Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: September 2009

11 - The long and winding road to the Government Procurement Agreement: Korea's accession experience


In every country, the government provides public services such as defense, administration, education, and infrastructure to its citizens. In providing these public services, government agencies engage in public procurement of goods and services. The procurement expenditures in a country are always quite a large share of total government expenditures, which often represent a significant share of gross domestic product (GDP). As one would expect, therefore, the size of the world government procurement market is huge. The world's total potential non-defense government procurement market is estimated to be close to $1.5 trillion a year.

It is important for a country to set up an good system of government procurement in order to ensure an efficient allocation of its limited government resources, which come mostly from taxes collected from its citizens. Governments have in fact developed formal rules and procedures in an effort to achieve efficiency in government procurement. Because of their nature, however, government purchases are somewhat different from those of private entities. Public entities are generally believed to be less efficient in purchasing goods and services than private entities. In fact, some researchers have found empirically that, by introducing more competitive tendering and outsourcing from the private sector to the process of government procurement, governments could save 20 percent or more without loss of quality in the goods and services being purchased (see Domberger, Hall, and Li 1995).

APEC–GPEG (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation–Government Procurement Experts Group) (1998), “Non-binding principles on government procurement”, Singapore: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat
Baldwin, R. and Richardson, J. D. (1972), “Government purchasing policies, other Non-tariff barriers, and the international monetary crisis”, in English, H. and Hay, K. (eds.), Obstacles to Trade in the Pacific Area, Ottawa: Carleton School of International Affairs
Choi, I. (1992), Trade Barriers in Government Procurement Practices of Developed Countries, KIEP Policy Study Series 92–22 (in Korean), Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy
Choi, I. (1993), “Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation issues in government procurement”, in Trade Liberalization in the APEC, KIEP Policy Study Series 93–33 (in Korean), Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy
Domberger, S., Hall, C., andAh Lik Li, E.(1995), “The determinants of price and quality in competitively tendered contracts”, Economic Journal 105: 1454–1470
Evenett, S. and Hoekman, B. (1999), “Government procurement of services: assessing the case for multilateral disciplines”, paper presented at the conference “General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization”, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, June 1–2
Hoekman, B.(1998), “Using international institutions to improve public procurement”, World Bank Research Observer 13 (2): 249–269
Korea Foreign Trade Association (1993), Korea's Accession to the Government Procurement Agreement, Its Impact on Domestic Industry, and Measures to Reform the Procurement System (in Korean), Seoul
Korea Foreign Trade Association and Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (1992), Government Procurement Agreement Expansion Negotiations and Korea's Accession Strategy (in Korean), Seoul
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1995), “Political economy of corruption”, Viewpoint 74, Washington, DC: World Bank, Private Sector and Infrastructure Network
Supply Administration of the Republic of Korea (Supply Administration of the Republic of Korea) (1999), 50-Year History of Supply Administration of the Republic of Korea (in Korean), Seoul
Wade, R.(1982), “The system of administrative and political corruption: canal irrigation in South India”, Journal of Development Studies 18: 287–327
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization) (1998), Annual Report of the Committee on Government Procurement, Geneva: World Trade Organization
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization) (1999), Annual Report of the Committee on Government Procurement, Geneva: World Trade Organization