Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- 1 The imbalances and limitations of theory and research on organizational wrongdoing
- 2 On taking the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously: a meta-conversation
- 3 Wrong paths to right: defining morality with or without a clear red line
- 4 From market enablers to market participants: redefining organizational and political-legal arrangements and opportunities for financial wrongdoing,1930s–2000
- 5 Wrongdoing and market development: an examination of the distinct roles of trust and distrust
- 6 Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: a “boundaries” perspective on professional misconduct
- 7 S/he blinded me with science: the sociology of scientific misconduct
- 8 Social networks and organizational wrongdoing in context
- 9 Falling stars: celebrity, infamy, and the fall from (and return to) grace
- 10 Compensation and employee misconduct: the inseparability of productive and counterproductive behavior in firms
- 11 Beware of organizational saints: how a moral self-concept may foster immoral behavior
- 12 “Is it me? Or is it me?” The role of coactivated multiple identities and identifications in promoting or discouraging workplace crimes
- 13 Consequences of organizational misconduct: too much and too little punishment
- 14 Who bears the brunt? A review and research agenda for the consequences of organizational wrongdoing for individuals
- 15 Organizational wrongdoing and media bias
- 16 Ethical learning: releasing the moral unicorn
- Index
- References
2 - On taking the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously: a meta-conversation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- 1 The imbalances and limitations of theory and research on organizational wrongdoing
- 2 On taking the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously: a meta-conversation
- 3 Wrong paths to right: defining morality with or without a clear red line
- 4 From market enablers to market participants: redefining organizational and political-legal arrangements and opportunities for financial wrongdoing,1930s–2000
- 5 Wrongdoing and market development: an examination of the distinct roles of trust and distrust
- 6 Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: a “boundaries” perspective on professional misconduct
- 7 S/he blinded me with science: the sociology of scientific misconduct
- 8 Social networks and organizational wrongdoing in context
- 9 Falling stars: celebrity, infamy, and the fall from (and return to) grace
- 10 Compensation and employee misconduct: the inseparability of productive and counterproductive behavior in firms
- 11 Beware of organizational saints: how a moral self-concept may foster immoral behavior
- 12 “Is it me? Or is it me?” The role of coactivated multiple identities and identifications in promoting or discouraging workplace crimes
- 13 Consequences of organizational misconduct: too much and too little punishment
- 14 Who bears the brunt? A review and research agenda for the consequences of organizational wrongdoing for individuals
- 15 Organizational wrongdoing and media bias
- 16 Ethical learning: releasing the moral unicorn
- Index
- References
Summary
As the large number of review articles in recent memory demonstrates, research on behavioral ethics in organizations has exploded (e.g., Bazerman and Gino 2012; Kish-Gephart, Harrison, and Treviño 2010; Tenbrunsel and Smith-Crowe 2008; Treviño, den Nieuwenboer, and Kish-Gephart 2014; Treviño, Weaver, and Reynolds 2006; Weaver, Reynolds, and Brown 2014). Scholars in this area focus on individuals’ ethical judgments, decisions, and behaviors, particularly those relevant to organizations. Treviño and colleagues (2014) trace the beginnings of this field to the 1980s and describe the overall endeavor like this: “Most research in the field begins with the premise that ethical behavior in organizations is good and unethical behavior is bad, and that understanding the predictors of each can help organizations produce more of the former and less of the latter” (p. 637). We find this description to be not only apt but also illuminating. It highlights something that those of us working in this area seem to take for granted: our theoretical focus should be on the predictor side of the model. While we struggle to achieve a degree of parsimony out of the kaleidoscope of possibilities on the predictor side of the equation, we tend to keep things simple on the criterion side (i.e., the outcomes we study). There is ethical and unethical. Usually, we focus on predicting unethical outcomes.
The cost of relative inattention to theory development on the criterion side is ultimately an impoverishment of theory more generally. We often vaguely refer to “unethical” behavior without acknowledging the potential for conceptual complexity. Such complexity surely holds implications for theorizing on the predictor side. In the long run, we cannot expect our theories to systematically connect predictors with outcomes when we have not specified the nature of the outcomes. Our contention is that, to the end of systematic theorizing, as a field we should take the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously, meaning that we should focus theory development not only on the predictor side of the equation but also on the criterion side.
In order to support our contention, we report the results of a somewhat unconventional literature review. First, we review the outcomes employed by those studying behavioral ethics in organizations. Though there are numerous reviews to date, they are organized around the predictors of unethical outcomes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Organizational WrongdoingKey Perspectives and New Directions, pp. 17 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
2013. Manufacturing Morals: The Values of Silence in Business School Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
and
2012. “Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science
8: 85–104.Google Scholar
and
2010. “In favor of clear thinking: Incorporating moral rules into a wise cost–benefit analysis – Commentary on Bennis, Medin, & Bartels,” Perspective on Psychological Science
5: 209–212.Google Scholar
, , and
2010a. “The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules,” Perspectives on Psychological Science
5: 187–202.Google Scholar
, , and
2010b. “Perspectives on the ecology of decision modes: Reply to comments,” Perspectives on Psychological Science
5: 213–215.Google Scholar
and in press. “Organizations matter,” in (ed.), The Social Psychology of Good and Evil (edn.). New York: Guilford Press.
, , and
2014. “The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty,” Administrative Science Quarterly
59: 705–735.Google Scholar
and
1987. The Measurement of Moral Judgment, Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
, , , and
1983. “A longitudinal study of moral development,” Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development
28: 1–96.Google Scholar
and
2014. “Locomotion concerns with moral usefulness: When liberals endorse conservative binding moral foundations,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
50: 109–117.Google Scholar
, , , and
2014. “Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
40: 1559–1573.Google Scholar
, , and
2015. “Moralized leadership: The construction and consequences of ethical leader perceptions,” Academy of Management Review
40: 182–209.Google Scholar
1992. “Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations,” Psychological Review
99: 689–723.Google Scholar
and
2010. “Who is with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decision making in organizations,” Academy of Management Journal
53: 1074–1089.Google Scholar
, , and
2015. “Liberals condemn sacrilege too: The harmless desecration of Cerro Torre,” Social Psychological and Personality Science
6: 878–886.Google Scholar
2009. Lawrence Kohlberg – An Introduction. Opladen & Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
1993. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1982).
2005. “Deception: The role of consequences,” The American Economic Review
95: 384–394.Google Scholar
2015. “Explaining away differences in moral judgment: Comment on Gray and Kenney,” Social Psychological and Personality Science
6(8): 869–873.Google Scholar
, , , , , , and
2012. “Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
47: 55–130.Google Scholar
, , and
2009. “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
96: 1029–1046.Google Scholar
, , , , , and
2011. “Mapping the moral domain,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
101: 366–385.Google Scholar
and
2015. “Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality,” Social Psychological and Personality Science
6(8): 859–868.Google Scholar
and
2015. “Disconfirming moral foundations theory in its own terms: Reply to Graham 2015,” Social Psychological and Personality Science
6(8): 874–877.Google Scholar
, , and
2014. “The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
143(4): 1600–1615.Google Scholar
2001. “The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment,” Psychological Review
108: 814–834.Google Scholar
and
2007. “When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize,” Social Justice Research
20(1): 98–116.Google Scholar
and
2004. “Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues,” Daedalus
133(4): 55–66.Google Scholar
, , and
1993. “Affect, culture and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
65: 613–628.Google Scholar
1991. “Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model,” Academy of Management Review
16: 366–395.Google Scholar
1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row (Original work published in 1785).
1995. How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. New York: Fireside.
, , and
2010. “Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work,” Journal of Applied Psychology
95(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
1963. “Moral development and identification,” in (ed.), Child Psychology; 62nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1976. “Moral stages and moral development: The cognitive-developmental approach,” in (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues: 31–53. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
, , , , and
2012. “Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments,” Academy of Management Journal
55: 1316–1333.Google Scholar
and
2014. “Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
53: 107–117.Google Scholar
and
2015. “Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
126: 88–106.Google Scholar
, , and
2008. “The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance,” Journal of Marketing Research
45(6): 633–644.Google Scholar
, , and
2007. “Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate,” Review of General Psychology
11: 99–111.Google Scholar
and
2015. “Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work,” The Academy of Management Annals
9: 235–289.Google Scholar
2012. Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
and
2015. “What is a ‘fair’ price? Ethics as sensemaking,” Organization Science
26(3): 867–888.Google Scholar
1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.
and
1999. “Protected values and omission bias,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
79: 79–94.Google Scholar
2010. “The limits of cost-benefit calculation: Commentary on Binnis, Medin, & Bartels (2010),” Perspectives on Psychological Science
5: 203–205.Google Scholar
and
2010. Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to Do the Right Thing. New York: Riverhead Books.
and
1990. “Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
58: 878–891.Google Scholar
, , , and
1997. “The ‘big three’ of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the ‘big three’ explanations of suffering,” in and (eds.), Morality and Health: 119–169. New York: Routledge.
, , , and
2014. “The moral ties that bind … even to outgroups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding foundations,” Psychological Science
25: 1554–1562.Google Scholar
and
2014. “The emotion-evoked collective corruption model: The role of emotion in the spread of corruption within organizations,” Organization Science
25: 1154–1171.Google Scholar
2007. “The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model,” Academy of Management Review
32: 1022–1040.Google Scholar
2009. “Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation,” Organization Science
20: 223–239.Google Scholar
in press. “Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: Some tales from the past and guidelines for the future,” Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.
2015. “Making government logical,” The New York Times, September 15.
and
2008. “Ethical decision making: Where we've been and where we're going,” Academy of Management Annals
2: 545–607.Google Scholar
2002. “Social-functionalist metaphors for judgment and choice: The intuitive politician, theologian, and prosecutor,” Psychological Review
109: 451–472.Google Scholar
and
2010. “Situated social identities constrain morally defensible choices: Commentary on Binnis, Medin, C Bartels (2010),” Perspectives on Psychological Science
5: 206–208.Google Scholar
, , and
2014. “(Un)ethical behavior in organizations,” Annual Review of Psychology
65: 635–660.Google Scholar
, , and
2006. “Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review,” Journal of Management
32(6): 951–990.Google Scholar
and
2007. “Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur's quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development,” Academy of Management Journal
50: 769–774.Google Scholar
and
2008. “Deciding what's right: The role of external sanctions and embarrassment in shaping moral judgments in the workplace,” Research in Organizational Behavior
28: 81–105.Google Scholar
, , and
2014. “Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice,” Journal of Management
40: 100–129.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by