Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-s56hc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T18:47:58.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Vaginal Breech Delivery

from Section 3 - Pathology of Labor and Labor and Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

P. Joep Dörr
Affiliation:
HMC Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague
Vincent M. Khouw
Affiliation:
VMK Designs, Utrecht
Frank A. Chervenak
Affiliation:
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Amos Grunebaum
Affiliation:
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Yves Jacquemyn
Affiliation:
Antwerp University Hospital
Jan G. Nijhuis
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Holmer, AJM, Ten Berge, BS, Van Bouwdijk Bastiaanse, MA, et al (eds). Leerboek der Verloskunde. 3rd edition. Amsterdam: Van Holkema Warendorf, 1963.Google Scholar
Dudenhausen, JW, Pschyrembel, W. Praktische Geburtshilfe. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Cunningham, G, Gant, NF, Leveno, KJ, et al (eds). Williams Obstetrics: Techniques for breech delivery. 21st edition. Stanford, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 2001, pp. 495508.Google Scholar
Stoeckel, W. Lehrbuch der Geburtshilfe. 7th edition. Jena: Fisher Verlag, 1943.Google Scholar
Gimovsky, ML, McIlhargie, CJ. Munro Kerr’s operative obstetrics. London: Williams & Wilkins, 1995.Google Scholar
Martius, H. Die geburtshilflichen Operationen. 8th edition. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1958.Google Scholar
Hickock, DE, Gordon, DC, Milberg, JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:605–18.Google Scholar
Hsieh, YY, Tsai, FJ, Lin, CC, et al. Breech deformation-complex in neonates. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:933–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Shipp, TD, Bromley, B, Benacerraf, B. The prognostic significance of hyperextension of the fetal head detected antenatally with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:391–6.Google Scholar
Collea, JV, Rabin, SC, Weghorst, GR, et al. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation. Vaginal delivery vs cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131:186–95.Google Scholar
Krebs, L, Langhoff-Roos, J. Breech presentation at term: indications for secondary caesarean section. In: Künzel, W (ed). Breech delivery, European practice in gynaecology and obstetrics. Paris: Éditions Scientifiques et Médicales/Elsevier SAS, 2002, pp. 129–37.Google Scholar
Fischl, F, Janisch, H, Wagner, G. pH-Messungen nach Geburt aus Beckenendlage. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1979;58:183–7.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, P, Zimmerman, M, Dehnhard, F. Noch eine Untersuchung zur Frage des optimalen Entbindungsmodus bei Beckenendlage. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1978;57:182–8.Google Scholar
Kubli, F, Boos, W, Rüttgers, H. Caesarean section in the management of singleton breech presentation. In: Rooth, G, Bratteby, LE (eds). Perinatal medicine. 5th European Congress of Perinatal Medicine, Uppsala. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1976, pp. 6975.Google Scholar
Kubli, F. Geburtsleitung bei Beckenendlagen. Gynäkologe. 1975;8:4857.Google Scholar
Flanagan, TA, Mulchahey, KM, Korenbrot, CC, et al. Management of term breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1492–9.Google Scholar
Society of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists of Canada. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation. Guideline Society of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists of Canada (www.sogc.org). J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31:557–66.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM, de Leeuw, JP, Bruinse, HW. Aterme stuitligging: onterechte keus voor de electieve keizersnede als standaardbehandeling vanwege te hoge risico’s voor moeder en haar volgende kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149:2007–10.Google Scholar
Rietberg, C. Term breech delivery in the Netherlands. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, 2006.Google Scholar
Goffinet, F, Carayol, M, Foidart, JM, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1002–11.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Tien jaar na de Term Breech Trial, een balans voor Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;124:143–7.Google Scholar
Dutch Society Obstetrics & Gynecology. Guideline Breech Position, 2008. www.nvog.nl.Google Scholar
Bergenhenegouwen, LA, Meertens, LJE, Schaaf, J, et al. Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm delivery: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, JFR, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:295305.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of breech presentation. Guideline No 20b. London: RCOG, 2006.Google Scholar
Su, M, McLeod, L, Ross, S, et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:740–5.Google Scholar
Mulder, ME. Het ontwikkelen der armen en de extractie volgens A. Müller. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, 1908.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Handgreep van Mauriceau (Levret-Smellie-Veit) – Eponiemen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;123:8692.Google Scholar
Bracht, E. Vortrag: Zur Manualhilfe bei Beckenendlage. Z Geburtsh Gynäkol. 1936;112:271.Google Scholar
Bracht, E. Zur Behandlung der Steisslage. Handelingen Internationaal Congres voor Verloskunde en Gynaecologie. Congresbericht II. Amsterdam: Brill, 1938, pp. 93–4.Google Scholar
Bracht, E. Zur Beckenendlage-Behandlung. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd. 1965;25:635–7.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Methode van Bracht – 70 jaar – Eponiemen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;119:812.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM, de Leeuw, JP. De theorie van de methode van Bracht en de praktische gevolgen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;121:5860.Google Scholar
Løvset, J. Schulterentwicklung ohne Armlösung bei natürlicher und künstlicher Beckenendlage. Arch Gynäkol. 1936;161:397–8.Google Scholar
Løvset, J. Shoulder delivery by breech presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1937;44:696704.Google Scholar
Løvset, J. Vaginal operative delivery. Oslo: Scandinavian University Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Handgreep van Løvset – 70 jaar Eponiemen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;120:21–3.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Dührssense incisies. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;123:61–3.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. De handgreep van Wigand-Martin- Von Winckel – Eponiemen, Geschiedkundige ontwikkeling en betekenis voor de huidige praktijk. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;121:345–50.Google Scholar
van Loon, AJ, Mantingh, A, Serlier, EK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. Lancet. 1997;350:1799–804.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, JW de, Struijk, PC, Vierhout, ME, et al. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG. 2001;108:383–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Kurz, CS, Künzel, W. Fetale Herzfrequenz, Dezelerationsfläche und Säure-Basen-Status bei Entbindung aus Beckenendlage-und Schädellage. Z Geburtshilfe Perinat. 1977;181:916.Ref in: Künzel W (ed). Breech delivery, European practice in gynaecology and obstetrics. Paris: Elsevier, 2002, p. 126.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, JP. Breech presentation vaginal or abdominal delivery? A prospective longitudinal study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maastricht, 1989.Google Scholar
Brady, K, Duff, P, Read, JA, et al. Reliability of fetal buttock sampling in assessing the acid-base balance of the breech fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:886–8.Google Scholar
Collea, JV, Chein, C, Quilligan, EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;137:235–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Künzel, W, Kirschbaum, M. Management of vaginal delivery in breech presentation at term. In: Künzel, W (ed). Breech delivery, European practice in gynaecology and obstetrics. Paris: Elsevier, 2002.Google Scholar
van Grinsven-Dmitrieva, N, Verhoeven, ATM. Stuitgeboorte volgens Bracht (1935) of Covjanov (1928)… wie had de primeur? Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;126:245–50.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM, De ontwikkeling van de armpjes bij stuitgeboorte volgens Müller – 110 jaar – Eponiemen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;122:251–4.Google Scholar
von Mickulicz-Radecki, F. Geburtshilfe des praktischen Ärztes. 3rd edition. Leipzig: Barth, 1943.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM, Methode volgens Sellheim. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;121:64–6.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Handgreep van De Snoo – Eponiemen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;116:101–2.Google Scholar
de Snoo, K. Leerboek der verloskunde. 4th edition. Groningen: Wolters, 1943.Google Scholar
Piper, EB, Backman, C. The prevention of fetal injuries in breech delivery. JAMA. 1929;92:217–21.Google Scholar
Douglas, Gordon R, Stromme, W. Operative obstetrics. 3rd edition. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1976.Google Scholar
Grady, JP, Gimovsky, M. Instrumental delivery: a lost art? In: Studd, J (ed). Progress in obstetrics and gynecology. Vol 10. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993.Google Scholar
Gabbe, SG, Niebyl, JR, Simpson, JL, et al. Obstetrics, normal and problem pregnancies. 4th edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2002.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. De Piperforceps – 80 jaar – Eponiemen. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;122:180–5.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, ATM. Handgreep van DeLee. In: Eponiemen en geschiedenis van de stuitgeboorte. Haarlem: DCHG, 2010, pp. 131–7.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA. Caesarean delivery for the second twin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000047.Google Scholar
Ayres, A, Johnson, TR. Management of multiple pregnancy: labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:550–6.Google Scholar
Rabinovici, J, Barkai, G, Reichman, B, et al. Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:52–6.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ, Kulier, R. Expedited versus conservative approaches for vaginal delivery in breech presentation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000082.Google Scholar
Usta, IM, Nassar, AH, Awwad, JT, et al. Comparison of the perinatal morbidity and mortality of the presenting twin and its co-twin. J Perinatol. 2002;22:391–6.Google Scholar
Caukwell, S, Murphy, DJ. The effect of mode of delivery and gestational age on neonatal outcome of the non-cephalic-presenting second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1356–61.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×