Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: July 2014

1 - Measuring numeracy

References

Barton, A., Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Koehler, A., & Haas, M. (2009). Comparing risk reductions: On the dynamic interplay of cognitive strategies, numeracy, complexity, and format. In: N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; pp. 2347–2352.
Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Bors, D. A., & Stokes, T. L. (1998). Raven’s advanced progressive matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 382–398.
Bruine de Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938–956.
Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20–33.
Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M., & Gilchrist, A. H. (2006). Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 991–997.
Cokely, E. T., Parpart, P., & Schooler, L. J. (2009). On the link between cognitive control and heuristic processes. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; pp. 2926–2931.
Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The berlin numeracy test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47.
Del Missier, F. T., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 69–97.
Del Missier, F. T., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2012). Decision-making competence, executive functioning, and general cognitive abilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 331–351.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
DuckworthA. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-s). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174.
Ericsson, A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85, 114–121.
Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, A., Derry, H. A., & Smith, D. M. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Medical Decision Making, 27, 672–680.
Fox, M. C., Roring, R., & Mitchum, A. L. (2009). Reversing the speed-IQ correlation: Intra-individual variability and attentional control in the inspection time paradigm. Intelligence, 37, 76–80.
Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 316–344.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
Galesic, M., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2010). Statistical numeracy for health: A cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 462–468.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 270–287.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 392–399.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. (in press). The influence of skills, message frame, and visual aids on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Behavioral Decisional Making. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1797.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2010a). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 1323–1329.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2010b). Who profits from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1019–1025.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2013). Transparent Communication of Health Risks: Overcoming Cultural Differences. New York: Springer.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (in press). Using analogies to communicate information about health risks. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Garcia-Retamero, R., Wicki, B., Cokely, E. T., & Hanson, B. (in press). Factors predicting surgeon’s preferred and actual roles in interactions with their patients. Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/hea0000061.
Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014). Predicting bias in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 15–34.
Ginsburg, L., Manly, M., & Schmitt, M. J. (2006). The Components of Numeracy [NCSALL Occasional Paper]. Cambridge, MA: National Center for Study of Adult Literacy and Learning.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
Guadagnoli, E., & Ward, P. (1998). Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 329–339.
Hanoch, Y., Miron-Shatz, T., Cole, H., Himmelstein, M., & Federman, A. D. (2010). Choice, numeracy and physicians-in-training performance: The case of Medicare part D. Health Psychology, 29, 454–459.
Hodapp, V., & Benson, J. (1997). The multidimensionality of test anxiety: A test of different models. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10, 219–244.
Huff, D., & Geis, I. (1954). How to Lie with Statistics. New York: Norton.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The Health Literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Lang, J. W., & Fries, S. (2006). A revised 10-item version of the Achievement Motives Scale: Psychometric properties in German-speaking samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 216.
Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., & Pardo, S. T. (2011). Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), 361–381.
Lindenberger, U., Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (1993). Speed and intelligence in old age. Psychology and Aging, 8, 207–220.
Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly-educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
Novick, M. R. (1966). The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 1–18.
Okan, Y., Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E. T., & Maldonado, A. (2013). Individual differences in graph literacy: Overcoming denominator neglect in risk comprehension. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 390–401.
Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005). Decision-making competence: external validation through an individual differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 1–27.
Paulos, J. A. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences. New York: Hill and Wang.
Peters, E. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgment and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 31–35.
Peters, E., & Levin, I. P. (2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 435–448.
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413.
Peters, E., Dieckmann, N. F., Dixon, A., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., & Hibbard, J. H. (2007a). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 64, 169–190.
Peters, E., Hibbard, J. H., Slovic, P., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2007b). Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk and benefit information. Health Affairs, 26, 741–748.
Peters, E., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Mertz, C. K. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 619–635.
Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48.
Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973.
Schapira, M. M., Walker, C. M., & Sedivy, S. K. (2009). Evaluating existing measures of health numeracy using item response theory. Patient Educational Counseling, 75, 308–314.
Schapira, M. M., Walker, C. M., Cappaert, K. J., Ganschow, P. S., Fletcher, K. E., McGinley, E. L., et al. (2012). The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: A measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 32(6), 851–865.
Schwartz, L. M. L., Woloshin, S. S., Black, W. C. W., & Welch, H. G. H. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972.
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson.
Sheridan, S. L., & Pignone, M. (2002). Numeracy and the medical student’s ability to interpret data. Effective clinical practice. ECP, 5(1), 35.
Sherrod, P. H. (2003). DTREG: Predictive Modeling Software. Software available at www.dtreg.com.
Steen, L. A. (1990).On the Shoulders of Giants: New Approaches to Numeracy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.
Van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York, NY: Springer.
Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2013). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 192–212.
Zikmund-Fisher, B., Smith, D. M., Ubel, P. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2007). Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making, 27, 663–671.