,ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Market Power Handbook: Competition Law and Economic Foundations (Chicago, IL: ABA Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar

,ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments, 6th edition, vol. I (Chicago, IL: ABA Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M., Breining-Kaufmann, Christine and Cottier, Thomas (eds.), International Trade and Human Rights – Foundations and Conceptual Issues (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2006).

Abu-Akeel, Aly K., ‘Definition of Trade in Services under the GATS: Legal Implications’, 32 George Washington Journal of International Law & Economics (1999) 189–210.Google Scholar

Abu-Akeel, Aly K, ‘The MFN as it Applies to Service Trade – New Problems for an Old Concept’, 33(4) Journal of World Trade (1999) 103–29.Google Scholar

Adlung, Rudolf, ‘Health and Social Services’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 369–98.Google Scholar

Adlung, Rudolf, ‘Economic Effects of Services Liberalization’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Adlung, Rudolf, ‘Public Services and the GATS’, 9 Journal of International Economic Law (2006) 455–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adlung, Rudolf and Molinuevo, Martín, ‘Bilateralism in Services Trade: Is There Fire Behind the (BIT-)Smoke?’, 11 Journal of International Economic Law (2008) 365–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahnlid, Anders, ‘Comparing GATT and GATS: Regime Creation Under and After Hegemony’, 3 Review of International Political Economy (1996) 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andenas, Mads and Zleptnig, Stefan, ‘Proportionality and Balancing in WTO Law: A Comparative Perspective’, in: Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas (eds.), The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 147–71.Google Scholar

Appleton, Arthur E., ‘The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade’, in: Patrick F. J. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. I (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 371–409.Google Scholar

Aristotle, , in: Saunders, Trevor J. (ed.), Politics, Books I and II (Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press 1995).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ in: Roger Crisp (ed.), Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, Equality and Non-discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian, ‘Rationalizing Antitrust Cluster Markets’, 95 Yale Law Journal (1985) 109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B., ‘Market Definition: An Analytical Overview’, 74 Antitrust Law Journal (2007) 129–73.Google Scholar

Baker, Stewart A., Lichtenbaum, Peter, Shenk, Maury D. and Yeo, Matthews S., ‘E-Products and the WTO’, 35 International Lawyer (2001) 5–21.Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction’, 36 Journal of World Trade (2002) 353–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baur, Jürgen F., ‘Der relevante Markt – eine durchaus notwendige Figur des Rechts der Zusammenschlusskontrolle’, in: Hans Merz and Walter R Schluep (eds.), Recht und Wirtschaft heute, Festgabe Max Kummer (Berne: Stämpfli, 1980), pp. 293–309.Google Scholar

Becker, Ulrich, ‘EGV Artikel 28–30’, in: Juergen Schwarze (ed.), EU-Kommentar, 2nd edition (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009).Google Scholar

Behrens, Peter, ‘Der Marktbeherrschungsbegriff in Artikel 82 EG’, in: Börris Ahrens, Peter Behrens and Philipp von Dietze (eds.), Marktmacht und Missbrauch (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), pp. 37–42.Google Scholar

Bellis, Jean-François, ‘Anti-competitive Practices and the WTO: The Elusive Search for New World Trade Rules’, in: Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 361–68.Google Scholar

Berg, Gerald C., ‘An Economic Interpretation of “Like-Product”’, 30(2) Journal of World Trade (1996) 195–209.Google Scholar

Berrisch, Georg M., ‘Allgemeines Zoll- und Handelsabkommen (GATT 1994)’, in: Hans-Joachim Prieß and Georg M. Berrisch (eds.), WTO-Handbuch – World Trade Organisation (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2003).Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish N. and Hudec, Robert E. (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization – Prerequisites For Free Trade?, vol. II: Legal analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).

Bhala, Raj, International Trade Law: Interdisciplinary Theory and Practice, 3rd edition (Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, 2007).Google Scholar

Bigdeli, Sadeq Z. and Rechsteiner, Stefan, ‘Commentary to Article VIII GATS (monopolies and exclusive service suppliers)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 205–19.Google Scholar

Bishop, Simon and Walker, Mike, The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Application and Measurement (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002).Google Scholar

Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘National Treatment’, in: August Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 29–58.Google Scholar

Bobjoseph, Mathew, The WTO Agreements on Telecommunications (Berne: Peter Lang Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin and Windsor, Joseph, ‘Commentary to Annex on Financial Services’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 618–39.Google Scholar

Bossche, Peter, Schrijver, Nico and Faber, Gerrit, ‘Unilateral Measures Addressing Non-Trade Concerns’, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Netherlands (2007), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1021946.

Bossche, Peter, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization – Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronckers, Marco, ‘The WTO Reference Paper on Telecommunications: A Model for WTO Competition Law?’, in: Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 371–89.Google Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and McNelis, Natalie, ‘Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in GATT 1994: Anti-Dumping and Environmental Protection’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 345–85.Google Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and Larouche, Pierre, ‘Telecommunications Services’, in: Patrick F. J. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. I (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 989–1040.Google Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and Larouche, Pierre, ‘A Review of the WTO Regime for Telecommunications Services’, in: Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas (eds.), The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp 319–79.Google Scholar

Brown Weiss, Edith and Jackson, John H., ‘The Framework for Environment and Trade Disputes’, in: Edith Brown Weiss, John H. Jackson and Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder (eds.), Reconciling Environment and Trade, 2nd edition (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 7th edition (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Burri Nenova, Mira, EC Electronic Communications and Competition Law (London: Cameron May, 2007).Google Scholar

Calster, Geert, International & EU Trade Law: The Environmental Challenge (London: Cameron May, 2000).Google Scholar

Calster, Geert, ‘The EU, Trade, Environment and Unilateralism: Passing the Buck’, 5 European Foreign Affairs Review (2000) 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, James, Demaret, Paul and Geradin, Damien (eds.), Trade & The Environment: The Search for Balance, vol. I (London: Cameron May, 1994).

Tomažič, Cárdenas, Luis, José, Rolle, Kriterien und Methodik der kartellrechtlichen Marktabgrenzung: eine juristische und ökonomische Analyse (Karlsruhe: Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, 2005).Google Scholar

Carter, Robert L., ‘Insurance’, in: Patrick A. Messerlin and Karl P. Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 60–68.Google Scholar

Cass, Ronald and Noam, Eli M., ‘The Economics and Politics of Trade in Services: A United States Perspective’, in: Daniel Friedmann and Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker (eds.), Rules for Free International Trade in Services – Symposium in Tel Aviv (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1990), pp. 43–87.Google Scholar

Chanda, Rupa, ‘Inter-modal Linkages in Services Trade’, OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing (2006), available at http://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/traaab/30-en.html

Chapman, Michael J. and Tauber, Paul J., ‘Liberalizing International Trade in Legal Services: A Proposal for an Annex on Legal Services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services’, 16 Michigan Journal of International Law (1995) 941–80.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Green Roots, Bad Pruning: GATT Rules and their Application to Environmental Trade Measures’, 7 Tulane Environmental Law Journal (1994) 299–352.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘WTO's Alcoholic Beverages Decision’, 6 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law (1997) 198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The Law of Environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’, 27 Yale Journal of International Law (2002) 59–110.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Belgian Family Allowances and the Challenge of Origin-based Discrimination’, 4 World Trade Review (2005) 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, Free Markets and Social Regulation: A Reform Agenda of the Global Trading System (London: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Choi, Won-Mog, ‘Overcoming the “Aim and Effect” Theory: Interpretation of the “Like Product” in GATT Article III’, 8 UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy (2002) 107–31.Google Scholar

Cossy, Mireille, ‘Like Products’ in International Trade Law – Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Cone, Sydney M., ‘The Asbestos Case and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: The Uneasy Relationship between Panels and the Appellate Body’, 23 Michigan Journal of International Law (2001) 103–42.Google Scholar

Conrad, Christiane R., ‘The Status of Measures Linked to Non-physical Aspects and Process and Production Methods in WTO Law’, PhD thesis, University of Bern/World Trade Institute (2009), draft on file with author.

Copeland, Bryan and Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘The Basic Economics of Services Trade’, in: Aaditya Mattoo, Robert M. Stern and Gianni Zanini (eds.), A Handbook of International Trade in Services (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 84–129.Google Scholar

Cossy, Mireille, ‘Determining Likeness under the GATS: Squaring the Circle?’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2006–08 (2006), available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=935213;.

Cossy, Mireille, ‘Some Thoughts on the Concept of “Likeness” in the GATS’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 327–57.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, ‘The WTO and Environmental Law: Three Points for Discussion’, in: Agata Fijalkowski and James Cameron (eds.), Trade and the Environment: Bridging the Gap (London: Cameron May, 1998), pp. 56–64.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Caplazi, Alexandra, ‘Labour Standards and World Trade Law: Interfacing Legitimate Concerns’, in: Thomas Geiser, Hans Schmid and Emil Walter-Busch (eds.), Arbeit in der Schweiz des 20. Jahrhunderts: Wirtschaftliche, rechtliche und soziale Perspektiven (Berne: Paul Haupt, 1998), pp. 469–508.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: An Overview’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Tuerk, Elisabeth and Panizzon, Marion, ‘Handel und Umwelt im Recht der WTO: Auf dem Weg zur praktischen Konkordanz’, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, Sonderheft (2003) 155–66.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Oesch, Matthias, International Trade Regulation – Law and Policy in the WTO, the European Union and Switzerland (London: Cameron May & Staempfli Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, ‘From Progressive Liberalization to Progressive Regulation in WTO Law’, 9 Journal of International Economic Law (2006) 779–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Delimatsis, PanagiotisandDiebold, Nicolas F., ‘Commentary to Article XIV GATS (general exceptions)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 287–328.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation – Experience and Lessons for the WTO (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003).CrossRef

Cottier, Thomas, Pauwelyn, Joost and Elisabeth, Bürgi (eds.), Human Rights and International Trade (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRef

Craig, Paul, ‘The Nature of the Community: Integration, Democracy, and Legitimacy’, in: Paul Craig and Gráinne De Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 1–54.Google Scholar

Cseres, Katalin Judit, Competition Law and Consumer Protection (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005).Google Scholar

Davey, William J. and Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘MFN Unconditionality: A Legal Analysis of the Concept in View of its Evolution in the GATT/WTO Jurisprudence with Particular Reference to the Issue of “Like Product”’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 13–50.Google Scholar

Davey, William J., ‘Specificities of WTO Dispute Settlement in Services Cases’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 276–95.Google Scholar

Búrca, Gráinne, ‘Unpacking the Concept of Discrimination in EC and International Trade Law’, in: Catherine Barnard and Joanne Scott (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market – Unpacking the Premises (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002), pp. 181–95.Google Scholar

Deardorff, Alan V. and Stern, Robert M., ‘Empirical Analysis of Barriers to International Services Transactions and the Consequences of Liberalization’, in: Aaditya Mattoo, Robert M. Stern and Gianni Zanini (eds.), A Handbook of International Trade in Services (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 169–220.Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Don't Gamble with GATS – The Interaction between Articles VI, XVI, XVII and XVIII GATS in the Light of the US–Gambling Case’, 40 Journal of World Trade (2006) 1059–80.Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations – Necessity, Transparency, and Regulatory Diversity (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demaret, Paul, ‘The Non-Discrimination Principle and the Removal of Fiscal Barriers to Intra-Community Trade’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 171–89.Google Scholar

Desmedt, Axel, ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (2001) 441–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diebold, Nicolas F., ‘The Morals and Order Exceptions in WTO Law: Balancing the Toothless Tiger and the Undermining Mole’, 11 Journal of International Economic Law (2008) 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, ‘Non-Discrimination and the Pillars of International Economic Law: Comparative Analysis and Building Coherency’, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Second Biennial Global Conference, University of Barcelona, IELPO Programme, July 8–10, 2010, available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1632927.

Diebold, Nicolas F. and Oesch, Matthias, ‘Die Durchsetzung von WTO-Recht durch Schweizer Unternehmen’, Aktuelle Juristische Praxis (2008) 1525–52.Google Scholar

Dijk, Pieter, Hoof, Fried, Rijn, Arjen and Zwaak, Leo (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 4th edition (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2006).

DiMascio, Nicholas and Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’, 102 American Journal of International Law (2008) 48–89.Google Scholar

Doebbler, Curtis F. J., The Principle of Non-Discrimination in International Law (Washington DC: CD Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drake, William J. and Nicolaidïs, Kalypso, ‘Global Electronic Commerce and GATS: The Millennium Round and Beyond’, in: Pierre Sauvé and Robert M Stern (eds.), GATS 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington DC: Bookings Institution Press, 2000), pp. 399–437.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, ‘After Keck and Mithouard: Free Movement of Goods in the EC, Market Access, and Non-Discrimination’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 191–206.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, ‘Constitutional Concepts for Free Trade in Services’, in: Gráinne De Búrca and Joanne Scott (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Legal Constitutional Issues (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 211–36.Google Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Ehring, Lothar, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Competition Law: Views from the Perspective of the Appellate Body's Experience’, 26 Fordham International Law Journal (2003) 1505–61.Google Scholar

Ehlers, Dirk, Wolffgang, Hans-Michael and Lechleitner, Marc (eds.), Rechtsfragen des internationalen Dienstleistungsverkehrs – Tagungsband zum 10. Münsteraner Außenwirtschaftsrechtstag (Frankfurt a.M.: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, 2006).

Ehring, Lothar, ‘De Facto Discrimination in World Trade Law; National and Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment – or Equal Treatment?’, 36 Journal of World Trade (2002) 921–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elhauge, Einer ‘Defining Better Monopolization Standards’, 56 Stanford Law Review (2003) 253–344.Google Scholar

Emch, Adrian, ‘Same Same But Different? Fiscal Discrimination in WTO Law and EU Law: What are “Like” Products?’, 32 Legal Issues of Economic Integration (2005) 369–415.Google Scholar

Englisch, Joachim, Wettbewerbsgleichheit im grenzüberschreitenden Handel: Mit Schlussfolgerungen für indirekte Steuern (Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008).Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel A. and Hudec, Robert E., ‘GATT Legal Restraints on Domestic Environmental Regulations’, in: Jagdish N. Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization – Prerequisites For Free Trade?, vol. II: Legal analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), pp. 59–94.Google Scholar

Fauchald, Ole Kristian, Environmental Taxes and Trade Discrimination (London: Kluwer Law International, 1998).Google Scholar

Fauchald, Ole Kristian, ‘Flexibility and Predictability under the World Trade Organization's Non-Discrimination Clauses’, 37 Journal of World Trade (2003) 443–82.Google Scholar

Feinäugle, Clemens, ‘Commentary to Article XXVIII GATS (definitions)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 540–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Thomas M., Die Entbündelung der letzten Meile in der Schweiz im Lichte des GATS (Berne: Peter Lang, 2004).Google Scholar

Fisher, Franklin M., ‘Detecting Market Power’, in: Wayne Dale Collins (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, vol. I (Chicago, IL: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2008), pp. 353–71.Google Scholar

Footer, Mary E. and George, Carol, ‘The General Agreement on Trade in Services’, in: Patrick F. J. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. I (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 799–953.Google Scholar

Forrester, Q. C., Ian, S. and Kaul, Tashi, ‘Tariff Classification’, in: Patrick FJ Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. I (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 1581–99.Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M., ‘Antitrust Law on a Global Scale: Races Up, Down and Sideways’, in: Daniel C. Esty and Damien Geradin (eds.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 348–63.Google Scholar

Franck, Susan D., ‘Occidental Exploration & Production Co. v. Republic of Ecuador. Final Award. London Court of International Arbitration Administered Case No. UN 3467’, 99 The American Journal of International Law (2005) 675–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Francois, Joseph and Wooton, Ian, ‘Market Structure, Trade Liberalization and the GATS’, 17 European Journal of Political Economy (2001) 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Froeb, Luke M. and Werden, Gregory J., ‘The Reverse Cellophane Fallacy in Market Delineation’, 7 Review of Industrial Organization (1992) 241–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaines, Sanford E., ‘Processes and Production Methods: How to Produce Sound Policy for Environmental PPM-Based Trade Measures?’, 27 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law (2002) 383–432.Google Scholar

Gamberale, Carlo, ‘Legal Services’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2001), pp. 399–427.Google Scholar

Gao, Henry, ‘Commentary to Telecommunications Services: Reference Paper’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 718–47.Google Scholar

Gardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy – The Origins and the Prospects of Our International Economic Order, New, expanded edition (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1969).Google Scholar

Gelb, Alan H. and Sagari, Silvia B., ‘Banking’, in: Patrick A. Messerlin and Karl P. Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 49–59.Google Scholar

Gifford, Daniel J. and Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘Antitrust or Competition Laws Viewed in a Trading Context: Harmony or Dissonance?’, in: Jagdish N. Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization – Prerequisites For Free Trade?, vol. II: Legal analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), pp. 269–331.Google Scholar

Gkoutzinis, Apostolos, ‘International Trade in Banking Services and the Role of the WTO: Discussing the Legal Framework and Policy Objectives of the General Agreement on Trade in Services and the Current State of Play in the Doha Round of Trade Negotiations’, 39 International Lawyer (2005) 877–914.Google Scholar

Goco, Jonell B., ‘Non-Discrimination, “Likeness”, and Market Definition in World Trade Organization Jurisprudence’, 40 Journal of World Trade (2006) 315–40.Google Scholar

Golz, Tilman, Der sachlich relevante Markt bei Verlagserzeugnissen (Heidelberg: C.F. Mueller, 2003).Google Scholar

Grierson-Weiler, , Todd, J. and Laird, Ian A., ‘Standards of Treatment’, in: Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino and Christoph Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 259–304.Google Scholar

Grubel, Herbert G., ‘All Traded Services are Embodied in Materials or People’, 10 The World Economy (1987) 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., ‘International Competition Law’, in: Andrew T Guzman and Alan O Sykes (eds.), Research Handbook in International Economic Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2007), pp. 418–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawk, Barry E., ‘Article 82 and Section 2: Abuse and Monopolizing Conduct’, in: Wayne Dale Collins (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, vol. II (Chicago, IL: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2008), pp. 871–94.Google Scholar

Heinze, Eric, The Logic of Equality: A Formal Analysis of Non-discrimination Law (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar

Hildebrand, Doris, The Role of Economic Analysis in the EC Competition Rules, 2nd edition (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Hildebrand, Doris, ‘Using Conjoint Analysis for Market Definition: Application of Modern Market Research Tools to Implement the Hypothetical Monopolist Test’, 29 World Competition (2006) 315–35.Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Puth, Sebastian, ‘The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT Law’, in: Armin von Bogdandy, Petros C. Mavroidis and Yves Mény (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination – Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp. 199–218.Google Scholar

Hindley, Brian and Smith, Alasdair, ‘Comparative Advantage and Trade in Services’, 7 The World Economy (1984) 369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hindley, Brian, ‘Principles in Factor-related Trade in Services’, in: Patrick A. Messerlin and Karl P. Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 12–18.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard, ‘Services-Related Production, Employment, Trade, and Factor Movements’, in: Patrick A. Messerlin and Karl P. Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 27–46.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard and Braga, Carlos Primo Alberto, ‘Protection and Trade in Services: A Survey’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1747 (1997), available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=569236.

Hoekman, Bernard and Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘Services, Economic Development and the Next Round of Negotiations on Services’, 12 Journal of International Development (2000) 283–96.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard and Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘Liberalizing Trade in Services: Reciprocal Negotiations and Regulatory Reform’, in: Pierre Sauvé and Robert M. Stern (eds.), GATS 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington DC: Bookings Institution Press, 2000), pp. 487–508.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard and Kostecki, Michel, The Political Economy of the World Trading System – The WTO and Beyond, 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard and Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘International Trade: Trade in Services’, in: Andrew T. Guzman and Alan O. Sykes (eds.), Research Handbook in International Economic Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007), pp. 113–50.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard and Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘Services Trade and Growth’, in: Juan A Marchetti and Martin Roy (eds.), Opening Markets for Trade in Services – Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 21–58.Google Scholar

Holoubek, Michael, ‘EGV Artikel 49/50’, in: Juergen Schwarze (ed.), EU-Kommentar, 2nd edition (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009).Google Scholar

Honeck, Dale, ‘Audiovisual Services’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 133–51.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Economic and Legal Aspects of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause’, 17 European Journal of Political Economy (2001) 233–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C, ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-law on Tax Discrimination’, 15 European Journal of International Law (2004) 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H., ‘European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products’, 3 World Trade Review (2004) 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert and Regan, Donald H., ‘The Product/Process Distinction – An Illusory Basis for Disciplining “Unilateralism” in Trade Policy’, 11 European Journal of International Law (2000) 249–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert and Tuerk, Elisabeth, ‘The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations – A Case Study of the Canada-EC Asbestos Dispute’, in: Gráinne De Búrca and Joanne Scott (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Legal Constitutional Issues (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 283–328.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: A new Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law (2002) 491–521.

Howse, Robert and Tuerk, Elisabeth, ‘The WTO Negotiations on Services: The Regulatory State up for Grabs’, Canada Watch, vol. 9, nos. 1–2 (2002) 3–6, available at www.law.nyu.edu/faculty/facultyprofiles/rhowse/pubsfordownload/index.htm.

Hudec, Robert E., ‘Tiger, Tiger in the House: A Critical Appraisal of the Case Against Discriminatory Trade Measures’, in: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Meinhard Hilf (eds.), The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Problems, 2nd edition (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publisher, 1991), pp. 165–212.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E, ‘GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aim and Effects” Test’, 32 International Lawyer (1998) 619–49.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E, ‘“Like Product”: The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles I and III’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 101–23.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E, ‘The Product-Process Doctrine in GATT/WTO Jurisprudence’, in: Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 187–217.Google Scholar

Hull, Cordell, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, vol. 1 (New York, NY: Macmillan Co., 1948).Google Scholar

Hylton, Keith N., Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A., Mavroidis, Petros C and Sykes, Alan O., The Genesis of the GATT (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishikawa, Yoshimichi, ‘Burden of Proof in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure’, PhD thesis, University of Bern/World Trade Institute (2009), draft on file with author.

Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (A Legal Analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) (Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1969).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H, ‘Constructing a Constitution for Trade in Services’, 11 The World Economy (1988) 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H, International Competition in Services: A Constitutional Framework (Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1988).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H, ‘National Treatment Obligations and Non-tariff Barriers’, 10 Michigan Journal of International Law (1989) 207–20.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H, ‘Greening the GATT: Trade Rules and Environmental Policy’, in: James Cameron, Paul Demaret and Damien Geradin (eds.), Trade & The Environment: The Search for Balance, vol. I (London: Cameron May, 1994), pp. 39–51.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd edition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H, ‘Comments on Shrimp/Turtle and the Product/Process Distinction’, 11 European Journal of International Law (2000) 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H., Davey, William J. and Sykes, Alan O., Legal Problems of International Economic Relations – Cases, Materials and Text, 5th edition (St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2008).Google Scholar

Janow, Merit E., ‘Trade and Competition Policy’, in: Patrick F. J. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. II (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 487–510.Google Scholar

Jones, Geoffry, Multinationals and Global Capitalism: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Christine and Weber, Rolf H., ‘Reconciling Liberalized Trade in Financial Services and Domestic Regulation’, in: Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas (eds.), The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 411–27.Google Scholar

Kauper, Thomas E., ‘The Problem of Market Definition under EC Competition Law’, 20 Fordham International Law Journal (1997) 1682–767.Google Scholar

Kearns, Jason, ‘International Competition Policy and the GATS: A Proposal to Address Market Access Limitations in the Distribution Services Sector’, in: Marco Bronckers and Gary N. Horlick (eds.), WTO Jurisprudence and Policy: Practitioners' Perspectives (London: Cameron May, 2004), pp. 649–86.Google Scholar

Kenen, Peter B., The International Economy, 4th edition (Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kono, Masamichi, ‘Construction and Related Service Industries’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 181–91.Google Scholar

Kono, Masamichi, ‘Architectural and Engineering Services’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 117–32.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services – The Legal Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) on National Regulatory Autonomy (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, ‘Public Services and Trade Liberalization: Mapping the Legal Framework’, 6 Journal of International Economic Law (2003) 341–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, ‘Book Review: Won-Mog Choi, Like Products in International Trade Law – Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence’, 15 King's College Law Journal (2004) 198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, ‘Commentary to Article VI (domestic regulation)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 165–96.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, ‘Comment: Quis custodiet necessitatem? Adjudicating Necessity in Multilateral Systems and the Importance of Judicial Dialogue’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 397–403.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus and Engelke, Maika, ‘Commentary to Article XVII GATS (national treatment)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 396–420.Google Scholar

Kreinin, Mordeachai E. and Plummer, Michael G., ‘Economic Principles of International Trade’, in: Patrick F. J. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. II (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar

Krommenacker, Raymond J., ‘Multilateral Services Negotiations: From Interest-Lateralism to Reasoned Multilateralism in the Context of the Servicization of the Economy’, in: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Meinhard Hilf (eds.), The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations – Legal and Economic Problems, 2nd edition (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1991), pp. 455–74.Google Scholar

Kuyper, Pieter J., ‘Booze and Fast Cars: Tax Discrimination under GATT and the EC’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration (1996/1) 129–44.

Kysar, Douglas A., ‘Preferences for Process: The Process/Product Distinction and the Regulation of Consumer Choice’, 118 Harvard Law Review (2004) 525–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landes, William M and Posner, Richard A, ‘Market Power in Antitrust Cases’, 94 Harvard Law Review (1981) 937–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Andrew, ‘The GATS and Regulatory Autonomy: A Case Study of Social Regulation of the Water Industry’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law (2004) 801–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,League of Nations, ‘The Most Favoured-Nation Clause’, 22 The American Journal of International Law (1928) 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, James, ‘Construction’, in: Patrick A Messerlin and Karl P Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 69–76.Google Scholar

Leroux, Eric H, ‘Eleven Years of GATS Case Law: What Have we Learned?’, 10 Journal of International Economic Law (2007) 749–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, Alistair and Scola, Nicholas, ‘Market Definition’, in: Peter QC Roth and Vivien Rose (eds.), Bellamy & Child European Community Law of Competition, 6th edition (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 239–302.Google Scholar

Loenen, Titia and Rodrigues, Peter R. (eds.), Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1999).

Lonbay, Julian, ‘A Review of Recent Tax Cases – Wine, Gambling, Fast Cars and Bananas’, 14 European Law Review (1989) 48–56.Google Scholar

Low, Patrick and Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘Is There a Better Way? Alternative Approaches to Liberalization under GATS’, in: Pierre Sauvé and Robert M Stern (eds.), GATS 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington DC: Bookings Institution Press, 2000), pp. 449–72.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F, International Economic Law, 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Macrory, Patrick FJ, Appleton, Arthur E and Plummer, Michael G (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. I (New York, NY: Springer, 2005).CrossRef

Mallampally, Padma, ‘Professional Services’, in: Patrick A Messerlin and Karl P Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 94–104.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle and Trachtman, Joel P, ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulations of Goods’, 36 Journal of World Trade (2002) 811–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchetti, Juan A and Mavroidis, Petros C, ‘What Are the Main Challenges for the GATS Framework? Don't Talk About Revolution’, 5 European Business Organization Law Review (2004) 511–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marconini, Mario, ‘The Uruguay Round Negotiations on Services: An Overview’, in: Patrick A Messerlin and Karl P Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 19–26.Google Scholar

Marsden, Philip, A. Competition Policy for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2003).Google Scholar

Matheny, Richard L., ‘In the Wake of the Flood: “Like Products” and Cultural Products after the World Trade Organization's Decision in Canada – Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals’, 147 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1998) 245–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the GATS and TRIPS Agreement’, in: Federico Ortino and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (eds.), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 455–74.Google Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J. and Mavroidis, Petros C., The World Trade Organization – Law, Practice, and Policy, 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘National Treatment in the GATS – Corner-Stone or Pandora's Box?’, 31(1) Journal of World Trade (1997) 107–35.Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya and Subramanian, Arvind, ‘Regulatory Autonomy and Multilateral Disciplines: The Dilemma and a Possible Resolution’, 1 Journal of International Economic Law (1998) 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘MFN and the GATS’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 51–99.Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘Distribution Services’, in: WTO-Secretariat (ed.), Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 193–227.Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘Shaping Future GATS Rules for Trade in Services’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2596 (2001), available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=632665

Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauvé, Pierre, ‘Domestic Regulation and Trade in Services: Key Issues’, in: Aaditya Mattoo and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington DC: World Bank & Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya and Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, ‘Pre-empting Protectionism in Services: The GATS and Outsourcing’, 7 Journal of International Economic Law (2004) 765–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya and Carzaniga, Antonia (eds.), Moving People to Deliver Services (Washington DC: World Bank & Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRef

Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘“Like Products”: Some Thoughts at the Positive and Normative Level’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 125–35.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. and Neven, Damien J., ‘The WTO Agreement on Telecommunications: It's never too late’, in: Damien Géradin (ed.), The Liberalization of State Monopolies in the European Union and Beyond (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 307–18.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C, ‘Highway XVI re-visited: The Road from Non-discrimination to Market Access in GATS’, 6 World Trade Review (2007) 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGovern, Edmond, International Trade Regulation (Exeter: Globefield Press, 1995).Google Scholar

McLachlan, Campbell, QCShore, Laurence and Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration – Substantive Principles (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melloni, Mattia, The Principle of National Treatment in the GATT: A Survey of the Jurisprudence, Practice and Policy (Brussels: Bruylant, 2005).Google Scholar

Messerlin, Patrick A. and Sauvant, Karl P. (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990).

Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim, ‘Free Trade in Services: Regional and Global Perspectives’, in: Daniel Friedmann and Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker (eds.), Rules for Free International Trade in Services – Symposium in Tel Aviv (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1990), pp. 9–24.Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim and Schweitzer, Heike, Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht, 2nd edition (Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2004).Google Scholar

Michaelis, Martin, ‘Dienstleistungshandel (GATS)’, in: Meinhard Hilf and Stefan Oeter (eds.), WTO-Recht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D., ‘Towards Compatibility: The Future of Electronic Commerce within the Global Trading System’, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (2001) 683–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molinuevo, Martín, ‘International Disputes in Investment in Services: Access, Substantial Rights and Remedies in WTO and Investment Arbitration’, PhD thesis, University of Bern/World Trade Institute (2009), draft on file with author.

Monopolkommission, , Ökonomische Kriterien für die Rechts-anwendung: Hauptgutachten 1982/1983 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1984).Google Scholar

Morrison, Peter K., ‘WTO Dispute Settlement in Services: Procedural and Substantive Aspects’, in: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997), pp. 377–93.Google Scholar

Motta, Massimo, Competition Policy – Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, Christian, Abschied vom Bedarfsmarktkonzept bei der Marktabgrenzung? (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007).Google Scholar

Neveling, Kirsten, Die sachliche Marktabgrenzung bei der Fusionskontrolle im deutschen und europäischen Recht (Tuebingen: Medien Verlag Köhler, 2003).Google Scholar

Neven, Damien J., ‘The Economic Evaluation of Protection under Art. III: Some Principles and Suggestions for the Definition of a Trade Relevant Market’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 331–41.Google Scholar

Neven, Damien J, ‘How Should “Protection” be Evaluated in Article III GATT Disputes?’, 17 European Journal of Political Economy (2001) 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties – Standards of Treatment (Austin, TX: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 2009).Google Scholar

Nicolaïdis, Kalypso and Trachtman, Joel P., ‘From Policed Regulation to Managed Recognition in GATS’, in: Pierre Sauvé and Robert M. Stern (eds.), GATS 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington DC: Bookings Institution Press, 2000), pp. 241–82.Google Scholar

Nnona, George C., ‘Multidisciplinary Practice under the World Trade Organization's Services Regime’, 16 Indiana International & Comperative Law Review (2005) 73–115.Google Scholar

Nolde, Boris, ‘La Clause de la Nation la Plus Favorisée et les Tarifs Préférentiels’, 39 Recueil des cours – L'Academie de Droit International de la Haye (1932) 1–130.Google Scholar

O' Donoghue, Robert and Padilla, A. Jorge, The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

O' Leary, Siofra, ‘The Free Movement of Persons and Services’, in: Paul Craig and Gráinne De Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 377–416.Google Scholar

Oesch, Matthias, Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oesch, Matthias, Differenzierung und Typisierung – Zur Dogmatik der Rechtsgleichheit in der Rechtsetzung (Berne: Staempfli Verlag, 2008).Google Scholar

Oesch, Matthias, ‘Commercial Treaties’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), online edition www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar

Oppermann, Thomas, Europarecht, 3rd edition (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2005).Google Scholar

Ortino, Federico, ‘WTO Jurisprudence on De Jure and De Facto Discrimination’, in: Federico Ortino and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (eds.), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 217–62.Google Scholar

Ortino, Federico, Basic Legal Instruments for the Liberalisation of Trade – A Comparative Analysis of EC and WTO Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Ortino, Federico, ‘From “Non-discrimination” to “Reasonableness”: A Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law?’, Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 01/05 (2005), available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=922524.

Ortino, Federico, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US – Gambling: A Critique’, 9 Journal of International Economic Law (2006) 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortino, Federico, ‘The Principle of Non-Discrimination and its Exceptions in GATS: Selected Legal Issues’, in: Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas (eds.), The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 173–204.Google Scholar

Pauletto, Christian, ‘Comment: Digital Trade: Technology versus Legislators’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 530–33.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement – Who Bears the Burden?’, 1 Journal of International Economic Law (1998) 227–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes’, 2 Journal of International Economic Law (1999) 641–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Recent Books on Trade and Environment: GATT Phantoms Still Haunt the WTO’, 15 European Journal of International Law (2004) 575–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Rien ne Va Plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in GATT and GATS’, 4 World Trade Review (2005) 131–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Comment: The Unbearable Lightness of Likeness’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 358–69.Google Scholar

Peritz, Rudolph J. R., Competition Policy in America – History, Rhetoric, Law (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Die Strukturähnlichkeit der Diskriminierungsverbote im Menschenrechtsbereich und im Welthandelsrecht – Eine exemplarische Prüfung der Fragmentierungsthese’, in: Stephan Breitenmoser, Bernhard Ehrenzeller, Marco Sassòli, Walter Stoffel and Beatrice Wagner Pfeifer (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law / Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Rechtsstaat / Droits de l'homme, démocratie et état de droit: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Zurich: DIKE/Nomos, 2007), pp. 551–93.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Economic, Legal and Political Functions of the Principle of Non-discrimination’, 9 The World Economy (1986) 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pillai, Rajesh, ‘Book Review: Gaëtan Verhoosel, National Treatment and WTO Dispute Settlement’, 1 World Trade Review (2002) 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piraino, Thomas A., ‘Identifying Monopolists’ Exclusionary Conduct under the Sherman Act', 75 New York University Law Review (2000) 809–92.Google Scholar

Pitofsky, Robert, ‘New Definitions of Relevant Market and the Assault on Antitrust’, 90 Columbia Law Review (1990) 1805–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitschas, Christian, ‘Übereinkommen über den Handel mit Dienstleistungen (GATS)’, in: Hans-Joachim Prieß and Georg M. Berrisch (eds.), WTO-Handbuch – World Trade Organisation (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2003).Google Scholar

Pitschas, Christian, ‘Subventionen, Schutzmaßnahmen und öffentliche Auftragsvergabe’, in: Dirk Ehlers, Hans-Michael Wolffgang and Marc Lechleitner (eds.), Rechtsfragen des internationalen Dienstleistungsverkehrs – Tagungsband zum 10. Münsteraner Außenwirtschaftsrechtstag (Frankfurt a.M.: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, 2006), pp. 103–27.Google Scholar

Poretti, Pietro, ‘Waiting for Godot: Subsidy Disciplines in Services Trade’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 466–88.Google Scholar

Porges, Amelia and Trachtman, Joel P., ‘Robert Hudec and Domestic Regulation: The Resurrection of Aim and Effects’, 37 Journal of World Trade (2003) 783–99.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A., Antitrust Law, 2nd edition (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Potts, Jason, The Legality of PPMs under the GATT: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Trade Policy (Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development 2008), available at www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/ppms_gatt.pdf.Google Scholar

Puth, Sebastian, WTO und Umwelt: Die Produkt-Prozess-Doktrin (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003).Google Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Defining Nondiscrimination under the Law of the World Trade Organization’, 23 Boston University International Law Journal (2005) 215–97.Google Scholar

Quick, Reinhard and Lau, Christian, ‘Environmentally Motivated Tax Distinctions and WTO Law – The European Commission's Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy in Light of the “Like Product” and “PPM” Debates’, 6 Journal of International Economic Law (2003) 419–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qureshi, Asif H., Interpreting WTO Agreements – Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Read, Robert, ‘Like Products, Health & Environmental Exceptions: The Interpretation of PPMs in Recent WTO Trade Dispute Cases’, 5 Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy (2004) 123–46.Google Scholar

Regan, Donald H., ‘Regulatory Purpose and “Like Products” in Article III:4 of the GATT (With Additional Remarks on Article III:2)’, 36 Journal of World Trade (2002) 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regan, Donald H, ‘Further Thoughts on the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Tribute to Bob Hudec’, 37 Journal of World Trade (2003) 737–60.Google Scholar

Rege, Vinod, ‘GATT Law and Environment-Related Issues Affecting the Trade of Developing Countries’, 28(3) Journal of World Trade (1994) 95–169.Google Scholar

Reyna, Jimmie V., ‘Services’, in: Terence P Stewart (ed.), The GATT Uruguay Round – A Negotiating History (1986–1992): Commentary, vol. II (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1993).Google Scholar

Rhoodie, Eschel M., Discrimination in the Constitutions of the World: A Study of the Group Rights Problem (Columbus, GA: Brentwood, 1984).Google Scholar

Roessler, Frieder, ‘Diverging Domestic Policies and Multilateral Trade Integration’, in: Jagdish N. Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization – Prerequisites For Free Trade?, vol. II: Legal analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), pp. 21–56.Google Scholar

Roessler, Frieder, ‘Beyond the Ostensible – A Tribute to Professor Robert Hudec's Insight on the Determination of the Likeness of Products under the National Treatment Provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, 37 Journal of World Trade (2003) 771–81.Google Scholar

Rose, Vivien and Roth, Peter QC, ‘The Treaty and its Territorial Reach’, in: Peter QC Roth and Vivien Rose (eds.), Bellamy & Child European Community Law of Competition, 6th edition (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 1–90.Google Scholar

Rule, Charles F. and Meyer, David L., ‘An Antitrust Enforcement Policy to Maximize the Economic Wealth of all Consumers’, in: Thomas E. Sullivan (ed.), The Political Economy of the Sherman Act – The First One Hundred Years (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 210–26.Google Scholar

Sampson, Gary P. and Snape, Richard H., ‘Identifying the Issues in Trade in Services’, 8 The World Economy (1985) 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandrock, Otto, ‘Grundprobleme der sachlichen Marktabgrenzung’, in: Hans Merz and Walter R. Schluep (eds.), Recht und Wirtschaft heute, Festgabe Max Kummer (Berne: Stämpfli, 1980), pp. 449–86.Google Scholar

Sauvant, Karl P., ‘The Tradability of Services’, in: Patrick A Messerlin and Karl P. Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 114–22.Google Scholar

Sauvignon, Édouard, La Clause de la Nation la Plus Favorisée (Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1972).Google Scholar

Schefer, Krista N., International Trade in Financial Services: The NAFTA Provisions (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar

Schiek, Dagmar and Chege, Victoria (eds.), European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009).

Schlagenhof, Markus, ‘Trade Measures Based on Environmental Process and Production Methods’, 29(6) Journal of World Trade (1995) 123–55.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Warren F. and Sykes, Alan O., ‘The Economics of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause’, in: Jagdeep S. Bhandari and Alan O. Sykes (eds.), Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 43–79.Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Commentary to Article 2 SPS (basic rights and obligations)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Anja Seibert-Fohr (eds.), WTO – Technical Barriers and SPS Measures: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 3 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007), pp. 392–411.Google Scholar

Senti, Richard, WTO – System und Funktionsweise der Welthandelsordnung (Zurich: Schulthess & Verlag Österreich, 2000).Google Scholar

Slotboom, Marco M., ‘Do Different Treaty Purposes Matter for Treaty Interpretation? – The Elimination of Discriminatory Internal Taxes in EC and WTO Law’, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (2001) 557–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Fiona and Woods, Lorna, ‘A Distinction Without a Difference: Exploring the Boundary Between Goods and Services in the World Trade Organization and the European Union’, 12 Columbia Journal of European Law (2005) 1–51.Google Scholar

Snape, Richard H., ‘Principles in Trade in Services’, in: Patrick A. Messerlin and Karl P. Sauvant (eds.), The Uruguay Round: Services in the World Economy (Washington DC: World Bank/The United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990), pp. 5–11.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, Thirukodikaval N., ‘Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin With and Is There Anything Left?’, 4 World Trade Review (2005) 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stadler, Christoph, Die Liberalisierung des Dienstleistungshandels am Beispiel der Versicherungen: Kernelemente bilateraler und multilateraler Ordnungsrahmen einschliesslich des GATS (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1992).Google Scholar

Stewart, Taimoon, ‘The Fate of Competition Policy in Cancun: Politics or Substance?’, 31 Legal Issues of Economic Integration (2004) 7–12.Google Scholar

Stewart, Terence P. and Mueller, David P., ‘Commentary to Article 2 ADA (determination of dumping)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade Remedies: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 4 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 11–46.Google Scholar

Stilwell, Matthew and Bohanes, Jan, ‘Trade and the Environment’, in: Patrick F. J. Macrory, Arthur E. Appleton and Michael G. Plummer (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, vol. II (New York, NY: Springer, 2005), pp. 511–69.Google Scholar

Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Schorkopf, Frank, WTO – World Economic Order, World Trade Law: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 1 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Lawrence A. and Grimes, Warren S., The Law of Antitrust: An Integrated Handbook, 2nd edition (St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2006).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Thomas E. and Harrison, Jeffrey L., Understanding Antitrust and its Economic Implications, 4th edition (Newark, NJ: Lexisnexis, 2003).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Thomas E. (ed.), The Political Economy of the Sherman Act – The First One Hundred Years (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1991).

Swanson, Steven R., ‘Concepts of Similarity and Indirect Protection under EEC Treaty Article 95: The Alcohol Cases’, 15 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1982) 277–308.Google Scholar

Swinbank, Alan, ‘Like Products, Animal Welfare and the World Trade Organization’, 40 Journal of World Trade (2006) 687–711.Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., ‘Comparative Advantage and the Normative Economics of International Trade Policy’, 1 Journal of International Economic Law (1998) 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sykes, Alan O, ‘Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade’, 66 University of Chicago Law Review (1999) 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sykes, Alan O, ‘International Trade: Trade Remedies’, in: Andrew T. Guzman and Alan O. Sykes (eds.), Research Handbook in International Economic Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007), pp. 62–150.Google Scholar

Tamiotti, Ludivine, ‘Commentary to Article 2 TBT (preparation, adoption and application of technical regulations)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Anja Seibert-Fohr (eds.), WTO – Technical Barriers and SPS Measures: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 3 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007), pp. 210–34.Google Scholar

Terry, Laurel S., ‘But what will the WTO Disciplines Apply to? Distinguishing Among Market Access, National Treatment and Article VI:4 Measures when Applying the GATS to Legal Services’, Professional Lawyer (2003) 83–114.Google Scholar

Thagesen, Rikke and Matthews, Alan, ‘The EU's Common Banana Regime: An Initial Evaluation’, 35 Journal of Common Market Studies (1997) 615–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaggert, Henry L., ‘A closer look at the Tuna–Dolphin Case: “Like Products” and “Extra jurisdictionality” in the Trade and Environment Context’, in: James Cameron, Paul Demaret and Damien Geradin, Trade & The Environment: The Search for Balance, vol. 1 (London: Cameron May, 1994), 69–95.Google Scholar

Tietje, Christian, Normative Grundstrukturen der Behandlung nichttarifärer Handelshemmnisse in der WTO/GATT-Rechtsordnung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998).Google Scholar

Tietje, Christian, ‘Stärken und Schwächen des GATS’, in: Dirk Ehlers, Hans-Michael Wolffgang and Marc Lechleitner (eds.), Rechtsfragen des internationalen Dienstleistungsverkehrs – Tagungsband zum 10. Münsteraner Außenwirtschaftsrechtstag (Frankfurt a.M.: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, 2006), pp. 7–25.Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., ‘Lessons for the GATS From Existing WTO Rules on Domestic Regulation’, in: Aaditya Mattoo and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington DC: World Bank & Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 57–81.Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P, ‘The Agency Model of Judging in Economic Integration: Balancing Responsabilities’, in: Thomas Cottier and Petros C Mavroidis (eds.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation – Experience and Lessons for the WTO (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003), pp. 135–50.Google Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael, ‘Competition Policy and Trade Policy – Mediating the Interface’, 30(4) Journal of World Trade (1996) 71–106.Google Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J. and Giri, Shiva K., ‘The National Treatment Principle in International Trade Law’, American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings (2004), available at http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=alea; reprinted in: E. Kwan Choi/James C. Hartigan (eds.), Handbook of International Trade, vol. II (Blackwell Publishing, 2004).

Trebilcock, Michael J.andHowse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd edition (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J. and Fishbein, Michael, ‘International Trade: Barriers to Trade’, in: Andrew T. Guzman and Alan O. Sykes (eds.), Research Handbook in International Economic Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar

Tsai, Edward S, ‘“Like” is a four-letter word-GATT Article III's “Like Product” Conundrum’, 17 Berkeley Journal of International Law (1999) 26–60.Google Scholar

Verhoosel, Gaëtan, National Treatment and WTO Dispute Settlement – Adjudicating the Boundaries of Regulatory Autonomy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar

Vermulst, EdwinandWaer, Paul, E.C. Anti-Dumping Law and Practice (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996).Google Scholar

Vranes, Erich, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldmann, Bernhard, Das Diskriminierungsverbot von Art. 8 Abs. 2 BV als besonderer Gleichheitssatz – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der völkerrechtlichen Diskriminierungsverbote einerseits und der Rechtslage in den USA, in Deutschland, Frankreich sowie dem europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht andererseits (Berne: Staempfli Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar

Wang, Yi, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment under the General Agreement on Trade in Services – And its Application in Financial Services’, 30(1) Journal of World Trade (1996) 91–124.Google Scholar

Warner, Mark A., ‘After Seattle: Is There a Future for Trade and Competition Policy Rule-Making?’, 26 Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2000) 307–62.Google Scholar

Weber, Rolf H., ‘International E-Trade’, 41 International Lawyer (2007) 845–72.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H., ‘The Constitution of the Common Market Place: Text and Context in the Evolution of the Free Movement of Goods’, in: Paul Craig and Gráinne De Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 1999), pp. 349–76.Google Scholar

Weiler, Todd, ‘Prohibitions Against Discrimination in NAFTA Chapter 11’, in: Todd Weiler (ed.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 2004), pp. 27–48.Google Scholar

Weiler, Todd, ‘Saving Oscar Chin: Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law’, in: Todd Weiler (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), pp. 557–96.Google Scholar

Weiss, Friedl, ‘The General Agreement on Trade in Services 1994’, 32 Common Market Law Review (1995) 1177–225.Google Scholar

Weitbrecht, Andreas, ‘From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond – The First 50 Years of European Competition Law’, 29 European Competition Law Review (2008) 81–88.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory J., ‘Market Delineation and the Justice Department's Merger Guidelines’, Duke Law Journal (1983) 514–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werden, Gregory J, ‘The History of Antitrust Market Delineation’, 76 Marquette Law Review (1992) 123–215.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory J, ‘Demand Elasticities in Antitrust Analysis’, Antitrust Law Journal (1998) 363–409.Google Scholar

Westen, Peter, Speaking of Equality: An Analysis of the Rhetorical Force of Equality in Moral and Legal Discourse (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Lawrence J., ‘Market Power and Market Definition in Monopolization Cases’, in: Wayne Dale Collins (ed.), Issues in Competition Law and Policy, vol. II (Chicago, IL: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2008), pp. 913–24.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, Gerhard, ‘Das Verbot des Mißbrauchs marktbeherrschender Stellungen im deutschen Kartellrecht’, in: Gerhard Wiedemann (ed.), Handbuch des Kartellrechts, 2nd edition (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2008).Google Scholar

Wilsher, Daniel, ‘Does Keck Discrimination Make any Sense? An Assessment of the Non-Discrimination Principle within the European Single Market’, 33 European Law Review (2008) 3–22.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, ‘Commentary to Article II GATS (most-favoured-nation treatment)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 71–91.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Fein, ClemensÄugle, (eds.), WTO – Trade Remedies: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 4 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008).CrossRef

Wouters, Jan and Coppens, Dominic, ‘GATS and Domestic Regulation’, in: Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas (eds.), The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 207–63.Google Scholar

,WTO-Secretariat, A Handbook on the GATS Agreement (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, The WTO, the Internet and Trade in Digital Products: EC-US Perspectives (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, ‘The Internet, Cross-Border Trade in Services, and the GATS: Lessons from US-Gambling’, 5 World Trade Review (2006) 319–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, ‘Trade Rules for the Digital Age’, in: Marion Panizzon, Nicole Pohl and Pierre Sauvé (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 497–529.Google Scholar

Wyss, David, Bankdienstleistungen im Allgemeinen Dienstleistungsabkommen der WTO – Auswirkungen auf das schweizerische Bankenrecht (Berne: Peter Lang, 1999).Google Scholar

Zacharias, Diana, ‘Commentary to Article I GATS (scope and definition)’, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum, Peter-Tobias Stoll and Clemens Feinäugle (eds.), WTO – Trade in Services: Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, vol. 6 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 31–69.Google Scholar

Zdouc, Werner, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the GATS’, 2 Journal of International Economic Law (1999) 295–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zdouc, Werner, Legal Problems Arising under the General Agreement on Trade in Services – Comparative Analysis of GATS and GATT (Bamberg: Difo-Druck, 2002).Google Scholar

Zdouc, Werner, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the General Agreement on Trade in Services’, in: Federico Ortino and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (eds.), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 381–420.Google Scholar

Zdouc, Werner, ‘Streitigkeiten über den Dienstleistungsverkehr vor dem DSB’, in: Dirk Ehlers, Hans-Michael Wolffgang and Marc Lechleitner (eds.), Rechtsfragen des internationalen Dienstleistungsverkehrs – Tagungsband zum 10. Münsteraner Außenwirtschaftsrechtstag (Frankfurt a.M.: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, 2006), pp. 129–42.Google Scholar

Zedalis, Rex J., ‘A Theory of the GATT “Like” Product Common Language Cases’, 27 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1994) 33–134.Google Scholar

Zedalis, Rex J, ‘Product v. Non-Product Based Distinctions in GATT Article III Trade and Environment Jurisprudence: Recent Developments’, 6 European Environmental Law Review (1997) 108–12.Google Scholar

Zleptnig, Stefan, ‘The GATS and Internet-Based Services: Between Market Access and Domestic Regulation’, in: Kern Alexander and Mads Andenas (eds.), The World Trade Organization and Trade in Services (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 381–410.Google Scholar