Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:22:53.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Main human uses of ocean areas and resources, impacts, and multiple scales of governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Marjo Vierros
Affiliation:
United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies
U. Rashid Sumaila
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Rolph A. Payet
Affiliation:
University of Seychelles
Salvatore Aricò
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

2.1 Introduction

The global ocean provides humankind with vital ecosystem goods and services that include the regulation of the Earth's climate, as well as provision of food and other goods, recreation, and spiritual values. The ocean is not only important for the Earth' s economy, but also its environmental balance and survival (Noone et al., 2013).

Human uses of the ocean include fishing (food), shipping, scientific research, the use of genetic resources, mining, underwater cables, energy, water, and recreation. While all those involved in these uses can be considered as ocean stakeholders, the concept of stakeholder is broader than just direct use. Stakeholders can include groups affected by management decisions; groups concerned by management decisions; groups dependent on the resources to be managed; groups with claims over the area of resources; groups with activities that impact on the area or resources; and groups with, for example, special seasonal or geographic interests (Vierros et al., 2006). Ultimately, however, the entire population of the Earth depends in one way or another on the ocean for their survival, due to the climate regulating and oxygen providing services of these areas, and can thus be considered to be stakeholders.

Preserving and maintaining the services provided by the ocean will require integrated, ecosystem-based management approaches and governance structures at both global and local levels, which will take into account both direct human uses and conservation needs, as well as global benefits. Many habitats and species in the ocean are highly threatened by human activities, and the current governance regime is not sufficient and in many cases too fragmented to provide for effective management and protection of multiple and emerging threats

2.2 Value and use of ocean areas, and environmental impacts of use

The goods and services provided by the ocean range from climate regulation to food, and recreational and spiritual value. For example, an analysis undertaken by The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) project, found the value of coral reefs to humankind to be between US$130,000 and $1.2 million per hectare, per year (Diversitas, 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alverson, D. L., Freeber, M. H., Pope, J. G. et al. (1994). A Global Assessment of Fisheries Bycatch and Discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Papers No. 339, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 233 pp.Google Scholar
Anker-Nilssen, T., Barret, R. T., and Krasnov, J. V. (1997). Long- and short-term responses of seabirds in the Norwegian and Barents Seas to changes in stocks of prey fish. In: International Symposium on the Role of Forage Fishes in Marine Ecosystems, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 13–16 November 1996. University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, AK-SG-97–01, pp. 683–698.Google Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) (2009). The Antarctic Biological Prospecting Database. WP001 for ATCM 17, Baltimore, USA.
Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) (2005). Cambridge University Press, 1042 pp. Available at www.acia.uaf.edu, last accessed on 8 June 2014.
Arctic Council (2009). Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report. Available at www.arctic.noaa.gov/detect/documents/AMSA_2009_Report_2nd_print.pdf, last accessed on 8 June 2014.
Armstrong, C. W., Foley, N., and Tinch, R. et al. (2010). Ecosystem Goods and Services of the Deep Sea. A HERMIONE Project report. Available at http://median-web.eu/IMG/pdf/ecosystem_goods_and_services.pdf, last accessed on 8 June, 2014.
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) (2012). Economic Impact of Submarine Cable Disruptions. Available at www.suboptic.org/uploads/Economic%20Impact%20of%20Submarine%20Cable%20Disruptions.pdf, last accessed on 8 June 2014.
Botsford, L. W., Castilla, J. C., and Peterson, C. H. (1997). The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Science 277: 509–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brida, J. G. and Zapata, S. (2010). Cruise tourism: Economic, socio-cultural and environmental impacts. Int. J. Leisure and Tourism Marketing 1(3): 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, L., Burnett, D., Drew, S. et al. (2009). Submarine Cables and the Oceans: Connecting the World. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 3-1. ICPC/UNEP/UNEP-WCMC.
Clark, M. R. and Koslow, J. A. (2007). Impacts of fisheries on seamounts. In: Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries, and Conservation. Pitcher, T. J., Morato, T., Hart, P. J. B., Clark, M. R., Haggan, N., and Santos, R. S. (eds.). Blackwell Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Series 12. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 413–441.Google Scholar
Cochonat, C., Durr, S., Gunn, V. K. et al. (2007). The deep sea frontier: Science challenges for a sustainable future. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 53 pp.
Collie, J. S., Escanero, G. A., and Valentine, P. C. (2000). Photographic evaluation of the impacts of bottom fishing on benthic epifauna. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 987–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlan, K. E, Kim, S. L, Lenihan, H. S, and Oliver, J. S. (2004). Benthic changes over ten years of organic enrichment by McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Mar. Poll. Bull. 49: 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. J, Lack, D. A., Winebrake, J. J. et al. (2010). Arctic shipping emissions inventories and future scenarios. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(19): 9689, doi: 10.5194/acp-10-9689-2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H. et al. (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(24): 8512–8518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullis-Suzuki, S. and Pauly, D. (2010). Failing the high sea: A global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations. Marine Policy 34(5): 1036–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danovaro, R., Dell'Anno, A., Corinaldesi, C. et al. (2008). Major viral impact on the functioning of benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Nature 454: 1084–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, A. J., Roberts, J. M., and Hall-Spencer, J. M. (2007). Preserving deep-sea natural heritage: Emerging issues in offshore conservation and management. Biological Conservation 138(3–4): 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diversitas (2009). What Are Coral Reef Services Worth? $130,000 to $1.2 Million Per Hectare, Per Year. ScienceDaily, 28 October 2009, available at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091016093913.htm, last accessed on 8 June 2014.
Dyck, A. J. and Sumaila, U. R. (2010). Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery. Journal of Bioeconomics 12(3): 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2010). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO (2012). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gjerde, K. M. (2008). Regulatory and Governance Gaps in the International Regime for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. IUCN Marine Series No. 1. Available at http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/EPLP-MS-1.pdf, last accessed on 16 June 2014.
Gjerde, K. M (2012). Challenges to protecting the marine environment beyond national jurisdiction. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 27: 839–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, A. G. and Smith, C. R. (2003). The deep-sea floor ecosystem: Current status and prospects of anthropogenic change by the year 2025. Environmental Conservation 30(3): 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, D. J. (1997). Shrimp fishery and capelin decline may influence decline of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) and northern sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) in Western Gulf of Alaska. In: International Symposium on the Role of Forage Fishes in Marine Ecosystems, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 13–16 November 1996, University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, AK-SG-97–01: pp. 197–207.Google Scholar
Herring, P., Gaten, E., and Shelton, P. M. J. (1999). Are vent shrimps blinded by science?Nature 398: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourigan, T. F. (2008). The status of cold-water coral communities of the world: A brief update. In: Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2008. Wilkinson, C. (ed.). Townsville, Australia: Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre.Google Scholar
Hunt, B. and Vincent, A. C. (2006). Scale and sustainability of marine bioprospecting for pharmaceuticals. Ambio 35(2): 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, H. P. (2009). A preliminary assessment of threats to Arctic marine mammals and their conservation in the coming decades. Marine Policy 3(1): 77–82.Google Scholar
Inagaki, F., Kuypers, M. M., Tsunogai, U. et al. (2006). Microbial community in a sediment-hosted CO2 lake of the southern Okinawa Trough hydrothermal system. PNAS 103(38): 13899–13900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2005). IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H. C., Loos, M., and Meyer, L. A. (eds.)). Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 442 pp.Google Scholar
ISA (2014). International Seabed Authority website, www.isa.org.jm/en/home, last accessed on 8 June 2014.
Juniper, K. S. (2001). Background paper on deep-sea hydrothermal vents. In: Managing Risks to Biodiversity and the Environment on the High Sea, Including Tools Such as Marine Protected Areas: Scientific Requirements and Legal Aspects. Thiel, H. and Koslow, A. (eds.). Proceedings of the Expert Workshop held at the International Academy for Nature Conservation, Isle of Vilm, Germany, 27 February–4 March 2001. German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. Available at www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/proceed1.pdf, last accessed on 16 June 2014.Google Scholar
Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M. T. et al. (2010). The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J. R. Soc. Interface 7(48): 1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimball, L. (2005). The International Legal Regime of the High Seas and the Seabed beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction and Options for Cooperation for the Establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Marine Areas beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series No. 19, 64 pp.
Koslow, J. A., Gowlett-Holmes, K., Lowry, J. K et al. (2001). Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: Community structure and impacts of trawling. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 213: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslow, T. (2007). The Silent Deep: The Discovery, Ecology, and Conservation of the Deep Sea. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Lenihan, H. S. (1992). Benthic marine pollution around McMurdo Station, Antarctica: A summary of findings. Marine Pollution Bulletin 25: 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, S. (1991). The northeast Arctic cod stock's place in the Barents Sea ecosystem in the 1980s: An overview. In ProMare. Sakshaug, E., Hopkins, C. C. E., and Øritsland, N. A. (eds). Symposium on Polar Marine Ecology, Trondheim, Norway, Polar Research10.Google Scholar
Merrie, A., Dunn, D. C., Metian, C., et al. (2014). An ocean of surprises – Trends in human use, unexpected dynamics and governance challenges in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Global Environmental Change 27: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morato, T., Cheung, W. W. L. and Pitcher, T. J. (2006). Vulnerability of seamount fish to fishing: Fuzzy analysis of life-history attributes. Journal of Fish Biology 67: 1–13.Google Scholar
Noone, K. J., Sumaila, U. R., and Diaz, R. J. (eds.) (2013). Managing Ocean Environments in a Changing Climate: Sustainability and Economic Perspectives. London, UK: Elsevier, 359 pp.Google Scholar
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J. et al. (1998). Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S. et al. (2002). Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418(6898): 689–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimental, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental costs associated with alien invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52: 274–288.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, G., Wilkinson, M., and Anderson, R. et al. (1980). Contribution of the ocean sector to the United States economy. Science 208(4447): 1000–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayfuse, R. (2008). Protecting marine biodiversity in polar areas beyond national jurisdiction. RECIEL 17(1): 3–13.Google Scholar
Riser, S. C. and Johnson, K. S. (2008.) Net production of oxygen in the subtropical ocean. Nature 451: 323–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, S., Aguilar, R., Warrenchuk, J. et al. (2005). Deep Sea Life: On the Edge of the Abyss. New York: Oceana.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, K. J., Campbell, R. A., and Whitelaw, A. W. (1993). Effects of trawling on the marine habitat on the north west shelf of Australia and implications for sustainable fisheries management. In: Hancock, D.A. (ed.,) Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop, Victor Harbor, South Australia, 12–13 August 1992. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, pp. 137–145.Google Scholar
Schubert, R., Schellnhuber, H.-J., Buchmann, N.et al. (2006). The Future Oceans – Warming Up, Rising High, Turning Sour. Special Report of the German Advisory Council on Global Change. Berlin.Google Scholar
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2008). Synthesis and Review of the Best Available Scientific Studies on Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Marine Areas beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction. CBD Technical Series No. 37: 63 pp.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2009). Scientific Synthesis of the Impacts of Ocean Fertilization on Marine Diversity. CBD Technical Series No. 45: 53 pp.
Sumaila, U. R., Cheung, W. W. L., and Dyck, A. et al. (2012). Benefits of rebuilding global marine fisheries outweigh costs. PLoS ONE 7(7), e40542, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teh, L. C. L. and Sumaila, U. R. (2013). Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish and Fisheries 14(1): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tladi, D. (2011). Ocean Governance: A Fragmented Regulatory Regime. In: Oceans: The New Frontier. Jacquest, P., Pachuari, R. K., and Tubiana, L. (eds.). Delhi: TERI Press, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
Treves, T. (2010). The development of the law of the sea since the adoption of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Achievements and challenges for the future. In: Law, Technology and Science for Oceans in Globalisation – IUU Fishing, Oil Pollution, Bioprospecting, Outer Continental Shelf. Vidas, D. (ed.). Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2010). Review of Maritime Transport 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Available at www.unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2010_en.pdf, last accessed on 16 June 2014.
UNEP (2010). High seas MPAs: Regional Approaches and Experiences. UNEP (DEPI)/RS.12 /INF.6.RS. 12th Global Meeting of the Regional Seas Conventions and Action Plans. Bergen, Norway, 20–22 September, 2010.
van den Hove, S. and Moreau, V. (2007). Deep-Sea Biodiversity and Ecosystems: A Scoping Report on their Socio-economy, Management and Governance. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
Van Dover, C. L. (2010). Mining seafloor massive sulphides and biodiversity: What is at risk? ICES Journal of Marine Science, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq086.CrossRef
Vierros, M., Aricò, S., and Douvere, F. (2006). Implementing the Ecosystem Approach in Open Ocean and Deep Sea Environments. United Nations University, Institute of Advanced Studies. Available at http://unu.edu/publications/policy-briefs/implementing-the-ecosystem-approach-in-open-ocean-and-deep-sea-environments.html, last accessed on 8 June 2014.
Waller, R., Watling, L., Auster, P. et al. (2007). Anthropogenic impacts on the Corner Rise Seamounts, North-West Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87(5): 1075–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangnick, K. (2002). 2002 IDA Worldwide Desalting Plants Inventory. Produced by Wangnick Consulting for the International Desalination Association. Gnarrenburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Watson, R. and Morato, T. (2004). Exploitation patterns in seamount fisheries: A preliminary analysis. In: Seamounts: Biodiversity and Fisheries. Fisheries Centre Research Report 12(5). Morato, T. and Pauly, D. (eds).Google Scholar
Watson, R. A., Cheung, W. W. L., Anticamara, J. A. et al. (2013). Global marine yield halved as fishing intensity redoubles. Fish and Fisheries 14(4): 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waycott, M., Duarte, C. M., Carruthers, T. J. B. et al. (2009). Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. PNAS 106(30): 12377–12381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, C. (ed.) (2008). Status of Coral Reefs of the World 2008. Townsville, Australia: Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre: 296 pp.Google Scholar
Zeller, D., Booth, S., and Pauly, D. (2006). Fisheries contributions to GDP: Underestimating small-scale fisheries in the Pacific. Marine Resource Economics 21(4): 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×