scholar
Niquet, H. Monumenta Virtutum Titulique: Senatorische Selbstdarstellung im spätantiken Rom im Spiegel der epigraphischen Denkmäler (Stuttgart, 2000).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. The Library of Lactantius (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
Osborn, E. Tertullian, First Theologian of the West (Cambridge, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A.-M. Prudentius on the Martyrs (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
Petersen, A. K. “Othering in Paul: A Case Study of II Corinthians,” in M. Kahlos, ed., The Faces of the Other (Turnhout, 2011), 19–50.Google Scholar
Rauhala, M. “Devotion and Deviance: The Cult of Cybele and the Others Within,” in M. Kahlos, ed., The Faces of the Other (Turnhout, 2011), 51–82.Google Scholar
Ricks, C. Dylan's Visions of Sin (New York, 2004).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Rosenthal, S., eds. Pete Seeger in His Own Words (Boulder and London, 2012).Google Scholar
Ruggiero, A. Paolino di Nola: I carmi. Vol. I (Naples, 1996).Google Scholar
Sághy, M.Scinditur in partes populus: Pope Damasus and the Martyrs of Rome.” Early Medieval Europe 9 (2000): 273–87.Google Scholar
Sallmann, K., ed. Nouvelle histoire de la littérature latine, Vol. 4. L’âge de transition: De la littérature romaine à la littérature chrétienne de 117 à 284 apres J.-C. (Turnhout, 2000).Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. The Making of a Christian Aristocracy: Social and Religious Change in the Western Roman Empire (Cambridge and London, 2002).Google Scholar
Salzman, M. R. and Roberts, Michael. The Letters of Symmachus: Book 1 (Atlanta, 2011).Google Scholar
Shanzer, D.The Date and Composition of Prudentius’ Contra orationem Symmachi libri.” Rivista di filologia e d'istruzione classica 117 (1989): 442–62.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Z. “What a Difference a Difference Makes,” in Neusner, J. and Frerichs, E. S., ed., “To See Ourselves as Others See Us”: Christians, Jews, “Others” in Late Antiquity (Chico, 1985): 3–48.Google Scholar
Sogno, C. Q. Aurelius Symmachus: A Political Biography (Ann Arbor, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, G. The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas (New York, 1933).Google Scholar
Thomson, H. J. Prudentius: Volume II (Cambridge and London, 1949).Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. “Q. Septimius Florens Tertullianus,” in K. Sallmann, ed., Nouvelle histoire de la littérature latine, Vol. 4. L’âge de transition: De la littérature romaine à la littérature chrétienne de 117 à 284 apres J.-C. (Turnhout, 2000), 494–571.Google Scholar
Trout, D.The Dates of the Ordination of Paulinus of Bordeaux and of his Departure for Nola.” Revue des Études Augustiniennes 37 (1991): 237–60.Google Scholar
Trout, D. Paulinus of Nola: Life, Letters, and Poems (Berkeley, 1999).Google Scholar
Trout, D.The Verse Epitaph(s) of Petronius Probus: Competitive Commemoration in Late-Fourth-Century Rome.” New England Classical Journal 28 (2001): 157–76.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. The Poems of Paulinus of Nola (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
Walters, J.Making a Spectacle: Deviant Men, Invective, and Pleasure.” Arethusa 31 (1998): 355–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, C. Claudian and the Roman Epic Tradition (Cambridge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. Saint Augustine: Soliloquies and Immortality of the Soul (Warminster, 1990).Google Scholar
Weston, A. Latin Satirical Writing Subsequent to Juvenal (Lancaster, 1915).Google Scholar
Wiesel, E. Legends of Our Time (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Wiesen, D. St. Jerome as a Satirist: A Study in Christian Latin Thought and Letters (Ithaca and New York, 1964).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×