Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T16:07:20.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consolidated Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Mark Pieth
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Lucinda A. Low
Affiliation:
Steptoe and Johnson LLP
Nicola Bonucci
Affiliation:
OECD
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The OECD Convention on Bribery
A Commentary
, pp. 783 - 818
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbell, M. (2010), Obtaining Evidence Abroad in Criminal Cases, Leiden/BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (2002), ‘Values and Interests: International Legalization in the Fight Against Corruption’, 31 Journal of Legal Studies141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acquaviva, G. (2003), ‘Il Foreign Corrupt Practices Act statunitense e il dilemma della lotta alla corruzione internazionale: azione unilaterale o cooperazione multilaterale?’ in Sacerdoti, G. (ed.), Responsabilità d'impresa e strumenti internazionali anticorruzione, Milan, 167Google Scholar
Aiolfi, G. and Ledergerber, Z. (2005), Glossary of International Anti-Corruption Standards with Examples of National Legal Practice, paper prepared for the sixth General Meeting Anti-Corruption Network for Transitional Economies in Istanbul, 30–31 May 2005
Aiolfi, G. and Pieth, M. (2002), ‘How to Make a Convention Work: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Recommendation and Convention on Bribery as an Example of a New Horizon in International Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden/Boston, 349Google Scholar
Aiolfi, G. and Pieth, M. (2005), ‘International Aspects of Corporate Liability and Corruption’ in Tully, S. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK)/Northhampton (US), 689Google Scholar
Robinson, Allens Arthur (2008), ‘Corporate Culture’ as a basis for the Criminal Liability of Corporations: Report for the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General on Human Rights and Business
Androulakis, I. N. (2007), Die Globalisierung der Korruptionsbekämpfung, Eine Untersuchung zur Entstehung, zum Inhalt und zu den Auswirkungen des internationalen Korruptionsstrafrechts unter Berücksichtigung der sozialökonomischen Hintergründe, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
Arlen, J. and Kraakman, R. (1997), ‘Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes’, 72 New York University Law Review687Google Scholar
Arnull, A. M., Dashwood, A. A., Ross, M. G. and Wyatt, D. A. (2000), Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Law, 4th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
Arsava, A. F. (1999), ‘Zypernkonflikt unter Berücksichtigung des Völkerrechts’ in Bundesministerium für Landesverteidigung (ed.), Jahrbuch für internationale Sicherheitspolitik, Vienna, also available at > Sicherheitspolitik > Publikationen > AutorenGoogle Scholar
Arzt, G. (1990), ‘Erfolgsdelikt und Tätigkeitsdelikt’, 107 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht168Google Scholar
Arzt, G. (2010), ‘Siemens: Vom teuersten zum lukrativsten Kriminalfall der deutschen Geschichte’ in Jahn, M., Kudlich, H. and Streng, F. (eds.), Strafrechtspraxis und Reform, Festschrift für Heinz Stöckel zum 70. Geburtstag, Berlin, 15Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. (2002), ‘Sentencing’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford, 1076Google Scholar
Aust, A. (2000), The Modern Treaty Law and Practice, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Baker, E. (2004), ‘Guilty Pleas, Diversion and Consensual Disposition: England and Wales’ in Eser, A. and Rabenstein, C. (eds.), Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, 381Google Scholar
Baker, E. (2013), ‘Sentencing Guidelines and European Union Law’ in Ashworth, A. and Roberts, J. V. (eds.), Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model, Oxford, 254Google Scholar
Balmelli, M. (1996), Die Bestechungstatbestände des schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches, BernGoogle Scholar
Bassiouni, M. (1974), International Extradition and World Public Order, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Beale, S. S. (2009), ‘A Response to the Critics of Corporate Criminal Liability’, 46 American Criminal Law Review1481Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1766), Dei delitti e delle pene, 5th edn, HaarlemGoogle Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1988), Über Verbrechen und Strafen (nach der Ausgabe von 1766 übersetzt und herausgegeben von W. Alff), Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1998), Was ist Globalisierung?, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Bell, R. E. (2001), ‘Discretion and Decision Making in Money Laundering Prosecutions’, 5(1) Journal of Money Laundering Control42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, P. (1995), New Criminal Law Provisions Against the Corruption of Public Officials, Multidisciplinary Group on Corruption (GMC), Council of Europe, 5
Bernasconi, P. (ed.) (2000), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice, updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996, NaplesGoogle Scholar
Bertossa, C. A. (2003), Unternehmensstrafrecht – Strafprozess und Sanktionen, BernGoogle Scholar
Bertossa, B. (2004), ‘Mechanisms for Gathering Evidence Abroad’ in Asian Development Bank (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (key papers by speakers at the Fourth Regional Conference of the ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur, 3–5 December 2003), available at
Bertossa, B. (2005), ‘Octroi d'avantages indus à des agents publics étrangers: corruption ou extorsion?’, 8 Secure-Finance, Prévention des risques et sécurité financière24Google Scholar
Bindschedler, R. L. (1995), ‘International Organisations, General Aspects’ in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Amsterdam, Vol. 2, 1289Google Scholar
Black, J. (2001), ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, 54 Current Legal Problems4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakesley, Ch. L. (1992), Terrorism, Drugs, International Law, and the Protection of Human Liberty: A Comparative Study of International Law, its Nature, Role, and Impact in Matters of Terrorism, Drug Trafficking, War, and Extradition, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Blakesley, Ch. L. (1999), ‘Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction’ in Bassiouni, M., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn, New York, 33Google Scholar
Bliss, J. C. and Spak, G. J. (1989), ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1988: Clarification or Evisceration?’, 20 Law and Policy in International Business441Google Scholar
Blokker, N. and Muller, S. (1994), ‘Towards More Effective Supervision by International Organizations: Some Concluding Observations’ in Blokker, N. and Muller, S. (eds.), Towards More Effective Supervision by International Organizations. Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers, Dordrecht, Vol. 1Google Scholar
Boch, C. (2000), EC Law in the UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
Bonvin, J. and Morrisson, C. (1998), L'organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDE), ParisGoogle Scholar
Böse, M. (2005), Wirtschaftsaufsicht und Strafverfolgung: Die verfahrensübergreifende Verwendung von Informationen und die Grund- und Verfahrensrechte des Einzelnen, TübingenGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. L. (1999), ‘Parent-Subsidiary Liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’ in American Bar Association (ed.), The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: How to Comply under the New Amendments and the OECD Convention, Chicago, F1–51Google Scholar
Brütsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2005), Hard, Soft and Private Legalities: The Increase, Variation and Differentiation of Law-Like Arrangements in International Relations (unpublished manuscript)
Burns, D. and Sullivan, E. (2009), ‘Navigating the FCPA's Complex Scienter Requirements’, Bloomberg Finance L.P., 1 April 2009
Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft (2005), FCPA Newsletter, March, June and July edns (available at )
Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft (2007), FCPA Advisor, May edn
Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft (2010), FCPA Advisor, November edn
Cartier-Bresson, J. (2000), ‘The Causes and Consequences of Corruption: Economic Analyses and Lessons Learnt’ in OECD (ed.), No Longer Business as Usual, Paris, 11Google Scholar
Cassani, U. (1996), ‘Die Anwendung des schweizerischen Strafrechts auf internationale Wirtschaftsdelikte (Art. 3–7 StGB)’, 114 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht237Google Scholar
Cassani, U. (2010), ‘Grenzüberschreitende Korruption – Internationale Zuständigkeit der schweizerischen Strafjustiz’ in Ackermann, J.-B. and Wohlers, W. (eds.), Korruption in Staat und Wirtschaft, Zurich, 17Google Scholar
Chavranski, H. (1997), L'OCDE au coeur des grands débats économiques, ParisGoogle Scholar
Chiavario, M. (2002), ‘Private Parties: The Rights of the Defendant and the Victim’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 541Google Scholar
Chilton, B. (2005), ‘Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ in Compliance Week: Columns and Editorials, January 2005
Clark, P. B. and Suprenant, J. (2009), ‘Siemens – Potential Interplay of FCPA Charges and Mandatory Debarment under the Public Procurement Directive of the European Union’, ABA White Collar Conference, available at
Clough, J. (2002), ‘Sentencing the Corporate Offender: The Neglected Dimension of Corporate Criminal Liability’ in Clough, J. and Mulhern, C. (eds.), The Prosecution of Corporations, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, L. (1999), Implementation of the OECD Convention: The Conditions for Success, available at
Coeurdray, M. (2003), Du dévoilement médiatique de la ‘corruption’ à la gestion déontologique des affaires (dissertation/thesis), ParisGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. (1981), ‘No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick: An Unscandalised Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment’, 79 Michigan Law Review386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. (1999), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: An Introduction and Comparative Survey’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 9Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A. (1996), ‘Theories of Punishment and Empirical Trends in Corporate Criminal Sanctions’, 17 Managerial and Decision Economics3993.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M. et al. (2008), ‘Under the FCPA, Who is a Foreign Official Anyway?’, 63 Business Lawyer1243Google Scholar
Cole, G. F. (1995), The American System of Criminal Justice, 7th edn, BelmontGoogle Scholar
Connor, J. (2006), ‘Effectiveness of Antitrust Sanctions on Modern International Cartels’, 6 Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, C. F. and Lawler, J. (1999), ‘Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't? The OECD Convention and the Globalization of Anti-Bribery Measures’, 32 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law1252Google Scholar
Courtney, C. (2002), ‘Corruption in the Official Arms Trade’ in Transparency International (ed.), Policy Research Paper 001, Sutton, available at Google Scholar
Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (1995), EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Craufurd Smith, R. (1999), ‘Remedies for Breaches of EC Law in National Courts: Legal Variation and Selection’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, 287Google Scholar
Craven, M. (2010), ‘Statehood, Self-Determination, and Recognition’ in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, 3rd edn, Oxford, 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. (2012), Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 8th edn, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, R. (2005), ‘The Schengen Acquis in Police Cooperation: Implementation in an Enlarged Europe’, 3 ERA-Forum, Trier, 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutchfield George, B., Lacey, K. A. and Birmele, J. (1999), ‘On the Threshold of the Adoption of Global Anti-Bribery Legislation: A Critical Analysis of Current Domestic and International Efforts Toward the Reduction of Business Corruption’, 32 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law1Google Scholar
Crutchfield George, B., Lacey, K. A. and Birmele, J. (2000), ‘The 1998 OECD Convention: An Impetus for Worldwide Changes in Attitudes Toward Corruption in Business Transactions’, 37 American Business Law Journal485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daams, C. (2003), Criminal Asset Forfeiture: One of the Most Effective Weapons Against (Organised) Crime?, BaselGoogle Scholar
Dahm, G., Delbrück, J. and Wolfrum, R. (1989), Völkerrecht, 2nd edn, Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. E. (1999), ‘National Treaty Law and Practice: United States’ in Leigh, M., Blakeslee, M. R. and Ederington, L. B. (eds.), National Treaty Law and Practice (Austria, Chile, Japan, Netherlands and the US), Washington DC, available at Google Scholar
Dannacher, M. (2012), Diktatorengelder in der Schweiz, Einziehung und Herausgabe von unrechtmässig erworbenen Vermögenswerten politisch exponierter Personen, BaselGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. N. (2008), ‘The Role of Agents and other Intermediaries’ in Heimann, F. and Vincke, F. (eds.), Fighting Corruption: International Corporate Integrity Handbook, Paris, 53Google Scholar
De Maglie, C. (2011), ‘Societas Delinquere Potest? The Italian Solution’ in Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckert, K. (2011), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in France’ in Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, R. (2009), ‘Congressional Legislation: The Next Step for Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreements’, 93 Marquette Law Review875Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (1994), ‘Die Strafbarkeit juristischer Personen nach dem neuen französischen Code Pénal’ in Schünemann, B. and González, C. S. (eds.), Bausteine des europäischen Wirtschaftsstrafrechts, Madrid-Symposium für Klaus Tiedemann, Köln/Berlin/Bonn/Munich, 305Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (1998), Trois défis pour un droit mondial, ParisGoogle Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2002), Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (ed.) (1997), Corpus Juris: Introducing Penal Provisions for the Purpose of the Financial Interests of the European Union, ParisGoogle Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. A. E. (eds.) (2000), The Implementation of Corpus Juris in the Member States, Antwerp, Groningen, Oxford, Vol. 1Google Scholar
Dietrich, O. (1998), ‘OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials in International Business Transactions’, 3 Austrian Review of International and European Law159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMento, J. F. C. and Geis, G. (2005), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in the United States’ in Tully, S. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK)/Northhampton (US), 159Google Scholar
Distefano, G. (1994), ‘La pratique subséquente des états parties à un traité’, XL Annuaire français de droit international41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M. and McCorquodale, R. (1991), Cases and Materials on International Law, LondonGoogle Scholar
Doehring, K. (2004), Völkerrecht, 2nd edn, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Dommel, D. (1999), Les défis de la corruption (working paper)
Douglas-Scott, S. (2002), Constitutional Law of the European Union, HarlowGoogle Scholar
D'Souza, A. (2009), The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention: Changing the Currents of Trade, On-line Working Paper Series, California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Ehrmann, M. (2002), ‘Procedures of Compliance Control in International Environmental Treaties’, 13 Colorado Journal of International Law and Policy, 377Google Scholar
Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.) (1999), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. (1993), Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1999), ‘The Basis for Criminal Responsibility of Collective Entities in Canada’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 153Google Scholar
Fisse, B. (1991), ‘The Attribution of Criminal Liability to Corporations: A Statutory Model’, 13 Sydney Law Review277Google Scholar
Fisse, B. (1993), ‘Rethinking Criminal Responsibility in a Corporate Society: An Accountability Model’ in Grabosky, P. and Braithwaite, J. (eds.), Business Regulation and Australia's Future, Canberra, ch. 18Google Scholar
Fisse, B. and Braithwaite, J. (1988), ‘The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability’, 11 Sydney Law Review468Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, P. (2011), Les dispositifs juridiques internationaux de lutte contre la corruption des agents publics étrangers, ToulonGoogle Scholar
Forti, G. (2000), ‘Remarks on the Role of Criminal Sanction in a Sustainable Prevention of Crimes in the Public Administration: The Italian Experience of Systemic Corruption’ in Bernasconi, P. (ed.), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice, updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996, Naples, 173Google Scholar
Frowein, J. A. (1968), Das de facto Regime im Völkerrecht, Köln/BerlinGoogle Scholar
Gareis, R. J. (1999), ‘The 1998 Amendments to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Comparative and Pragmatic Analysis of, and with, the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials’, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), A-1013
Geradin, D. and Henry, D. (2005), The EC Fining Policy for Violations of Competition Law: An Empirical Review of the Commission Decisional Practice and the Community Courts’ Judgments, Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC), Working Paper 03/05
Gilbert, G. (1991), Aspects of Extradition Law, Dordrecht/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, G. (1996), ‘Crimes Sans Frontières: Jurisdictional Problems in English Law’ in Dugard, J. and van den Wyngaert, (eds.), International Criminal Law and Procedure, Aldershot/Brookfield (US)/Singapore/Sydney, 101Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. (1998), Transnational Fugitive Offenders in International Law, Extradition and Other Mechanisms, The Hague/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, W. C. (ed.) (1995), Mutual Assistance in Criminal and Business Regulatory Matters, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, W. C. (2011), Dirty Money: The Evolution of International Measures to Counter Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, 4th edn, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, G.-J. (2003), Sicherheit in Freiheit: Die Schutzfunktion des demokratischen Staates und die Freiheit der Bürger, OpladenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gless, S. (2011), Internationales Strafrecht, BaselGoogle Scholar
Gless, S. (2012), ‘Interpol’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Gobert, J. (1998), ‘Controlling Corporate Criminality: Penal Sanctions and Beyond’, 2 Webjournal of Current Legal IssuesGoogle Scholar
Göhler, E., König, P. and Seitz, H. (2002), Gesetz über Ordnungswidrigkeiten, Beck'sche Kurz-Kommentare, 13th edn, MunichGoogle Scholar
Gordon, G. (2000), The Criminal Law of Scotland, 3rd edn, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Gossin, P. (2004), ‘Récents accords bilatéraux et le rôle de l'Office fédéral de la justice’ in Gani, R. (ed.), Récents développements en matière d'entraide civile, pénale et administrative, Lausanne, 143Google Scholar
Guilmette, J.-H. (2004) [cited Guilmette 2004a], The Power of Peer Pressure: Development Co-operation Among Nations Using OECD and IDRC Network Approach (unpublished manuscript)
Guilmette, J.-H. (2004) [cited Guilmette 2004b], Peer Pressure Power: Development Cooperation and Networks – Making Use of Methods and Know-How from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), OttawaGoogle Scholar
Gurulé, J. and Guerra, S. (1998), The Law of Asset Forfeiture, CharlottevilleGoogle Scholar
Hafiez, M. (2004), ‘Mutual Legal Assistance and Repatriation of Proceeds: Pakistan's Experience’ in Asian Development Bank (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (key papers by speakers at the Fourth Regional Conference of the ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur, 3–5 December 2003), available at
Hailbronner, K. and Kau, M. (2010), ‘Der Staat und der Einzelne als Völkerrechtssubjekte’ in Vitzthum, W. (ed.), Völkerrecht, 5th edn, Berlin/New York, 156Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. (2005), ‘Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters in Ireland and the Proposed European Evidence Warrant’, ERA-Forum Special Issue, Trier, 53Google Scholar
Harari, M. (2011), ‘Quelle coopération internationale dans la lutte contre la corruption?’ in Cassani, U. et al. (eds.), Lutte contre la corruption internationale, The Never Ending Story, Geneva, 107Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2012), ‘The Free Rider Problem’ in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at
Hasnas, J. (2009), ‘The Centenary of a Mistake: One Hundred Years of Corporate Criminal Liability’, 46 American Criminal Law Review1329Google Scholar
Haufler, V. (2001), A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Hawley, S. (2003), Turning a Blind Eye: Corruption and the UK Export Credits Guarantee Department, Sturminster NewtonGoogle Scholar
Heimann, F. (2008), ‘ICC Rules of Conduct and the OECD Convention’ in Heimann, F. and Vincke, F. (eds.), Fighting Corruption: International Corporate Integrity Handbook, Paris, 11Google Scholar
Heimann, F., Dell, G., Sng-Sachsenroeder, A. and Whittier, N. (2005), Transparency International Progress Report: Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, 21 January 2005
Heimann, F. and Mohn, C. (1999), ‘Die Rolle der Privatwirtschaft bei der Bekämpfung der Korruption’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Heimann, F. and Vincke, F. (eds.) (2008), Fighting Corruption: International Corporate Integrity Handbook, ParisGoogle Scholar
Heine, G. (1995), Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Unternehmen, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
Heine, G. (1999), ‘Sanctions in the Field of Corporate Criminal Liability’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 237Google Scholar
Heine, G. (2000), Corporate Liability Rules in Civil Law Jurisdictions, OECD Room Document (DAFFE/IME/BR(2000)23), ParisGoogle Scholar
Heine, G. (2001), ‘Europäische Entwicklungen bei der strafrechtlichen Verantwortlichkeit von Wirtschaftsunternehmen und deren Führungskräften’, 119 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht22Google Scholar
Heine, G. (2003), ‘Das kommende Unternehmensstrafrecht (Art. 100quater et seq.)’, 121 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht24Google Scholar
Heine, G. (2010), Commentary on section 331 in Schönke, A. and Schröder, H. (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch, 28th edn, Munich, 2900Google Scholar
Heine, G., Huber, B. and Rose, T. O. (2003), Private Commercial Bribery: A Comparison of National and Supranational Legal Structures, Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar
Heineman, B. W. and Heimann, F. (2007), ‘Arrested Development: The Fight Against International Corporate Bribery’, The National Interest, November/December, 80
Heinze, C. (1997), ‘Zur Frage der Vereinbarkeit der Aufnahme von Zypern in die Europäische Union mit dem Völkerrecht, dem Recht der EU und den Zypern-Verträgen von 1959/60, Kurzgutachten der Republik Türkei’, available at
Henzelin, M. (2005), ‘“Ne bis in idem”: un principe à géométrie variable’, 123 Revue Pénale Suisse345Google Scholar
Herdegen, M. (2012), Völkerrecht, 11th edn, MunichGoogle Scholar
Hillier, T. (1998), Sourcebook on Public International Law, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hines, J. R. (1995), Forbidden Payment: Foreign Bribery and American Business After 1977, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5266, available at
Hodgson Committee (1984), Profits of Crime and their Recovery: The Report of a Committee Chaired by Sir Derek Hodgson, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, R. and Wyser, J. (2010), ‘Going East: Korruptionsbedingte Risiken für Unternehmen und Mitarbeiter’, Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht 24
Horn, F. (1988), Reservations and Interpretative Declarations to Multilateral Treaties, Amsterdam/OxfordGoogle Scholar
Huber, B. (2002), ‘Sanctions Against Bribery Offences in Criminal Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden/Boston, 137Google Scholar
Huet, A. and Koering-Joulin, R. (2005), Droit pénal international, 3rd edn, ParisGoogle Scholar
Janis, M., Kay, R. and Bradley, A. (2000), European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials, 2nd edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jean-Pierre, T. (2003), Taiwan Connection: Scandales et meurtres au coeur de la République, ParisGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R. (2001), ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct, Self-Regulation in a Global Economy’, UN Research Institute for Social Development 21
Jescheck, H. H. and Weigend, T. (1996), Lehrbuch des Strafrechts: Allgemeiner Teil, 5th edn, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Jung, H. (1979), ‘Die Inlandsteilnahme an ausländischer strafloser Haupttat. Regelungsgehalt und Problematik des § 9 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StGB’, Juristenzeitschrift 325
Jung, H. (1986), ‘Legalität oder Opportunität im Strafverfahren?’ in Prütting, H. (ed.), Recht und Gesetz im Dialog III, Köln, 55Google Scholar
Kaiafa-Gbandi, M. (2012), ‘The Commission's Proposal for a Directive on the Fight Against Fraud to the Union's Financial Interests by Means of Criminal Law (COM(2012)363 final): An Assessment Based on the Manifesto for a European Criminal Policy’, 2(3) European Criminal Law Review319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerse, C. and Khan, N. (2005), EC Antitrust Procedures, 5th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
Khanna, V. and Dickinson, T. L. (2007), ‘The Corporate Monitor: The New Corporate Czar?’, 105 Michigan Law Review1713Google Scholar
Kilchling, M. (ed.) (2002), Die Praxis der Gewinnabschöpfung in Europa, Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar
Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002), ‘Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance’, 15(1) Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, M. (2010) [cited Koehler 2010a], ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the Ultimate Year of its Decade of Resurgence’, 43 Indiana Law Review410Google Scholar
Koehler, M. (2010) [cited Koehler 2010b], ‘The Façade of FCPA Enforcement’, 41 Georgetown Journal of International Law907Google Scholar
Kok, R. A. (2007), Statutory Limitations in International Criminal Law, The Hague, available at CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontorovich, E. (2004), ‘The Piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction's Hollow Foundation’, 45(1) Harvard International Law Journal183Google Scholar
Kubiciel, M. (2012), ‘International Legal Development and National Legal Change in the Fight against Corruption’ in Linnan, D. K. (ed.), Legitimacy, Legal Development and Change, Ashgate, 419Google Scholar
Kühne, H.-H. (2010), Strafprozessrecht, 8th edn, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
LaFave, W. R. (2000), Criminal Law, 3rd edn, St. Paul (US)Google Scholar
Langer, S. H. and Pelzman, J. (2001), ‘An Analysis of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials’ in Fatemi, K. (ed.), International Public Policy and Regionalism at the Turn of the Century, Amsterdam/New York, 60Google Scholar
Larguier, J. (1999), Procédure pénale, 17th edn, ParisGoogle Scholar
Lenz, S. and Mäder, W. (2013), ‘Grenzüberschreitende Korruption: Die Anwendbarkeit des schweizerischen Unternehmensstrafrechts aus Sicht der Praktiker’, 1 Forumpoenale33Google Scholar
Low, L. A. (2003) [cited Low 2003a], The Global Legal Framework: The OECD, OAS and Council of Europe Antibribery Conventions: New International Standards and National Anti-Corruption Laws: Challenges for Effective Implementation and Enforcement, unpublished paper, prepared for a Conference in Paris, April 2003
Low, L. A. (2003) [cited Low 2003b], ‘Milestones in Mutual Evaluation: The Phase 2 Review of the United States under the OECD Anti Bribery Convention’, 5(2) International Law Forum101Google Scholar
Low, L. A. (2004), ‘Towards Universal International Anticorruption Standards: The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and other International Anticorruption Treaties: Too Much of a Good Thing?’, presentation at the Second Annual Conference of the IBA, ICC, and OECD, ‘The Awakening Giant of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Paris’, 22–23 April 2004
Low, L. A. (2005), ‘Enforcement of the FCPA in the United States: Trends and the Effects of International Standards’, presentation at the Third Annual Conference of the IBA, ICC, and OECD, ‘The Awakening Giant of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Paris’, 4–6 May 2005
Low, L. A., Ayers, R. and Armstrong, S. (2011), ‘Settling an FCPA Enforcement Action: Contrasting NPAs, DPAs and Plea Agreements’, ACI National FCPA Conference, 9 November 2011 (available from the authors upon request)
Low, L. A., Best, T. and Cook, J. (2012), ‘FCPA Liability in M&A: Lessons from Pfizer Settlements’, Law360, 11 September 2012
Low, L. A., Bonheimer, O. and Best, T. (2012), ‘Avoiding FCPA Prosecution For Employee Conduct’, Law360, 25 May 2012, available at
Low, L. A. and Burton, M. L. (2000), ‘The OECD, OAS and Council of Europe Antibribery Conventions: A Comparison with the Corrupt Practices Act: New International Standards and their Implications’, 10(2) California International Practitioner1Google Scholar
Low, L. A. and Prelogar, B. (2010), ‘International Law Advisory: French Companies Prepare to Pay Hundreds of Millions to U.S. Authorities in Foreign Corruption Matters’, Financial Fraud Law Report, November/December 2010, available at
Low, L. A., Tillen, G. and Abendschein, K. (2003), ‘Country Report: The US Anti-Money Laundering System’ in Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (eds.), A Comparative Guide to Anti-Money Laundering: A Critical Analysis of Systems in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK and the USA (study by the Basel Institute on Governance, commissioned by the Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz), Cheltenham (UK)/Northhampton (US), 346Google Scholar
Magrini, P. (2003), ‘L'attuazione della Convenzione OCSE contro la corruzione negli Stati membri: il quadro comparato’ in Sacerdoti, G. (ed.), Responsabilità d'impresa e strumenti internazionali anticorruzione, Milan, 95Google Scholar
Manacorda, S. (2004), ‘Investigation and Prosecution: Prosecution Authorities’ in Cullen, P. J. (ed.), Enlarging the Fight Against Fraud in the European Union, Academy of European Law Trier Series of Publications, Vol. 36, Cologne, 139Google Scholar
Marberg, S. (2012), ‘Promises of Leniency: Whether Companies Should Self-Disclose Violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’, 45 Vanderbilt University Journal of Transnational Law557Google Scholar
Marsch, A.-C. (2009), Strukturen der internationalen Korruptionsbekämpfung. Wie wirksam sind internationale Abkommen?, OsnabrückGoogle Scholar
Mauro, P. (1995), ‘Corruption and Growth’, 110 Quarterly Journal of Economics681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, A. J. (2001), Judging the Past in Unified Germany, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
McClean, D. (2012), International Co-operation in Civil and Criminal Matters, 3rd edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, D. (2000), ‘The OECD Agreement to Criminalize Bribery: A Negotiation Analytic Perspective’, 5 International Negotiation129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, Miller (2008), FCPA Alert, ‘Siemens agrees to landmark $800 million settlement’, 15 December 2008, available at
Miller, S. K. (1998), ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil Among Affiliated Companies in the European Community and in the U.S.: A Comparative Analysis of U.S., German, and U.K. Veil-Piercing Approaches’, 36 American Business Law Journal73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. (2003), Money Laundering Counter-Measures in the European Union: A New Paradigm of Security Governance versus Fundamental Legal Principles, The Hague/London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. (2011), ‘Corruption and the European Union’ in Cassani, U. et al. (eds.), Lutte contre la corruption internationale, The Never Ending Story, Geneva, 83Google Scholar
Möhrenschlager, M. (1999), ‘Developments on the International Level’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 89Google Scholar
Moody-Stuart, G. (1997), Grand Corruption, 3rd edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Moosmayer, K. (2012), Compliance, Praxisleitfaden für Unternehmen, 2nd edn, MunichGoogle Scholar
Moreillon, L. (ed.) (2004), Entraide internationale en matière pénale, Commentaire romand, Bâle/Genève/MunichGoogle Scholar
Morris Barron, L. (2009), Comment: ‘Right to Counsel Denied: Corporate Criminal Prosecutions, Attorney Fee Agreements, and the Sixth Amendment’, Emory Law Journal 58, 1265Google Scholar
Müller, J. P. and Wildhaber, L. (eds.) (1982), Praxis des Völkerrechts, BernGoogle Scholar
Müller, P. (2003), Commentary on Art. 70 in Niggli, M. A. and Wiprächtiger, H. (eds.), Basler Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch I, Art. 1–110 StGB, Basel/Genf/Munich, 1021Google Scholar
Murphy, A. G. (2011), Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Practical Resource for Managers and Executives, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. and Boehme, D. (2010), ‘Commentary: OECD Good Practice Guidance on Internal Controls, Ethics and Compliance’, Discussion Draft for Comment 11 June 2010, available at
Nagel, S. (2007), Entwicklung und Effektivität internationaler Massnahmen zur Korruptionsbekämpfung, TübingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, V. P. (2011), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in the United States: Is a New Approach Warranted?’ in Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nastou, P. (2010), ‘L’évaluation des parties à la Convention de l'OCDE sur la lutte contre la corruption d'agents publics étrangers dans les transactions commerciales internationales: Un mécanisme institutionnel de suivi au service de l'harmonisation des législations et pratiques nationales’ in Dormoy, D., La corruption et le droit international, Brussels, 5Google Scholar
Nicholls, C., Daniel, T., Bacarese, A. and Hatchard, J. (2011), Corruption and Misuse of Public Office, 2nd edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, K. (2011), ‘What the U.S. Government Can Do to Assist U.S. Companies with Respect to Transnational Corruption’, Export Law, 101, available at Google Scholar
OECD (ed.) (2000), No Longer Business as Usual: Fighting Bribery and Corruption, ParisGoogle Scholar
Oehler, D. (1983), Internationales Strafrecht, 2nd edn, Köln/Berlin/Bonn/MunichGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, E. (2011), The Bribery Act 2010, A Practical Guide, BristolGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. S. (1996), ‘Doctrine for Destruction: The Case of Corporate Criminal Liability’, 17 Managerial and Decision Economics3813.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passas, N. (1999), ‘Globalization, Criminogenic Asymmetries and Economic Crime’, 1(4) European Journal of Law Reform399Google Scholar
Pavlidis, G. (2012), Confiscation internationale: instruments internationaux, droit de l'Union européenne, droit suisse, Geneva/Zurich/BaselGoogle Scholar
Perrodet, A. (2002) [cited Perrodet 2002a], ‘The Italian System’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 348Google Scholar
Perrodet, A. (2002) [cited Perrodet 2002b], ‘The Public Prosecutor’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 415Google Scholar
Pesquié, B. (2002), ‘The Belgian System’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 81Google Scholar
Peters, A. (2012), Völkerrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, 3rd edn, ZurichGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. (1992), Bekämpfung der Geldwäscherei – Modellfall Schweiz?, Basel/Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (1996), ‘Die verjährungsrechtliche Einheit gemass Art. 71 Abs. 2 StGB bei Bestechungsdelikten’, Basler Juristische Mitteilungen 57
Pieth, M. (1997) [cited Pieth 1997a], ‘International Cooperation to Combat Corruption’ in Elliott, K. A. (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy, Washington, 119Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (1997) [cited Pieth 1997b], ‘Internationale Harmonisierung von Strafrecht als Antwort auf transnationale Wirtschaftskriminalität’, 109 Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. (1999) [cited Pieth 1999a], ‘Die Strafbarkeit der aktiven Bestechung ausländischer Beamter’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M., 341Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (1999) [cited Pieth 1999b], ‘International Efforts to Combat Corruption’ in American Bar Association (ed.), The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: How to Comply under the New Amendments and the OECD Convention, Chicago, E-1Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (1999) [cited Pieth 1999c], ‘International Efforts to Combat Corruption’, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), A-1038
Pieth, M. (2000) [cited Pieth 2000a], ‘From Ideal to Reality: Making the New Global Standard Stick’ in OECD (ed.), No Longer Business as Usual, Paris, 51Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2000) [cited Pieth 2000b], “‘Funktionale Äquivalenz”: Praktische Rechtsvergleichung und internationale Harmonisierung von Wirtschaftsstrafrecht’, 119 Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht447Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2001), ‘Internationale Anstösse zur Einführung einer strafrechtlichen Unternehmenshaftung in der Schweiz’, 119 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht1Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2003), ‘Die strafrechtliche Verantwortung des Unternehmens’, 121 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht353Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2004), ‘Risikomanagement und Strafrecht: Organisationsversagen als Voraussetzung der Unternehmenshaftung, Risiko und Recht’ in Festgabe zum Schweizerischen Juristentag 2004, Basel/Bern, 597Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2007) [cited Pieth 2007a], ‘Das OECD-Übereinkommen über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr’ in Dölling, D. (ed.), Handbuch der Korruptionsprävention, Munich, 563Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2007) [cited Pieth 2007b], ‘Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives to Combat Money Laundering and Bribery’ in Brütsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (eds.), Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations, London/New York, 81Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2010), ‘Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im Geschäftsverkehr: Eine kriminologische Studie’ in Bannenberg, B. and Jehle, J.-M. (eds.), Wirtschaftskriminalität, Mönchengladbach, 173Google Scholar
Pieth, M. (2011), Harmonising Anti-Corruption Compliance: The OECD Good Practice Guidance 2010, Zurich, St. GallGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. (2012) [cited Pieth 2012a], Schweizerisches Strafprozessrecht, 2nd edn, BaselGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. (2012) [cited Pieth 2012b], ‘Collective Action and Corruption’ in Pieth, M. (ed.), Collective Action: Innovative Strategies to Prevent Corruption, Zurich, St. Gall, 3Google Scholar
Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (2003) [cited Pieth and Aiolfi 2003a], ‘The Private Sector Becomes Active: The Wolfsberg Process’ in Clark, A. and Burell, P. (eds.), A Practitioner's Guide to International Money Laundering Law and Regulation, Surrey, 267Google Scholar
Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (2003) [cited Pieth and Aiolfi 2003b], Anti-Money Laundering: Levelling the Playing Field (study by the Basel Institute on Governance, commissioned by the Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz), BaselGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. and Aiolfi, G. (eds.) (2004), A Comparative Guide to Anti-Money Laundering: A Critical Analysis of Systems in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK and the USA (study by the Basel Institute on Governance, commissioned by the Stiftung Finanzplatz Schweiz), Cheltenham (UK)/Northhampton (US)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.) (1999), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Pieth, M. and Estermann, J. (2002), ‘Landesbericht Schweiz’ in Kilchling, M. (ed.), Die Praxis der Gewinnabschöpfung in Europa, Freiburg i. Br., 371Google Scholar
Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (2011), ‘Emergence and Convergence: Corporate Criminal Liability Principles in Overview’ in Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability: Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieth, M. and Lelieur, J. (2007), ‘Strengthening International Coordination and Cooperation’, Expert Meeting of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention: The Road Ahead, available at
Pletscher, T. (1999), ‘Wie halten wir uns sauber? – Bekämpfung der Korruption aus Sicht der Wirtschaft’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M., 275Google Scholar
Poncet, D. and Gully-Hart, P. (1999), ‘Legal Framework of Extradition in Europe’ in Bassiouni, M. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, 2nd edn, New York, Vol. 2, 277Google Scholar
Popp, P. (2001), Grundzüge der internationalen Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen, BaselGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1994), The Economics of Justice, Cambridge (US)Google Scholar
Préfontaine, D. (1999), ‘Effective Criminal Sanctions Against Corporate Entities: Canada’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 277Google Scholar
Prost, K. (1998), Breaking Down the Barriers: International Co-operation in Combating Transnational Crime, available at
Raphael, M. (2010), The Bribery Act 2010, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Renwick, N. (2012), ‘Emerging Issues for the Forensic Accountant: Foreign Bribery’, available at
Reuben, E. (2003), The Evolution of Theories of Collective Action, Master's thesis, Tinbergen Institute, available at
Reuter, P. (1995), Introduction au droit des traités, 3rd edn, GenevaGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999), ‘Globale Wirtschaft und Korruption’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M., 40Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. and Billa, B. (2008), ‘Treaties and National Security’, 40 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics437Google Scholar
Rumpf, Ch. (2004), ‘Zur Rechtslage Zyperns: Grundlagen und Konfliktlinien’, available at
Sacerdoti, G. (1999), ‘Das OECD-Übereinkommen 1997 über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M., 212Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, G. (2000), ‘To Bribe or Not to Bribe?’ in OECD (ed.), No Longer Business as Usual, Paris, 29Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, G. (ed.) (2003), Responsabilità d'impresa e strumenti internazionali anticorruzione, MilanGoogle Scholar
Salas, D. (2002), ‘The Role of the Judge’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 488Google Scholar
Saliger, F. and Gaede, K. (2008), ‘Rückwirkende Ächtung der Auslandskorruption und Untreue als Korruptionsdelikt – Der Fall Siemens als Startschuss in ein entgrenztes internationalisiertes Wirtschaftsstrafrecht?’, 2 Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung zum Strafrecht57, available at Google Scholar
Sands, P. (2004), Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edn, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Sansonetti, R. (2001), ‘Die Problematik der Offshore-Finanzzentren und die Position der Schweiz’, 2 Die Volkswirtschaft – Das Magazin für Wirtschaftspolitik40Google Scholar
Satzger, H. (2009), ‘“Schwarze Kassen” zwischen Untreue und Korruption – Eine Besprechung des Urteils BGH – 2StR 587/07 (Siemens-Entscheidung)’, 6 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht297Google Scholar
Savona, E. (2002), ‘Obstacles in Company Law to Anti-Money Laundering: International Cooperation in European Union Member States’ in Pieth, M. (ed.), Financing Terrorism, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
Schaupensteiner, W. J. (1999), ‘Korruption in Deutschland – Das Ende der Tabuisierung’ in Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied/Kriftel/Basel/Frankfurt a. M., 131Google Scholar
Schlösser, J. (2011), ‘Die Bestimmung des erlangten Etwas i.S.v. § 73 I 1 StGB bei in Folge von Straftaten abgeschlossenen gegenseitigen Verträgen’, 3 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht121Google Scholar
Schmid, N. (2008), ‘Straf- und einziehungsrechtliche Fragen bei “schwarzen Kassen” zur Begehung von Bestechungen’, Aktuelle Juristische Praxis 797
Schoenlaub, F. E. (1999), ‘International Bribery, Corruption and Fair Competition: Part 1’, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), A-1056
Schubarth, M. (2002), ‘Das neue Recht der strafrechtlichen Verjährung’, 120 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht321Google Scholar
Schubarth, M. (2010), ‘Einziehung ohne Anlasstat? – Grenzen der Einziehung des “pretium sceleris”’, 128 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht214Google Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, I. and Hummer, W. (2004), ‘Die Staaten’ in Neuhold, H., Hummer, W. and Schreuer, (eds.), Österreichisches Handbuch des Völkerrechts, 4th edn, Vienna, Vol. 1, 135Google Scholar
Shaw, M. N. (2012), International Law, 6th edn, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shearman & Sterling LLP (2009), Client Publication, ‘Latin Node Inc.: Undiscovered FCPA Violations Wipe Out an Investment’, available at
Shearman & Sterling LLP (2011), Client Publication, ‘A New Tool and a Twist? The SEC's first Deferred Prosecution Agreement and a Novel Punitive Measure’, available at
Shearman & Sterling LLP (2012), Client Publication, ‘The New FCPA Guide: The DOJ and the SEC Do Not Break New Ground but Offer Useful Guidance and Some Ominous Warnings’, available at
Shearman & Sterling LLP (2013), FCPA Digest of Cases and Review Releases Relating to Bribes to Foreign Officials under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977
Shibahara, K. (1999), ‘Le droit japonais de la responsabilité pénale, en particulier la responsabilité pénale de la personne morale’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 39Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. M. (1973), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
Snyder, H. W. (2011), ‘Client Confidentiality and Fraud: Should Auditors be Able to Exercise More Ethical Judgment?’, Fraud Magazine, January/February
Spahn, E. K. (2013), ‘Multijurisdictional Bribery Law Enforcement: The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention’, 53 Virginia Journal of International Law Digest1Google Scholar
Spencer, J. R. (2002), ‘Introduction’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 1Google Scholar
Spencer, J. R. (2005), ‘An Academic Critique of the EU Acquis in Relation to Trans-Border Evidence Gathering’, ERA-Forum Special Issue, Trier, 28Google Scholar
Spinellis, D. D. (1999), ‘Securing Evidence Abroad: A European Perspective’ in Bassiouni, M. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, 2nd edn, New York, Vol. 2, 359Google Scholar
Spivack, P. and Raman, S. (2008), ‘Regulating the “New Regulators”: Current Trends in Deferred Prosecution Agreements’, 45 American Criminal Law Review159Google Scholar
Stark, F. (2011), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in Scotland: The Problems with a Piecemeal Approach’ in Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefani, G., Levasseur, G. and Bouloc, B. (2000), Procédure pénale, 17th edn, ParisGoogle Scholar
Steptoe & Johnson LLP (2009), ‘International Law Advisory: UK Serious Fraud Office Issues Guidance on Overseas Corruption Investigations’, 30 July 2009, available at
Steptoe & Johnson LLP (2010) [cited Steptoe & Johnson LLP 2010a], ‘Resolution of Panalpina and Related Cases Yields Significant Penalties, New Enforcement Theories’, 29 November 2010
Steptoe & Johnson LLP (2010) [cited Steptoe & Johnson LLP 2010b], ‘International Law Advisory: 2009 UK Anti-Corruption Year Review’, 22 February 2010
Steptoe & Johnson LLP (2011), ‘Racing to a Locked Door? SEC Issues Final Whistleblower Bounty Rule and Announces First Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Revealing Competing Incentives for Corporate Self Reporting’, 7 June 2011
Stree, W. and Sternberg-Lieben, D. (2001), Commentary on ss. 78–9 in Schönke, A. and Schröder, H. (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 26th edn, MunichGoogle Scholar
Swart, B. (1999), ‘The European Union and the Schengen Agreement’ in Bassiouni, M. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, 2nd edn, New York, Vol. 2, 177Google Scholar
Szarek-Mason, P. (2010), The European Union's Fight Against Corruption: The Evolving Policy Towards Member States and Candidate Countries, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarullo, D. K. (2004), ‘The Limits of Institutional Design: Implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention’, 44 Vanderbilt Journal of International Law665Google Scholar
Tobler, C. (2005), Remedies and Sanctions in EC Non-Discrimination Law: Effective, Proportionate and Dissuasive National Sanctions and Remedies, with particular reference to Upper Limits on Compensation to Victims of Discrimination, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Trechsel, S. (1997), Geldwäscherei: Prävention und Massnahmen zur Bekämpfung, ZurichGoogle Scholar
Trepp, G. (1996), Swiss Connection, ZurichGoogle Scholar
Tröndle, H. and Fischer, T. (2004), Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze, 52nd edn, MunichGoogle Scholar
Tronnes, R. D. (2000), ‘Ensuring Uniformity in the Implementation of the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions’, 33 George Washington International Law Review100Google Scholar
Tulkens, F. (2002), ‘Negotiated Justice’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Spencer, J. R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge, 641Google Scholar
Tully, S. (ed.) (2005), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK)/Northhampton (US)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. (2011), ‘Enforcing Enforcement: Is the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention's Peer Review Effective?’, 43 George Washington International Law Review137Google Scholar
Urofsky, P. (2009), ‘What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Successor Liability Resulting from Inadequate FCPA Due Diligence in M&A Transactions’, 1763 Practising Law Institute, Corporate Law and Practice Course Handbook Series 631
Urofsky, P. and Bartlett, J. (2013), ‘Effective Corporate Compliance and the Irrelevant “Foreign Official” Debate’, 8 White Collar Crime Report23Google Scholar
Urofsky, P., Moon, H. M. and Rimm, J. (2012), ‘How Should We Measure the Effectiveness of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act? Don't Break What isn't Broken – The Fallacies of Reform’, 73 Ohio State Law Journal1145Google Scholar
Van den Wyngaert, Ch. (1989), ‘Double Criminality as a Requirement to Jurisdiction’ in Dugard, J. and van den Wyngaert, (eds.) (1996), International Criminal Law and Procedure, Aldershot/Brookfield (US)/Singapore/Sydney, 131Google Scholar
Van den Wyngaert, Ch. (1993), ‘Belgium’ in Van den Wyngaert, (ed.), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community, London, 1Google Scholar
Van den Wyngaert, Ch. (ed.) (2005), International Criminal Law, A Collection of International and European Instruments, 3rd edn, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Van den Wyngaert, Ch. and Stessens, G. (1999), ‘The International Ne Bis in Idem Principle: Resolving Some of the Unanswered Questions’, 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vervaele, J. A. E. (2005), ‘The Transnational Ne Bis in Idem Principle in the EU: Mutual Recognition and Equivalent Protection of Human Rights’, 1(2) Utrecht Law Review100, available at CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincke, F. (2008), ‘Responsibilities of Enterprises’ in Heimann, F. and Vincke, F. (eds.), Fighting Corruption: International Corporate Integrity Handbook, Paris, 67Google Scholar
Vincke, F. and Heimann, F. (eds.) (2003), Fighting Corruption: A Corporate Practices Manual, ParisGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. (1987), ‘The Sentencing Commission's Functions’ in von Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A. and Tonry, M., The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, Boston, 3Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A. (2005), Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A. and Tonry, M. (1987), The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, BostonGoogle Scholar
Waldman, A. (2002), ‘Bhopal seethes, pained and poor 18 years later’, New York Times, 21 September 2002, available at Google Scholar
Walther, S. (2004), ‘Communication over Confrontation: Modern Criminal Procedure in Transformation’ in Eser, A. and Rabenstein, C. (eds.), Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, 367Google Scholar
Warin, F. J., Diamant, M. S. and Root, V. S. (2010), ‘Somebody's Watching Me: FCPA Monitorships and How They Can Work Better’, 13 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law321Google Scholar
Warin, F. J., Falconer, C. and Diamant, M. S. (2010), ‘The British are Coming!: Britain Changes its Law on Foreign Bribery and Joins the International Fight Against Corruption’, 46 Texas International Law Journal1Google Scholar
Weatherill, S. (2007), Cases and Materials on EU Law, 6th edn, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Weigend, T. (2008), ‘Societas Delinquere non Potest? A German Perspective’, 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, M. J., Meyer, R. J. and Clark, J. D. (2012), The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Compliance, Investigations and Enforcement, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, M. J. and Trambley, C. A. (2003), ‘Obtaining or Retaining Business under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: The Implications of U.S. v. Kay and SEC v. Mattson’, presentation at the second Annual Conference of the IBA, ICC, and OECD, ‘The Awakening Giant of Anti-corruption Enforcement’, Paris, 24–25 April 2003
Weissmann, A. and Smith, A. (2010), ‘Restoring Balance: Proposed Amendments to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’, released by the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, US Chamber of Commerce
Wells, C. (1999), ‘Developments in Corporate Liability in England and Wales and a New Offence of Corporate Killing: The English Law Commission's Proposals’ in Eser, A., Heine, G. and Huber, B. (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities, Freiburg i. Br., 119Google Scholar
Wells, C. (2000), Criminal Responsibility of Legal Persons in Common Law Jurisdictions, OECD Room Document (DAFFE/IME/BR(2000)22), ParisGoogle Scholar
Wells, C. (2001), Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd edn, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, C. (2005), ‘Corporate Criminal Responsibility’ in Tully, S. (ed.), Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, Cheltenham (UK)/Northhampton (US), 147Google Scholar
Wells, C. (2011), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in England and Wales: Past, Present, and Future’ in Pieth, M. and Ivory, R. (eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, A. D. (2011), ‘Enthusiastic Enforcement, Informal Legislation: The Unruly Expansion of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’, 45 Georgia Law Review489Google Scholar
White, S. (2011), ‘“Yes We Can!” – The UK Bribery Act 2010’, 1 European Criminal Law Associations’ Forum (EUCRIM)27Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. (2010), The 2010 UK Bribery Act Adequate Procedures, Guidance on good practice procedures for corporate anti-bribery programmes, LondonGoogle Scholar
Wise, E. M. (1999), ‘Aut Dedere aut Judicare: The Duty to Prosecute or Extradite’ in Bassiouni, M. (ed.), International Criminal Law, Procedural and Enforcement Mechanisms, 2nd edn, New York, Vol. 2, 15Google Scholar
Wolf, S. (2009), ‘Die Siemens-Korruptionsaffäre – ein Überblick’ in Graeff, P., Schröder, K. and Wolf, S. (eds.), Der Korruptionsfall Siemens, Baden-Baden, 9Google Scholar
Wymeersch, E. (2001), Study of the Regulation and its Implementation in the EU Member States that Obstruct Anti-Money Laundering International Co-operation, TrentoGoogle Scholar
Zander, M. (1999), Cases and Materials on the English Legal System, 8th edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, R. (2009), La coopération judiciaire internationale en matière pénale, 3rd edn, BernGoogle Scholar
ABA 2012, American Bar Association, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, 2012, available at
African Union 2003, African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption, 11 July 2003, available at
American Law Institute 1987, Restatement of the Law, Third, Foreign Relations Law of United States
Asser Institute 2013, Manual for Preventive Measures and Best Practices against Fraud, Corruption and Bribery Committed through Legal Entities for the purpose of Financial and Economic Gain, 23 February 2013
Benelux Treaty 1962, Benelux Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, 27 June 1962
Botschaft 1993, Botschaft (Switzerland) 1993 über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes (Revision des Einziehungsrechts, Strafbarkeit der kriminellen Organisation, Melderecht des Financiers) vom 30. Juni 1993, BBl. 1993 III 277 (93.058)
Botschaft 1998, Botschaft (Switzerland) 1998 über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches (Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Einführung und Anwendung des Gesetzes) und des Militärstrafgesetzes sowie zu einem Bundesgesetz über das Jugendstrafrecht vom 21. September 1998 (98.038)
Botschaft 1999, Botschaft (Switzerland) 1999 über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes (Revision des Korruptionsstrafrechts) sowie über den Beitritt der Schweiz zum Übereinkommen über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung ausländischer Amtsträger im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr vom 19. April 1999 (99.026)
Bundesministerium für Justiz (Austria) 2004, Entwurf eines Bundesgesetzes über die Verantwortung von Verbänden für mit gerichtlicher Strafe bedrohte Handlungen (Verbandsverantwortlichkeitsgesetz [VbVG]), JMZ 318.017/0001-II2/2004
BUSA 2009, Business Unity South Africa, Corruption, An Anti-corruption Guide for South African SMEs, August 2009
Circulaire 2004, Bulletin Officiel du Ministère de la Justice, No. 94, Circulaire de présentation des évaluations de la France par l'OCDE et le GRECO et fixant des orientations de politique pénale (CRIM 2004–06 G3/21-06-2004, NOR: JUSD0430119C, 21 June 2004)
Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act 2000 (United States), Pub. L. No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (25 April 2000)
Chamber of Commerce Letter 2013, US Chamber of Commerce et al., Letter addressed to Assistant Attorney General L. Breuer, Criminal Division, US DOJ, and Acting Director of Enforcement G. Canellos, US SEC, 19 February 2013, available at
COE 1950, Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 5, 4 November 1950)
COE 1957, Council of Europe, European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 24, 13 December 1957)
COE 1959, Council of Europe, European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 30, 20 September 1959)
COE 1972, Council of Europe, European Convention on the Transfer of Proceedings in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 73, 15 May 1972)
COE 1974, Council of Europe, European Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes (ETS No. 82, 25 January 1974)
COE 1975, Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 86, 15 December 1975)
COE 1978a, Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 99, 17 March 1978)
COE 1978b, Council of Europe, Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 98, 17 March 1978)
COE 1983, Council of Europe, Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (ETS No. 122, 21 March 1983)
COE 1987, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R(87)18 concerning the Simplification of Criminal Justice (adopted 17 September 1987)
COE 1988, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R(88)18 concerning Liability of Enterprises having Legal Personality for Offences committed in the Exercise of their Activities (adopted 20 October 1988)
COE 1990, Council of Europe, Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime (ETS No. 141, 8 November 1990)
COE 1997, Council of Europe, Resolution (97)24 on the Twenty Guiding Principles for the Fight against Corruption (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 November 1997)
COE 1998, Council of Europe, Final Communiqué of the 102nd Session of the Comittee of Ministers (Strasbourg, 4–5 May 1998)Google Scholar
COE 1999a, Council of Europe, Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 173, 27 January 1999)
COE 1999b, Council of Europe, Civil Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 174, 4 November 1999)
COE 2000a, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Recommendation Rec(2000)19 on the Role of Public Prosecution in the Criminal Justice System (adopted 6 October 2000)
COE 2000b, Council of Europe, Explanatory Memorandum to Recommendation Rec(2000)19 (adopted 6 October 2000)
COE 2001, Council of Europe, Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 182, 8 November 2001)
COE 2003, Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS No. 191, 15 May 2003)
COE 2005, Council of Europe, Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and the Financing of Terrorism (ETS No. 198, 16 May 2005)
COMSEC 2005, Commonwealth Secretariat, Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, Final Communique, Malta 25–27 November, available at
Conseil de l'Europe 1990, Conseil de l'Europe, Affaires juridiques, compétences extraterritoriales en matière pénale, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
CPS 2004, The Code for Crown Prosecutors (England and Wales), published November 2004
CPS 2013, The Code for Crown Prosecutors (England and Wales), published January 2013, available at
Department of Commerce 2004, US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Addressing the Challenges of International Bribery and Fair Competition, the Sixth Annual Report under Section 6 of the International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, July 2004, available at
Dodd-Frank Act 2010, United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (21 July 2010)
EU 1991, First Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (OJ L166, 28 June 1991, 77–83)
EU 1992, Treaty on European Union, Maastricht Treaty (OJ C191, 29 July 1992, 1)
EU 1995a, Convention on Simplified Extradition Procedure (OJ C078, 3 March 1995, 2–10)
EU 1995b, Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (OJ C316, 27 November 1995, 49–57)
EU 1996a, Council Act of 27 September 1996, adopted on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, drawing up the Convention relating to Extradition between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C313, 23 October 1996, 11)
EU 1996b, Protocol drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (OJ C313, 23 October 1996, 1–10)
EU 1997a, Convention drawn upon the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union on the Fight against Corruption involving Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of the European Union (OJ C195, 25 June 1997, 2–11)
EU 1997b, Second Protocol, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests (OJ C221, 19 July 1997)
EU 1997c, Explanatory Report on the Second Protocol drawn upon the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests, text approved by the Council on 19 December 1997 (OJ C11, 15 January 1998, 8)
EU 1997d, Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and related Acts (OJ C340, 10 November 1997)
EU 1998a, Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines Imposed pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65(5) of the ECSC Treaty (OJ C9, 14 January 1998, 3)
EU 1998b, Joint Action of 22 December 1998, adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on Corruption in the Private Sector (OJ L358, 31 December 1998, 2–4)
EU 1999, European Commission Report of the European Antifraud Office (OJ C91, 31 March 1999, 8)
EU 2000, Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C197, 12 July 2000, 3)
EU 2001a, Council Act of 16 October 2001 establishing, in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, the Protocol to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C326, 21 November 2001, 1)
EU 2001b, Second Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (OJ L344, 28 December 2001, 76–82)
EU 2002a, Consolidated Version of the Treaty establishing the European Community (OJ C325, 24 December 2002, 33)
EU 2002b, Council Framework Decision on Combating Terrorism (OJ L164, 13 June 2002, 3)
EU 2002c, Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between Member States (OJ L190, 18 July 2002, 1)
EU 2002d, Council Regulation of 16 December 2002 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition laid down in Articles 82 and 83 of the Treaty (OJ L1, 4 January 2003, 1)
EU 2003a, Council Framework Decision on Combating Corruption in the Private Sector (OJ L192, 31 July 2003, 54)
EU 2003b, Protocol No. 10 on Cyprus (OJ L236, 23 September 2003, 955)
EU 2003c, Proposal for a Council Framework Decision to strengthen the Criminal-Law Framework for the Enforcement of the Law against Ship-Source Pollution, 2 May 2003 (COM(2003)227 final)
EU 2003d, Council Regulation on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L001, 16 December 2002, 1)
EU 2003e, Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance between the European Union and the United States of America (OJ L181, 19 July 2003, 34)
EU 2004a, Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper on the Approximation, Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Criminal Sanctions in the European Union, 30 April 2004 (COM(2004)334 final)
EU 2004b, Commission of the European Communities, Staff Working Paper: Annex to the Report from the Commission ‘Implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests and its Protocols: Article 10 of the Convention’, 25 October 2004 (COM(2004)709 final)
EU 2004c, Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (OJ C310, 16 December 2004)
EU 2004d, Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts
EU 2005a, Third Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing (Ref. IP/05/682, 26 May 2005)
EU 2005b, Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the Fight against Organised Crime, 19 January 2005 (COM(2005)6 final)
EU 2007, Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community (OJ C306, 17 December 2007)
EU 2010, European Commission, Communication on reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector, 8 December 2010 (COM(2010)716 final)
EU 2011, Commission Communication, ‘Towards an EU Criminal Policy: Ensuring the effective implementation of EU policies through criminal law’, 20 September 2011 (COM(2011)573 final)
EU 2012a, European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law, 11 July 2012 (COM(2012)363 final)
EU 2012b, Council Proposal for a Directive on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) (First reading) – General approach, 12 December 2012
EU 2013a, European Commission, Proposal for a Directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, published (provisional version) 5 February 2013 (COM(2013)4563)
EU 2013b, European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA, 5 February 2013 (COM(2013)42 final)
EU 2013c, European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups (COM(2013)207 final)
FATF Report 2010, Money Laundering Using Trusts and Company Service Providers (October 2010)
FATF Report 2011, Laundering the Proceeds of Corruption (July 2011)
FATF Report 2012, Specific Risk Factors in Laundering the Proceeds of Corruption: Assistance to Reporting Institutions (June 2012)
FATF 40/1990, The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (29 July 1990)
FATF 40/1996, The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering 1990 (revised 28 June 1996)
FATF 40/2003, The Forty Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering 1990 (revised 20 June 2003)
FATF 40/2012, International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation, The Financial Action Task Force Recommendations (adopted 15 February 2012)
FCPA OPR 93-01, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 93-01 (20 April 1993)
FCPA OPR 01-01, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 01-01 (24 May 2001)
FCPA OPR 04-02, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 04-02 (12 July 2004)
FCPA OPR 08-02, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 08-02 (13 June 2008)
FCPA OPR 10-03, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 10-03 (1 September 2010)
FCPA OPR 12-01, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 12-01 (18 September 2012)
FCPA OPR 12-02, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review, Opinion Procedure Release, No. 12-02 (18 October 2012)
FCPA Resource Guide 2012, A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 14 November 2012
FCPA RPR 80-04, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Review Procedure Release, No. 80-04 (29 October 1980)
FCPA RPR 81-02, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Review Procedure Release, No. 81-02 (11 December 1981)
FCPA RPR 83-02, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Review Procedure Release, No. 83-02 (26 July 1983)
FCPA 1977, United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Pub. L. No. 95-213, 91 Stat. 1494)
FCPA 1988, United States Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-418, s. 5003, 102 Stat. 1107 (3 August 1988)
FCPA 1998, United States International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-366, 112 Stat. 3302 (10 November 1998)
Filip Memo 2008, US Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Memorandum from Mark Filip, Deputy Attorney General, to Heads of Department Components and United States Attorneys, Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations, 28 August 2008
Financial Stability Board Charter, 25 September 2009
FSF Report 2000, Financial Stability Forum, Report of the Working Group on Offshore Centres, 5 April 2000
G-8 2011, Roma-Lyon Group, Requesting Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters from G8 Countries: A Step-by-Step Guide, available at
Geneva Convention 1958, Geneva Convention on the High Seas of 29 April 1958, adopted 30 September 1962
Geneva Protocol 1977, Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1), adopted 8 June 1977
Global Witness 2004, Global Witness, Time for Transparency: Coming Clean on Oil, Mining and Gas Revenues (March 2004)
GRECO 1999, Resolution (99)5 establishing the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) (adopted 1 May 1999)
Grindler Memo 2010, US Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Memorandum from Gary G. Grindler, Deputy Attorney General, for Heads of Department Components United States Attorneys, ‘Additional Guidance on the Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations’, 25 May 2010
Harvard Research International Law 1935, Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime, 29 American Journal of International Law435 (supp. 1935)Google Scholar
HCCH 1954, Hague Convention on Civil Procedure (concluded 1 March 1954, entered into force 12 April 1957)
HCCH 1965, Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (concluded 15 November 1965, entered into force 10 February 1969)
HCCH 1970, Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (concluded 18 March 1970)
Holder Memo 1999, US Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Memorandum from Eric Holder, Deputy Attorney General, to All Component Heads and United States Attorneys, ‘Bringing Criminal Charges Against Corporations’, 16 June 1999
House of Commons 2004, House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, The Work of the Export Credits Guarantee Department, Sixth Report of Session 2003–2004, Vol. 1, HC 506-I
IAP 1999, International Association of Prosecutors, Standards of Professional Responsibility and Statement of the Essential Duties and Rights of Prosecutors (adopted 23 April 1999), available at
IBA 2008, International Bar Association, Report of the Task Force on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Bribery and Corruption, 201 et seq., available at
ICC 2010, International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Commission on Corporate Responsibility and Anti-corruption, ICC Guidelines on Agents, Intermediaries and Other Third Parties, 19 November 2010 (195-11 Rev2 Final EN VS/zse)
ICC 2011, International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Rules on Combating Corruption, 2011 edn
IFAC 2012, International Federation of Accountants, International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, Handbook of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, 2012 edn
ILC Draft Articles 2001, International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, 53rd session, 2001 (A/56/10)
ISA 240, International Standard on Auditing 240, ‘The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements’ (effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2009)
Law Commission (England and Wales) 1996, Legislating the Criminal Code: Involuntary Manslaughter, Report No. 237, London (HMSO)Google Scholar
Law Commission (England and Wales) 1998, Legislating the Criminal Code: Corruption, Report No. 248, London (HMSO), 106Google Scholar
Law Commission (England and Wales) 2008, Reforming Bribery, Report No. 313, LondonGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Commission (Australia) 2003, Report 102 – Sentencing: Corporate Offenders
Lay-Person's Guide to the FCPA 2008, US Department of Justice, Lay-Person's Guide to the FCPA, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Antibribery Provisions
McNulty Memo 2006, US Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Memorandum from Paul J. McNulty, Deputy Attorney General, to Heads of Department Components and United States Attorneys, Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations, 12 December 2006
Morford Memo 2008, US Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Attorney General, to Heads of Department Components and United States Attorneys, ‘Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations’, 7 March 2008
New York City Bar 2011, New York City Bar, Committee on International Business Transactions, ‘The FCPA and its Impact on International Business Transactions: Should Anything be Done to Minimize the Consequences of the U.S.'s Unique Position on Combating Offshore Corruption?’, available at
OAS 1996, Inter-American Convention against Corruption (G.A/RES/1398(XXVIO/96, 29 March 1996)
OECD and COE 2011, The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (amended by the 2010 Protocol)
OECD WGB Annual Report 2010, OECD Working Group on Bribery, Annual Report, available at
OECD WGB Annual Report 2011, OECD Working Group on Bribery, Annual Report
OECD 1960, Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (14 December 1960)
OECD 1989a, OECD Council, United States Proposal on the Issue of Illicit Payments, Note by the Secretary-General, 23 March 1989, incl. Annex, United States Proposal for an International Agreement on Illicit Payments, 14 March 1989 (C(89)49)
OECD 1989b, Illicit Payments in International Commercial Transactions, Inventory of National Legislation
OECD 1992, Resolution of the Council concerning the Participation of Non-Member Economies in the Work of Subsidiary Bodies of the Organisation (C(92)65/FINAL)
OECD 1994, Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 27 May 1994)
OECD 1996, Recommendation on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes of Foreign Public Officials (adopted 11 April 1996, C(96)27/FINAL)
OECD 1997a, Revised Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions (adopted by the Council 23 May 1997)
OECD 1997b, Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (adopted 21 November 1997, signed 17 December 1997)
OECD 1997c, Council Decision of 19 December 1997 (C(97)240/FINAL)
OECD 1998, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase 1 (DAFFE/IME(98)17)
OECD 1999, Travaux Préparatoires of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials, International Trade Corruption Monitor (ITCM), 1001 et seq., also (DAFFE/IME/BR(97)14)
OECD 2000, Resolution of the Council concerning the Participation of Non-Member Economies in the Work of Subsidiary Bodies of the Organisation, 25 September 2000 (C(96)64/REV1/FINAL) (revised twice)
OECD 2001a, Behind the Corporate Veil: Using Corporate Entities for Illicit Purposes, 2001
OECD 2001b, Procedure for Self- and Mutual Evaluation of Implementation of the Convention and the Revised Recommendation, Phase 2 (DAFFE/IME(2001)3)
OECD 2001c, Notes by the Secretariat, The Liability of Legal Persons for Bribery Acts (DAFFE/IME/BR(2001)12)
OECD 2002a, Update on the Implementation of the OECD Recommendation on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes to Foreign Public Officials in Countries Party to the Bribery Convention (information as of January 2002)
OECD 2002b, Report on the Nature and Impact of Hard Core Cartels and Sanctions against Cartels under National Competition Law, 9 April 2002 (DAFFE/COMP(2002)7)
OECD 2003a, Peer Review, A Tool for Co-operation and Change, 2003
OECD 2003b, Trade Directorate, Trade Commission, Action Statement on Bribery and Officially Supported Export Credits, 20 February 2003 (TD/ECG(2000)15)
OECD 2004a, Resolution of the Council concerning the Participation of Non-Members in the Work of Subsidiary Bodies of the Organisation, 5 August 2004 (C(2004)132/FINAL)
OECD 2004b, Principles of Corporate Governance, endorsed by OECD Ministers in 1999 (reviewed in 2004)
OECD 2004c, Steps Taken and Planned Future Actions by Participating Countries to Ratify and Implement the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 12 November 2004 (DAFFE/IME/BR(2004)9/REV2)
OECD 2005, Trade Directorate, Trade Commission, Working Party on Export Credits and Credit Guarantees, Export Credits and Bribery: Review of Responses to the 2004 Revised Survey on Measures taken to Combat Bribery in Officially Supported Export Credits, Situation as of 30 September 2005 (TD/ECG(2005)4/REV)
OECD 2006a, OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Phase 2 Monitoring Information Resources, ParisGoogle Scholar
OECD 2006b, OECD WGB, Mid-Term Study of Phase 2 reports, 22 May 2006
OECD 2006c, Recommendations of the Council on Bribery and Officially Supported Export Credits, 14 December 2006 (C(2006)163)
OECD 2007, Statement, Shared Commitment to Fight Against Foreign Bribery, Tenth Anniversary of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, Rome, 21 November 2007
OECD 2008, Consultation Paper, Review of the OECD Instruments on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions Ten Years After Adoption (January 2008)
OECD 2009a, Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 26 November 2009 (with amendments adopted by Council 18 February 2010 to reflect the inclusion of Annex II, Good Practice Guidance on Internal Controls, Ethics and Compliance)
OECD 2009b, OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Phase 3 Monitoring Information Resources, Post-Phase 2 Evaluation Procedure: The Conduct of Phase 3 Evaluations, 17 December 2009 (DAF/INV/BR (2008)25/FINAL)
OECD 2009c, Recommendation of the Council on Tax Measures for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 25 May 2009 (C(2009)64)
OECD 2010, Recommendation of the Council to Facilitate Co-operation between Tax and Other Law Enforcement Authorities to Combat Serious Crimes, 14 October 2010 (C(2010)119)
OECD 2011, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (first adopted 1976, revised 2011)
OECD 2012a, Typology on Mutual Legal Assistance in Foreign Bribery Cases
OECD 2012b, Resolution of the Council on Partnerships in OECD Bodies, 9 October 2012 (C(2012)100/FINAL)
OECD 2012c, Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (updated 22 July 2010)
PACI 2005, Partnering against Corruption, Principles for Countering Bribery, An Initiative of the World Economic Forum in Partnership with Transparency International and the Basel Institute on Governance
Patriot Act 2001, United States Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism, USA Patriot Act of 2001, 24 October 2001
President's Commission 1984, President's Commission on Organized Crime, Interim Report to the President and the Attorney General, The Cash Connection: Organized Crime, Financial Institutions and Money Laundering 1984
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 1995, United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-67, 109 Stat. 737
Resist 2011, ICC, TI, United Nations Global Compact, WEF, Resisting Extortion and Solicitation in International Transactions, A Company Tool for Employee Training
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745 (107th Cong., 2d. Sess., 30 July 2002)
Schengen Agreement 1985, Agreement between the Governments of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the Gradual Abolition of Checks at their Common Borders (OJ L239, 22 September 2000, 13)
Schengen Implementing Agreement 1990, Convention applying the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 (OJ L239, 22 September 2000, 19)
Securities and Exchange Act 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 881 (6 June 1934)
Securities and Exchange Commission 1999, Staff Accounting Bulletin, No. 99 – Materiality, 17 C.F.R. Part 211, Release No. SAB 99 (12 August 1999)
Securities and Exchange Commission 2001, Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Commission Statement on the Relationship of Cooperation to Agency Enforcement Decisions, 23 October 2001
Securities and Exchange Commission 2003, United States Securities and Exchange Commission 2003, Final Rule: Management's Reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 (14 August 2003)
Securities and Exchange Commission 2005, United States Staff Statement on Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, Division of Corporation Finance, Office of the Chief Accountant, 16 May 2005
Securities and Exchange Commission 2012, Enforcement Manual, 1 November 2012
Thompson Memo 2003, US Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Memorandum from Larry D. Thompson, Deputy Attorney General, to Heads of Department Components and United States Attorneys, Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations, 20 January 2003
TI Business Principles 2009, Transparency International, Business Principles for Countering Bribery, February 2009
TI Report 2012, Transparency International, Exporting Corruption?, Country Enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, Progress Report 2012, 2nd edn, BerlinGoogle Scholar
TI SME Business Principles 2008, Transparency International, Business Principles for Countering Bribery, Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Edition
Trace 2010, Trace Anti-Bribery Compliance Solutions, Trace Due Diligence Guidebook: Doing Business with Intermediaries Internationally 2010
Treadway Report 1987, United States Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, October 1987
Turnbull Report 1999, Internal Control, Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code, England and Wales, September 1999Google Scholar
UK Bribery Act 2010, United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010
UK Drug Trafficking Act 1994, United Kingdom Drug Trafficking Act 1994
UK Joint Prosecution Guidance 2011, Bribery Act 2010, Joint Prosecution Guidance of the Director of the Serious Fraud Office and the Director of Public Prosecutions, available at
UK MOJ Deferred Prosecution Agreements 2012, Ministry of Justice, Deferred Prosecution Agreements, Government response to the consultation on a new enforcement tool to deal with economic crime committed by commercial organisations, 23 October 2012, available at
UK MOJ Guidance 2011, Ministry of Justice, The Bribery Act 2010, Guidance about Procedures which Relevant Commercial Organisations can Put into Place to Prevent Persons Associated with Them from Bribing (section 9 of the Bribery Act 2010), available at
UK MOJ Quick Start Guide 2012, Ministry of Justice, The Bribery Act 2010, Quick Start Guide, available at
UK POCA 2002, United Kingdom Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
UK SFO Boardroom Guide 2011, UK Serious Fraud Office, Serious Economic Crime, A Boardroom Guide to Prevention and Compliance, Harry Travers (ed.), 2011, available at
UN MTE 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on Extradition (A/RES/45/116, 14 December 1990)
UN MTMA 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (A/RES/45/117, 14 December 1990)
UN MTTP 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on the Transfer of Proceedings in Criminal Matters (A/RES/45/118, Annex, 45 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 49A) at 215, UN Doc. A/45/49, 14 December 1990)
UN MTTS 1990, United Nations Model Treaty on the Transfer of Supervision of Offenders Who have been Conditionally Sentenced or Conditionally Released (A/RES/45/119, 14 December 1990)
UN 1961, United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as amended by the 1972 Protocol amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961 (adopted 30 March 1961)
UN 1966, United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (A/Res/2200A(XXI), 21 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, UN Doc. A/6316, 16 December 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171)
UN 1968, United Nations Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (A/RES/2391(XXIII), Annex, 23 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 18) at 40, UN Doc. A/7218, 26 November 1968)
UN 1973, United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents (A/RES/3166(XXVIII), 14 December 1973)
UN 1974, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3237 (A/RES/3237(XXIX), 22 November 1974)
UN 1983, United Nations Security Council Resolution 541 (S/RES/541(1983), 18 November 1983)
UN 1988, United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (adopted on 19 December 1988)
UN 1990, United Nations Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August–7 September 1990
UN 1996, United Nations Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions (A/RES/51/191, 16 December 1996)
UN 1997, United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations (A/RES/52/164, 15 December 1997)
UN 1999a, United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (A/RES/54/109, 9 December 1999)
UN 1999b, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (S/RES/1244(1999), 10 June 1999)
UN 2000a, United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime (A/RES/55/25, 15 November 2000)
UN 2000b, United Nations Global Compact
UN 2002, United Nation Security Council Resolution 1410 (S/RES/1410(2002), 17 May 2002)
UN 2003, General Assembly Resolution (A/RES/58/4, 31 October 2003), Annex, United Nations Convention Against Corruption
US GAO 2009, United States Government Accountability Office, Corporate Crime, Preliminary Observations on DOJ's Use and Oversight of Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements, Statement of Eileen R. Larence, 25 June 2009, available at
US Sentencing Commission 2004, US Sentencing Commission, Fifteen Years of Guidelines Sentencing, November 2004, available at
USSG 2004, United States Sentencing Commission 2004, Revised Guidelines Manual
USSG 2010, United States Sentencing Commission 2010, Revised Guidelines Manual incorporated with new amendments, 1 November 2010
USSG 2012, United States Sentencing Commission 2012, Revised Guidelines Manual, 1 November 2012
Vienna Convention 1969, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969 (UKTS No. 58 (1980), Cmnd 7964)
WGB 2009, Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions, Policy Statement on Bribery in International Business Transactions, 19 June 2009
Wolfsberg 2000, Global Anti-Money-Laundering Guidelines for Private Banking (30 October 2000, updated in 2002)
Wolfsberg 2002a, Wolfsberg Statement, The Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (11 January 2002)
Wolfsberg 2002b, The Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles for Correspondent Banking (21 October 2002)
Wolfsberg 2002c, Anti-Money Laundering Principles on Private Banking (revised version May 2002)
Wolfsberg 2006a, Wolfsberg Statement, Guidance on a Risk-Based Approach for Managing Money Laundering Risks
Wolfsberg 2006b, Wolfsberg Guidance on Public Corruption
Wolfsberg 2007, The Wolfsberg Statement Against Corruption (2007)
Wolfsberg 2011, Wolfsberg Anti-Corruption Guidance (August 2011)
Wolfsberg 2012, Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles for Private Banking (2012)
World Bank 2004, The Costs of Corruption, Feature Story, 8 April 2004, available at
World Bank 2011a, The World Bank Group Sanctions Board Law Digest (December 2011)
World Bank 2011b, Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Borrowers (January 2011)
World Bank 2012, World Bank Sanctions Procedures, adopted 15 April 2012

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×